Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

ERK5 signalling rescues intestinal epithelial turnover and tumour cell proliferation upon ERK1/2 abrogation

Abstract

The ERK1/2 MAPK signalling module integrates extracellular cues that induce proliferation and differentiation of epithelial lineages, and is an established oncogenic driver, particularly in the intestine. However, the interrelation of the ERK1/2 module relative to other signalling pathways in intestinal epithelial cells and colorectal cancer (CRC) is unclear. Here we show that loss of Erk1/2 in intestinal epithelial cells results in defects in nutrient absorption, epithelial cell migration and secretory cell differentiation. However, intestinal epithelial cell proliferation is not impeded, implying compensatory mechanisms. Genetic deletion of Erk1/2 or pharmacological targeting of MEK1/2 results in supraphysiological activity of the ERK5 pathway. Furthermore, targeting both pathways causes a more effective suppression of cell proliferation in murine intestinal organoids and human CRC lines. These results suggest that ERK5 provides a common bypass route in intestinal epithelial cells, which rescues cell proliferation upon abrogation of ERK1/2 signalling, with therapeutic implications in CRC.

Introduction

The extracellular signal-regulated kinases 1 and 2 (ERK1/2) are part of the classical family of mammalian mitogen-activated protein kinases (MAPKs), which also include three c-Jun amino-terminal kinases (JNK1/2/3), four p38 isoforms and its lesser-known counterpart, ERK5. The serine/threonine kinases ERK1 (MAPK3, also known as p44 MAPK) and ERK2 (MAPK1, also known as p42 MAPK) show 83% amino acid identity, are ubiquitously expressed and typically activated by growth factors and phorbol esters, whereas the p38 and JNK pathways are mainly activated by inflammatory cytokines and stress1. MAPKs are involved in regulation of mitosis, gene expression, cell metabolism, cell motility and apoptosis. ERK1/2 are activated by MEK1 and MEK2, which themselves are activated by Raf-1, A-Raf or B-Raf1,2. Ras proteins (K-Ras, H-Ras or N-Ras) are small GTPases that can be activated by receptor tyrosine kinases (RTKs) or G-protein coupled receptors (GPCRs), which recruit Raf proteins to the plasma membrane where they are activated. Together, these modules constitute the Ras–Raf–MEK–ERK pathway3.

The activation of ERK1/2 results in their nuclear translocation where they can phosphorylate a variety of nuclear targets such as Elk-1, c-Fos and c-Myc1, in addition to p90 ribosomal S6 kinases (p90RSKs) and mitogen- and stress-activated protein kinases, MSK1/2. The full repertoire of substrates for ERK1/2 consists of at least 160 cellular proteins4. These proteins are typically involved in the regulation of cell proliferation—more specifically, G1/S-phase cell cycle progression—and differentiation. However, their cellular effects are context-dependent and determined by the spatial and temporal dynamics of ERK1/2 activity5, which are highly regulated by scaffolding proteins and phosphatases3,6,7.

Despite vast literature on the role of ERK1/2 in cell proliferation, the absolute requirement of this signalling module in rapidly dividing tissues relative to other signalling pathways is unknown. The small intestinal epithelium is particularly suitable to address this question given the short (4–8 days) and dynamic life cycle of intestinal epithelial cells (IECs). Lgr5+ intestinal stem cells at the intestinal crypt base produce transit-amplifying cells, which then undergo a number of proliferative cycles before terminal differentiation into absorptive enterocytes at the crypt–villus border. Enterocytes then migrate to the villus tip where they undergo anoikis and are shed into the gut lumen8. All of these cellular events are tightly coordinated by the Wnt, Notch, bone morphogenetic protein (BMP) and Hedgehog pathways9, whereas the roles of ERK1/2 remain to be charted. In the intestines, the ERK1/2 pathway is likely activated by autocrine and paracrine factors downstream of RTKs, such as epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR)10, and by exogenous microbial-derived substrates that signal through the Toll-like receptor (TLR)/MyD88 pathway11.

To study the effects of ERK1/2 in the adult intestinal epithelium, we generated mice with a conditional (IEC-specific) and tamoxifen-inducible deletion of Erk2 on the Erk1−/− background, which completely abrogates this pathway. We show that the ERK1/2 signalling module, surprisingly, is dispensable for IEC proliferation. Genetic deletion of Erk1/2 in primary IEC or treatment of colorectal cancer (CRC) cell lines with MEK1/2 inhibitors results in compensatory activation of the ERK5 pathway. Moreover, the treatment of human CRC lines with a combination of MEK1/2 and ERK5 inhibitors is more efficacious in the inhibition of cancer cell growth. Thus, compensatory signalling by ERK5 suggests a potential rescue pathway that has clinical implications for targeted therapy in colorectal cancer.

Results

Generation of Erk1−/− Erk2fl/fl Vil-CreERT2 mice

Erk1−/− mice are viable and fertile12, whereas the Erk2−/− genotype is associated with embryonic lethality13. We generated compound genetically engineered Erk1−/−;Erk2fl/fl;Vil-CreERT2 mice by crossing the Erk1−/−;Erk2fl/fl 13 and Vil-CreERT2strains14. In these mice, treatment with tamoxifen induces IEC-specific deletion of Erk2 in Erk1−/−;Erk2fl/fl;Vil-CreERT2 (referred to hereafter as ‘ΔIEC’) but not Erk1−/−;Erk2fl/fl (‘fl/fl’) mice (Supplementary Fig. 1a,c). The specificity of Erk2 ablation after tamoxifen treatment was demonstrated by genotyping and immunoblotting using lysates of IEC and other tissues (Supplementary Fig. 1b,c). Immunofluorescent staining of small intestine and colon confirmed IEC-specific deletion of ERK1/2; ERK2-positive immunoreactivity in ΔIEC mice was observed only in lamina propria cells and intraepithelial lymphocytes (Fig. 1a). Finally, p-ERK1/2 staining in the small intestine was abundant in the transit-amplifying zone of the crypt, as recently reported15 (Supplementary Fig. 1d). This specific staining pattern was only observed in fl/fl mice, whereas p-ERK1/2 immunoreactivity in ΔIEC mice was only detected in lamina propria cells (Supplementary Fig. 1d).

Figure 1: Wasting disease associated with malabsorption in Erk1/2ΔIEC mice.
figure1

(a) Immunofluorescent staining of paraffin-embedded sections from small intestine or colon taken from Erk1−/−;Erk2fl/fl (‘fl/fl’) and Erk1−/−;Erk2fl/fl;Vil-CreERT2 (‘ΔIEC’) mice for an IEC marker, Claudin-1 (green) and ERK1/2 (red). Nuclear counter staining with Hoechst (blue). (b) Body weight changes of fl/fl and ΔIEC mice (n=6 per group) after five consecutive treatments with tamoxifen (1 mg day−1). *P<0.05, **P<0.001 by analysis of variance. (c) Survival of fl/fl (n=10) and ΔIEC mice (n=9) after tamoxifen treatment (Kaplan–Meier). (d) Macroscopic appearance of the small intestine and abdominal fat pads (indicated by arrows) in fl/fl and ΔIEC mice on day 10 of follow-up. Arrowheads indicate intestinal distension. (e) Weight of the epididymal fat of fl/fl and ΔIEC mice (n=6 per group) at day 10 of follow-up. (fh) Analysis of serum samples from fl/fl and ΔIEC mice. Albumin and globulin levels (f), glucose levels (g) and calcium levels (h) are shown. (i) Crypt and villus architecture in the small intestine of fl/fl and ΔIEC mice. Lymphangiectasia marked by (*) was only observed in ΔIEC mice. Haematoxylin and eosin (H&E) staining. (j) Alkaline phosphatase (AP) staining of ileum sections from fl/fl and ΔIEC mice. Arrowheads indicate the crypt–villus junction. (k) Transmission electron microscopy (TEM) analysis of the brush border of absorptive enterocytes at × 25,000 magnification. Data are presented as mean±s.e.m. (b), box-and-whiskers plots (e) or scatter plots with mean (fh). *P<0.05 and **P<0.001 by Student’s t-test (eh). Scale bars, 1 cm (d), 100 μm (i and j), 50 μm (a) or 0.5 μm (k).

ERK1/2ΔIEC causes wasting and enterocyte dysfunction

After tamoxifen treatment, ΔIEC mice developed a moribund phenotype between 8 and 10 days of follow-up, whereas their fl/fl littermates remained healthy (Supplementary Fig. 2a). This coincided with the clinical signs of malabsorption, including progressive body weight loss and 100% lethality of ΔIEC mice within 2 weeks of follow-up (Fig. 1b,c). Necropsy was performed at day 10 of follow-up of tamoxifen-treated ΔIEC mice and their fl/fl littermates to evaluate the underlying pathology. ΔIEC mice showed luminal distension of the small intestine and loss of abdominal fat, as well as a trend for shortening of the small intestine and colon (Fig. 1d,e and Supplementary Fig. 2b,c). Serum analysis at day 10 revealed that ΔIEC mice suffered from hypoalbuminaemia, hypoglycaemia, hypocalcaemia and decreased alkaline phosphatase levels when compared with fl/fl littermates (Fig. 1f–h and Supplementary Fig. 2d,e). Together with steatorrhoea (Supplementary Fig. 2f), these findings are indicative of malabsorption. ΔIEC mice also showed lymphocytopenia and increased levels of faecal albumin (Supplementary Fig. 2g,h), consistent with a protein-losing enteropathy. These observations suggest a loss of absorptive surface in the small intestine and/or severe intestinal pathology. Of note, normal serum levels of critical electrolytes, such as Na+, K+ and PO43−, were maintained in ΔIEC mice (Supplementary Fig. 2i). In addition, the serum levels of lipids (triglycerides, cholesterol) were normal or even increased in ΔIEC mice (Supplementary Fig. 2j). This hyperlipidaemia may be associated with loss of gut barrier function16, which also occurred in ΔIEC mice (Supplementary Fig. 2h,k), leading to lipid accumulation in the intestinal lamina propria (Supplementary Fig. 3a). Since the Vil-CreERT2 model may lead to recombinase activity in the kidney14, which could explain some of the observed metabolic aberrations, we analysed kidney function in fl/fl and ΔIEC mice. We did not observe any microscopic differences in the parenchymal tissue indicative of kidney failure, nor increased blood urea nitrogen levels in ΔIEC mice (Supplementary Fig. 2l,m), suggesting the observed phenotype was primarily caused by intestinal pathology.

