Thymic selection shapes an appropriate T cell antigen receptor (TCR) repertoire during T cell development. Here, we show that a serine/threonine kinase, protein kinase D (PKD), is crucial for thymocyte positive selection. In T cell-specific PKD-deficient (PKD2/PKD3 double-deficient) mice, the generation of CD4 single positive thymocytes is abrogated. This defect is likely caused by attenuated TCR signalling during positive selection and incomplete CD4 lineage specification in PKD-deficient thymocytes; however, TCR-proximal tyrosine phosphorylation is not affected. PKD is activated in CD4+CD8+ double positive (DP) thymocytes on stimulation with positively selecting peptides. By phosphoproteomic analysis, we identify SH2-containing protein tyrosine phosphatase-1 (SHP-1) as a direct substrate of PKD. Substitution of wild-type SHP-1 by phosphorylation-defective mutant (SHP-1S557A) impairs generation of CD4+ thymocytes. These results suggest that the PKD–SHP-1 axis positively regulates TCR signalling to promote CD4+ T cell development.
An appropriate αβ T cell receptor (TCR) repertoire is shaped in the thymus through multiple selection steps. In this process, transduction of signals through the TCR in CD4+CD8+ double positive (DP) thymocytes determines CD4/CD8 lineage specification and generates CD4+CD8− and CD4−CD8+ single positive (SP) thymocytes. At the DP stage, interaction of the TCR with self-peptides on major histocompatibility complex (MHC) molecules generates positive-selecting signals. DP thymocytes that undergo positive selection increase their surface expression of CD5, CD69 and TCR and differentiate into a CD4+CD8int transitional stage. At this stage, persistent TCR signalling promotes CD4 lineage specification through a series of transcriptional programs1. However, the molecular mechanisms by which the signal duration is translated into specific responses have yet to be fully defined.
It is well established that sequential tyrosine phosphorylation events triggered by protein tyrosine kinases (PTKs), such as Src-, Syk- and Tec-family PTKs, orchestrate TCR signalling during T cell development2. Serine/threonine kinases also regulate T cell development by controlling transcriptional and metabolic programs3. Until now, loss of several serine/threonine kinases has been reported to result in defective T cell development4,5,6,7,8,9,10. However, the crosstalk between serine/threonine kinase and tyrosine phosphorylation cascade is not clearly understood.
PKD, initially called PKCμ, is a serine/threonine kinase family now classified within the CaMK group and separated from the AGC group (named for PKA, PKG and PKC)11. The three isoforms, PKD1, PKD2 and PKD3, are encoded by different genes, prkd1, prkd2 and prkd3, respectively. All PKD isoforms have a highly conserved amino acid sequence with a diacylglycerol (DAG)-binding domain, pleckstrin homology (PH) domain and kinase domain11. Among them, PKD2 is abundantly expressed in T cells12,13 and is phosphorylated on TCR stimulation14. In addition, constitutively active PKD2 drives T cell development15. However, thymic selection was not grossly disturbed in PKD2-deficient mice13. Until now, no studies have addressed the role of PKD in thymocyte development using mice lacking all PKD isoforms, and the downstream substrates of PKD in thymocytes have not fully been elucidated.
Inhibitory signalling molecules, such as protein tyrosine phosphatases (PTPs), modulate TCR signalling and thus contribute to setting the threshold for thymocyte selection16,17. In particular, SH2-containing protein tyrosine phosphatase-1 (SHP-1) is reported to regulate thymic selection through a variety of proposed mechanisms18,19,20,21. The inhibitory activity of SHP-1 is regulated by binding to the phosphorylated targets via SH2 domains and by phosphorylation of its C-terminal tyrosines (Try536 and Tyr564)17,22. However, the role of serine/threonine phosphorylation in the function of SHP-1 remains unclear23.
In this study, we established mice lacking all PKD isoforms in T cells. The generation of CD4 SP thymocytes is impaired in these T cell-specific PKD-deficient mice. Using a phosphoproteomic approach, we identify SHP-1 as a direct substrate for PKD. The phosphorylation of SHP-1 by PKD positively regulates TCR signalling. Collectively, we demonstrate that the PKD–SHP-1 axis is required for CD4+ T cell development.
PKD is phosphorylated in preselection DP thymocytes
We first investigated whether PKD is activated on TCR engagement in thymocytes by evaluating phosphorylation of its activation loop. To address this, ‘unengaged’ DP thymocytes that have never encountered self-peptides were prepared. To obtain preselection thymocytes bearing antigen-specific TCR, bone marrow (BM) cells from OT-I TCR Tg mice were transferred into transporter associated with antigen processing (TAP)-deficient mice, which lack functional MHC class I. The preselection thymocytes were stimulated with OVA peptides that differ in affinity such as OVA257–264 (SIINFEKL) (strong agonist), T4 (intermediate agonist) and G4 (weak agonist). To evaluate PKD activation, we established anti-phospho-PKD1/2/3 Abs that recognize phosphorylated activation loops containing a common sequence shared by all PKDs (Fig. 1a). Substantial PKD activation, as assessed by anti-phospho-PKDs Abs, was induced by low-affinity peptides (Fig. 1b), implying a role for PKD in positive selection.
We next examined the PKD isoforms expressed in thymocytes. Reverse transcription-PCR (RT-PCR) analyses confirmed that thymocytes express abundant PKD2, less PKD3 and undetectable PKD1 mRNA (Fig. 1c,d), as previously reported13. The lack of PKD1 expression in thymocytes was further verified by evaluating mRNA copy number using a molecular indexing assay (Fig. 1e)24. To generate T cells lacking all PKD isoforms, we established T cell-specific PKD2/PKD3 double-deficient mice using Lck-Cre Tg mice (PKD2/3ΔT) (Fig. 2a,b). We confirmed that none of the three PKD isoforms was expressed in PKD2/3ΔT thymocytes using Abs reacting with PKD1, PKD2 and PKD3 (Fig. 2c,d).
Defective T cell development in PKD2/3ΔT mice
In PKD2/3ΔT mice, the proportion and number of CD4 SP thymocytes were markedly lower compared with wild-type (WT) mice, whereas those from single-deficient (PKD2ΔT or PKD3ΔT) mice were not altered (Fig. 3a,b). These trends were more prominent in the TCRhi-gated mature CD4 SP population (Fig. 3a, lower panels). Consistent with the reduction of CD4 SP cells, PKD2/3ΔT mice had small and fragmented thymic medulla (Fig. 3c). The above results might be due to a possible survival defect of CD4 SP cells (Fig. 3d; Supplementary Fig. 1), as Bcl-2 expression was reduced by half in PKD2/3ΔT cells (Fig. 3e). However, this possibility seems unlikely as promotion of survival by a Bcl-2 transgene in PKD2/3ΔT mice (Fig. 3f) failed to restore the proportion and number of CD4 SP thymocytes (Fig. 3g,h). Thus, PKD is likely to regulate CD4 SP cell generation beyond any effects on survival. A small number of CD4 SP thymocytes in PKD2/3ΔT mice expressed lower levels of TCR and CD5 on the cell surface (Fig. 3i). This phenomenon was also observed in CD8 SP cells, suggesting that TCR signalling is impaired during positive selection in PKD2/3ΔT mice.
