Abstract
The ratchet phenomenon is a means to get directed transport without net forces. Originally conceived to rectify stochastic motion and describe operational principles of biological motors, the ratchet effect can be used to achieve controllable coherent quantum transport. This transport is an ingredient of several perspective quantum devices including atomic chips. Here we examine coherent transport of ultracold atoms in a rocking quantum ratchet. This is realized by loading a rubidium atomic Bose–Einstein condensate into a periodic optical potential subjected to a biharmonic temporal drive. The achieved longtime coherence allows us to resolve resonance enhancement of the atom transport induced by avoided crossings in the Floquet spectrum of the system. By tuning the strength of the temporal modulations, we observe a bifurcation of a single resonance into a doublet. Our measurements reveal the role of interactions among Floquet eigenstates for quantum ratchet transport.
Introduction
A controllable dissipationless, fully coherent quantum transport of ultracold atoms is a prerequisite for several applications, ranging from quantum information processing with atom chips^{1,2} to highprecision BECgravimetry^{3,4}. There are several ways to reach this goal^{5,6,7} and the ratchet effect is one of them^{8,9,10,11,12}. The essence of this effect is that a particle in a periodic potential can be set into a directed motion by using zeromean timeperiodic modulations of the potential only^{13,14}.
There exists a variety of different ratchet devices^{13,14}, with setupsensitive conditions for occurrence of directed transport. Of prime importance in this context is the identification of the dynamical symmetries which prevent the appearance of the directed motion^{12}. A proper choice of the system parameters, especially of the driving field, leads to the breaking of all nogo symmetries to yield an average net current.
There are two popular Hamiltonian ratchet setups for both, classical^{13,14} and quantum systems^{12,15,16,17,18,19,20,21}. While flashing ratchets are characterized by multiplicative driven potentials, U(x)=V(x)F(t), rocking ratchets are realized with periodically tilted potentials, U(x)=V(x)+F(t)x. In the flashing mode of operation the forcing enters multiplicative, whereas it is of additive character for the rocking mode. As a consequence, the two setups belong to different dynamical symmetry groups^{12}. Particularly, the rocking ratchet can be realized with a singleharmonic potential while a flashing ratchet needs a potential with at least two spatial harmonics^{12}.
The symmetry analysis alone, however, fails to predict the transport direction and its average velocity. These quantities depend on the inherent mechanisms specific to the system’s nature and control parameters. Physical intuition may sometimes apply, for example, a high velocity can be expected in the case of resonant driving, when the modulating frequency matches the characteristic frequency of the potential, as was verified with experiments using cold atoms in the regime of classical ratchets^{22,23,24} and, as well, with a flashing quantum ratchet realized with a Bose–Einstein condensate of rubidium atoms^{11}.
An intriguing phenomenon was predicted in numerical simulations of quantum coherent ratchets^{10}. Namely, the ratchet current can be substantially boosted by tuning specific Floquet states of a periodically driven potential into an avoided crossing^{25,26,27}. It was also predicted that these transport resonances follow an universal bifurcation scenario upon increasing the driving strength. The scenario is dictated by generic properties of the Floquet spectra of quantum ratchets. This theoretical result provides a possibility of a more subtle (as compared with the symmetrybased scheme) control of the quantum ratchet transport. The Floquet resonances were theoretically observed with both abovementioned driving schemes^{10}. However, an experimental verification requires a regime of coherent quantum transport on time scales much larger than the period of the driving.
Our objective here is the resolution of the theoretically predicted Floquet resonances in experiment, by using an a.c.driven optical potential and an atomic Bose–Einstein condensate. In contrast to the previous experiment using a quantum flashing ratchet^{11}, where a biharmonic potential building upon the dispersion of multiphoton Raman transitions was used, the rocking setup requires only a standard sinusoidal standingwave optical potential. For alkali atoms with a selectronic ground state configuration L=0, the absence of the second harmonic in the optical potential is beneficial because it allows for much longer coherence times as compared with those achieved with the flashing setup. Therefore, by implementing the rocking scheme, we can observe Floquet resonances in the mean velocity of ultracold atoms and the splitting of a single resonance into a doublet of transport resonances.