Histological analysis showed that the crypt–villus morphology was severely perturbed in ΔIEC mice. This included signs of crypt elongation and villus shortening, more severely in the ileum compared with the jejunum and duodenum, respectively (Fig. 1i). Notably, at the most severely affected sites in the ileum, there was dilation of lacteals in villi, also known as intestinal lymphangiectasia (Fig. 1i and Supplementary Fig. 3b), consistent with protein-losing enteropathy. Even though alkaline phosphatase (AP) staining did not show differences by confocal fluorescence microscopy (Fig. 1j and Supplementary Fig. 3c), detailed analysis of the brush border on enterocytes by electron microscopy revealed that microvilli of ΔIEC mice were short, thick and non-uniform (Fig. 1k), a hallmark of defective enterocyte differentiation. Together, these observations indicate a malabsorption and protein-losing enteropathy phenotype, resulting in rapid lethality of ΔIEC mice. These data suggest an essential role for the ERK1/2 signalling module in the orchestration of normal crypt–villus architecture, maintenance of the gut barrier and absorptive enterocyte maturation in the small intestine.

ERK1/2ΔIEC has no major effects on colon homeostasis

Although efficient knockout was achieved in the colon by tamoxifen treatment in Erk1−/−;Erk2fl/fl;Vil-CreERT2 mice (Fig. 1a and Supplementary Fig. 1b,c), no gross alterations were observed in the colon crypt architecture resulting from ΔIEC (Supplementary Fig. 3d). More detailed analysis showed a loss of the luminal, flat epithelial sheet in the colon (Supplementary Fig. 3d–g), analogous to the villous changes in the small intestine. However, Erk1/2 deletion in the colon did not result in perturbation of goblet cell differentiation or an increased rate of apoptosis (Supplementary Fig. 3h–k). Given the lack of a spontaneous phenotype in the colon in ΔIEC mice, we focused on the changes in physiology in the small intestine hereafter.

ERK1/2ΔIEC leads to migration and differentiation defects

We hypothesized that the architectural derangement in the small intestine of ΔIEC mice might be explained by a migration defect on loss of epithelial ERK1/2 signalling. Consistent with this, we observed retention of AP-positive IECs in small intestinal crypts in ΔIEC mice, whereas AP immunoreactivity is normally not observed distal to the crypt–villus junction (Fig. 1j and Supplementary Fig. 4a). BrdU pulse-chase experiments demonstrated a dramatic reduction in the migratory rate of epithelial cells in ΔIEC mice compared with fl/fl littermates (Fig. 2a,b). This defect appeared to involve mostly migration in the villous compartment, which was observed >24 h after BrdU labelling. Differentiation and maturation of epithelial cells from the secretory lineage—most prominently, goblet and Paneth cells—are directly correlated with their position along the crypt–villus axis. The long-lived Paneth cells make antimicrobial peptides and provide a stem cell niche at the crypt base; goblet cells produce mucus17. Less abundant secretory cell types include enteroendocrine cells that release a variety of hormones, and Tuft cells that produce eicosanoids17. These secretory cells, with the exception of Paneth cells, follow the migration pattern of absorptive enterocytes and share their fate at the villus tip. Indeed, we observed reduced numbers and an irregular distribution of Alcian blue-positive staining goblet cells in the small intestine of ΔIEC mice when compared with fl/fl littermates (Fig. 2c, Supplementary Fig. 4b–d). Paneth cells, which can be identified by positive staining for the granule protein matrilysin (also known as matrix metalloproteinase 7, MMP7), displayed more dramatic changes. Paneth cells in ΔIEC mice were mislocalized along the crypt–villus axis, showed reduced granule contents and had smaller secretory granules that were heterogeneous in size and found outside the apical cytoplasm (Fig. 2d–f). MMP7+ cells in the small intestine of ΔIEC mice also showed a more rounded morphology rather than their regular wedge-like shape in fl/fl control littermates, even though they expressed the prototypical Paneth cell marker Cryptdin (Fig. 2f,g). Alcian blue/MMP7 double staining showed an increased number of cells expressing the Paneth cell marker, with a relative loss of mucin positive cells (Supplementary Fig. 4c,d). We hypothesized that these observations might be explained by a differentiation block in the secretory lineage, resulting in the accumulation of immature ‘intermediate’ cells—a precursor cell type that is normally rarely found in the lateral wall of the crypt base18. We did not observe any intermediate cells in the ileal sections from fl/fl mice, which showed the typical electron microscopic features of mature goblet and Paneth cells, respectively (Fig. 2h,i and Supplementary Fig. 4e). In contrast, intermediate cells were evident in the ileal sections from ΔIEC littermates (Fig. 2h,i), with their goblet cells showing larger electrodense cores, and conversely, Paneth cells displaying smaller cores and increased amounts of free ribosomes in the cytoplasm (Supplementary Fig. 4f). These data suggest that ERK1/2 signalling is critical for the migration of IEC along the crypt–villus axis, in addition to the full differentiation and maturation of IEC from the secretory cell lineage.

Figure 2: Abnormal IEC migration and secretory cell differentiation in Erk1/2ΔIEC mice.
figure2

(ag) Comparison of ileum sections from fl/fl and ΔIEC mice 10 days after initiation of tamoxifen treatment. Representative examples from BrdU pulse-chase labelling experiments (2, 24 and 48 h) with ileum sections (a). Small intestinal sections without the aforementioned typical villous atrophy observed in ΔIEC mice were selected for the analysis. The position of BrdU-positive cells along the crypt–villus axis at 2 (green), 24 (blue) or 48 h (red) after injection (b). Results are mean±s.e.m. of 10 crypts (n=2 per group). Immunohistochemical staining for Alcian blue (c) and MMP7 (d). Immunofluorescent staining for MMP7 at low magnification to show crypts and villi (e), and at high magnification to show MMP7+ staining cells at the crypt base (f). Detection of Cryptdin transcripts by in situ hybridization; counter staining with nuclear red (g). (h,i), Ileum sections from fl/fl and ΔIEC mice 10 days after tamoxifen treatment were visualized by transmission electron microscopy (TEM). Ultrastructural features of secretory epithelial cells at the crypt base at × 2,500 magnification (h). Higher magnification of Paneth cells in the crypt at × 6300 magnification (i). IC, intermediate cell; PC, Paneth cell. Scale bars, 100 μm (a,ce, g), 10 μm (f), 5 μm (h) or 2 μm (i).

Abrogation of ERK1/2 results in enhanced ERK5 signalling

Despite the well-established role of MAPK ERK1/2 signalling in cell cycle progression, there were no signs of epithelial cell hypoproliferation in ΔIEC mice. In fact, we observed crypt hyperplasia and an increased number of Ki67+ cells in the ileum (Fig. 3a,b and Supplementary Fig. 5a) and to a lesser degree in the colon (Supplementary Fig. 5b,c) of ΔIEC mice compared with fl/fl littermates. This was associated with increased expression of the proliferation marker PCNA and cell cycle-associated protein cyclin D1 (Fig. 3c). Upregulation of cyclin D1 promotes progression through the G1/S-phase, thus indicating that on genetic ablation of ERK1/2, cell cycling in the intestinal epithelium remains intact. There was no direct evidence for upregulated Wnt/β-catenin signalling in IEC after ERK1/2 deletion in vivo (Supplementary Fig. 5d), or after siRNA-mediated knockdown in TOPflash reporter cell lines in vitro (Supplementary Fig. 5e–g). We hypothesized that an alternative MAPK pathway may compensate for the loss of ERK1/2 signalling to drive the hyperproliferative phenotype of ΔIEC mice. We did not observe compensatory upregulation of p38 or JNK phosphorylation upon ERK1/2 abrogation (Fig. 3d). In contrast, constitutive levels of phospho-ERK5 were undetectable in fl/fl mice, whereas ERK1/2 abrogation resulted in a marked increase of ERK5 phosphorylation (Fig. 3d). Loss of constitutive phosphorylation of p90RSK confirmed sustained abrogation of signalling downstream of the ERK1/2 module in ΔIEC mice, despite the concomitant ERK5 activation (Fig. 3d).