Role of PKD in positive and negative selection
To examine the role of PKD in positive selection, we crossed PKD2/3ΔT mice with MHC class II-restricted OT-II TCR transgenic (Tg) mice. In OT-II × PKD2/3ΔT mice, the percentage of CD4 SP thymocytes was reduced to one-tenth that of PKD-sufficient OT-II mice (Fig. 4a), demonstrating that PKD is critically involved in positive selection for the CD4 lineage. In the MHC class I-restricted OT-I TCR background, the proportion of mature CD8 SP thymocytes in PKD2/3ΔT mice was reduced compared with that in control OT-I Tg mice (Fig. 4b), albeit less severe than in OT-II background. Furthermore, the expression of Tg-TCR was lower in PKD2/3ΔT mice (Fig. 4a,b, lower panels). Analysis of female H–Y TCR Tg mice supported this finding, as CD8 SP development was impaired in H–Y × PKD2/3ΔT mice (Fig. 4c). Thus, positive selection for both the CD4 and CD8 lineages is impaired in PKD2/3ΔT mice, particularly when the αβTCR is fixed by transgenes.
We next investigated the function of PKD in negative selection using two different models. In male H–Y Tg × PKD2/3ΔT mice, the percentage and number of DP thymocytes were significantly higher than in control male H–Y Tg mice, suggesting inefficient negative selection in PKD-deficient thymocytes (Fig. 4d). Strikingly, male H–Y Tg × PKD2/3ΔT mice had CD8 SP thymocytes bearing high levels of the H–Y TCR (Fig. 4e). Furthermore, the peripheral T cells in male H–Y Tg × PKD2/3ΔT mice expressed normal levels of CD8, unlike low-level expression in WT H–Y controls (Fig. 4f). These results suggest that the loss of PKD results in a shift of the normal positive selection window towards high self-reactivity due to impaired TCR signalling in thymocytes.
For the second model, we used a clonal deletion model triggered by endogenous superantigens. Thymocytes bearing Vβ5+ and Vβ11+ TCR are deleted in the presence of mtv-8 and mtv-9 on I–E (Fig. 4g, H-2b/d)25. This deletion persisted in PKD single-deficient mice; however, it was significantly blocked in PKD2/3ΔT (H-2b/d) mice (Fig. 4g, left panels). Irrelevant Vβ6+ cells were not affected by the absence of PKD (Fig. 4g, right panel). Thus, these two models reveal that PKD is involved in negative selection.
Collectively, our results indicate that PKD is critical for positive selection to the CD4 lineage and is also required for optimal positive selection to the CD8 lineage and negative selection.
Impaired CD4+CD8int thymocyte generation by loss of PKD
DP thymocytes stimulated with positive-selecting peptides express CD69 and then differentiate into CD4+CD8int intermediate cells, which are the precursors to both CD4 and CD8 SP thymocytes1. Although the number of CD69+ DP cells was not altered in PKD2/3ΔT mice, the CD4+CD8int subpopulation was significantly decreased (Fig. 5a). The impaired generation of the CD4+CD8int population was also evident in OT-I and OT-II TCR Tg backgrounds (Fig. 5b), indicating that PKD is required for the transition from the DP to the CD4+CD8int stage. Consistent with this, the CD4+CD8int population in PKD2/3ΔT mice showed lower expression levels of CD5 than in WT mice, suggesting that loss of PKD led to the attenuation of TCR signalling during differentiation of DP to CD4+CD8int stage (Fig. 5c).
To confirm this assumption, we conducted two-step differentiation assay in vitro. During recovery culture after cross-linking of TCR and co-receptor, DP thymocytes differentiate into CD4+CD8int cells (Fig. 5d), as previously reported26. However, PKD2/3ΔT DP thymocytes generated a much lower percentage of CD4+CD8int cells than WT thymocytes after this treatment (Fig. 5d). Collectively, these results suggest that PKD regulates the TCR signals required for transition of DP to CD4+CD8int thymocytes during positive selection.
PKD mediates signals triggered by weak-affinity peptides
To evaluate the strength of TCR signals, we performed quantitative assays using OVA peptide variants to stimulate thymocytes from TCR Tg mice. Ag peptide-induced co-receptor downregulation is a molecular indicator of the strength of TCR signalling in DP thymocytes27. Indeed, stimulation of thymocytes from OT-II TCR Tg mice resulted in co-receptor downregulation in accordance with the peptide affinity as seen using OVA323–339 (strong agonist), R9 (weak agonist) and F9 (very weak agonist) (Fig. 5e, open circles)28. However, the responses were suppressed in PKD-deficient OT-II thymocytes, even on stimulation with the R9 variant (Fig. 5e, closed circles). Likewise, upregulation of CD69 and CD5 was also reduced in the absence of PKD (Fig. 5f). To further investigate, we stimulated thymocytes bearing OT-I TCR. Again, the co-receptor downregulation faithfully reflected the peptide affinity: namely, OVA257–264 is the most potent, followed by T4 and G4 (Fig. 5g, open circles). We found that in the absence of PKD, the response was significantly attenuated when stimulated with a low-affinity variant, G4, which is known as a positive-selecting ligand (Fig. 5g, closed circles)29. These findings suggest that PKD is required for TCR signalling triggered by weak-affinity ligands, which is consistent with the above observation that positive selection is severely affected in PKD2/3ΔT mice.
PKD is involved in CD4 lineage specification
As the generation of CD4 SP cells was more severely affected than CD8 SP cells in PKD2/3ΔT mice (Fig. 3a,b), we next investigated whether PKD influences CD4 lineage commitment. If PKD2/3ΔT thymocytes have an intrinsic defect in commitment to the CD4 lineage, they should give rise to CD8 SP cells even in the absence of MHC class I (in an MHC class II-dependent manner), which is called ‘CD8-redirection’ (refs 30, 31). To address this possibility, we transferred BM cells from WT or PKD2/3ΔT mice to TAP-deficient mice. PKD-deficient BM cells, but not WT BM cells, gave rise to mature CD8 SP thymocytes even in TAP-deficient hosts lacking functional MHC class I (Fig. 6a), suggesting that PKD2/3ΔT cells are defective in lineage commitment to CD4 SP thymocytes.
In fact, expression of ThPOK, a critical regulator of CD4 lineage commitment32, was decreased in PKD2/3ΔT CD4+CD8int cells, whereas Runx3, a transcription factor essential for CD8 lineage specification, was not decreased (Fig. 6b). Forced expression of ThPOK restored the percentage of CD4 SP thymocytes to nearly WT levels (Fig. 6c). However, the expression of the CD5 maturation marker in CD4+CD8int cells remained low even in the presence of ThPOK transgene (Fig. 6d). Thus, these results suggest that PKD regulates the development of CD4 SP cells through at least two mechanisms: (i) promotion of TCR signals in the DP stage that trigger transition to the CD4+CD8int stage; and (ii) specification of CD4 lineage development via a ThPOK-dependent process.
SHP-1 is a PKD substrate in thymocytes
The above results demonstrate that PKD promotes TCR signalling during thymic selection. However, proximal signalling events including Ca2+ influx and Erk activation following TCR ligation were comparable between WT and PKD2/3ΔT thymocytes (Fig. 7a,b). Furthermore, in DP cells, TCR-induced tyrosine phosphorylation of proximal signalling molecules, such as CD3ζ and ZAP-70, as well as MAPKs, such as Erk, p38 and JNK, was unaffected by the loss of PKD (Fig. 7c).
On the other hand, expression of a truncated PKD2 transgene lacking the kinase domain inhibited the generation of CD4 SP thymocytes (Fig. 7d), suggesting that the PKD kinase activity is required for thymocyte development.
