Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

The effect of soil-borne pathogens depends on the abundance of host tree species

Abstract

The overarching issue for understanding biodiversity maintenance is how fitness advantages accrue to a species as it becomes rare, as this is the defining feature of stable coexistence mechanisms. Without these fitness advantages, average fitness differences between species will lead to exclusion. However, empirical evidence is lacking, especially for forests, due to the difficulty of manipulating density on a large-enough scale. Here we took advantage of naturally occurring contrasts in abundance between sites of a subtropical tree species, Ormosia glaberrima, to demonstrate how low-density fitness advantages accrue by the Janzen–Connell mechanism. The results showed that soil pathogens suppressed seedling recruitment of O. glaberrima when it is abundant but had little effect on the seedlings when it is at low density due to the lack of pathogens. The difference in seedling survival between abundant and low-density sites demonstrates strong dependence of pathogenic effect on the abundance of host species.

Introduction

Stabilization mechanisms are essential for maintaining diversity in natural communities. Such mechanisms require the per capita growth rate of a population to be a decreasing function of abundance so that a species is able to increase at low abundance. This outcome forms the basis of the invasibility criterion1,2,3 that is critical for stable species coexistence regardless of the specific mechanisms applying to a community2,4,5. However, in most communities, there is a lack of understanding of the actual mechanisms contributing to this outcome, which is rarely rigorously demonstrated in nature2,6.

The decreasing function of per capita population growth with abundance that reflects fitness advantages at low density inversely implies also disadvantages at high density. This high-density disadvantage prevents individual species from overwhelming other species and promotes species diversity in communities. These advantages at low density and disadvantages at high density appear from the perspective of an individual species as negative density dependence (NDD) but reflect stabilizing niche differences between species in a community1, and in some older literature have been referred to as a community compensatory trend (CCT)7,8. However, controversy arises from recent studies about the strength of NDD in rare species versus common species, which appears to contradict the predictions of the CCT9,10,11. Although this controversy could be due to different interpretations about the coefficients of the CCT models used in those studies12, a true understanding of the role of NDD in maintaining species diversity requires well-designed experiments on the mechanisms that regulate NDD. Currently, little is known about the mechanisms controlling relative abundances of species and especially how the mechanisms involved are related to the mechanisms maintaining species diversity.

One of the major mechanisms hypothesized to be widely responsible for maintaining species diversity in forests is specialized or at least partially specialized natural enemies, originally proposed independently by Janzen and Connell10,12,13,14,15,16,17,18,19,20,21,22. The key to this hypothesis is that host-specific pathogens or herbivores are maintained by or near adult trees, inhibiting the establishment and later success of conspecific seedlings in the vicinity. The inhibition of conspecifics thus releases space near adult trees favouring the establishment of heterospecifics. In principle, this effect leads to decreasing per capita recruitment as adult densities increase, in accordance with the idea of NDD discussed above.

Although Janzen and Connell both emphasized the importance of localization of natural enemies near adult hosts, in principle the mechanism would work with widely dispersing natural enemies that create no spatial structure in likelihood of a seedling being attacked, because NDD would still be present23. Moreover, some natural enemies may disappear altogether when adult densities are low, as is often observed in epidemiology24. Thus, a sufficiently low adult density might lead to very little effect of natural enemies even near a conspecific adult tree.

Although an increasing number of studies have supported the Janzen–Connell hypothesis as a primary density (or distance)-dependent mechanism regulating recruitment patterns of many tree species in forests as well as grassland ecosystems10,12,13,14,15,16,17,18,19,20,21,22,25,26,27,28, very few studies have actually isolated specific natural enemies and tested their effects on plant establishment17,25,28. For those studies that focused on soil pathogens and conducted fungicide treatments in the field, the experiments focused on species that were abundant at the experimental sites19,27, or no comparisons between population densities were made25. Here we performed a field survey and two growth-room experiments on O. glaberrima with soil collected from six field sites varying in tree density from rare to abundant. We asked whether the Janzen–Connell mechanism is operating on two scales: in the vicinity of an adult and between sites differing greatly in density. We thus tested whether the mechanism is sensitive to adult density on a larger scale, not merely in the vicinity of a parent tree of a given seedling. The results showed that the survival of O. glaberrima seedlings in low-density population sites was high compared with that in abundant population sites. Soil-borne fungal pathogens were found to be responsible for suppressing seedling recruitment of O. glaberrima when it is abundant but had little adversary effect on the seedlings when it is rare, owing to the lack of pathogens at the low host-density sites.

