Abstract
When spinning particles, such as electrons and photons, undergo spin–orbit coupling, they can acquire an extra phase in addition to the wellknown dynamical phase. This extra phase is called the geometric phase (also known as the Berry phase), which plays an important role in a startling variety of physical contexts such as in photonics, condensed matter, highenergy and space physics. The geometric phase was originally discussed for a cyclically evolving physical system with an Abelian evolution, and was later generalized to noncyclic and nonAbelian cases, which are the most interesting fundamental subjects in this area and indicate promising applications in various fields. Here, we enable optical spin–orbit coupling in asymmetric microcavities and experimentally observe a noncyclic optical geometric phase acquired in a nonAbelian evolution. Our work is relevant to fundamental studies and implies promising applications by manipulating photons in onchip quantum devices.
Introduction
In optics, spin–orbit coupling leads to two important observable effects, the geometric phase^{1,2,3,4,5,6} and the spin Hall effect^{3,6,7,8}, which play an important role in a surprisingly large number of physical contexts^{7,9,10,11,12}. The geometric phase has been generalized from a cyclic and Abelian context to noncyclic and nonAbelian cases^{13,14,15}, which have been realized in many physical systems, such as spinning neutrons^{16} and superconducting artificial atoms^{17}. In optics, it is of fundamental interest to realize a noncyclic geometric phase acquired in a nonAbelian evolution by enabling optical spin–orbit coupling in a weakly anisotropic medium^{3,18}. Optical spin–orbit coupling has been observed in open systems by the refraction across an interface^{7} or in the propagation along helical waveguides^{3,19}.
Here we report on the spin–orbit coupling of light confined to a closed path within an asymmetric optical microcavity. The polarization state of light is found to change in both orientation and eccentricity due to the occurrence of a geometric phase together with a mode conversion, generating a noncyclic geometric phase in a nonAbelian evolution.
Results
Theory of light evolution applied to optical microcavities
Optical microcavities, which confine light to small volumes by resonant circulation in a dielectric medium, play an indispensable role in a wide range of applications and fundamental studies^{20}. In a general theory describing the evolution of light in a dielectric medium, a quantum mechanical diagonalization procedure was applied to the Maxwell equations and Berry’s phase theory^{18}, where the effective Hamiltonian takes the form:
Here p is the momentum operator, ɛ_{0}(r) represents the scalar isotropic component of the propagation medium, stands for a unit matrix, the matrix denotes the anisotropic component of the dielectric permittivity, λ is the wavelength, represents the gauge potential, and is the derivative of p. The Hamiltonian can be divided into three parts . The first part characterizes the ordinary light propagation and interference. The second part denotes the spin–orbit coupling of photons, and the third part describes the medium anisotropy^{18}.
In conventional optical whisperinggallerymode (WGM) microcavities, such as a cylindrical ring resonator (see Fig. 1a), the electric field vector does not change with respect to the wave vector k. In addition, the resonant light propagates along a closedloop trajectory, which is distinct from the open helical trajectories that have been widely used to enable the optical spin–orbit interactions^{2,3,19,21}. Unlike the propagation via helical trajectories, the wave vector k experiences a trivial evolution when propagating along a closed loop. As such, the optical spin–orbit interaction is irrelevant and the corresponding Hamiltonian contains only the part, which results in ordinary discrete eigenmodes in optical WGM resonators. Experimentally, the eigenmodes manifest themselves by discrete peaks in the resonant spectra. Each peak in the resonant spectrum is formed by selfinterference with an integer number of waves along the closedloop trajectory^{20,22}. In these systems the optical polarization states are conserved at each resonance.
However, optical spin–orbit coupling can be induced in specially designed cavity structures. For example, one can introduce topology into a WGM cavity by employing a Möbius strip^{23} as an optical microring cavity. Although the wave vector k experiences a trivial evolution in this geometry, the transverse electric field twists around during the propagation in the strip (see Fig. 1b). In this way, an effective orbital angular momentum (OAM), similar to that of an optical vortex^{24,25,26} or transformed light beam^{27}, is generated for the spin–orbit coupling. Thus, the effective Hamiltonian takes the form , where the spin–orbit coupling leads to the occurrence of a geometric phase. This extra phase leads to a noninteger number of waves for constructive interferences along a closedloop trajectory, which has been revealed in classical Möbiusring resonators^{28}. Similar to the previously reported helical waveguides^{3,29}, this behavior represents an Abelian evolution, where the polarization orientation varies, while the polarization eccentricity does not.