Figure 3: Abrogation of ERK1/2IEC results in enhanced ERK5 signalling.
figure3

(a,b) Ki67 staining of paraffin-embedded ileum sections from fl/fl and ΔIEC mice, 10 days after tamoxifen treatment. Nuclear staining with Hoechst. Sections were analysed by confocal fluorescent imaging; scale bar, 100 μm (a). Enumeration of the number of Ki67-positive cells per crypt (b). Data are mean±s.e.m. of 10 crypts (n=3 per group). **P<0.001 (Student’s t-test). (c) Immunoblotting for indicated proteins with IEC lysates isolated from fl/fl and ΔIEC mice as in a. (d) Immunoblotting for indicated proteins with IEC lysates as in a. (e) HCT116 cells were treated with the specific MEK1/2 inhibitor, PD0325901, for 0, 1, 2, 4 or 6 h and analysed by immunoblotting for indicated proteins. (f) HCT116 cells were treated with PD0325901 (0, 1, 10 and 100 nM) for 6 h and analysed by immunoblotting for indicated proteins. As control, some cells were co-treated with the specific ERK5 inhibitor, XMD8-92 (10 μM). (g) DLD-1 cells were treated as in e, and cell lysates analysed by immunoblotting. (h) DLD-1 cells were treated as in f, and lysates were analysed by immunoblotting. (i) Caco2 cells were treated as in e, and lysates were analysed by immunoblotting. (j) Caco2 cells were treated as in f, and analysed by immunoblotting. All data are representative of two to three experiments.

To further study the interactions between the ERK1/2 and ERK5 pathways, we used human colorectal cancer (CRC) cell lines HCT116 and DLD-1 that harbour heterozygous KRASG13D (gain-of-function) mutations. Treatment of HCT116 cells with the specific MEK1/2 inhibitor, PD0325901, resulted in the upregulation of p-ERK5 levels in a time- and dose-dependent manner (Fig. 3e,f), suggesting compensatory ERK5 activation upon inhibition of the ERK1/2 pathway. Specificity of p-ERK5 immunoblotting was demonstrated by reversal of the signal by co-treatment with an ERK5 inhibitor, XMD8-92 (Fig. 3f). Similar results were achieved with the DLD-1 cell line (Fig. 3g,h), as well as Caco2 cells (Fig. 3i,j). The latter cell line is KRAS wildtype, which suggests that upregulation of ERK5 signalling occurs independently of KRAS mutation status. These data are consistent with the upregulated p-ERK5 levels we observed in ΔIEC mice that do not harbour oncogenic mutations. Since abrogation of the Raf–MEK–ERK module can result in feedback activation of EGFR19, which could then be responsible for supraphysiological activity of the ERK5 pathway20,21, we tested whether EGFR inhibition prevented ERK5 upregulation. However, treatment of DLD-1 or Caco2 cells with MEK1/2 inhibitor in the presence of the EGFR inhibitor, erlotinib, still resulted in enhanced p-ERK5 levels (Supplementary Fig. 5h). These data suggest that the compensatory upregulation of the ERK5 pathway upon abrogation of ERK1/2 signalling takes place through an EGFR-independent mechanism.

ERK1/2 and ERK5 are interconnected signalling pathways

We addressed the role of the ERK1/2 versus ERK5 signalling modules on cell proliferation in primary IEC cultures. To exclude any indirect effects by stromal, hematopoietic or neuronal cells on IECs, we used the small intestinal organoid culture system22. Intestinal organoids were generated from untreated ΔIEC mice and, after purification and several passages, treated with tamoxifen or its vehicle (ethanol) for two consecutive days in vitro. This protocol resulted in rapid and robust (>98%) knockout of Erk2 transcripts in tamoxifen-treated organoids (Fig. 4a,b and Supplementary Fig. 6a–c). Genetic ablation of Erk1/2 did not interfere with crypt budding or cell proliferation in intestinal organoids, analogous to our observations in vivo, but resulted in morphological changes (Supplementary Fig. 6a,d), possibly related to migration and differentiation defects. We evaluated the requirement for ERK5 signalling in Erk1/2ΔIEC organoids for cell proliferation. Treatment with tamoxifen or with ERK5 inhibitor, XMD8-92, alone did not prevent organoid growth, whereas co-treatment resulted in the disappearance of budding crypts and a marked loss of expression of proliferation marker Ki67 (Fig. 4c,d and Supplementary Fig. 6f). Genetic deletion of Erk2 was confirmed by quantitative PCR (Q-PCR) analysis (Supplementary Fig. 6e). Expression of the ERK1/2 target gene c-Fos was abrogated by tamoxifen treatment but increased upon ERK5 inhibition, suggesting compensatory upregulation; this was abolished upon co-treatment with XMD8-92 (Fig. 4e). Furthermore, targeting ERK1/2 and ERK5 together inhibited expression of the intestinal stem cell marker, Lgr5, and the Paneth cell marker, Mmp7 (Fig. 4f). Both the cell types are crucial for the regenerative potential of the intestinal crypt. These data suggest that ERK1/2 and ERK5 act as interconnected signalling pathways that maintain the self-renewal capacity of the intestinal epithelium.

Figure 4: ERK5 signalling is required for the proliferation of Erk1/2ΔIEC organoids.
figure4

(a,b) Small intestinal organoids generated from naive ΔIEC mice were treated with EtOH or tamoxifen (0.5 μM) for two consecutive days. Organoids were stained for ERK1/2 with counter staining for F-actin (phalloidin-AF546), on day 5 after initiation of treatment, and analysed by confocal fluorescent imaging (a). Immunoblotting with intestinal organoid lysates for indicated proteins (b). (cf) Intestinal organoids were treated with EtOH or tamoxifen (0.5 μM) in combination with DMSO or XMD8-92 (10 μM), respectively, and analysed on day 5. Ki67 staining and confocal fluorescent imaging (c). Analysis of RNA samples by Q-PCR (n=2–3 per group) for Mki67 (d), c-Fos (e), Lgr5 and Mmp7 (f), normalized to Gapdh. Data are mean±s.e.m. *P<0.05, **P<0.01 versus control (EtOH) or as indicated, by analysis of variance. Scale bars, 100 μm (a and c). All data are representative of at least two independent experiments.

To confirm these findings in IEC with genetic deletion of Erk5, intestinal organoids were generated from Erk5fl/fl mice23,24. Established organoid lines were then transduced with retroviral Puro-CreERT2 or lentiviral Puro-Cre, followed by puromycin selection. Tamoxifen treatment of these transduced intestinal organoids resulted in 50% reduction of Erk5 mRNA levels (Fig. 5c). The deletion of Erk5 did not result in enhanced levels of p-ERK1/2 in intestinal organoids cultures (Supplementary Fig. 6g). In accordance with the aforementioned data, we found that tamoxifen-induced reduction of Erk5 expression in combination with PD0325901 treatment was more efficient in abrogating cell proliferation when compared with either condition alone (Fig. 5a–d).

Figure 5: ERK1/2 signalling is required for Erk5−/− intestinal organoid growth.
figure5

Intestinal organoids were generated from Erk5fl/fl mice and transduced with CreERT2 pMSCV retrovirus. Organoids were then treated with EtOH or 4-hydroxytamoxifen (0.5 μM), together with DMSO or PD0325901 (100 nM) for 2 days. Organoids were analysed on day 5 of culture and imaged by confocal microscopy after immunofluorescent staining for Ki67 and F-actin (a). Morphology of EtOH or tamoxifen treated Erk5fl/fl organoids after transduction with CreERT2 retrovirus, with or without co-treatment with PD0325901, visualized by live-cell brightfield microscopy (b). Analysis of Erk5 (c), and Mki67 (d) transcript levels in organoids after treatment, measured by Q-PCR and normalized to 18 S rRNA (n=2–3 per group). Data are mean±s.e.m. *P<0.05, **P<0.01 versus control (EtOH) or as indicated, by analysis of variance. Data are representative of at least two experiments. Scale bars, 100 μm (a and b).

Targeting ERK1/2 and ERK5 inhibits tumour cell proliferation

Given the functional interconnection between the ERK1/2 and ERK5 pathways in IEC, we next evaluated the effects of targeted inhibition of both signalling modules on tumour cell proliferation. In a two-dimensional growth model, we found that treatment of the colorectal cancer cell line, HCT116, with the MEK1/2 inhibitor, PD0325901, was more effective in suppressing cell proliferation in combination with ERK5 inhibitor, XMD8-92, compared with either treatment alone (Fig. 6a,b). Similar results were achieved by measuring cells in S/G2/M-phase by propidium iodide labelling after treatment with DMSO, MEK1/2 inhibitor alone, ERK5 inhibitor alone or the combination of both inhibitors, respectively (Supplementary Fig. 7a,b). These results were confirmed in the other CRC cell lines, including DLD-1, HT-29 and SW480 (Supplementary Fig. 7c,d). Of note, siRNA-mediated knockdown of ERK1/2 and/or ERK5 validated these MAPKs as drug targets in CRC, although cell lines were relatively more susceptible to ERK1/2 knockdown (Supplementary Fig. 7e,f). We then used a three-dimensional growth model with intestinal organoids generated from Apcfl/fl mice25, that were transduced with Adeno-Cre in vitro (referred to hereafter as ‘Apc−/−’). Intestinal organoids with a somatic deletion of tumour suppressor APC display upregulated Wnt signalling activity, which results in a rounded, cyst-like morphology, distinct from wild-type organoids26 (Supplementary Fig. 7g). We have previously shown that ERK1/2 signalling is required for Wnt-driven adenoma formation in vivo11. Furthermore, intestinal organoids that are APC deficient showed upregulated levels of p-ERK1/2 and p-ERK5 compared with WT organoids (Fig. 6c). In line with this, PD0325901 treatment inhibited organoid growth and the expression of proliferation marker Mki67 and oncogenes c-Myc and Fra1, which was also observed with XMD8-92 treatment, with the combination treatment being superior to either treatment alone (Fig. 6d,e). Synergistic, specific or antagonistic effects of the MAPK inhibitors were observed on the expression of stem cell markers Lgr5 and Ascl2, Paneth cell marker Mmp7 and immediate-early gene Egr1, respectively (Supplementary Fig. 7h). Confirmation of on-target effects of the inhibitors was confirmed by the analysis of c-Fos expression and immunoblotting for MAPK proteins (Fig. 6e, Supplementary Fig. 7i). Notably, we observed that ERK5 protein levels were increased on long-term MEK1/2 inhibitor treatment, whereas ERK5 inhibitor treatment resulted in reduced ERK5 protein levels (Supplementary Fig. 7i), suggesting antagonistic interactions between the two MAPK modules. Suppression of total ERK5 levels by long-term treatment with XMD8-92 was also observed in multiple CRC lines (Supplementary Fig. 7j). Together, these data suggest that ERK1/2 and ERK5 are major, interrelated transducers of extracellular mitogenic signals.