Results
Experimental realization
The quantum rocking ratchet is described by the timeperiodic Hamiltonian^{10,12}
where m denotes the mass of the atom, k=2π/λ is the wavevector of the potential, where λ≃783.5 nm is the wavelength of the laser beams used in the experiment, and V_{0} is the tunable lattice depth. A timeperiodic force, F(t)=F(t+T), is implemented by modulating one of the two counterpropagating lattice beams with a timedependent frequency Ω(t). In the lab frame, this field produces a moving lattice potential, V(x′,t)=V_{0} cos[2kx′–f(t)], , where the temporal evolution starts at the (starting) time t_{0}∈[0,T]. This parameter specifies the strength of the rocking force when the modulations are switched on. In the comoving frame, this corresponds to a stationary potential subjected to a rocking inertial force , see (1). Similar to the setup in refs 22, 23, 24 we use a biharmonic frequency modulation
where Ω_{0} denotes the modulation amplitude, ω_{m} is the modulation frequency, and β and θ are the relative amplitude and relative phase of the second harmonic. Thus, in the comoving frame this corresponds to the Hamiltonian in (1) with a rocking force F(t) of the form^{10}
with and .
In our experiment, a Bose–Einstein condensate (BEC) of ^{87}Rb atoms is produced first in the m_{F}=0 spin projection of the F=1 hyperfine ground state by evaporative cooling. After that the condensate expands freely for 3 ms and converts the internal interaction energy of the dense atomic cloud into kinetic energy. From the resulting velocity distribution, a narrow slice of the momentum width Δp=0.2ℏk is separated with a 330μs long Raman pulse, transferring atoms into the m_{F}=−1 spin projection state. The atoms are then loaded into a rocked periodic potential formed by an optical standing wave, detuned 3 nm to the red end of the rubidium D2line. After the interaction with the optical potential, the atomic cloud is allowed to expand freely for 15–20 ms and then an absorption image is recorded. By using timeofflight images, we analyse the velocity distribution of the atomic cloud, see Fig. 1. The interaction with the lattice potential during a time span [t_{0}, t_{0}+t] results in a diffraction pattern with a set of discrete peaks, separated by two photon recoils, with the nth order peak corresponding to a momentum of p_{n}=2ℏkn; see Fig. 1a. The mean momentum of the atomic cloud is calculated as , where b_{n} is the relative population of the nth momentum state. Due to finiteness of the contrast and sensitivity of the imaging system, we restrict the summation to n=−3,…,3.
Dependence of atom current on the modulation starting time
The atomic current produced by the rocking quantum ratchet, equations (1, 2, 3), can be evaluated in terms of the eigenfunctions of the operator which propagates the system over one period of the driving, U(T), . These eigenfunctions are stroboscopic snapshots of the timeperiodic Floquet states {φ_{α}(t)}_{α=1,2,...}, φ_{α}(t+T)〉=φ_{α}(t)〉 (refs 28, 29, 30). In the lab frame, the system Hamiltonian is a spatiallyperiodic operator and its reciprocal space is spanned by the quasienergy Bloch bands, ɛ_{α}(κ), κ∈[−π/L_{lat}, π/L_{lat}], with L_{lat}=λ/2, α=1,2,..., and the Floquet states are parameterized by the quasimomentum values ℏκ, φ_{α,κ}(t)〉(ref. 31). A nonvanishing transport is expected for κ=0 when and . This choice of parameters results in the breaking of the sole dynamical symmetry,
preventing the desymmetrization of the eigenstates^{8,9,10,11}. The average velocity of αth Floquet state φ_{α,κ}(t)〉 at quasimomentum κ is determined by the local slope, υ_{α,κ}=ℏ^{−1}∂ɛ_{α}(κ)/∂κ (refs 8, 9, 10). An initial wave packet can be expanded over the instantaneous Floquet basis, . The distribution f(κ) is determined by the momentum profile of the initial wave packet, which is transformed into the profile in the κspace. The velocity after an overall interaction time t then reads^{12}
where the last term on the rhs accounts for the interference between different Floquet states. Its time average disappears in the asymptotic limit, , provided that either there are at least several Floquet states which overlap substantially with the initial wavefunction that is welllocalized at κ=0, f(κ)≈δ(κ)^{10}, or the initial wave packet is spread over the quasimomentum space (we discuss the corresponding mechanism in the next section). In the latter case it is enough to have two Floquet bands effectively overlapping with the initial wave packet; this latter situation is the case in our experiment; see Fig. 2c. The theoretical quantity m·v(t, t_{0}) should be compared with the mean momentum of the atomic cloud, , a quantity measured in the experiment and defined in the previous section.