Here, we experimentally realize light evolution in the presence of both the spin–orbit interaction and the medium anisotropy in an onchip coneshaped microtube resonator. The coneshaped resonator (see Supplementary Figs 1 and 2) is an asymmetric tube made of a rolledup SiO_{x} thin film^{30} as schematically shown in Fig. 1c. The tube is around 7 μm in diameter with a wall thickness of ∼100 nm. In the microtube cavity, optical WGMtype resonances are established via optical selfinterferences along a closedloop trajectory guided by the cylindrical tube wall. To pump the resonances, a linearly polarized laser (at 532 nm) is focused on the larger diameter tube end, where resonant modes of higher quality (Q) factor exist (see Supplementary Fig. 2). The laser excites luminescent defects^{31} in the amorphous silicon oxide microtube, which emit light in the visible spectral range at room temperature. Due to the subwavelengththin tube wall, photons linearly polarized along the tube wall are allowed to circulate around a closed trajectory within the microtubes^{22}, which ensures that the initial state of the resonant light is linearly polarized with the polarization orientated around the tube axis. The photons circulating along the closed trajectory eventually escape from the microtube cavity and can then be measured and analyzed.
When the light propagates in the thinwalled microtube, the electric field vector rotates around the tube axis due to the coneshape of the microtube (see Fig. 1c). This rotation generates an effective OAM along the tube axis^{15}. In conventional WGM cylindrical cavities, the wave vector k (indicating the direction of the spin angular momentum ) of the resonant light is orthogonal to the tube axis; thus, there is no possibility to generate the spin–orbit interactions even if there is an OAM along the axis. However, at the largerdiameterend part of a coneshaped tube, the average refractive index is made to vary along the tube axis owing to the variation in the number of windings^{30}. In this particular geometry, the resonant trajectory slightly tilts out of plane (see Fig. 1c) to reduce the optical path according to Fermat’s principle (see Supplementary Note 3). It is this tilted trajectory which causes the spin angular momentum to be not orthogonal to the OAM and which, in turn, enables the coupling between spin and orbital degree of freedom . In addition, the resonant light experiences an anisotropic refractive index (see Supplementary Fig. 5) in the asymmetric tube when it propagates along a tilted trajectory, which contributes to the term.
The terms and determine the polarization evolution of the optical wave. By expanding the two terms in equation (1) in the basis of Pauli matrices (i=1,2,3), the expression exhibits a similar form to that of electrons under the interaction between spin and orbital magnetic moments, where the vector α plays the role of an ‘effective magnetic field’^{18} and is a vector formed of the Pauli matrices. Based on the Schrödinger equation, the polarization evolution equation reads^{13,18}
where the polarization state is comprised of right and left components in the circular polarization basis. A wellknown solution of equation (2) takes the form^{13,18}
where P represents the pathordering operator and is the linear polarization state parallel to the tube axis, which is the initial state in this work. The first term in the integral accounts for the Berry phase^{1,18}
The second term in the integral in equation (3) results in a factor C_{A} that originates from the anisotropy of the system. C_{A} enables the interplay between the two polarization states that gives rise to the mutual conversion of the right and left circular polarization components a_{+} and a_{−}. One should note that the tensor is nondiagonal due to the anisotropy of the medium. In our work the Berry phase is noncyclic; in general it takes the form^{15}
where a (a≡a(t)) is the final state after an evolution on an open path in the parameter space. Unlike for the cyclic case, a noncyclic geometric phase usually cannot easily be derived from equation (5), and practical measurements could be more complicated^{32,33,34}. In the present work, we show a different convenient strategy to measure this noncyclic geometric phase.
Starting from equation (3), one can present the final polarization state in terms of the Jones vector^{3} (see Supplementary Note 6), where the time variable is omitted as we have only access to the measured polarization state at the end of its evolution,
The terms denote the geometric phase acquired for each circular basis state. and represent the redistributed circular components after the mode conversion, where (see Supplementary Note 6)
It is the nondiagonal element iC_{A} in the matrix in equation (6) that leads to the coupling and, consequently, to a mutual conversion between the two circular polarization components a_{+} and a_{−}.