Results

Seedling survival observed from the field

The field results showed that the densities of surviving O. glaberrima seedlings at different distances from adult trees in abundant and low-density population sites fared very differently (Fig. 1). In the abundant sites, seedling density decreased dramatically over time with few survival seedlings left after August (Fig. 1a). Moreover, the distance effect disappeared at distance larger than 8–12 m away from the adult trees. In contrast, seedling density changed little over time for the three low-density sites (Fig. 1b). The contrasting difference between abundant and low-density populations is clearly revealed by the decreasing ratios of their seedling densities (Fig. 1c) and by the trend of per-capita seedling survival rates over time (Fig. 1d). We did a non-parametric Mann–Whitney test to compare the difference in seedling density within 8 m of focal trees between the abundant and low-density populations for each of the five months (that is, testing the difference between Fig. 1a,b for the pooled density for 0–8 m). All the P-values of the tests are at least smaller than 0.0069 (sample sizes: n1=15 abundant sites versus n2=3 low-density sites), except for April when field observations started (P=0.37; sample size: n1=15 versus n2=3), indicating highly significant differences between the two populations.

Figure 1: Effects of seedling density over time (month) and distance on seedling survival.
figure 1

(a) Changes in seedling density over time and distance for abundant population sites. (b) Changes in seedling density over time and distance for low-density population sites. (c) Ratios of seedling density (within 0–8 m from the focal trees, where over 90% seedlings located) of abundant sites over the density of low-density sites. The dashed line refers to equal seedling density between abundant and low-density sites. (d) Changes in per-capita seedling survival rates over time within 0–8 m from the focal trees. The number of seedlings at each observation time was the old seedlings that survived up to that time plus the new seedlings that germinated since the previous time. The per-capita seedling survival rate was calculated by dividing the number of live seedlings at an observation time by the total tagged seedlings up to that time. In c, the interval for the ratio of seedling density in April 2012 contains 1, suggesting no significant difference in density between abundant and low-density populations at the beginning of observation. All the error bars are 95% bootstrapped confidence intervals.

We further modelled the effects of abundance, distance and their interaction on seedling survival rates using a generalized linear mixed effects model (GLMM; see ‘Statistical analysis’ in Methods). The results do not only show significant effects of abundance and distance but also their interaction on seedling survival (Table 1). If survival rates were the same between the abundant and low-density sites, the abundance term would not be significant. The results in Table 1 show that abundance had a highly significant negative effect on seedling survival (abundant sites were coded as 0 and low-density sites as 1), while distance had a positive effect. The significant interaction term between abundance and distance indicates that distance had very different effects on seedling survival rates between the abundant and low-density sites, which is consistent with the results of the above Mann–Whitney test. Together, these results indicate that soil-borne pathogens suppressed the recruitment of O. glaberrima seedlings in the abundant sites but had no detectable effect on seedlings in the low-density sites.

Table 1 GLMM for modelling seedling survival data from the field.

Effects of pathogens in growth-room experiments

When seedling survival was tested in untreated soils collected at different distances from focal trees of the three abundant sites (see Methods for the growth-room experiment), seedling survival significantly increased with increasing distance from the focal trees (Fig. 2a). However, this trend was not observed in the soils collected from the three low-density sites (Fig. 2b). After fungicide treatment, the effect of distance on seedling survival disappeared. A similar result was also observed for γ-radiation-treated soils (lower panels in Fig. 2). This result is consistent with the result of the GLMM modelling for the growth-room experiment (see ‘Statistical analysis’ in Methods), showing seedling survival increased with distance in the abundant populations (Table 2; the highly significant three-way interaction of abundance, distance and fungicide, P=4.22e−07) and local seedlings of a focal tree suffered a significantly higher mortality from soil-borne pathogens than non-local seedlings derived from seeds collected from other trees (P=4.46e−08 for ‘Seed’ in Table 2; by odds ratio the likelihood of survival of non-local seedlings is e0.46=1.58 times higher than that of local seedlings, if else is equal). All these results suggest that disease-inducing fungi are the primary agent suppressing seedling recruitment in abundant O. glabrrima sites. It is noteworthy that there was no effect of planting density on seedling survival (P=0.45 in Table 2) and the variance of the random effect ‘Site’ was not different from 0 (P=1 in Table 2).