Because of the explicit timedependence of the Floquet states, the weights C_{α,κ}(t_{0}) depend on the starting time t_{0}, so that the asymptotic velocity depends on the starting time even when the initial wave function and all other parameters are held fixed^{10,11}. We first studied this quantum feature, namely the dependence of the atomic transport on the starting time t_{0}∈[0, T], T=2π/ω_{m}. Our Fig. 1b depicts the experimental results for two values of θ, π/18 (filled blue dots) and 17π/18 (filled green squares). In both cases we observe a strong dependence of the ratchet transport on the starting time t_{0}. Theory predicts a particular symmetry, reading, . This symmetry follows from the invariance of the quantum Hamiltonian (1–3) under the transformation of θ and t_{0}, combined with the double reversal {t,x}→{−t, −x} and complex conjugation. The result of this transformation applied to the experimentally measured momentum dependencies is depicted with Fig. 1c. Within experimental uncertainty, the momentum dependencies perfectly match each other. We interpret this finding as key evidence for the coherent character of the dynamics of our quantum ratchet.
Temporal evolution of the mean atomic momentum
Figure 2a depicts the mean atomic momentum , where 〈...〉 denotes the averaging of the momentum over the starting time t_{0}, versus the number of modulation periods. The interference between the contributing Floquet states comes into play immediately after the switchon of the modulations and induces the appearance of a nonzero current already after several periods of the modulations. Upon increasing elapsing interaction time t, the mean momentum exhibits several oscillations, as expected from the interference beating (note the last term on the rhs of equation (5), and saturates towards a nearly constant value. The initial wavefunction of the loaded BEC can be effectively represented as a coherent superposition of two Floquet states, see Fig. 2c. The spectral gap at the avoided crossing point (near κ=0), ω_{beat}=δɛ/ℏ, δɛ=ɛ_{α}–ɛ_{β}, specifies the time scale of the interference beating. The theoretical model yields ω_{beat}=0.04ω_{m}, cf. Fig. 2c, which matches the time, t_{max}≈20T, after which the first maximum appears in the dependence versus interaction time t.
The finite momentum dispersion of the BEC produces an additional, while fully coherent, dampinglike effect for the time evolution of the current. Namely, contributions of Floquet eigenstates from different κ—bands, characterized by continuously changing quasienergies, ɛ_{α}(κ), cf. Fig. 2c, result upon elapsing interaction time in a selfaveraging of the interference term v_{beat} towards zero. Thus, the finite momentum width of the initial packet removes the need for the additional runtime averaging of the current in order to obtain the asymptotic velocity v_{a}(t_{0}) (this averaging was used in ref. 10 when calculating ratchet dynamics of the wave packet f(κ)=δ(κ)]. For a broader momentum BEC slice, this effect causes with increasingly elapsing interaction time t a substantial damping of the oscillations, note the filled green squares in panel Fig. 2a.