Characterizations of optical polarization evolution
For optical characterizations, a 50 × objective lens was used to focus the excitation laser beam on the tube wall, while the emitted photons were collected by the same objective and sent to the spectrometer. The polarization states of the resonant light were examined by a fixed polarizer in front of the detector of the spectrometer and a rotatable λ/2 plate. By rotating the λ/2 plate, the polarization orientation of the measured light can be rotated stepbystep and subsequently filtered by the polarizer and recorded by the detector. In this way, both the polarization orientation (with respect to the tube axis) and the polarization eccentricity can be resolved.
It is well known that the resonant light in WGM microcavities is either transverse magnetic or transverse electric linearly polarized^{22}. For symmetric microtubes, the measured electric field of the light is linearly polarized and oriented parallel to the tube axis for the transverse magnetic modes^{22}. However, in coneshaped microtube cavities the resonant light is no longer linearly polarized. Figure 2b shows the intensity maps for the linearly (Lp) and elliptically polarized (Ep) modes as a function of the orientation angle (0–360°), which were respectively measured from a symmetric and an asymmetric tube. In the intensity map measured from the symmetric tube, the polarization state is clearly shown to be linearly polarized along the tube axis. In the asymmetric tube case, the varying but unbroken polarization trace is characteristic for elliptical polarization. Moreover, the major axis of the ellipse, or in other words the polarization orientation, is found to tilt away from the tube axis. The polar plots in Fig. 2c clearly reveal the eccentricity and the tilt angle (ϕ∼44.5°) of one of the measured polarization states after evolution in the asymmetric microtube cavity. These unusual phenomena go beyond the conventional knowledge of optical WGM resonances in microcavities and can be attributed to the occurrence of a geometric phase in a nonAbelian evolution of light.
As mentioned above, the initial state of the resonant light in the microtube cavity is linearly polarized. A linear polarization state is comprised of the inphase components of the right and left circular polarization components as a(0)=a_{+}(0)+a_{−}(0), with the same probability amplitude , as schematically shown in Fig. 2a. Due to the spin–orbit coupling, the right and left circular components acquire a geometric phase with opposite signs: , where ϕ is a geometric phase^{3}, and are redistributed vector amplitudes for each component due to the mode conversion, as described in equation (7). As shown in Fig. 2a, the conversion of amplitudes between the two circular components leads to a change from a linear to an elliptical polarization, while the geometric phase causes the orientation of the major axis of the polarization to tilt by an angle (equal to ϕ) with respect to the initial orientation. Since the final output state differs from the initial one, the evolution generates a noncyclic geometric phase. Here we show that the noncyclic geometric phase can be readily measured by simply recording the tilt angle of the light polarization ellipse. The change of the circular bases is evidence for the lack of independent modes, which is a consequence of the intricate nonAbelian evolution as described above. Since the photons are guided in the tube wall and their polarization states vary smoothly, the evolution can be described by an adiabatic process^{2,3}.
The resonant light experiences the spin–orbit coupling in an anisotropic medium when resonating in an asymmetric microtube cavity, hence the polarization state (described by the eccentricity and the tilt angle) continuously changes as the light resonates in the microtube, as schematically shown in Fig. 3a. However, the polarization state can only be measured when the light escapes from the microtube cavity, at which point the final state of the evolution has been reached. In order to depict the evolution trace, a series of final polarization states were measured from different asymmetric tubes, in which the resonant light experiences different extents of the polarization evolution. Figure 3b shows these series of polarization states plotted on a Poincaré sphere. In our measurements, tilt angles (Berry phase) up to ∼44.5° and an eccentricity of 0.7 have been recorded. It is found that a larger eccentricity is accompanied by a larger tilt angle (ϕ) due to their coupled evolution in equation (3). The corresponding evolution trace can be well reproduced by equation (6), indicating a good agreement between the theoretical model and measurements (see Supplementary Note 6). In addition, we have performed polarization measurements for different mode frequencies in the same tube cavity and found that the tilt angle as well as the eccentricity is independent of the wavelength. This is a clear evidence that the effect is of purely geometric, rather than dynamical origin.