Hence, to clarify downstream signalling events, we performed an unbiased proteomic search for novel PKD substrates in thymocytes. To identify proteins that exhibit TCR-induced phosphorylation in WT but not PKD-deficient thymocytes, phosphoproteins from unstimulated WT, stimulated WT and stimulated PKD2/3ΔT thymocytes were labelled with Cy2 (blue), Cy3 (red) and Cy5 (green) fluorescent markers, respectively, and analysed by two-dimensional fluorescence difference gel electrophoresis (2D-DIGE)33. We detected six ‘red’ spots representing proteins that were phosphorylated in a stimulation- and PKD-dependent manner (Fig. 8a). These spots were identified to be pro-IL-16, SHP-1, NCK1 and Gads by mass spectrometry (MS) (Fig. 8a,b; Supplementary Data 1). SHP-1, NCK1 and Gads are reported to be involved in T cell development17,34,35. Phosphate-affinity SDS–PAGE (Phos-tag) western blotting33 showed that the migration of SHP-1, NCK1 and Gads was retarded (indicating phosphorylation) in stimulated-WT thymocytes (Fig. 8c; Supplementary Fig. 2). In PKD2/3ΔT cells, the levels of phosphorylation of these proteins were reduced (Fig. 8c). In vitro kinase assays with recombinant PKD2 and PKD3 revealed that SHP-1, Gads and NCK1 are direct substrates for PKD2/3, and were phosphorylated at an efficiency similar to substrates previously identified in other tissues (Fig. 8d)36. We next used MS and site-directed mutagenesis, and identified the sites phosphorylated by PKD as SHP-1 Ser557, Gads Ser186 and NCK1 Ser85 (Fig. 8e, Supplementary Fig. 3 and Supplementary Data 2). Notably, these sites are similar in sequence to the PKD consensus phosphorylation motif, L/V/IxRxxpS/T (Fig. 8f)37.
These substrates were also phosphorylated in OT-I thymocytes on stimulation with various OVA peptides as assessed by Phos-tag western blotting. Among these substrates, the phosphorylation of SHP-1 was largely dependent on PKD2/3 (Fig. 9a). In order to further examine SHP-1 phosphorylation in vivo, tryptic phosphopeptides were enriched using TiO2 from each thymocyte. The liquid chromatography (LC)–MS data revealed that a phosphorylated peptide corresponding to amino acid residues 555–570 was increased by TCR stimulation in a PKD2/3-dependent manner (Fig. 9b, Supplementary Fig. 4 and Supplementary Data 3). Tandem mass spectrometry (MS/MS) analysis confirmed phosphorylation at Ser557 of endogenous SHP-1 derived from stimulated-WT thymocytes (Fig. 9c). Finally, we developed an antibody that recognizes the phosphorylated Ser557 in SHP-1. TCR stimulation increased the levels of phospho-Ser557 SHP-1 in thymocytes from WT but not PKD2/3ΔT mice (Fig. 9d). These results indicate that PKD mediates TCR-induced phosphorylation of Ser557 in SHP-1. Importantly, the Ser557 amino acid is highly conserved across mammalian species (Fig. 9e).
Mutant SHP-1 (SHP-1S557A) suppresses thymocyte development
To further examine the role of the SHP-1 phosphorylation in T cell development, we turned to the DPK cell line, a pigeon cytochrome c (PCC)-specific DP cell line that retains the potential to undergo differentiation in vitro38. Stimulation of DPK cells with cognate peptide on I–Ek resulted in downregulation of CD8 expression and differentiation into CD4 SP cells as previously reported38 (Fig. 10a, Mock). Forced expression of a phosphorylation-defective mutant of SHP-1 (SHP-1S557A) reduced the generation of CD4 SP cells (Fig. 10a). Likewise, SHP-1S557A also inhibited CD5 upregulation induced by peptide stimulation (Fig. 10b). These results suggest that SHP-1S557A can suppress TCR signalling in a dominant negative manner and that phosphorylation of Ser557 in SHP-1 promotes TCR signalling.
We finally examined the in vivo relevance of the phosphorylation of Ser557 in SHP-1 by establishing knock-in mice expressing mutant SHP-1 (SHP-1S557A/S557A mice) (Fig. 10c). Thymocytes from SHP-1S557A/S557A mice expressed comparable amount of SHP-1 to that of WT, whereas TCR-induced phosphorylation was impaired (Fig. 10d), indicating that Ser557 is a major phosphorylation site on TCR stimulation. To address the role of this site, we evaluated the ability of SHP-1S557A/S557A thymocytes to develop into SP cells in the context of competition with WT. CD3ɛ-deficient (CD3ɛΔ5/Δ5) mice lacking T cells were transferred with mixed BM cells from CD45.1+ WT and CD45.2+ SHP-1S557A/S557A mice and analysed after T cell reconstitution. SHP-1S557A/S557A thymocytes showed impaired development into CD4 SP population compared with WT thymocytes (Fig. 10e), indicating that Ser557 is required for the optimal generation of CD4 SP thymocytes. Collectively, these results suggest that the phosphorylation of Ser557 in SHP-1 can positively regulate TCR signalling in DP thymocytes to promote T cell development.
In this study, we established T cell-specific PKD-deficient mice to characterize the role of PKD in T cell development. PKD appears to control the generation of CD4 SP thymocytes through promoting (i) TCR signalling during positive selection, and (ii) CD4 lineage specification. Since the decreased number of CD4+CD8int cells in PKD2/3ΔT mice was restored by a Bcl-2 transgene (Fig. 3h), an important function of PKD during positive selection may be promoting survival that allows DP cells to differentiate into the CD4+CD8int stage. On the other hand, defective CD4 lineage specification on loss of PKD is likely due to the incomplete induction of ThPOK during positive selection, as CD4/CD8 ratio was restored by ThPOK transgene, but not by Bcl-2. Optimal ThPOK induction requires ‘duration’ of TCR signalling during positive selection39. In contrast, the expression of Runx3, a transcription factor essential for CD8 lineage specification, is controlled by TCR-induced immediate upregulation of IL-7R and subsequent IL-7 signalling40. As Runx3 induction occurred normally in PKD-deficient mice (Fig. 6b), PKD is apparently dispensable for the transient TCR signalling required for Runx3 induction. In this respect, we speculate that another critical role of PKD may be to maintain the ‘duration’ of TCR/co-receptor signalling after sensing a weak-affinity ligand. Consistent with this idea, PKD was efficiently activated by stimulation with weak-affinity peptide variants in preselection DP thymocytes (Supplementary Fig. 5).
PKD2 is abundantly expressed in thymocytes, while the amount of PKD3 is considerably lower. Nevertheless, the strikingly different phenotype of PKD2/3ΔT versus PKD2ΔT mice demonstrates that a limited amount of PKD3 is sufficient to support SP thymocyte generation. The redundant functions of PKD2 and PKD3 in T cell development suggest that their substrate specificities are likely to overlap. Indeed, all substrates tested in this study were phosphorylated by both PKD2 and PKD3 with similar efficiencies (Fig. 8d). The PKD consensus phosphorylation motif has been reported to be L/V/IxRxxS/T37. The new phosphorylation sites that we have identified herein are similar but not identical to this motif (Fig. 8f). This finding underscores the important contribution of unbiased phospho-proteomics33,41, in addition to motif-based approaches42, in identifying novel kinase substrates.
It has been suggested that SHP-1 dephosphorylates several key molecules involved in TCR signalling mainly through interactions with ITIM-containing transmembrane proteins17. Recently, Themis, a molecule critical for positive selection, was reported to recruit SHP-1 to antagonize TCR signalling, thereby preventing the apoptosis of DP cells that encountered weak agonists during positive selection43, although some debate exists44. Given that loss of Themis or PKD cause similar defects in T cell development, one might speculate that PKD also antagonizes TCR signalling to ensure positive selection. However, this possibility seems less likely, as the expression levels of CD5, CD69 (Fig. 5f) and Nur77 (Supplementary Fig. 6), which represent the summation of TCR signalling intensity45,46, were reduced in PKD-deficient cells. This finding is consistent with the fact that active PKD induces upregulation of CD5 in thymocytes15. In addition, a ‘selection shift’ from negative selection to positive selection has been reported in mice with defective TCR signalling, such as ZAP-70-mutated mice or CD3ζ−/− mice47,48, similar to what we observe herein for PKD2/3ΔT mice (Fig. 4e,f). In contrast, in Themis−/− mice, proximal TCR signalling is enhanced rather than attenuated43. Therefore, although PKD and Themis can both act on SHP-1, they appear to regulate TCR signalling in opposite directions. The generation of Themis−/− × PKD2/3ΔT triple-deficient mice will clarify this issue.