Detection of transport resonances
We next turn to the issue of quantum transport resonances present in coherently rocking quantum ratchets, with both harmonic amplitudes . A theoretical analysis is elucidative in the limit f(κ)=δ(κ) (the analysis for the general case can be performed by using the recipe in ref. 32). When the phase , the system (1–3) obeys timereversal symmetry so that all Floquet states become nontransporting, υ_{α,κ=0}≡0. An asymptotic current is absent though a transient current is still possible due to the abovediscussed interference effects. From the symmetry analysis of the Schrödinger equation with the Hamiltonian (1–3), it follows that the dependence of the averaged (over t_{0}) asymptotic velocity v_{a}(θ)=〈v_{a}(θ;t_{0})〉 on θ obeys v_{a}(θ)=−v_{a}(θ±π)=−v_{a}(−θ) (ref. 10). The results of experimental measurements nicely fit this theoretical prediction, see Fig. 2b.
Theoretically one may find^{10} a resonantlike increase of the average current versus θ when tuning the amplitude of the driving. All Floquet states are ordered with respect to their averaged kinetic energy in ascending order α=1,.... The Floquet state φ_{1}(t) has the lowest kinetic energy and any initial wavefunction which has a lower kinetic energy overlaps with this state mainly. This state is strongly affected by the change of the potential shape and thus the corresponding dependence ɛ_{1}(θ) exhibits noticeable dispersion upon the variation of θ, with a ‘tip’, either minimumlike or maximumlike, at the point of maximal asymmetry, θ=±π/2; note the the bottom sketch in Fig. 3a. Floquet states with high kinetic energies possess large average velocities . We call them ‘ballistic states’. The quasienergy dependence on θ of a typical ballistic state, ɛ_{α=n}(θ), , is close to a straight line because the state is only weakly affected by the variations of the potential shape.
Even when being distant on the energy scale, the two bands, α=1 and α=n, can be brought into an avoided crossing on the quasienergy scale, ɛ_{α}∈[−ℏω/2, ℏω/2], by tuning the amplitudes of the modulating force, A_{1} and A_{2} (refs 10, 27). Due to the paraboliclike structure of the dependence ɛ_{1}(θ), the two states always meet first (if they do) at the points θ=±π/2, see second (from the bottom) sketch in Fig. 3a. The eigenstates mix at these avoided crossings^{33}, so that their wave functions exchange their structures. This effect leads to an increase of the average velocity of the Floquet state with minimal kinetic energy. Because the crossing is forbidden, a further increase of the modulation strength causes a bifurcation of the avoided crossing point into two avoided crossing points, with the latter moving apart upon even further increase, as it shown on third and forth (from the bottom) sketches on Fig. 3a. For an initial wavefunction which substantially overlaps with the Floquet state assuming minimal kinetic energy the ‘mixing’ of the Floquet states will reveal itself through a resonancelike behaviour of the velocity dependence 〈v_{a}〉 (ref. 10). The particular choice of the initial lowenergy wave function, for example the zeroplane wave 0〉 or the ground state of the stationary potential V(x), is not essential because it does modify the results only slightly. The avoided crossing should not be sharp, however, otherwise the beating time t_{beat}=2πℏ/Δɛ will be larger than the time scale of the experiment and the mixing effect cannot be detected.
Figure 3b depicts the mean momentum of the atomic cloud as a function of the phase θ for different values of the amplitude Ω_{0}. For small values of Ω_{0}, we observe an enhancement of transport at the point θ=π/2. It is attributed to a local contact of Floquet states as indicated on the two lower panels on Fig. 3a. For larger values of the amplitude Ω_{0}, the peak splits into a doublet. This bifurcation is attributed to the splitting of a single avoided crossing point as depicted on the top panel of Fig. 3a.