In contrast to previous reports on optical spin–orbit coupling^{3,7,8}, where the right and left handed circular polarization bases are often spatially separated, here we do not observe such a spatial separation of the spin components, but rather an amplitude conversion between basis vectors during the evolution, as discussed above. This process is systematically shown in Fig. 4 by comparing the variation of the squared moduli of the coefficients and accompanied by the tilt angle ϕ. In the measured elliptical polarization curves, the maximum intensity represents the sum of the two moduli squared , while the minimum represents the difference . Based on the measured results, the respective squared amplitudes for the right and left circular components are extracted. The two squared vector amplitudes vary in an opposite way and therefore result in the vector splitting of the spinning photons in a Hilbert space. The evolution traces of the two vector amplitudes agree well with the theoretical model of equation (7), as shown in Fig. 4.
Discussion
In a previous report, light propagating around a dielectric microsphere cavity was used to mimic the effect of gravitational lensing^{35}. Furthermore, the analogy between a static gravitational field and an anisotropic medium has been utilized to realize a spin–Hall effect triggered by gravitational field^{36}. In this sense, our asymmetric microtube cavity could provide an effective analogue for the laboratory study of the light evolution in a gravitational field. Moreover, in WGM microcavities light is confined in a small volume. This avoids a large space required in the previously reported open lightpath systems^{3,29}, and is therefore attractive for integrating photonic applications on a chip. This finding may motivate the search for many novel applications, such as those for onchip quantum information technologies, or exploiting interactions of light with chiral molecules^{37}.
Our work shows that the noncyclic geometric phase and the mode conversion for degenerate photon systems, in a nonAbelian evolution, can be readily demonstrated in a compact optical microtube cavity. The conelike asymmetric optical microcavities establish an ideal platform to realize spin–orbit coupling for the examination of nontrivial topological effects in the context of a nonAbelian evolution. In our microtube structures, the geometric phase can be directly measured by simply monitoring the polarization tilt angles, while the eccentricities indicate the mode conversion between the right and left circular bases. Geometric phase and amplitude variations of components in the circular polarization basis reveal essential physical processes in a nonAbelian evolution, which is of interest for both fundamental and applied physics.
Methods
Microtube preparation
In our experiment, tubular microcavities were prepared by rollingup prestrained nanomembranes^{30,38,39}. The conelike microtubes were selfassembled by curling up a circularly patterned SiO_{x}/SiO_{2} bilayer nanomembrane on a silicon substrate^{30}, forming an asymmetric microtube. After rollup, a 30nmthick hafnium oxide film was grown on the microtube surface using atomiclayerdeposition. The tube is around 7 μm in diameter with a wall thickness of about 100 nm. The tube length is 45 μm and the polarization states were measured at the largerdiameterend, where highQ resonant modes exist^{30}. All highQ resonant modes in an asymmetric tube exhibit the same output polarization state.
Optical measurements
The optical polarization analyzer consists of a fixed polarization beam splitter in front of a spectrometer detector and an assisted rotatable half wave plate. The microtubular cavities are measured using a laser confocal microscope (50 × ), by which the excitation laser beam (at 532 nm) is focused at an area of 1 μm^{2} on the tube wall. The emission signal is collected through the same objective and then sent to the polarization analyzer. The initial orientation of the polarization beam splitter and half wave plate is calibrated by a predefined linearly polarized light, where the polarization orientation is set parallel to the tube axis. In the measurements, the eccentricities as well as the major axis orientation of the emission light polarizations are revealed by rotating the half wave plate (in a step of 2°).
Additional information
How to cite this article: Ma, L. B. et al. Spin–orbit coupling of light in asymmetric microcavities. Nat. Commun. 7:10983 doi: 10.1038/ncomms10983 (2016).
References
 1
Berry, M. V. Quantal phase factors accompanying adiabatic changes. Proc. R. Soc. London Ser. A 392, 45–57 (1984).
 2
Berry, M. V. Interpreting the anholonomy of coiled light. Nature 326, 277–278 (1987).
 3
Bliokh, K. Y., Niv, A., Kleiner, V. & Hasman, E. Geometrodynamics of spinning light. Nat. Photon 2, 748–753 (2008).
 4
van Enk, S. J. Geometric phase, transformations of gaussian light beams and angular momentum transfer. Opt. Commun. 102, 59–64 (1993).
 5
Souza, C. E. R., Huguenin, J. A. O., Milman, P. & Khoury, A. Z. Topological phase for spinorbit transformations on a laser beam. Phys. Rev. Lett. 99, 160401 (2007).