Figure 6: Co-targeting MEK1/2 and ERK5 pathways inhibits tumour cell growth.
figure6

(a) HCT116 cells were plated at 5 × 103 cells per well and treated with PD0325901 (0.63, 1.25, 2.5, 5.0, 10, 20, 40, 80, 160, 320, 640 or 1280, nM) with or without XMD8-92 (0, 1 or 10 μM). Cell viability was assessed by XTT assay after 48 h of treatment. (b) HCT116 cells were plated at 2 × 103 cells per well and cultured in the presence of DMSO, PD0325901 (100 nM), XMD8-92 (10 μM) or PD0325901 (100 nM)+XMD8-92 (10 μM). Compounds were added on day 0 and day 2. XTT assay was performed on five consecutive days. Results are normalized to cell densities on day 1 (n=8 per condition). (c) Small intestinal organoids were generated from WT or Apc−/− mice (first two lanes). Some Apc−/− organoids were transduced with KRASG12V lentivirus (third lane). Organoids were then analysed for the indicated signal transducers by western blotting. (d,e) Intestinal organoids generated from Apc−/− mice were treated with DMSO, PD0325901 (20 nM), XMD8-92 (10 μM) or PD0325901 (20 nM)+XMD8-92 (10 μM) for 5 days. Organoids were visualized by live-cell brightfield microscopy at the end of treatment (d), and analysed by Q-PCR (n=3 per condition) for expression of Mki67, c-Myc, Fra1 and c-Fos transcripts, normalized to Gapdh (e). (f,g) Intestinal organoids generated from Apc−/− mice were transduced with KRASG12V lentivirus, and treated with MAPK inhibitors as in d. The resultant Apc−/−;KRASG12V organoids were analysed by live-cell brightfield microscopy (f) and Q-PCR (n=3 per condition) for expression of Mki67, c-Myc, Fra1 and c-Fos transcripts, normalized to Gapdh (g). All data are mean±s.e.m. *P<0.05, **P<0.001 versus DMSO, P<0.01 for PD0325901 versus PD+XMD (b), *P<0.05, **P<0.001 versus DMSO or as indicated, by analysis of variance (e,g). Scale bars, 100 μm (d and f).

Next, we assessed the effects of MAPK inhibitors on the growth of Apc−/− organoids that express mutant KRASG12V by lentiviral transduction. These organoids showed marked morphological differences compared with both wild-type and Apc−/− organoids (Supplementary Fig. 7g), suggesting abnormal cellular homeostasis, reminiscent of oncogenic KRAS signalling in human CRC. Mutant KRAS expression appeared to preferentially activate ERK1/2 compared with ERK5 in organoids on the Apc−/− background (Fig. 6c). Treatment with MAPK inhibitors showed that only the combination of MEK1/2 and ERK5 inhibitors reversed the typical morphological changes induced by oncogenic KRAS on the Apc−/− background (Fig. 6f). Interestingly, treatment with ERK5 inhibitor was superior over MEK1/2 inhibitor with regard to suppression of proliferation and expression of the oncogene c-Myc, stem cell markers Lgr5 and Ascl2 and Paneth cell marker Mmp7 (Fig. 6g, Supplementary Fig. 7k), suggesting differential effects of abrogating MEK1/2 versus ERK5 signalling depending on KRAS activity in three-dimensional growth. The direct effects of MEK1/2 and ERK5 inhibition were validated by the evaluation of c-Fos expression and immunoblotting for MAPK proteins (Fig. 6g, Supplementary Fig. 7l). Thus, these data suggest that pharmacological inhibitors of ERK5 can be exploited to target Wnt-driven intestinal tumour cell proliferation, and may be superior over MEK1/2 inhibitors in CRC tumours depending on KRAS mutation status.

Discussion

Here we show that ERK1/2 signalling in mouse intestinal epithelium is dispensable for cell proliferation, while it resulted in abnormal differentiation of enterocytes, wasting disease and ultimately lethality (Fig. 1). Consistent with these findings, ERK1/2 MAPKs were shown to be associated with the enterocyte brush border and activated upon RTK stimulation or feeding27 or electrical field stimulation in polarized epithelium28. This seems at odds with literature that suggest that maintained ERK1/2 signalling precludes enterocyte differentiation29,30. A possible explanation for this discrepancy could be that cycling IEC in the transit amplifying zone of the crypt require relatively high levels of active ERK1/2, which is readily blocked by pharmacological intervention, whereas a transition to low level ERK1/2 activity in IEC migrating into the villus compartment promotes the absorptive enterocyte differentiation program that is only perturbed upon complete genetic deletion of Erk1/2. Little is known about the role of ERK1/2 signalling in the life cycle of secretory cells in the gut. A recent report by Heuberger et al.15 described that IEC-specific deletion of non-receptor tyrosine phosphatase, Shp2, resulted in the loss of p-ERK1/2 levels in the small intestine. This coincided with an increased number of Paneth cells at the expense of goblet cells in the small intestine, as well as shortening of villi. They also observed the strongest staining for epithelial p-ERK1/2 in the TA zone. This p-ERK1/2+ staining pattern and the architectural organization of the TA zone were lost in Shp2 knockout mice. Interestingly, the deleterious effects of Shp2 deficiency were rescued by expression of constitutively active MEK1. A model was proposed in which the balance between Wnt/β-catenin and MAPK signalling determines Paneth cell versus goblet cell differentiation, respectively15. This proposed crucial role for ERK1/2 MAPK signalling in intestinal secretory cell differentiation is consistent with our observations in ERK1/2ΔIECmice.

Migration and differentiation are functionally intertwined in the intestines, as demonstrated by the immature phenotype of mislocalized Paneth cells observed in ΔIEC mice (Fig. 2). Critical to epithelial cell migration is proper cytoskeleton reorganization mediated by the small GTPases of the Rho family, cell polarization regulated by Cdc42 and dynamic adhesion through cell–matrix and cell–cell interaction via integrin/FAK/Src signalling31. The ERK1/2 module is used as a downstream effector of many of these pathways in the intestine, including Rho GTPases32, FAK33 and Src34, and has been suggested to promote cell motility33,35. RTK signalling also contributes to cell migration, for example, Eph–Ephrin receptor interactions are crucial for correct positioning of Paneth cells36. Ephrin receptor-induced epithelial cell migration has been shown to be mediated by Src and ERK1/2 activation37,38, which may explain the Paneth cell mislocalization observed in ΔIEC mice. In summary, the ERK1/2 module is indispensable for full maturation of both absorptive enterocytes and the secretory lineage (Fig. 7a), confirming its crucial role in the integration of cellular cues required for determination of epithelial cell fate.

Figure 7: Roles of ERK1/2 and ERK5 in intestinal homeostasis and tumorigenesis.
figure7

(a) When the ERK1/2 pathway is intact, extracellular cues that are transduced via RTKs or GPCRs activate Ras under physiological conditions, or alternatively, Ras is constitutively active in colorectal cancer (RasΔ*), which preferentially activates the Raf–MEK1/2–ERK1/2 module. The nuclear and transcriptional targets of ERK1/2 are crucial for enterocyte and secretory cell differentiation, IEC migration, as well as cell proliferation under homeostatic and oncogenic conditions. Importantly, ERK1/2 activation also results in the activation of negative feedback mechanisms that suppress its upstream kinases (for example, RTKs, son of sevenless, Raf) and activate dual specificity phosphatases (DUSPs), resulting in the silencing of the ERK5 module. (b) Upon abrogation of MEK1/2 or genetic knockout of Erk1/2, the lack of negative feedback mechanisms (that is, feedback activation) results in upregulation of the Ras–Raf–MEK5–ERK5 module, which maintains cell proliferation under physiological conditions, or results in continued tumour cell proliferation in colorectal cancer, respectively. However, the lack of activation of ERK1/2-specific targets results in differentiation and migration defects of intestinal epithelial cells culminating in malabsorption, wasting disease and mortality. Compensatory upregulation of the ERK5 pathway in CRC can be reversed by targeted treatment with its specific inhibitor, XMD8-92.