We also performed numerical simulations of the ratchet dynamics by using the model Hamiltonian in equations (1, 2, 3). Figure 4a,b depicts the Floquet band structure in κspace at θ=π/2 obtained for the parameter set used in the experiment. The width and colour of the band indicate the relative populations (additionally averaged over starting times t_{0}) of the bands for an initial Gaussian wave packet. The obtained numerical results confirm that for the chosen set of parameters and the chosen initial condition the system dynamics indeed is governed by two bands, a Floquet band exhibiting minimal kinetic energy (the corresponding band assumes a flat line) and a ballistic band.
For the modulation amplitude Ω_{0}=70 kHz, Fig. 4a, there occurs an avoided crossing between the Floquet state with minimal kinetic energy and the ballistic state. This avoided crossing is responsible for the appearance of the resonant singlepeak in the atomic current. On the other hand, for Ω_{0}=122 kHz, Fig. 4b, there is almost no interaction between the ballistic state and the lowenergy state. This explains the minimum in the momentum dependence at θ=π/2, cf. the top panel on Fig. 3a. The bifurcated avoided crossings are shifted from the point θ=π/2; the latter causes the formation of a doublepeak pattern in the momentum dependence versus θ.
Discussion
In conclusion, we demonstrate the control of coherent quantum transport in a rocking quantum ratchet by engineering avoided crossings between Floquet states. Rocking quantum ratchets allow for an experimentally longlasting coherent transport regime and thus make possible the observation of specific bifurcation scenarios, such as those transport resonances. Our results give direct experimental evidence for the interaction between Floquet states of the driven system to determine the directed atomic current, enabling a finetuned control of transport of ultracold matter in the fully coherent limit.
Other problems for which coherent controllable interactions between Floquet states are beneficial include quantum systems containing a leak^{34,35,36} or photonic systems with losses^{37,38}, where tunable external modulations can create longlived dynamical modes. Periodically modulated optical potentials can also be put to work as tunable quantum ‘metamaterials’. This scenario also allows the sculpturing of materials with Dirac cones in the quasienergy spectrum by subtle engineering of avoided crossings between designated Floquet states. To achieve such Dirac points, the corresponding avoided crossing has to be sufficiently sharp, which means the difference between the quasienergies of the participating Floquet states, Δɛ, must assume values smaller than the characteristic time τ ∝ 1/v, where v is the velocity of the atomic beam moving across the optical potential. The avoided crossing in κspace would then be ignored during the corresponding motion along the Floquet band^{27}. Because this condition (to have a sharp avoided crossing) is opposite to what we utilized in this work (to have a broad avoided crossing, in order to resolve it on the time scale of the experiment) this latter perspective is even more appealing. The coherence time of the order 100T can be sufficient to meet the above condition. Possible applications of this idea include the study of Klein tunnelling^{39,40}, or also the observation of interacting relativistic wave equations phenomena, such as a chiral confinement^{41} in a.c.driven systems.
Methods
Numerical simulation
In order to reproduce the experimental measurements, we accounted for a finite width of the initial wave function and performed simulations for a Gaussian initial wave packet. If the initial packet is not too broad and welllocalized within the first Brillouin zone the neglect of its tale contributions to the overall current produces a uniform rescaling of the ratchet current. This resolves the issue of the finite contrast resolution when calculating diffraction peak populations obtained in the experiments. However, it also leads to an overestimation of the current. In order to fit the measurements, we did perform numerical simulations with a Gaussian wave packet with a dispersion (being the fitting parameter used in our case) five times smaller than that used in the experiments. The region κ=[ℏk, ℏk] was sliced with 500 equidistant quasimomentum subspaces, assuming the initial state being in the form of the plane wave. We have also performed simulations assuming the Bloch groundsate of the undriven potential as the initial wave function (within each κslice). The obtained results only slightly differ from the presented ones. We propagate the wave functions independently and after an interaction time t sum the velocities by weighting them with the Gaussian distribution. Similar to the experiment, these results were averaged over eight different values of t_{0}. The obtained dependencies are in very good agreement with the experimental data, see thin coloured lines in Figs 2a and 3b.