What is the molecular basis for the positive signalling resulting from the phosphorylation of Ser557 in SHP-1? There are at least three possibilities: First, the phosphorylation by PKD may constrain the inhibitory function, such as phosphatase activity, of SHP-1. Alternatively, the phosphorylation might alter the proper cellular localization of SHP-1 away from the area where efficient inhibition of TCR signalling takes place. Indeed, a 6-mer motif including Ser557 in SHP-1 is reported to regulate its subcellular localization49. Second, we cannot rule out the possibility that serine-phosphorylated SHP-1 dephosphorylates proteins containing tyrosines that on phosphorylation, negatively regulate TCR signalling. For example, SHP-1 dephosphorylates the C-terminal regulatory tyrosine of Src family PTKs in osteoblasts to activate their kinase activities50. Third, SHP-1 may function as an adaptor rather than a phosphatase through its C-terminal phospho-Ser557, and may recruit positive regulators into the vicinity of the TCR. In every case, it would be extremely intriguing to identify the protein(s) that selectively bind to Ser557-phosphrylated SHP-1. Johnson et al.51 recently reported that T cell-specific SHP-1 deletion using Cd4-Cre Tg mice had no obvious effect on T cell development. This may be explained by the loss of both positive and negative regulation via SHP-1 in thymocytes lacking SHP-1 protein.
The observation that the defects found in SHP-1S557A/S557A mice are milder than that of PKD2/3ΔT mice could be explained by a possible contribution of other PKD substrates, such as Gads and NCK1. Indeed, co-transfection of phosphorylation-defective forms of three other PKD substrates (Gads, NCK1 and pro-IL-16) together with SHP-1S557A resulted in more severe impairment in CD5 upregulation (Supplementary Fig. 7). Thus, we cannot exclude the possibility that PKD might control T cell development by modulating multiple TCR signalling pathways through various substrates in addition to SHP-1.
Histone deacetylase 7 (HDAC7) is also reported to be a substrate for PKD52 and we confirmed this in in vitro kinase assay (Fig. 8d), whereas we could not detect PKD-dependent phosphorylation of HDAC7 in thymocytes by 2D-DIGE (Fig. 8a,b). HDAC7-deficient mice show poor generation of SP thymocytes53. However, the phenotype of PKD-deficient mice is unlikely to be attributed to HDAC7, as loss of HDAC7 results in unique phenotypes, such as limited usage of TCR Jα segments, which are not observed in PKD2/3ΔT mice. In addition, in HDAC7-deficient mice, the introduction of TCR transgenes (OT-I or OT-II) reduced rather than exacerbated the defect in thymocyte development53, which contrasts with the phenotypes seen in PKD-deficient mice.
Currently, the pathway upstream of PKD during thymic selection is not clearly understood. PKD is activated by binding to DAG and, more importantly, by phosphorylation of serine residues in the activation loop (Ser707/711 in PKD2 and Ser731/735 in PKD3)3. In T cells, classical as well as novel PKCs, including PKCα, δ, ɛ, η and θ, are implicated in the phosphorylation of these residues14. Among them, PKCθ and PKCη are abundantly expressed in DP thymocytes, and recently, PKCθ−/−PKCη−/− double-deficient mice were demonstrated to have a decreased number of SP thymocytes compared with single-deficient mice54. In this regard, one can speculate that PKDθ and PKCη act as upstream regulators of PKD after TCR engagement in thymocytes. This hypothesis warrants further investigation.
In conclusion, we propose that the PKD represents one of the molecular switches that converts weak TCR engagement to positive selection and CD4 lineage specification. The critical roles of PTKs and PTPs in thymic selection have been clearly established. The present study brings to light the additional importance of serine/threonine kinases as key modulators of TCR signalling cascade regulated by tyrosine phosphorylation during thymic selection.
PKD2-floxed and PKD3-floxed mice were generated by homologous recombination-mediated gene targeting in embryonic stem (ES) cells of C57BL/6 and 129 genetic background, respectively. PKD3-floxed mice were backcrossed to C57BL/6 mice and floxed Neo cassette of each allele was deleted by crossing with CAG-Cre Tg mice. Bcl-2 Tg mice55 were provided by J. Domen (The Children’s Mercy Hospital, Kansas City, MO) by the courtesy of K. Ikuta (Kyoto University, Kyoto, Japan). CD3ɛΔ5/Δ5 mice56 were provided by B. Malissen (Aix Marseille Université UM2, Marseille, France). Truncated PKD2 (a.a. 1-381) Tg mice were established under Lck proximal promoter57. Tg mice expressing ThPOK were established under Cd4 enhancer and promoter58. For the generation of SHP-1S557A/S557A mice, C57BL/6-derived ES cells were co-transfected with a circular form of targeting vector and two Cas9D10A and sgRNA expression vectors (pX335, Addgene) to produce nicks in homology arms and genomic DNA for efficient homologous recombination (gRNAs for CRISPR were GTGGTGGA GTGGGAGAAGCCC (pX335-SHP-short arm) and AGCTATGATATGGCTTCACA (pX335-SHP-long arm)). A floxed Neo cassette was deleted by crossing with CAG-Cre Tg mice. Male and female mice of 7–12 weeks of age with C57BL/6 background were used for all experiments unless otherwise specified. For in vivo negative selection model, C57BL/6 (H-2b) mice and B10.D2 (H-2d) mice were obtained from Kyudo Co. Ltd. and Sankyo Labo Service Co. Inc., respectively. All mice were maintained in filter-air, laminar-flow enclosures and given standard laboratory food and water ad libitum. Animal protocols were approved by the committee of Ethics on Animal Experiment, Faculty of Medical Sciences, Kyushu University.