 6
Bliokh, K. Y., RodriguezFortuno, F. J., Nori, F. & Zayats, A. V. Spinorbit interactions of light. Nat. Photon 9, 796–808 (2015).
 7
Hosten, O. & Kwiat, P. Observation of the spin Hall effect of light via weak measurements. Science 319, 787–790 (2008).
 8
Yin, X., Ye, Z., Rho, J., Wang, Y. & Zhang, X. Photonic spin Hall effect at metasurfaces. Science 339, 1405–1407 (2013).
 9
Shapere, A. & Wilczek, F. Geometric Phase in Physics Vol. 5,, pp 45–104 (World Scientific (1989).
 10
Hsieh, D. et al. Observation of Unconventional Quantum Spin Textures in Topological Insulators. Science 323, 919–922 (2009).
 11
Milman, P. & Mosseri, R. Topological phase for entangled twoqubit states. Phys. Rev. Lett. 90, 230403 (2003).
 12
Du, J., Zhu, J., Shi, M., Peng, X. & Suter, D. Experimental observation of a topological phase in the maximally entangled state of a pair of qubits. Phys. Rev. A 76, 042121 (2007).
 13
Wilczek, F. & Zee, A. Appearance of gauge structure in simple dynamical systems. Phys. Rev. Lett. 52, 2111–2114 (1984).
 14
Zak, J. Berry’s geometrical phase for noncyclic hamiltonians. Europhys. Lett. 9, 615 (1989).
 15
Garcia de Polavieja, G. Noncyclic geometric phase shift for quantal revivals. Phys. Rev. Lett. 81, 1–5 (1998).
 16
Wagh, A. G., Rakhecha, V. C., Fischer, P. & Ioffe, A. Neutron interferometric observation of noncyclic phase. Phys. Rev. Lett. 81, 1992–1995 (1998).
 17
Abdumalikov, A. A. Jr et al. Experimental realization of nonAbelian nonadiabatic geometric gates. Nature 496, 482–485 (2013).
 18
Bliokh, K. Y., Frolov, D. Y. & Kravtsov, Y. A. NonAbelian evolution of electromagnetic waves in a weakly anisotropic inhomogeneous medium. Phys. Rev. A 75, 053821 (2007).
 19
Tomita, A. & Chiao, R. Y. Observation of Berry’s topological phase by use of an optical fiber. Phys. Rev. Lett. 57, 937–940 (1986).
 20
Vahala, K. J. Optical microcavities. Nature 424, 839 (2003).
 21
Chiao, R. Y. & Wu, Y.S. Manifestations of Berry’s topological phase for the photon. Phys. Rev. Lett. 57, 933–936 (1986).
 22
Bolaños Quiñones, V. A. et al. Optical resonance tuning and polarization of thinwalled tubular microcavities. Opt. Lett. 34, 2345–2347 (2009).
 23
Tanda, S. et al. Crystal topology: A Mobius strip of single crystals. Nature 417, 397–398 (2002).
 24
Marrucci, L., Manzo, C. & Paparo, D. Optical spintoorbital angular momentum conversion in inhomogeneous anisotropic media. Phys. Rev. Lett. 96, 163905 (2006).
 25
Nye, J. F. & Berry, M. V. Dislocations in wave trains. Proc. R. Soc. Lond. A 336, 165–190 (1974).
 26
Souza, C. E. R., Huguenin, J. A. O. & Khoury, A. Z. Topological phase structure of vector vortex beams. J. Opt. Soc. Am. A 31, 1007–1012 (2014).
 27
Galvez, E. J. et al. Geometric phase associated with mode transformations of optical beams bearing orbital angular momentum. Phys. Rev. Lett. 90, 203901 (2003).
 28
Ballon, D. J. & Voss, H. U. Classical möbiusring resonators exhibit FermionBoson rotational symmetry. Phys. Rev. Lett. 101, 247701 (2008).
 29
Chiao, R. Y. et al. Observation of a topological phase by means of a nonplanar MachZehnder interferometer. Phys. Rev. Lett. 60, 1214–1217 (1988).
 30
Bolaños Quiñones, V. A., Ma, L., Li, S., Jorgensen, M., Kiravittaya, S. & Schmidt, O. G. Enhanced optical axial confinement in asymmetric microtube cavities rolled up from circularshaped nanomembranes. Opt. Lett. 37, 4284–4286 (2012).