An unexpected finding was the redundancy of ERK1/2 in the gut with regard to cell proliferation. Erk1/2 deletion was compensated by upregulated ERK5 signalling. Genetic targeting of ERK1/2 in vitro previously showed that Erk2 knockdown is more effective than Erk1 knockdown in suppressing cell proliferation, although this may be related to higher expression levels of the former39. The effect of gene dosage was demonstrated in vivo by the observations that while Erk1−/− mice are viable12 and Erk2−/− mice die in utero13, Erk2+/− mice are only viable when at least one copy of Erk1 is present. However, mice heterozygous (+/−) for both Erk1 and Erk2 alleles were born at lower than Mendelian ratio39. More recently, it was reported that transgenic expression of ERK1 can compensate for Erk2 deletion40, demonstrating functional redundancy between both family members. Deletion of Erk1/2 in adult skin tissue resulted in hypoplasia, which was associated with G2/M cell cycle arrest, without notable differentiation defects of keratinocytes41. These data differ from our observations in the intestines, which might be explained by incomplete and transient siRNA-mediated knockdown of ERK1/2 in primary keratinocyte cultures41, compared with more efficient genomic deletion of Erk1 and Erk2 that is typically achieved by the Villin-Cre-ERT2 system14, possibly resulting in different outcomes.

Both ERK1/2 and ERK5 have been described to promote cell cycle progression, although they have different upstream signalling partners, MEK1/2 and MEK5, respectively1. Furthermore, ERK2 and ERK5 proteins share only about 66% sequence identity, and MEK5 is phosphorylated by MEKK2/3, which can also activate the p38 and JNK pathways42. The ERK5 pathway is classically activated by stress stimuli, in addition to mitogens; thus, it shares features of both the ERK1/2, and p38 and JNK pathways, respectively43. ERK5 induces expression of cyclin D1 (refs 44, 45), and suppresses expression of cyclin dependent kinase inhibitors46, thereby promoting G1/S-phase cell cycle progression. Importantly, the role of ERK5 in IEC differentiation and intestinal homeostasis is currently unknown. Knockout of Erk1/2 in IEC induced activity of ERK5, which was not detectable in naive mice (Fig. 3). These data suggest that the ERK1/2 and ERK5 modules may share proximal signalling components. Although EGFR is a likely candidate in this context19,20, we found that abrogation of EGFR signalling did not prevent enhanced ERK5 activity upon MEK1/2 inhibition. Although it was originally suggested that ERK5 signalling is independent of Ras20, other groups established that Ras, either through physiological signalling47, or by its oncogenic activity48,49, activates the MEK5–ERK5 signalling axis. Thus, rewiring of signalling networks downstream of Ras could explain the supraphysiological activity of ERK5 upon conditional deletion of Erk1/2 in the intestines. In fact, it has been shown that ERK1/2 signalling mediates negative feedback on ERK5 activity50, possibly through transcriptional activation of dual specificity phosphatases (DUSPs)51. Alternatively, ERK1/2-induced FOS-like antigen 1 (Fra-1) may negatively regulate MEK5 (ref. 52). These data suggest that ERK5 is a default bypass route downstream of RTK-Ras and activated upon loss of ERK1/2-mediated repression, thereby ensuring the transduction of mitogenic signals to the nucleus (Fig. 7b). Consistent with this concept, we found that ERK5 inhibition induces atrophy of ΔIEC intestinal organoids (Fig. 4). In addition, important downstream transcriptional targets of ERK5 and ERK1/2 overlap, such as immediate-early gene Fra1 and oncogene c-Myc, whereas c-Fos and Egr1 were specifically induced by ERK1/2 (Fig. 6 and Supplementary Fig. 7). Specificity of ERK1/2 over ERK5 and other MAPK family members for the activation of c-Fos has been previously described53, demonstrating their differential biological output despite the shared ability to transduce potent mitogenic signals.

Our findings may be relevant for the use of MAPK inhibitors in the treatment of colorectal cancer. Although there was only a mild phenotype in the colons of ΔIEC mice under homeostatic conditions, the Ras–RAF–MEK–ERK pathway is generally upregulated in malignant cells including CRC54. Targeted therapy typically results in feedback activation of upstream players of the targeted kinase, which are then able to reactivate the same pathway or utilize bypass signalling routes55. For example, on activation, ERK1/2 phosphorylates EGFR, son of sevenless56, and Raf57, thereby terminating upstream signalling activity. Knockout of Erk1/2 eliminates this negative feedback. Our data suggest that ERK5 is a putative resistance pathway in the context of targeted treatment with MEK1/2 or ERK1/2 inhibitors (Fig. 7b). Different classes of MEK1/2 inhibitors display various modes of resistance to therapy (innate, adaptive and acquired)58. Since we have only used one MEK1/2 inhibitor (PD0325901) in our studies, it will be necessary to evaluate other classes of inhibitors in combination with ERK5 inhibitors. Importantly, while treatment with either the MEK1/2 or ERK5 inhibitor suppressed tumour growth in murine Apc−/− organoids, only the latter was able to inhibit the proliferation of Apc−/−;KRASG12V organoids (Fig. 6), which are more representative of human CRC. In line with this, suppression of ERK5 expression by forced expression of miR-143/145 inhibited intestinal adenoma formation in the ApcMin/+ model59, and activated MEK5 correlated with more invasive CRC in human60. ERK5 has been previously reported to mediate resistance to cytotoxic chemotherapy-induced apoptosis61. The highly specific and bioavailable ERK5 inhibitor, XMD8-92, has shown antitumour effects in multiple preclinical cancer models by inhibiting tumour angiogenesis, metastasis and chemo-resistance62. Furthermore, ERK5 inhibition does not induce feedback activation of upstream or parallel signalling pathways62. In conclusion, the ERK1/2 and ERK5 MAPK modules display a high degree of signalling plasticity in the intestinal epithelium, which has implications for targeted treatment of colorectal cancer.

Methods

Reagents

Tamoxifen, safflower oil, DL-dithiothreitol (DTT), DMSO and fluorescein isothiocyanate (FITC)-Dextran (FD-4) were purchased from Sigma. EDTA was obtained from Invitrogen. MEK1/2 inhibitor PD0325901 was obtained from Stemgent. ERK5 inhibitor XMD8-92 was obtained from Santa Cruz Biotechnology. EGFR inhibitor erlotinib was obtained from Selleckchem. Recombinant mWnt3a was obtained from R&D Systems.

Antibodies

Anti-β-catenin (9562), anti-cyclin D1 (2922), anti-E-Cadherin (24E10), anti-phospho-ERK1/2 (T202/Y204; D13.14.4E), anti-ERK1/2 (137F5), anti-ERK5 (D23E9), anti-phospho-JNK (T183/Y185; 81E11), anti-JNK (9252), anti-MMP7 (3801), anti-phospho-p38 (T180/Y182; D3F9), anti-p38 (9212), anti-phospho-p90RSK (T359/S363; 9344), anti-p90RSK1/2/3 (9347), anti-TCF4 (C9B9) and anti-PCNA (PC10) antibodies were obtained from Cell Signaling Technologies. Anti-β-actin antibody (AC-74) and anti-α-Tubulin (T9026) came from Sigma, Alexa Fluor 488-conjugated claudin-1 (2H10D10) antibody from Invitrogen, anti-claudin-3 and anti-claudin-5 from Thermo Scientific, anti-phospho-ERK5 (T218/Y220; 07-507) antibody from Millipore, anti-Ki67 (GTX16667) antibody from GeneTex and anti-LYVE1 (ab33682) antibody from Abcam, anti-mucin 2 (H-300) antibody and anti-ERK2 (C-14) antibody from Santa Cruz Biotechnology. Antibodies for western blotting were used at 1:1,000 dilution. All uncropped western blots can be found in Supplementary Fig. 8.

Cell culture and siRNA treatments

HCT116, DLD-1, Caco2, HT-29 and SW480 cell lines were obtained from ATCC and cultured in high-glucose DMEM (Mediatech), supplemented with 4 mM glutamine, 50 U ml−1 penicillin, 50 μg ml−1 streptomycin (all from Invitrogen) and 10% fetal calf serum. The cell lines were routinely tested for mycoplasma contamination with the MycoAlert Mycoplasma Detection Kit (Lonza). For cell line authentication, short tandem repeat (STR) analysis was performed on isolated genomic DNA with the GenePrint 10 System from Promega, and peaks were analysed using GeneMarker HID from Softgenetics. Allele calls were searched against STR databases maintained by ATCC (www.atcc.org), DSMZ (www.dsmz.de) and Texas Tech University Children’s Oncology Group (cogcell.org). For some experiments, the cells were pre-treated with PD0325901, XMD8-92 or DMSO (control) before western blotting or cell viability assays. For siRNA-mediated knockdown, the cells were plated at 5 × 103 cells per well in 96-well plates and transfected with 40 nM siRNA with optimized Dharmacon transfection reagents (Thermo). Oligonucleotides used: siGENOME non-targeting Control siRNA #5, siCONTROL TOX, ON-TARGETplus SMARTPOOL human CTNNB1 (all from Thermo), SignalSilence Erk1/2 (6560) and SignalSilence ERK5 siRNA I (7301) (Cell Signaling Technologies).