Cells and reagents
DP thymocyte cell line, DPK cells59 were obtained from J. G. Kaye (The Scripps Research Institute, La Jolla, CA, USA) and maintained in RPMI1640 medium (SIGMA) supplemented with 10% fetal bovine serum (FBS) (SIGMA), 100 U ml−1 penicillin, 10 μg ml−1 streptomycin, 50 μM 2-mercaptoehthanol, 0.1 mM non-essential amino acids and 1 mM sodium pyruvate. Murine fibroblast cell line DCEK transfected with I–Ek was kindly provided by K. Yasutomo (Tokushima University, Tokushima, Japan) and maintained in DMEM medium (SIGMA) supplemented with 10% FBS, 100 U ml−1 penicillin, 10 μg ml−1 streptomycin and 50 μM 2-mercaptoehthanol. To use DCEK cells as APC in in vitro DPK differentiation assay, cells were treated with 50 μg ml−1 mitomycin C for 30 min, washed with DMEM medium three times and plated on 96-well plates at 1 × 105 cells per well. After 24 h, PCC88–104 peptides were added, and 2 h later, 5 × 104 DPK cells were plated. The mixed culture was incubated for 3 days and analysed by flow cytometry for the expression of CD4, CD8 and CD5. Anti-PKD1/2/3 (pan) and anti-phospho-PKD1/2/3 (pan) were raised by immunization of rabbits with peptides, CIIGEKSFRRSVVGTP and CIIGEKpSFRRpSVVGTP, respectively, which are common sequence of PKD1, PKD2 and PKD3. Specificity of these Abs was validated by Western blotting of lysates from HEK293 cells that were transfected with PKD1, PKD2 and PKD3 or WT PKD2, PKD2S707A, PKD2S711A and PKD2S707/711A (Fig. 1a). Anti-PKDs Ab and anti-pPKDs Ab were used at 10 and 2 μg ml−1, respectively. Anti-pSHP-1 (Ser557) was raised with a peptide, CASRTSpSKHKEE and used at 2 μg ml−1. Anti-CD3ɛ (cat#553058, 145-2C11, 10 μg ml−1), anti-CD4 (cat#553051, RM4-5, 1:100), anti-CD8 (cat#553033, 53-6.7, 1:100), anti-CD69 (cat#553236, H1.2F3, 1:100), anti-Vα2 (cat#553288, B20.1, 1:80), anti-mouse TCR Vβ screening panel (cat#557004, 1:2) and anti-pCD247 (Y142) (pCD3ζ) (cat#558486, 1:50) were purchased from BD Biosciences. Anti-CD5 (cat#100606, 53-7.3, 1:50), anti-TCRβ (cat#109206, H57, 1:20) and anti-CD4 (cat#100540, RM4-5, 1:100) were from BioLegend. Anti-H–Y TCR (cat#11-9930-82, T3.70, 1:100), anti-TCRβ (cat#16-5961, H57) and anti-CD2 (cat#16-0021, RM2-5) were purchased from eBioscience. Annexin V-FITC kit (cat#4700, 1:20) was from MBL. For intracellular staining, anti-pErk1/2 (anti-ACTIVE MAPK) (cat#V8031, 1:40) was obtained from Promega and anti-pZAP70 (cat#2717, 1:50), anti-pp38 (cat#4511, 1:50) and anti-pJNK (cat#9255, 1:25) were from Cell Signaling Technology. For Western blotting, anti-pErk1/2 (cat#4379, 1:2,000), anti-Erk1/2 (cat#9102, 1:1,000), anti-NCK1 (cat#2319, 1:000) and anti-β-actin (cat#4970, 1:1,000) were obtained from Cell Signaling Technology. Anti-SHP-1 (cat#sc-287, 1:200) was from Santa Cruz Biotechnology. Anti-Gads (cat#06-983, 2.5 μg ml−1) was from Upstate Biotechnology. Goat anti-hamster IgG (cat#55397) was from MP Biomedicals. OT-I TCR-specific OVA257–264 peptide (SIINFEKL) and OT-II TCR-specific OVA323–339 peptide (ISQAVHAAHAEINEAGR) were from ABGENT. OVA323–339 variants, F9 and R9, were from ABGENT and MBL, respectively. OVA257–264 peptide variants, T4 (SIITFEKL) and G4 (SIIGFEKL), were purchased from AnaSpec.
Preselection DP thymocytes were obtained from TAP-deficient mice transferred with OT-I Tg BM cells. For peptide stimulation, preselection DP thymocytes were added with 10 μM OVA peptides followed by centrifugation at 4 °C for packing, and stimulated at 37 °C. For CD3 cross-linking, cells were stained with 10 μg ml−1 anti-CD3 Ab at 4 °C for 30 min, washed twice with cold medium, and then cross-linked by 100 μg ml−1 goat anti-hamster IgG at 37 °C. After stimulation, cells were rapidly transferred on ice and added with cold HEPES buffered saline for washing. Then, cells were lysed in lysis buffer containing 1% Nonidet P-40, 1 mM PMSF, protease inhibitor cocktail, 10 mM NaF and 1 mM Na3VO4 and the lysates were mixed with sample buffer and applied to western blot analysis60. For Phos-tag immunoblotting, 50 U ml−1 benzonase (Novagen) was also added in RIPA buffer. Images have been cropped for presentation. Full size images are presented in Supplementary Figs 8–12.
For RT-PCR, following primers were used: PKD1 (F: 5′-ATAACACTCTTCCAAAATGACACAGG-3′, R: 5′-TCTCCCACATAATACACTACATTCGC-3′), PKD2 (F: 5′-GATGAGTTGGAGGATTCTGGTGTC-3′, R: 5′-AGGGTGGTGCTGGATTTCCG-3′), PKD3 (F: 5′-AAGAGACATTATTGGAGACTTGACAG-3′, R: 5′-AGTGTGGGTTACTGCCTTGTG-3′), Bcl-2 (F: 5′-TCCTTCCAGCCTGAGAGCAAC-3′, R: 5′-CACGACGGTAGCGACGAGA-3′), ThPOK (F: 5′-GGAGCAGAGCCCCAAGCC-3′, R: 5′-GATTCCAATCAGGTCATCCTCGG-3′), Runx3 (F: 5′-AGCACCACGAGCCACTTCAG-3′, R: 5′-TAGGGAAGGAGCGGTCAAACTG-3′), Runx3d (F: 5′-AGCACGTCCACCATCGAG-3′, R: 5′-TGCGACATGGCTTCCAACAG-3′), Nur77 (F: 5′-CCACCTCTCCGAACCGTGACA-3′, R: 5′-GAGAAGATTGGTAGGGGAGGC-3′).
Molecular indexing assay
RNA extracted from DP thymocytes of WT mice was reverse-transcribed with oligo(dT) primers containing molecular indexing labels. ds cDNA was amplified with gene-specific primers and fluorescent dye-labelled universal primers. The number of labels in amplified ds cDNA was detected by microarray hybridization with Pixel System (Cellular Research).
Cell survival assay
Thymocytes were cultured in medium at 37 °C with 5% CO2. After incubation for different times, cells were stained with APC-conjugated anti-CD4, PE-conjugated anti-CD8, FITC-conjugated Annexin V at the concentration described in the ‘Cells and reagents’ section and propidium iodide at room temperature for 15 min, and immediately analysed by flow cytometry.
In vivo negative selection model
C57BL/6 (H-2b) mice were backcrossed onto B10.D2 (H-2d) mice and analysed for the expression of Vβ5, Vβ6 and Vβ11. Thymocytes expressing Vβ5 or Vβ11 are deleted by binding of Mtv-8 and Mtv-9 superantigens only when I–E is also expressed. Thus, deletion occurs on H-2b/d but not H-2b/b backgrounds. Thymocytes expressing Vβ6 are not deleted by these superantigens.
Two-step differentiation assay
In vitro differentiation of CD4+CD8int thymocytes was performed using purified DP thymocyets26. Thymocytes in RPMI1640 medium supplemented with 10% (v/v) charcoal- and dextran-treated FBS were plated on 96-well plates at 5 × 105 cells per well and stimulated for 20 h in wells coated with 5 μg ml−1 anti-TCRβ and 10 μg ml−1 anti-CD2. Cells were washed and immediately analysed for CD4 and CD8 expressions by flow cytometry (stimulatory culture) or transferred to a new plate, washed extensively, and cultured for another 20 h in same medium, followed by the analysis for the expression of CD4 and CD8 by flow cytometry (recovery culture).
Co-receptor downregulation assay (Dulling assay)
Co-receptor downregulation was examined using OT-II thymocytes or preselection OT-I thymocytes27. Overall, 1 × 105 thioglycollate-induced peritoneal cells were used as APC and pulsed with peptides before the addition of thymocytes (1.5 × 105–5.0 × 105) for stimulation of OT-II thymocytes. To stimulate preselection OT-I thymocytes, peptides were loaded on MHC class I expressed on thymocytes themselves. The expression of CD4 and CD8 was analysed by flow cytometry after 16–20 h.
BM chimera for quantification of redirection
For the analysis of CD8-redirection, BM cells from WT or PKD2/3ΔT mice were suspended in phosphate-buffered saline (PBS) and 1 × 107 cells were injected into 8 Gy-irradiated TAP−/− mice. Then, 6 weeks after BMT, mice were dissected and thymocytes were analysed. For mixed BM transfer, CD3ɛΔ5/Δ5 mice were transferred with 5 × 106 each of CD45.1+ WT and CD45.2+ SHP-1S557A/S557A BM cells and analysed 4 weeks after BMT.