Experimental details
Our experiment uses an alloptical approach to produce a quantum degenerate sample of rubidium atoms, which subsequently is loaded onto a modulated optical lattice potential to realize a rocking ratchet setup. Bose–Einstein condensation of rubidium (^{87}Rb) atoms is reached by evaporative cooling of atoms in a quasistatic optical dipole trap, formed by a tightly focused horizontally oriented optical beam derived from a CO_{2}laser with optical power of 36 W operating near 10.6 μm wavelength. A spinpolarized BEC is realized by applying an additional magnetic field gradient during the final stage of the evaporation, in this case a condensate of 5 × 10^{4} atoms in the m_{F}=0 spin projection of the F=1 hyperfine electronic ground state component^{42,43}. A homogeneous magnetic bias of 2.9 G (corresponding to a Δω_{z}≈2π·2 MHz splitting between adjacent Zeeman sublevels) is applied, which removes the degeneracy of magnetic sublevels.
By letting the condensate expand freely for a period of 3 ms, the atomic interaction energy is converted into kinetic energy. The measured momentum width of the condensate the atoms then reach is Δp=0.8ℏk. We subsequently use a 330μs long Raman pulse to cut out a narrow slice of Δp=0.2ℏk width from the initial velocity distribution, transferring the corresponding atoms into the the m_{F}=−1 spin projection. The atoms are now loaded into a modulated optical lattice potential formed by two counterpropagating optical lattice beams deriving from a high power diode laser with output power of ≈1 W detuned 3 nm to the red of the rubidium D2line. Before irradiating the atomic cloud, the two optical lattice beams each pass an acoustooptic modulator and are spatially filtered with optical fibres. One of the modulators is used to in a phasestable way modulate the relative frequency of the two lattice beams with a biharmonic function. The acoustooptic modulators are driven with two phase locked arbitrary function generators. The maximum relative frequency modulation amplitude (≈700 kHz) of the lattice beams is clearly below the Zeeman splitting between adjacent Zeeman sublevels (ω_{z}/2π≈2 MHz), which suppresses unwanted Raman transitions between the sublevels.
After the interaction with the driven lattice, we let the atomic cloud expand freely for a 15–20ms long period and subsequently measure the population in the F=1, m_{F}=−1 state with an absorption imaging technique. For this, the corresponding atoms are first transferred to the F=2, m_{F}=−1 ground state sublevel with a 34μs long microwave πpulse, and then a shadow image is recorded with a resonant laser beam tuned to the F=2→F′=3 component of the rubidium D2line onto a CCDcamera, see also (ref. 43). The used timeofflight technique allows us to analyse the velocity distribution of the atomic cloud.
Additional information
How to cite this article: Grossert, C. et al. Experimental control of transport resonances in a coherent quantum rocking ratchet. Nat. Commun. 7:10440 doi: 10.1038/ncomms10440 (2016).
References
Krüger, P., Haase, A., Andersson, M. & Schmiedmayer, J. Quantum Information Processing 2nd ed. WileyVCH (2005).
Reichel, J. & Vuletic, V. Atom Chips WileyVCH (2011).
Müntinga, H. et al. Interferometry with BoseEinstein condensates in microgravity. Phys. Rev. Lett. 110, 093602 (2013).
Schlippert, D. et al. Quantum test of the universality of free fall. Phys. Rev. Lett. 112, 203002 (2014).
Hänsel, W., Reichel, J., Hommelhoff, P. & Hänsch, T. W. Magnetic conveyor belt for transporting and merging trapped atom clouds. Phys. Rev. Lett. 86, 608–611 (2001).
Walther, A. et al. Controlling fast transport of cold trapped ions. Phys. Rev. Lett. 109, 080501 (2012).