Cell viability and reporter assays

XTT assays were performed according to the manufacturer’s instructions (Biotium). In short, HCT116, DLD-1, HT-29 or SW480 cells were plated at 2–4 × 103 cells per well (n=8 per condition) in 96-well plates (Corning) and XTT assays were performed on five consecutive days. For TOPflash luciferase reporter assays, HCT116 or SW480 cells were co-transfected with the TCF Reporter Plasmid (Millipore) and pcDNA3.1(+) vector (Thermo Scientific) that contains a Geneticin-selectable marker. Stable lines were selected with 800 μg ml−1 Geneticin (Thermo). The cells were lysed in total cell lysis buffer and Luciferase substrate (Promega) was added, followed by measurement of bioluminescence.

Mice

Eight-to-12-week-old mice on the C57BL/6 background and bred in the animal facility of the Stein Clinical Research building at the University of California, San Diego were used for all the experiments, except for Erk5fl/fl mice that were solely used for the generation of ex vivo intestinal organoids. Age-matched male and female mice were used for experiments. To generate the Erk1−/−;Erk2fl/fl;Vil-CreERT2 mouse strain, Erk1−/−;Erk2fl/fl mice (a gift of Dr S. Hedrick, UCSD)13 were intercrossed with Vil-CreERT2mice that express the CRE transgene under control of the IEC-specific Villin promoter, which is inducible by tamoxifen14. Genotyping of the Erk1 and Erk2 genes, as well as the CRE transgene, with gDNA obtained from intestinal epithelial cells, skin and spleen tissue was used to confirm the genotype of the mice. Erk1−/−;Erk2fl/fl;Vil-CreERT2 mice were fertile and viable, and did not shown any overt phenotype without tamoxifen treatment. To induce recombination of the Erk2 gene (deletion of exon 3) in IEC, the mice were treated with tamoxifen (1 mg day−1) dissolved in safflower oil for five consecutive days by oral gavage. The Erk5fl/fl mice were generated by Dr C. Tournier (University of Manchester, Manchester, UK)23,24, and transferred from Dr Z. Xia’s laboratory (University of Washington, Seattle, WA, USA). Gut barrier assays were performed with FITC-Dextran or by faecal albumin measurements with the Mouse Albumin ELISA kit (Bethyl Laboratories), as previously described63. All the experimental procedures were conducted in accordance with the University of California, San Diego institutional guidelines for Animal Care and Use (IACUC).

Mouse blood analysis

Analysis of blood chemistry from blood plasma (albumin, globulin, total protein, liver enzymes, glucose, electrolytes, ALP, lipid spectrum, blood urea nitrogen) and haematological parameters (lymphocyte counts, haemoglobin) from EDTA blood were performed by the STAT Veterinary Lab, San Diego, CA, USA.

IEC isolation

IEC isolation was performed as previously described64. Briefly, the intestines were washed three times in PBS with 1 mM dithiothreitol, followed by incubation in HBSS with 5 mM EDTA and 0.5 mM dithiothreitol and harvest of epithelial cells.

RNA extraction and Q-PCR

For the preparation of RNA samples from murine IEC, the cell lysates were prepared with RLT buffer after IEC isolation procedures and stored at −80 °C until extraction. For RNA isolation from small intestinal organoid cultures, purified IEC were recovered from Matrigel using the BD Cell Recovery Solution following the manufacturer’s instructions and cell lysates were prepared with RLT buffer. RNA extraction was performed with the RNeasy Mini Kit (Qiagen), followed by cDNA synthesis with the qScript cDNA superMix kit (Quanta Biosciences). Q-PCR was performed on the AB7300 Real-Time PCR System (Applied Biosystems) using PerfeCta SYBR Green FastMix (Quanta Biosciences). Oligonucleotide sequences for Q-PCR were custom designed with NCBI Primer-BLAST and synthesized by IDT Technologies (see Supplementary Table 1). For selected experiments, PCR products were run in TAE buffer on 2% agarose gels and visualized with SYBR Safe DNA (Invitrogen).

Intestinal organoid culture

Small intestinal organoids were generated following published protocols22, and as previously described64. Briefly, intestinal organoids were grown in Advanced DMEM/F12 Reduced Serum Medium supplemented with 2 mM Glutamax, 10 mM HEPES, 100 U ml−1 penicillin and 100 μg ml−1 streptomycin, B27 and N2 supplements, 50 ng ml−1 mEGF (all from Invitrogen), 100 ng ml−1 mNoggin (PeproTech) and 10% (v/v) RspoI conditioned medium from 293 T-HA-RspoI-Fc cells (kindly provided by Dr C. Kuo, Stanford University). Growth Factor Reduced (GFR) Matrigel came from BD Biosciences. For experiments with Erk5−/− intestinal organoids, small intestines were harvested from Erk5fl/fl mice23,24 and stable organoid lines were generated. These were then transduced with Puro-Cre-ERT2 retrovirus (Addgene plasmid 22776; ref. 65) or Puro-Cre lentivirus (Addgene plasmid 17408) with a selectable marker (puromycin) following published protocols66. After transduction and puromycin selection, organoids were used for experiments with 4-hydroxytamoxifen (4-OHT) (Sigma) and/or PD0325901 treatment or western blotting. For experiments with Apc−/− intestinal organoids, small intestines were harvested from Apcfl/fl mice (kindly provided by Dr E. Fearon, University of Michigan Medical School)25, and stable organoid lines were generated. To delete the floxed Apc alleles, these organoids were infected with Adeno-Cre virus as previously described67. For experiments with Apc−/−;KRASG12V intestinal organoids, Apc−/− intestinal organoids were transduced with KRASG12V lentivirus (Addgene plasmid 35633) with hygromycin. After transduction and selection, Apc−/− and Apc−/−;KRASG12Vintestinal organoids were used for experiments with PD0325901 and/or XMD8-92 treatment.

Immunohistochemistry and in situ hybridization

Immunohistochemistry was performed using standard staining procedures64. Briefly, 4–6-μm paraffin sections from murine small or large intestinal tissues were incubated with 1:200 dilutions of anti-Ki67 or anti-MMP7 antibodies (overnight, 4 °C), followed by detection with biotinylated secondary antibodies (1 h at room temperature; 1:500 dilution) and horseradish peroxidase-streptavidin conjugates (Jackson; 30 min at room temperature), followed by the addition of 3,3′-diaminobenzidine (DAB; Vector Laboratories). Counterstaining was performed with haematoxylin 560 (Surgipath). Alcian Blue (American MasterTech) and alkaline phosphatase (Vector Laboratories) stainings were performed according to the manufacturer’s instructions. Oil red O stainings were performed by treating frozen sections with 60% isopropanol, followed by staining with Oil red O for 15 min, followed by rinsing with 60% isopropanol and haematoxylin counterstaining. For BrdU pulse-chase experiments, the mice were injected with BrdU (2 mg intraperitoneally) at 2, 24 or 48 h before analysis. The BrdU In-Situ Detection Kit (BD) was used for the detection of BrdU-labelled cells according to the manufacturer’s instructions. Quantification of BrdU+ cells along the crypt–villus axis was performed following published methods11,68. In situ hybridization was performed to detect Cryptdin-1 expression to visualize Paneth cells in small intestinal sections, as previously described69.

Immunofluorescent staining and confocal microscopy

Immunofluorescent staining and confocal imaging was performed using standard techniques64,70, by using Alexa Fluor (AF) 488 conjugated primary antibodies (1:200 dilution) with or without AF 546-conjugated phalloidin (1:500 dilution) and Hoechst 33258 (Invitrogen; 1:1,000 dilution) counterstaining. In some cases, AF 488-conjugated secondary antibodies (1:500 dilution) were used for visualization of the primary target (Molecular Probes). For immunofluorescent stainings of intestinal organoids, the cells were fixed in Matrigel, followed by incubation with 1:100 dilutions of primary antibodies and detection with AF 488-conjugated secondary antibody (1:500 dilution). Fluorescence images were acquired using × 20 air or × 63 oil-immersion objectives on a confocal laser-scanning microscope (Olympus IX81).

TUNEL assay

Performed as previously described11 following the manufacturer’s instructions (BD Biosciences).

Flow cytometry

Flow cytometry analysis of intestinal epithelial cells was performed using standard protocols11,70. Propidium iodide (PI) stainings were performed with the FxCycle PI/RNase Staining Solution (Molecular Probes) following the manufacturer’s instructions. Briefly, the cells were fixed with 4% paraformaldehyde and prepared at 1 × 106 cells per condition. The cells were pelleted, followed by the addition of 0.5 ml of PI/RNase Staining Solution. After a 15-min incubation period, the samples were run on a BD Accuri C6 flow cytometer.

Transmission electron microscopy

Transmission electron microscopy (TEM) was performed by using a Zeiss EM10C electron microscope with a Gatan 785 11 megapixel digital camera at the Microimaging Core Facility (VA San Diego Healthcare System). Mouse small intestinal samples were fixed with 2% paraformaldehyde with 2.5% glutaraldehyde, embedded in epoxy 812 and sectioned with a Reichert Ultracut ultramicrotome for placement on TEM grids.

Statistical analysis

The data are represented as mean±s.e.m. or as stated in the figure legends. The P values are stated in the figure legends; a P value <0.05 was considered significant. Unpaired Student’s t-test was used for statistical analyses to compare two data sets with normal distribution, Mann–Whitney U-test was used for nonparametric data, analysis of variance was used to compare multiple data sets, log-rank analysis was applied for survival curves. All the statistical tests were performed with Prism 6.0 (GraphPad, La Jolla, CA, USA).