Thymocytes were freshly isolated and loaded with 1.2 μM Fluo-4 (Molecular Probes) in phenol red-free RPMI1640 containing 5% FBS for 30 min at 30 °C. After washing, cells were stained with anti-CD3, phycoerythrin-conjugated anti-CD8 and PerCP-Cy5.5 -conjugated anti-CD4 at the concentration described in the ‘Cells and reagents’ section for 30 min on ice. Cells were washed, suspended in PBS containing 5% FBS, prewarmed to 37 °C before analysis and were kept at 37 °C during event collection on FACSCalibur (Becton-Dickinson). For cell stimulation, various concentrations of goat anti-hamster IgG were added to crosslink anti-CD3 Abs. Maximum Ca2+ influx was obtained by the addition of 10 μM ionomycin (Calbiochem). Mean fluorescence ratio was calculated by FlowJo software (Tree Star).
For intracellular staining of phosphorylated proteins, thymocytes were stained with anti-CD3, anti-CD4 and anti-CD8 at the concentration described in the ‘Cells and reagents’ section for 30 min on ice and cross-linked by goat anti-hamster IgG as described above. Cells were washed, fixed and permeabilized using cytofix/cytoperm solution (BD Biosciences) for pCD3ζ, pErk, pp38 and pJNK staining or fixation/permeabilization buffer (eBioscience) for pZAP70 staining. Data were analysed by FACSCalibur flow cytometer and CellQuest software (BD Biosciences).
Thymocytes were freshly isolated and cultured for 16 h to upregulate TCR. Cells were then incubated with 10 μg ml−1 anti-CD3 mAb for 30 min on ice and stimulated by cross-linking by 100 μg ml−1 goat anti-hamster IgG Ab for 2 min at 37 °C. The unstimulated WT, stimulated WT and stimulated PKD2/3ΔT cells were lysed and phosphoproteins were enriched using PhosphoProtein Purification Kit (Qiagen). The interfering non-protein materials were subsequently removed by 2-D Clean Up Kit (GE Healthcare). Overall, 30 μg of the resultant phosphoproteins were minimally labelled with 400 pmol Cy2, Cy3 or Cy5 fluorescent dye (CyDye DIGE Fluors, GE Healthcare) for 30 min on ice. After quenching the labelling reaction with 10 nmol lysine, differentially labelled samples were mixed and subjected to first-dimension isoelectric focusing on immobilized pH gradient strips (24 cm; pH4–7) using an Ettan IPGphor II system. The second-dimensional SDS–PAGE was carried out on 10% acrylamide gel. The Cy2, Cy3 and Cy5 signals were individually acquired with a Typhoon 9400 scanner (GE Healthcare).
Phos-tag western blotting
Lysates from thymocytes were subjected to PAGE clean up kit (Nacalai tesque) before phosphate-affinity SDS–PAGE is performed using 6–7.5% acrylamide gels containing 25 or 50 μM Phos-tag acrylamide (Wako chemicals) and 50 or 100 μM MnCl2. After electrophoresis, gels were washed in Trans-Blot Turbo transfer buffer (Bio-Rad) added with 1 mM EDTA for 15 min and then incubated in the buffer without EDTA for 15 min. Proteins were transferred to polyvinylidene difluoride (PVDF) membranes using Trans-Blot Turbo Transfer System (Bio-Rad) with the program for HIGH molecular weight proteins (1.3A, 25 V, 10 min) and analysed by immunoblotting. For λ protein phosphatase (λ PP) treatment, lysates were treated with λ PP for 30 min at 30 °C before purification using PAGE clean up kit.
Preparation of GST fusion proteins
SHP-1, Gads and NCK1 cDNAs were cloned into pGEX-6P-1 vector (GE Healthcare). For the mutant GST fusion proteins, Ser557 and Ser591 of SHP-1, Ser186 of Gads and Ser85 of NCK1 were changed to alanine by site-directed mutagenesis. The vectors were transformed into E. coli BL21 and GST fusion proteins were purified using glutathione sepharose (GE Healthcare).
In vitro kinase assay
For in vitro kinase assay using [γ-32P]ATP, 2 μg GST-SHP-1, GST-Gads and GST-NCK1 were incubated with 50 ng active PKD2 or PKD3 (Carna Bioscience) and 100 μM [γ-32P]ATP (5 μCi) in 20 μl kinase buffer (5 mM MgCl2 and 20 mM Tris–HCl, pH7.5) for 30 min at 30 °C. The reaction was stopped by addition of sample buffer followed by heating at 95 °C for 5 min. Half of the sample was subjected to 5–20% gradient SDS–PAGE and CBB staining. Phosphorylated proteins were visualized by autoradiography.
Identification of proteins and peptides by LC–MS/MS analysis
The 2D-DIGE gel was silver-stained (Thermo Scientific) and protein spots were excised and digested with trypsin (Promega). The obtained peptides were analysed by a capillary liquid chromatography system (Waters/Micromass) connected to a Q-TOF Ultima mass spectrometer (Waters/Micromass). Raw data were acquired and processed using MassLynx version 4.0. (Waters/Micromass) to generate a peak list file for MS/MS ion search. The peak list files were searched against the NCBI non-redundant protein database restricted Mus musculus using the MS/MS ion search on Mascot search engine (Matrix Science). To identify in vitro phosphorylation sites, GST fusion proteins phosphorylated by active PKD2 or PKD3 were subjected to SDS–PAGE. The gel was stained with Coomassie Brilliant Blue and protein bands were excised and digested with trypsin. The resultant peptides were analysed by an ADVANCE UHPLC (Michrom Bioresources) connected to an Orbitrap Velos Pro mass spectrometer (for GST-Gads and GST-NCK1) or by an EASY-nLC1000 UHPLC (Thermo Fisher Scientific) connected to an Orbitrap Fusion Tribrid mass spectrometer (for GST-SHP-1).
Identification of phosphopeptides by LC–MS/MS analysis
The unstimulated WT, stimulated WT and stimulated PKD2/3ΔT thymocytes were lysed in buffer containing 50 mM Tris–HCl, pH 8.0, 8 M urea, 1 mM DTT and PhosSTOP phosphatase inhibitor mixture (Roche). The lysates were sonicated and cleared by centrifugation at 20,000g at 4 °C for 15 min. Proteins (each 50 μg) were reduced with 5 mM DTT for 30 min and alkylated with 27.5 mM iodoacetamide for 30 min in the dark. The urea concentration was then reduced to 1 M before addition of 0.5 μg trypsin. After 4 h at 37 °C, the digestion was quenched by acidification with 0.5% TFA. The digests were desalted using InertSep RP-1 (GL Sciences), concentrated and adjusted to binding conditions for TiO2-based phosphopeptide enrichment (80% acetonitrile, 0.5% TFA and 300 mg ml−1 lactic acid). Phosphopeptides were enriched using 50 mg of Titansphere Phos-TiO column (GL Sciences) in accordance with the manufacturer’s instructions. Peptides were eluted with 200 μl of 5% ammonia and then with 200 μl of 5% pyrrolidine. The collected eluates were acidified with TFA and desalted using GL-Tip SDB (GL Sciences). LC–MS/MS analysis of enriched phosphopeptides was performed on an EASY-nLC 1200 UHPLC (Thermo Fisher Scientific) connected to a Q Exactive Plus mass spectrometer (Thermo Fisher Scientific). The peptides were separated on an EASY-Spray column (15 cm × 75 μm, PepMap C18, 3 μm) with a linear gradient from 4 to 28% ACN in 0–100 min followed by increase to 80% ACN in 100–110 min. The mass spectrometer was operated in a data-dependent acquisition mode with a top 10 MS/MS method. Raw data were converted to the mgf files using Proteome Discoverer version 2.0 (Thermo Fisher Scientific), which were then searched against the SwissProt database restricted to M. musculus using the MS/MS ion search on Mascot search engine. The false discovery rate was set to be <0.01. To generate extracted ion chromatograms, the raw data were processed using Xcalibur software (Thermo Fisher Scientific).