Haller, E. et al. Inducing transport in a dissipationfree lattice with super Bloch oscillations. Phys. Rev. Lett. 104, 200403 (2010).
Schanz, H., Otto, M.F., Ketzmerick, R. & Dittrich, T. Classical and quantum Hamiltonian ratchets. Phys. Rev. Lett. 87, 070601 (2001).
Schanz, H., Dittrich, T. & Ketzmerick, R. Directed chaotic transport in Hamiltonian ratchets. Phys. Rev. E 71, 026228 (2005).
Denisov, S., MoralesMolina, L., Flach, S. & Hänggi, P. Periodically driven quantum ratchets: symmetries and resonances. Phys. Rev. A 75, 063424 (2007).
Salger, T. et al. Directed transport of atoms in a Hamiltonian quantum ratchet. Science 326, 1241–1243 (2009).
Denisov, S., Flach, S. & Hänggi, P. Tunable transport with broken spacetime symmetries. Phys. Rep. 538, 77–120 (2014).
Reimann, P. Brownian motors: noisy transport far from equilibrium. Phys. Rep. 361, 57–265 (2002).
Hänggi, P. & Marchesoni, F. Artificial Brownian motors: controlling transport on the nanoscale. Rev. Mod. Phys. 81, 387–442 (2009).
Gong, J. B. & Brumer, P. Generic quantum ratchet accelerator with full classical chaos. Phys. Rev. Lett. 97, 240602 (2006).
Dana, I., Ramareddy, V., Talukdar, I. & Summy, G. S. Experimental realization of quantumresonance ratchets at arbitrary quasimomenta. Phys. Rev. Lett. 100, 024103 (2008).
Shrestha, R. K., Ni, J., Lam, W. K., Wimberger, S. & Summy, G. S. Controlling the momentum current of an offresonant ratchet. Phys. Rev. A 86, 043617 (2012).
Wang, J. & Gong, J. B. Quantum ratchet accelerator without a bichromatic lattice potential. Phys. Rev. E 78, 036219 (2008).
Sadgrove, M., Horikoshi, M., Sekimura, T. & Nakagawa, K. Rectified momentum transport for a kicked BoseEinstein condensate. Phys. Rev. Lett. 99, 043002 (2007).
Sadgrove, M., Schell, T., Nakagawa, K. & Wimberger, S. Engineering quantum correlations to enhance transport in cold atoms. Phys. Rev. A 87, 013631 (2013).
White, D. H., Ruddell, S. K. & Hoogerland, M. D. Experimental realization of a quantum ratchet through phase modulation. Phys. Rev. A 88, 063603 (2013).
Schiavoni, M., SanchezPalencia, L., Renzoni, F. & Grynberg, G. Phase control of directed diffusion in a symmetric optical lattice. Phys. Rev. Lett. 90, 094101 (2003).
Jones, P. H., Goonasekera, M. & Renzoni, F. Rectifying fluctuations in an optical lattice. Phys. Rev. Lett. 93, 073904 (2004).
Gommers, R., Bergamini, S. & Renzoni, F. Dissipationinduced symmetry breaking in a driven optical lattice. Phys. Rev. Lett. 95, 073003 (2005).
von Neumann, J. & Wigner, E. Über das Verhalten von Eigenwerten bei adiabatischen Prozessen. Phys. Zeitschr. 30, 465–467 (1929).
Breuer, H. P., Dietz, K. & Holthaus, M. The role of avoided crossings in the dynamics of strong laser fieldmatter interactions. Z. Phys. D 8, 349–357 (1988).
Breuer, H. P., Dietz, K. & Holthaus, M. Transport of quantum states of periodically driven systems. J. Phys. 51, 709–722 (1990).
Grifoni, M. & Hänggi, P. Driven quantum tunneling. Phys. Rep. 304, 229–354 (1998).
Shirley, J. H. Solution of the Schrödinger equation with a Hamiltonian periodic in time. Phys. Rev. 138, B979–B987 (1965).