 31
Ma, L. B., Schmidt, T., Jäger, C. & Huisken, F. Evolution of multiplepeak photoluminescence of Gedoped silicon oxide nanoparticles upon thermal annealing. Phys. Rev. B 82, 165411 (2010).
 32
Sjöqvist, E. et al. Geometric phases for mixed states in interferometry. Phys. Rev. Lett. 85, 2845–2849 (2000).
 33
Weinfurter, H. & Badurek, G. Measurement of Berry’s phase for noncyclic evolution. Phys. Rev. Lett. 64, 1318–1321 (1990).
 34
Filipp, S., Hasegawa, Y., Loidl, R. & Rauch, H. Noncyclic geometric phase due to spatial evolution in a neutron interferometer. Phys. Rev. A 72, 021602 (2005).
 35
Sheng, C., Liu, H., Wang, Y., Zhu, S. N. & Genov, D. A. Trapping light by mimicking gravitational lensing. Nat. Photon 7, 902–906 (2013).
 36
Gosselin, P., Bérard, A. & Mohrbach, H. Spin Hall effect of photons in a static gravitational field. Phys. Rev. D 75, 084035 (2007).
 37
Tang, Y. & Cohen, A. E. Enhanced enantioselectivity in excitation of chiral molecules by superchiral light. Science 332, 333–336 (2011).
 38
Schmidt, O. G. & Eberl, K. Nanotechnology: Thin solid films roll up into nanotubes. Nature 410, 168–168 (2001).
 39
Prinz, V. Y. et al. Freestanding and overgrown InGaAs/GaAs nanotubes, nanohelices and their arrays. Physica E 6, 828–831 (2000).
Acknowledgements
The authors gratefully acknowledge V. Bolaños and S. Kumar for experimental assistance and M. Daghofer for fruitful discussions. This work was supported by the Volkswagen Foundation (I/84072), the U.S. Air Force Office of Scientific Research MURI program under grant FA95500910550 and the DFG priority program FOR 1713. S.L.L. thanks the financial support from China Scholarship Council (CSC, file no. 2008617109). Y.Y. thanks the financial support from China Scholarship Council (CSC, file no. 201206090008). M.R.J thanks the Alexander von Humboldt Foundation for financial support. L.B.M. thanks the support from National Science Foundation of China (NSFC) with the grant no. 11104343.
Author information
Affiliations
Contributions
L.B.M. and O.G.S. had the idea for this experiment; L.B.M. prepared the samples; L.B.M. and S.L.L. performed the measurements and analyzed the data; M.H. and J.B.G. provided theoretical support on optical spin–orbit coupling, which culminated in the model to explain the observed phenomenon formulated by L.B.M., S.L.L. Y.Y. and V.M.F.; L.B.M. drafted the manuscript with the assistance of O.G.S., M.H., J.B.G., M.R.J. and V.M.F.
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Competing interests
The authors declare no competing financial interests.
Supplementary information
Supplementary Information
Supplementary Figures 18, Supplementary Notes 16 Supplementary References. (PDF 962 kb)
Rights and permissions
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons license, unless indicated otherwise in the credit line; if the material is not included under the Creative Commons license, users will need to obtain permission from the license holder to reproduce the material. To view a copy of this license, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
About this article
Cite this article
Ma, L., Li, S., Fomin, V. et al. Spin–orbit coupling of light in asymmetric microcavities. Nat Commun 7, 10983 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1038/ncomms10983
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Further reading

Steering Directional Light Emission and Mode Chirality through Postshaping of Cavity Geometry
Laser & Photonics Reviews (2020)

Dynamic tuning of photonplasmon interaction based on threedimensionally confined microtube cavities
Optics Letters (2020)

Spinorbit interaction of light in threedimensional microcavities
Physical Review A (2020)

Silicon‐Based Integrated Label‐Free Optofluidic Biosensors: Latest Advances and Roadmap
Advanced Materials Technologies (2020)

Selective Out‐of‐Plane Optical Coupling between Vertical and Planar Microrings in a 3D Configuration
Advanced Optical Materials (2020)
Comments
By submitting a comment you agree to abide by our Terms and Community Guidelines. If you find something abusive or that does not comply with our terms or guidelines please flag it as inappropriate.