Additional information

How to cite this article: de Jong, P. R. et al. ERK5 signalling rescues intestinal epithelial turnover and tumour cell proliferation upon ERK1/2 abrogation. Nat. Commun. 7:11551 doi: 10.1038/ncomms11551 (2016).

References

  1. 1

    Roux, P. P. & Blenis, J. ERK and p38 MAPK-activated protein kinases: a family of protein kinases with diverse biological functions. Microbiol. Mol. Biol. Rev. 68, 320–344 (2004).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  2. 2

    Johnson, G. L. & Lapadat, R. Mitogen-activated protein kinase pathways mediated by ERK, JNK, and p38 protein kinases. Science 298, 1911–1912 (2002).

    CAS  ADS  Article  Google Scholar 

  3. 3

    Kolch, W. Coordinating ERK/MAPK signalling through scaffolds and inhibitors. Nat. Rev. Mol. Cell Biol. 6, 827–837 (2005).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  4. 4

    Courcelles, M. et al. Phosphoproteome dynamics reveal novel ERK1/2 MAP kinase substrates with broad spectrum of functions. Mol. Syst. Biol. 9, 669 (2013).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  5. 5

    Murphy, L. O. & Blenis, J. MAPK signal specificity: the right place at the right time. Trends Biochem. Sci. 31, 268–275 (2006).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  6. 6

    Patterson, K. I., Brummer, T., O'Brien, P. M. & Daly, R. J. Dual-specificity phosphatases: critical regulators with diverse cellular targets. Biochem. J. 418, 475–489 (2009).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  7. 7

    Boutros, T., Chevet, E. & Metrakos, P. Mitogen-activated protein (MAP) kinase/MAP kinase phosphatase regulation: roles in cell growth, death, and cancer. Pharmacol. Rev. 60, 261–310 (2008).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  8. 8

    van der Flier, L. G. & Clevers, H. Stem cells, self-renewal, and differentiation in the intestinal epithelium. Annu. Rev. Physiol. 71, 241–260 (2009).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  9. 9

    Medema, J. P. & Vermeulen, L. Microenvironmental regulation of stem cells in intestinal homeostasis and cancer. Nature 474, 318–326 (2011).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  10. 10

    Fiske, W. H., Threadgill, D. & Coffey, R. J. ERBBs in the gastrointestinal tract: recent progress and new perspectives. Exp. Cell Res. 315, 583–601 (2009).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  11. 11

    Lee, S. H. et al. ERK activation drives intestinal tumorigenesis in Apc(min/+) mice. Nat. Med. 16, 665–670 (2010).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  12. 12

    Pages, G. et al. Defective thymocyte maturation in p44 MAP kinase (Erk 1) knockout mice. Science 286, 1374–1377 (1999).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  13. 13

    Fischer, A. M., Katayama, C. D., Pages, G., Pouyssegur, J. & Hedrick, S. M. The role of erk1 and erk2 in multiple stages of T cell development. Immunity 23, 431–443 (2005).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  14. 14

    el Marjou, F. et al. Tissue-specific and inducible Cre-mediated recombination in the gut epithelium. Genesis 39, 186–193 (2004).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  15. 15

    Heuberger, J. et al. Shp2/MAPK signaling controls goblet/paneth cell fate decisions in the intestine. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 111, 3472–3477 (2014).

    CAS  ADS  Article  Google Scholar 

  16. 16

    Puppa, M. J. et al. Gut barrier dysfunction in the Apc(Min/+) mouse model of colon cancer cachexia. Biochim. Biophys. Acta 1812, 1601–1606 (2011).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  17. 17

    Clevers, H. & Batlle, E. SnapShot: the intestinal crypt. Cell 152, 1198–1198.e2 (2013).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  18. 18

    Troughton, W. D. & Trier, J. S. Paneth and goblet cell renewal in mouse duodenal crypts. J. Cell Biol. 41, 251–268 (1969).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  19. 19

    Prahallad, A. et al. Unresponsiveness of colon cancer to BRAF(V600E) inhibition through feedback activation of EGFR. Nature 483, 100–103 (2012).

    CAS  ADS  Article  Google Scholar 

  20. 20

    Kato, Y. et al. Bmk1/Erk5 is required for cell proliferation induced by epidermal growth factor. Nature 395, 713–716 (1998).

    CAS  ADS  Article  Google Scholar 

  21. 21

    Esparis-Ogando, A. et al. Erk5 participates in neuregulin signal transduction and is constitutively active in breast cancer cells overexpressing ErbB2. Mol. Cell. Biol. 22, 270–285 (2002).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  22. 22

    Sato, T. et al. Single Lgr5 stem cells build crypt-villus structures in vitro without a mesenchymal niche. Nature 459, 262–265 (2009).

    CAS  ADS  Article  Google Scholar 

  23. 23

    Wang, X. et al. Activation of extracellular signal-regulated protein kinase 5 downregulates FasL upon osmotic stress. Cell Death Differ. 13, 2099–2108 (2006).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  24. 24

    Zou, J. et al. Targeted deletion of ERK5 MAP kinase in the developing nervous system impairs development of GABAergic interneurons in the main olfactory bulb and behavioral discrimination between structurally similar odorants. J. Neurosci. 32, 4118–4132 (2012).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  25. 25

    Hinoi, T. et al. Mouse model of colonic adenoma-carcinoma progression based on somatic Apc inactivation. Cancer Res. 67, 9721–9730 (2007).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  26. 26

    Sato, T. et al. Paneth cells constitute the niche for Lgr5 stem cells in intestinal crypts. Nature 469, 415–418 (2011).

    CAS  ADS  Article  Google Scholar 

  27. 27

    Boucher, M. J. & Rivard, N. Regulation and role of brush border-associated ERK1/2 in intestinal epithelial cells. Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun. 311, 121–128 (2003).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  28. 28

    Cao, L. et al. Polarizing intestinal epithelial cells electrically through Ror2. J. Cell. Sci. 127, 3233–3239 (2014).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  29. 29

    Lemieux, E. et al. Constitutive activation of the MEK/ERK pathway inhibits intestinal epithelial cell differentiation. Am. J. Physiol. Gastrointest. Liver Physiol. 301, G719–G730 (2011).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  30. 30

    Laprise, P., Langlois, M. J., Boucher, M. J., Jobin, C. & Rivard, N. Down-regulation of MEK/ERK signaling by E-cadherin-dependent PI3K/Akt pathway in differentiating intestinal epithelial cells. J. Cell. Physiol. 199, 32–39 (2004).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  31. 31

    Ridley, A. J. et al. Cell migration: integrating signals from front to back. Science 302, 1704–1709 (2003).

    CAS  ADS  Article  Google Scholar 

  32. 32

    Chen, L. et al. Peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor gamma promotes epithelial to mesenchymal transformation by Rho GTPase-dependent activation of ERK1/2. J. Biol. Chem. 281, 24575–24587 (2006).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  33. 33

    Chaturvedi, L. S., Marsh, H. M. & Basson, M. D. Role of RhoA and its effectors ROCK and mDia1 in the modulation of deformation-induced FAK, ERK, p38, and MLC motogenic signals in human Caco-2 intestinal epithelial cells. Am. J. Physiol. Cell. Physiol. 301, C1224–C1238 (2011).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  34. 34

    Bouchard, V. et al. Fak/Src signaling in human intestinal epithelial cell survival and anoikis: differentiation state-specific uncoupling with the PI3-K/Akt-1 and MEK/Erk pathways. J. Cell. Physiol. 212, 717–728 (2007).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  35. 35

    Gayer, C. P. et al. ERK regulates strain-induced migration and proliferation from different subcellular locations. J. Cell. Biochem. 109, 711–725 (2010).

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  36. 36

    Batlle, E. et al. Beta-catenin and TCF mediate cell positioning in the intestinal epithelium by controlling the expression of EphB/ephrinB. Cell 111, 251–263 (2002).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  37. 37

    Rutkowski, R., Mertens-Walker, I., Lisle, J. E., Herington, A. C. & Stephenson, S. A. Evidence for a dual function of EphB4 as tumor promoter and suppressor regulated by the absence or presence of the ephrin-B2 ligand. Int. J. Cancer 131, E614–E624 (2012).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  38. 38

    Vindis, C., Cerretti, D. P., Daniel, T. O. & Huynh-Do, U. EphB1 recruits c-Src and p52Shc to activate MAPK/ERK and promote chemotaxis. J. Cell Biol. 162, 661–671 (2003).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  39. 39

    Lefloch, R., Pouyssegur, J. & Lenormand, P. Single and combined silencing of ERK1 and ERK2 reveals their positive contribution to growth signaling depending on their expression levels. Mol. Cell. Biol. 28, 511–527 (2008).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  40. 40

    Fremin, C., Saba-El-Leil, M. K., Levesque, K., Ang, S. L. & Meloche, S. Functional redundancy of ERK1 and ERK2 MAP kinases during development. Cell. Rep. 12, 913–921 (2015).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  41. 41

    Dumesic, P. A., Scholl, F. A., Barragan, D. I. & Khavari, P. A. Erk1/2 MAP kinases are required for epidermal G2/M progression. J. Cell Biol. 185, 409–422 (2009).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  42. 42

    Nithianandarajah-Jones, G. N., Wilm, B., Goldring, C. E., Muller, J. & Cross, M. J. ERK5: structure, regulation and function. Cell. Signal. 24, 2187–2196 (2012).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  43. 43