The mass spectrometry proteomics have been deposited in the jPOST repository (https://repository.jpostdb.org) under the accession codes JPST000031, JPST000032 and JPST000033. All other data supporting the findings of this study are available within the article and Supplementary Information, and can also be obtained from the corresponding author upon request.
How to cite this article: Ishikawa, E. et al. Protein kinase D regulates positive selection of CD4+ thymocytes through phosphorylation of SHP-1. Nat. Commun. 7:12756 doi: 10.1038/ncomms12756 (2016).
Singer, A., Adoro, S. & Park, J. H. Lineage fate and intense debate: myths, models and mechanisms of CD4- versus CD8-lineage choice. Nat. Rev. Immunol. 8, 788–801 (2008).
Chan, A. C., Desai, D. M. & Weiss, A. The role of protein tyrosine kinases and protein tyrosine phosphatases in T cell antigen receptor signal transduction. Annu. Rev. Immunol. 12, 555–592 (1994).
Matthews, S. A. & Cantrell, D. A. New insights into the regulation and function of serine/threonine kinases in T lymphocytes. Immunol. Rev. 228, 241–252 (2009).
Cao, Y. et al. LKB1 regulates TCR-mediated PLCgamma1 activation and thymocyte positive selection. EMBO J. 30, 2083–2093 (2011).
Hinton, H. J., Alessi, D. R. & Cantrell, D. A. The serine kinase phosphoinositide-dependent kinase 1 (PDK1) regulates T cell development. Nat. Immunol. 5, 539–545 (2004).
Fayard, E. et al. Deletion of PKBalpha/Akt1 affects thymic development. PLoS ONE 2, e992 (2007).
Juntilla, M. M., Wofford, J. A., Birnbaum, M. J., Rathmell, J. C. & Koretzky, G. A. Akt1 and Akt2 are required for alphabeta thymocyte survival and differentiation. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 104, 12105–12110 (2007).
Gruber, T., Pfeifhofer-Obermair, C. & Baier, G. PKCtheta is necessary for efficient activation of NFkappaB, NFAT, and AP-1 during positive selection of thymocytes. Immunol. Lett. 132, 6–11 (2010).
Zarrouk, M., Rolf, J. & Cantrell, D. A. LKB1 mediates the development of conventional and innate T cells via AMP-dependent kinase autonomous pathways. PLoS ONE 8, e60217 (2013).
Raman, V. et al. Requirement for Ca2+/calmodulin-dependent kinase type IV/Gr in setting the thymocyte selection threshold. J. Immunol. 167, 6270–6278 (2001).
Rozengurt, E., Rey, O. & Waldron, R. T. Protein kinase D signaling. J. Biol. Chem. 280, 13205–13208 (2005).
Irie, A. et al. Protein kinase D2 contributes to either IL-2 promoter regulation or induction of cell death upon TCR stimulation depending on its activity in Jurkat cells. Int. Immunol. 18, 1737–1747 (2006).
Matthews, S. A. et al. Unique functions for protein kinase D1 and protein kinase D2 in mammalian cells. Biochem. J. 432, 153–163 (2010).
Matthews, S. A., Rozengurt, E. & Cantrell, D. Protein kinase D. A selective target for antigen receptors and a downstream target for protein kinase C in lymphocytes. J. Exp. Med. 191, 2075–2082 (2000).
Marklund, U., Lightfoot, K. & Cantrell, D. Intracellular location and cell context-dependent function of protein kinase D. Immunity 19, 491–501 (2003).
Brownlie, R. J. & Zamoyska, R. T cell receptor signalling networks: branched, diversified and bounded. Nat. Rev. Immunol. 13, 257–269 (2013).
Lorenz, U. SHP-1 and SHP-2 in T cells: two phosphatases functioning at many levels. Immunol. Rev. 228, 342–359 (2009).
Stefanova, I. et al. TCR ligand discrimination is enforced by competing ERK positive and SHP-1 negative feedback pathways. Nat. Immunol. 4, 248–254 (2003).
Fu, G. et al. Fine-tuning T cell receptor signaling to control T cell development. Trends. Immunol. 35, 311–318 (2014).
Carter, J. D., Neel, B. G. & Lorenz, U. The tyrosine phosphatase SHP-1 influences thymocyte selection by setting TCR signaling thresholds. Int. Immunol. 11, 1999–2014 (1999).
Germain, R. N. T-cell development and the CD4-CD8 lineage decision. Nat. Rev. Immunol. 2, 309–322 (2002).
Pao, L. I., Badour, K., Siminovitch, K. A. & Neel, B. G. Nonreceptor protein-tyrosine phosphatases in immune cell signaling. Annu. Rev. Immunol. 25, 473–523 (2007).
Liu, Y., Kruhlak, M. J., Hao, J. J. & Shaw, S. Rapid T cell receptor-mediated SHP-1 S591 phosphorylation regulates SHP-1 cellular localization and phosphatase activity. J. Leukoc. Biol. 82, 742–751 (2007).
Fu, G. K., Hu, J., Wang, P. H. & Fodor, S. P. Counting individual DNA molecules by the stochastic attachment of diverse labels. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 108, 9026–9031 (2011).
Irwin, M. J. & Gascoigne, N. R. Interplay between superantigens and the immune system. J. Leukoc. Biol. 54, 495–503 (1993).
Cibotti, R., Punt, J. A., Dash, K. S., Sharrow, S. O. & Singer, A. Surface molecules that drive T cell development in vitro in the absence of thymic epithelium and in the absence of lineage-specific signals. Immunity 6, 245–255 (1997).
Hogquist, K. A. et al. Identification of a naturally occurring ligand for thymic positive selection. Immunity 6, 389–399 (1997).
Albrecht, B., Woisetschlager, M. & Robertson, M. W. Export of the high affinity IgE receptor from the endoplasmic reticulum depends on a glycosylation-mediated quality control mechanism. J. Immunol. 165, 5686–5694 (2000).
Daniels, M. A. et al. Thymic selection threshold defined by compartmentalization of Ras/MAPK signalling. Nature 444, 724–729 (2006).
Liu, X. & Bosselut, R. Duration of TCR signaling controls CD4-CD8 lineage differentiation in vivo. Nat. Immunol. 5, 280–288 (2004).
Wang, L. et al. Distinct functions for the transcription factors GATA-3 and ThPOK during intrathymic differentiation of CD4(+) T cells. Nat. Immunol. 9, 1122–1130 (2008).
He, X. et al. The zinc finger transcription factor Th-POK regulates CD4 versus CD8 T-cell lineage commitment. Nature 433, 826–833 (2005).
Kosako, H. et al. Phosphoproteomics reveals new ERK MAP kinase targets and links ERK to nucleoporin-mediated nuclear transport. Nat. Struct. Mol. Biol. 16, 1026–1035 (2009).
Yoder, J. et al. Requirement for the SLP-76 adaptor GADS in T cell development. Science 291, 1987–1991 (2001).
Roy, E. et al. Fine tuning of the threshold of T cell selection by the Nck adapters. J. Immunol. 185, 7518–7526 (2010).
Fu, Y. & Rubin, C. S. Protein kinase D: coupling extracellular stimuli to the regulation of cell physiology. EMBO Rep. 12, 785–796 (2011).