Sambe, H. Steady states and quasienergies of a quantummechanical system in an oscillating field. Phys. Rev. A 7, 2203–2213 (1973).
Glück, M., Kolovsky, A. R. & Korsch, H. J. Wannier Stark resonances in optical and semiconductor superlattices. Phys. Rep. 366, 103–182 (2002).
Zhan, F., Denisov, S., Ponomarev, A. V. & Hänggi, P. Quantum ratchet transport with minimal dispersion rate. Phys. Rev. A 84, 043617 (2011).
Timberlake, T. & Reichl, L. E. Changes in Floquetstate structure at avoided crossings: delocalization and harmonic generation. Phys. Rev. A 59, 2886–2893 (1999).
Friedman, N., Kaplan, A., Carasso, D. & Davidson, N. Observation of chaotic and regular dynamics in atomoptics billiards. Phys. Rev. Lett. 86, 1518–1521 (2001).
Kaplan, A., Friedman, N., Andersen, M. F. & Davidson, N. Observation of islands of stability in soft wall atomoptics billiards. Phys. Rev. Lett. 87, 274101 (2001).
Altmann, E. G., Portela, J. S. E. & Tél, T. Leaking chaotic systems. Rev. Mod. Phys. 85, 869–918 (2013).
Wiersig, J. Formation of longlived, scarlike modes near avoided resonance crossings in optical microcavities. Phys. Rev. Lett. 97, 253901 (2006).
Song, Q. H. & Cao, H. Improving optical confinement in nanostructures via external mode coupling. Phys. Rev. Lett. 105, 053902 (2010).
Klein, O. Die Reflexion von Elektronen an einem Potentialsprung nach der relativistischen Dynamik von Dirac. Z. Phys. D 53, 157–165 (1929).
Salger, T., Grossert, C., Kling, S. & Weitz, M. Klein tunneling of a quasirelativistic BoseEinstein condensate in an optical lattice. Phys. Rev. Lett. 107, 240401 (2011).
Merkl, M. et al. Chiral confinement in quasirelativistic BoseEinstein condensates. Phys. Rev. Lett. 104, 073603 (2010).
Cennini, G., Ritt, G., Geckeler, C. & Weitz, M. Alloptical realization of an atom laser. Phys. Rev. Lett. 91, 240408 (2003).
Leder, M., Grossert, C. & Weitz, M. Veselago lensing with ultracold atoms in an optical lattice. Nat. Commun. 5, 3327 (2014).
Acknowledgements
This work was supported by the DFG Grants No. We1748/20 (M.W.), HA1517/312 (P.H.) and DE1889/11 (S.D.). The theoretical analysis was supported by the Russian Science Foundation (Grant No. 151220029; to P.H.).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Contributions
C.G. and M.L. conducted the experiment and analysed the data. S.D. did the numerical studies and simulations. S.D., P.H. and M.W. planned the project. All authors contributed to the writing of the paper and to the interpretation of the results.
Corresponding authors
Ethics declarations
Competing interests
The authors declare no competing financial interests.
Rights and permissions
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons license, unless indicated otherwise in the credit line; if the material is not included under the Creative Commons license, users will need to obtain permission from the license holder to reproduce the material. To view a copy of this license, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
About this article
Cite this article
Grossert, C., Leder, M., Denisov, S. et al. Experimental control of transport resonances in a coherent quantum rocking ratchet. Nat Commun 7, 10440 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1038/ncomms10440
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/ncomms10440
This article is cited by

Collective transient ratchet transport induced by many elastically interacting particles
Scientific Reports (2021)

Transient anomalous diffusion in periodic systems: ergodicity, symmetry breaking and velocity relaxation
Scientific Reports (2016)
Comments
By submitting a comment you agree to abide by our Terms and Community Guidelines. If you find something abusive or that does not comply with our terms or guidelines please flag it as inappropriate.