    Nishimoto, S. & Nishida, E. MAPK signalling: ERK5 versus ERK1/2. EMBO Rep. 7, 782–786 (2006).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  44. 44

    Mulloy, R., Salinas, S., Philips, A. & Hipskind, R. A. Activation of cyclin D1 expression by the ERK5 cascade. Oncogene 22, 5387–5398 (2003).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  45. 45

    Bera, A. et al. A positive feedback loop involving Erk5 and Akt turns on mesangial cell proliferation in response to PDGF. Am. J. Physiol. Cell. Physiol. 306, C1089–C1100 (2014).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  46. 46

    Perez-Madrigal, D., Finegan, K. G., Paramo, B. & Tournier, C. The extracellular-regulated protein kinase 5 (ERK5) promotes cell proliferation through the down-regulation of inhibitors of cyclin dependent protein kinases (CDKs). Cell. Signal. 24, 2360–2368 (2012).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  47. 47

    Kamakura, S., Moriguchi, T. & Nishida, E. Activation of the protein kinase ERK5/BMK1 by receptor tyrosine kinases. Identification and characterization of a signaling pathway to the nucleus. J. Biol. Chem. 274, 26563–26571 (1999).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  48. 48

    English, J. M., Pearson, G., Baer, R. & Cobb, M. H. Identification of substrates and regulators of the mitogen-activated protein kinase ERK5 using chimeric protein kinases. J. Biol. Chem. 273, 3854–3860 (1998).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  49. 49

    English, J. M. et al. Contribution of the ERK5/MEK5 pathway to Ras/Raf signaling and growth control. J. Biol. Chem. 274, 31588–31592 (1999).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  50. 50

    Mody, N., Leitch, J., Armstrong, C., Dixon, J. & Cohen, P. Effects of MAP kinase cascade inhibitors on the MKK5/ERK5 pathway. FEBS Lett. 502, 21–24 (2001).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  51. 51

    Sarkozi, R. et al. ERK1/2-driven and MKP-mediated inhibition of EGF-induced ERK5 signaling in human proximal tubular cells. J. Cell. Physiol. 211, 88–100 (2007).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  52. 52

    Ramos-Nino, M. E. et al. HGF mediates cell proliferation of human mesothelioma cells through a PI3K/MEK5/Fra-1 pathway. Am. J. Respir. Cell Mol. Biol. 38, 209–217 (2008).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  53. 53

    Gilley, R., March, H. N. & Cook, S. J. ERK1/2, but not ERK5, is necessary and sufficient for phosphorylation and activation of c-Fos. Cell. Signal. 21, 969–977 (2009).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  54. 54

    Karra, A. S., Taylor, C. A. 4th, Thorne, C. A. & Cobb, M. H. A kinase divided. Cancer Cell 28, 145–147 (2015).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  55. 55

    Duncan, J. S. et al. Dynamic reprogramming of the kinome in response to targeted MEK inhibition in triple-negative breast cancer. Cell 149, 307–321 (2012).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  56. 56

    Lito, P., Rosen, N. & Solit, D. B. Tumor adaptation and resistance to RAF inhibitors. Nat. Med. 19, 1401–1409 (2013).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  57. 57

    Ritt, D. A., Monson, D. M., Specht, S. I. & Morrison, D. K. Impact of feedback phosphorylation and Raf heterodimerization on normal and mutant B-Raf signaling. Mol. Cell. Biol. 30, 806–819 (2010).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  58. 58

    Caunt, C. J., Sale, M. J., Smith, P. D. & Cook, S. J. MEK1 and MEK2 inhibitors and cancer therapy: the long and winding road. Nat. Rev. Cancer 15, 577–592 (2015).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  59. 59

    Takaoka, Y. et al. Forced expression of miR-143 represses ERK5/c-Myc and p68/p72 signaling in concert with miR-145 in gut tumors of Apc(Min) mice. PLoS ONE 7, e42137 (2012).

    CAS  ADS  Article  Google Scholar 

  60. 60

    Hu, B. et al. Expression of the phosphorylated MEK5 protein is associated with TNM staging of colorectal cancer. BMC Cancer 12, 127 (2012).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  61. 61

    Weldon, C. B. et al. Identification of mitogen-activated protein kinase kinase as a chemoresistant pathway in MCF-7 cells by using gene expression microarray. Surgery 132, 293–301 (2002).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  62. 62

    Yang, Q. et al. Pharmacological inhibition of BMK1 suppresses tumor growth through promyelocytic leukemia protein. Cancer Cell 18, 258–267 (2010).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  63. 63

    de Jong, P. R. et al. TRPM8 on mucosal sensory nerves regulates colitogenic responses by innate immune cells via CGRP. Mucosal Immunol. 8, 491–504 (2015).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  64. 64

    de Jong, P. R. et al. Ion channel TRPV1-dependent activation of PTP1B suppresses EGFR-associated intestinal tumorigenesis. J. Clin. Invest. 124, 3793–3806 (2014).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  65. 65

    Kumar, M. S. et al. Dicer1 functions as a haploinsufficient tumor suppressor. Genes Dev. 23, 2700–2704 (2009).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  66. 66

    Koo, B. K., Sasselli, V. & Clevers, H. Retroviral gene expression control in primary organoid cultures. Curr. Protoc. Stem Cell Biol. 27, Unit 5A.6 (2013).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  67. 67

    Wang, K. et al. Interleukin-17 receptor a signaling in transformed enterocytes promotes early colorectal tumorigenesis. Immunity 41, 1052–1063 (2014).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  68. 68

    Sansom, O. J. et al. Loss of Apc in vivo immediately perturbs Wnt signaling, differentiation, and migration. Genes Dev. 18, 1385–1390 (2004).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  69. 69

    Taniguchi, K. et al. A gp130-Src-YAP module links inflammation to epithelial regeneration. Nature 519, 57–62 (2015).

    CAS  ADS  Article  Google Scholar 

  70. 70

    Bertin, S. et al. The ion channel TRPV1 regulates the activation and proinflammatory properties of CD4(+) T cells. Nat. Immunol. 15, 1055–1063 (2014).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

We thank M. Scholl and S. Herdman for animal breeding. We thank L. Deng and S. Shenouda for tissue processing. We thank Professor N. Varki from the Department of Pathology (UCSD) for the histological evaluations. We thank M. Mashore from the Microimaging Core Facility (VA San Diego Healthcare System) for his assistance with transmission electron microscopy. We thank J. Santini for assistance in confocal imaging at the University of California at San Diego Neuroscience Microscopy Shared Facility, funded by NIH Grant P30 NS047101 through the NINDS. We thank Dr B. James from the SBP Genomics Shared Resource for cell line authentication, supported by the Sanford Burnham Prebys NCI Cancer Center Support Grant P30 CA030199. We thank Dr S. Grivennikov (Fox Chase Cancer Center) for his comments. This study was supported by grants from the Crohn’s and Colitis Foundation of America (CCFA) to P.R.d.J. (Research Fellowship Award #2927), E.R. (Senior Research Award #330251) and S.B. (Career Development Award #381862); the Japan Society for the Promotion of Science (JSPS) to N.T.; a postdoctoral fellowship for Research Abroad, Research Fellowship for Young Scientists and the Strategic Young Researcher Overseas Visits Program for Accelerating Brain Circulation from the Japan Society for the Promotion of Science (JSPS), and a Uehara Memorial Foundation Fellowship to K.T.; the NIH AI095623 and DK035108 to E.R.; the NIH CA160398 to G.P.; and the NIH AI043477 to M.K., who is an American Cancer Society Research Professor and holds the Ben and Wanda Hildyard Chair for Mitochondrial and Metabolic Diseases.

Author information

Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

P.R.J., K.T., M.K. and E.R. designed the experiments. P.R.d.J., K.T., A.H., N.T. and S.B. performed the molecular biology experiments. K.T., P.R.d.J. and A.H. performed the intestinal organoid cultures. P.R.d.J., K.T., N.T. and S.B. performed the in vivo experiments. P.R.d.J. and J.D. performed the immunohistochemical stainings. M.C. generated Erk1−/−;Erk2fl/fl;Vil-CreERT2 mice. P.R.d.J., A.D.C. and G.P. designed and performed the experiments with colorectal cancer reporter lines and drug dose titrations. P.R.d.J., K.T. and E.R. wrote the manuscript.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Petrus R. de Jong.

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing financial interests.

Supplementary information

Supplementary Information

Supplementary Figures 1-8 and Supplementary Table 1 (PDF 9695 kb)

Rights and permissions

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons license, unless indicated otherwise in the credit line; if the material is not included under the Creative Commons license, users will need to obtain permission from the license holder to reproduce the material. To view a copy of this license, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

de Jong, P., Taniguchi, K., Harris, A. et al. ERK5 signalling rescues intestinal epithelial turnover and tumour cell proliferation upon ERK1/2 abrogation. Nat Commun 7, 11551 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1038/ncomms11551

Download citation

Further reading

Comments

By submitting a comment you agree to abide by our Terms and Community Guidelines. If you find something abusive or that does not comply with our terms or guidelines please flag it as inappropriate.

Search

Quick links

Nature Briefing

Sign up for the Nature Briefing newsletter — what matters in science, free to your inbox daily.

Get the most important science stories of the day, free in your inbox. Sign up for Nature Briefing