Nishikawa, K., Toker, A., Johannes, F. J., Songyang, Z. & Cantley, L. C. Determination of the specific substrate sequence motifs of protein kinase C isozymes. J. Biol. Chem. 272, 952–960 (1997).
Kaye, J. & Ellenberger, D. L. Differentiation of an immature T cell line: a model of thymic positive selection. Cell 71, 423–435 (1992).
Muroi, S. et al. Cascading suppression of transcriptional silencers by ThPOK seals helper T cell fate. Nat. Immunol. 9, 1113–1121 (2008).
Park, J. H. et al. Signaling by intrathymic cytokines, not T cell antigen receptors, specifies CD8 lineage choice and promotes the differentiation of cytotoxic-lineage T cells. Nat. Immunol. 11, 257–264 (2010).
Navarro, M. N., Goebel, J., Hukelmann, J. L. & Cantrell, D. A. Quantitative phosphoproteomics of cytotoxic T cells to reveal protein kinase D 2 regulated networks. Mol. Cell. Proteomics 13, 3544–3557 (2014).
Doppler, H., Storz, P., Li, J., Comb, M. J. & Toker, A. A phosphorylation state-specific antibody recognizes Hsp27, a novel substrate of protein kinase D. J. Biol. Chem. 280, 15013–15019 (2005).
Fu, G. et al. Themis sets the signal threshold for positive and negative selection in T-cell development. Nature 504, 441–445 (2013).
Zvezdova, E. et al. Themis1 enhances T cell receptor signaling during thymocyte development by promoting Vav1 activity and Grb2 stability. Sci. Signal 9, ra51 (2016).
Azzam, H. S. et al. CD5 expression is developmentally regulated by T cell receptor (TCR) signals and TCR avidity. J. Exp. Med. 188, 2301–2311 (1998).
Moran, A. E. et al. T cell receptor signal strength in Treg and iNKT cell development demonstrated by a novel fluorescent reporter mouse. J. Exp. Med. 208, 1279–1289 (2011).
Sakaguchi, N. et al. Altered thymic T-cell selection due to a mutation of the ZAP-70 gene causes autoimmune arthritis in mice. Nature 426, 454–460 (2003).
Yamazaki, T. et al. A shift from negative to positive selection of autoreactive T cells by the reduced level of TCR signal in TCR-transgenic CD3 zeta-deficient mice. J. Immunol. 158, 1634–1640 (1997).
Sankarshanan, M., Ma, Z., Iype, T. & Lorenz, U. Identification of a novel lipid raft-targeting motif in Src homology 2-containing phosphatase 1. J. Immunol. 179, 483–490 (2007).
Rangaswami, H. et al. Cyclic GMP and protein kinase G control a Src-containing mechanosome in osteoblasts. Sci. Signal 3, ra91 (2010).
Johnson, D. J. et al. Shp1 regulates T cell homeostasis by limiting IL-4 signals. J. Exp. Med. 210, 1419–1431 (2013).
Dequiedt, F. et al. Phosphorylation of histone deacetylase 7 by protein kinase D mediates T cell receptor-induced Nur77 expression and apoptosis. J. Exp. Med. 201, 793–804 (2005).
Kasler, H. G. et al. Histone deacetylase 7 regulates cell survival and TCR signaling in CD4/CD8 double-positive thymocytes. J. Immunol. 186, 4782–4793 (2011).
Fu, G. et al. Protein kinase C eta is required for T cell activation and homeostatic proliferation. Sci. Signal 4, ra84 (2011).
Kondo, M., Akashi, K., Domen, J., Sugamura, K. & Weissman, I. L. Bcl-2 rescues T lymphopoiesis, but not B or NK cell development, in common gamma chain-deficient mice. Immunity 7, 155–162 (1997).
Malissen, M. et al. Altered T cell development in mice with a targeted mutation of the CD3-epsilon gene. EMBO J. 14, 4641–4653 (1995).
Chaffin, K. E. et al. Dissection of thymocyte signaling pathways by in vivo expression of pertussis toxin ADP-ribosyltransferase. EMBO J. 9, 3821–3829 (1990).
Taniuchi, I. et al. Differential requirements for Runx proteins in CD4 repression and epigenetic silencing during T lymphocyte development. Cell 111, 621–633 (2002).
Poirier, G., Lo, D., Reilly, C. R. & Kaye, J. Discrimination between thymic epithelial cells and peripheral antigen-presenting cells in the induction of immature T cell differentiation. Immunity 1, 385–391 (1994).
Ishikawa, E., Miyake, Y., Hara, H., Saito, T. & Yamasaki, S. Germ-line elimination of electric charge on pre-T-cell receptor (TCR) impairs autonomous signaling for beta-selection and TCR repertoire formation. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 107, 19979–19984 (2010).
We thank M. Sakuma, M. Kurata and M. Kawano for technical assistance; Y. Ohkawa and T. Iwabuchi for analyzing data; I. Taniuchi for constructs; N. Tani, A.C. Yoshizawa, A. Nakai, I. Sagawa, D. Higo, E. Koba and M. Matsumoto for MS analyses; M.Y. Kimura and H. Takayanagi for discussion; and Laboratory for Technical Support, Medical Institute of Bioregulation, Kyushu University for technical support. This research was supported by Grant-in-Aid for Young Scientists (B) (25860365) and for Scientific Research (C) (16K08841) (E.I.) from Japan Society for the Promotion of Science, Joint Usage/Research Center for Multi-scale Research of Host Defense Systems from MEXT and Grant-in-Aid for Scientific Research on Innovative Areas (26110009)(S.Y.) from MEXT.
The authors declare no competing financial interests.
Supplementary Figures 1-12 (PDF 2697 kb)
Supplementary Data 1
A complete list of proteins and peptides identified by LC-MS/MS analysis of six "red" spots in the 2D-DIGE gel. This table is related to Fig. 8a,b. (XLS 68 kb)
Supplementary Data 2
A complete list of peptides and phosphopeptides identified by LC-MS/MS analysis of in vitro phosphorylated GST fusion proteins. GST-fused SHP-1, Gads and NCK1 were incubated with buffer, PKD2 or PKD3 plus ATP. This table is related to Supplementary Fig. 3. (XLS 3349 kb)
Supplementary Data 3
A complete list of TiO2-enriched phosphorylated peptides identified by LC-MS/MS analysis of tryptic digests of unstimulated WT, TCR-stimulated-WT and PKD2/3ΔT thymocyte lysates. This table is related to Fig. 9b,c and Supplementary Fig. 4. (XLS 3041 kb)
Rights and permissions
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons license, unless indicated otherwise in the credit line; if the material is not included under the Creative Commons license, users will need to obtain permission from the license holder to reproduce the material. To view a copy of this license, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
About this article
Cite this article
Ishikawa, E., Kosako, H., Yasuda, T. et al. Protein kinase D regulates positive selection of CD4+ thymocytes through phosphorylation of SHP-1. Nat Commun 7, 12756 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1038/ncomms12756
This article is cited by
Addressing the role of PKD3 in the T cell compartment with knockout mice
Cell Communication and Signaling (2022)
IκBζ controls IL-17-triggered gene expression program in intestinal epithelial cells that restricts colonization of SFB and prevents Th17-associated pathologies
Mucosal Immunology (2022)
Independent origins of fetal liver haematopoietic stem and progenitor cells
T cell receptor signaling for γδT cell development
Inflammation and Regeneration (2019)
Regulatory mechanisms in T cell receptor signalling
Nature Reviews Immunology (2018)
By submitting a comment you agree to abide by our Terms and Community Guidelines. If you find something abusive or that does not comply with our terms or guidelines please flag it as inappropriate.