Figure 2: Distance effect from focal trees on seedling survival.
figure 2

Upper panels are the results for fungicide-treated soils, whereas lower panels are for γ-radiation-treated soils, to show the distance effect from focal trees on seedling survival. (a,c) Soil samples were collected from abundant sites; (b,d) soil samples were collected from low-density sites. Boxplots for untreated soil are in blue colour (solid line) and red colour (dashed line) for fungicide-treated soil (a,b) or γ-treated soil (c,d). Each boxplot shows the median, inter-quartiles and whiskers. Dots outsides the whiskers are outliers. **indicates seedling survival rates in fungicide (or γ-radiation)-treated soils were significantly higher than that in untreated soils collected at the respective distances of 0 and 5 m away from the focal trees in the abundant sites. The P-values for the two ** in a are 6.27e−11 and 2.87e−11, respectively (Mann–Whitney test), and for the two ** in c are 6.27e−11 and 2.86e−11, respectively. Sample size for each of the Mann–Whitney tests is 90 untreated soils versus 90 treated soils.

Table 2 GLMM for modelling seedling survival data from the growth-room experiment experiments.

Seedling survival in a dilution experiment increased with the reduction of untreated soil from abundant sites (see Methods for dilution experiment), whereas there was little change in seedling survival (consistently high) after the soil was treated with two fungicides (Fig. 3). When the proportion of untreated soil was <10%, the survival of O. glaberrima seedlings was no longer affected by inoculation with untreated soil (for example, at 5% untreated soil, Mann–Whitney test had P=0.30 with sample size n1=3 versus n2=3; Fig. 3).

Figure 3: Effects of the proportion of untreated soil on seedling survival of O. glaberrima.
figure 3

The soil used for the experiment was a mixture of untreated soil and γ-radiated soil in different proportions. This dilution experiment was only performed with local O. glaberrima seeds. For comparison, two fungicides were further applied to the diluted soil, to remove the effect of inoculating untreated soil (the open dots and dashed line). When the proportion of untreated soil is <10% (to the right of the vertical dotted line), seedling survival rates are no longer different from that of fungicide-treated soils (for example, at 5% untreated soil, Mann–Whitney test: P=0.30; sample size: n1=3, n2=3). The error bars are 95% bootstrapped confidence intervals.

Discussion

In this study we performed field observations and growth-room experiments to test the effects of soil-borne pathogens on abundant and low-density populations of a subtropical tree species. Our results show that soil pathogens significantly suppressed the recruitment of O. glaberrima in sites where the host populations were abundant but had little effect on the low-density populations. The seedling survival rates in low-density population sites were significantly higher compared with those in abundant sites (Fig. 1 and Tables 1 and 2). However, this increased survival in low-density populations was caused by the lack of pathogenic effects as shown by both the field observation (Fig. 1) and the growth-room sterilized treatments (Figs 2 and 3). The density of soil pathogens such as Fusarium oxysporum28 in all low-density sites was too low to cause disease to the seedlings of the study tree species (Fig. 3), where seedling survival was nearly as high as that in the fungicide-treated or γ-radiated soils (Fig. 2b,d). In contrast, seedling survival was significantly reduced within approximately a 10-m vicinity of the focal trees in the abundant sites but the survival rates became as high as the fungicide (or γ-radiation)-treated level at a distance >10 m from the focal trees (Fig. 2a,c). If measured by odds ratio, assuming all else is equal, the likelihood of seedling mortality in abundant populations is e9.64=15367.3 times higher than that in low-density populations in the field (Table 1) and e3.27 =26.3 times higher in the growth-room experiment (Table 2). However, it is worth noting that adult trees in abundant sites do not necessarily show uniform pathogenic effects possibly arising from the spatial variation in pathogen distribution or in the local microhabitat conditions. This pathogenic variation is reflected by the wide variation in seedling survival rates at 0 and 5 m distances for trees in abundant sites (Fig. 2a,c).

This study has demonstrated the Janzen–Connell mechanism on two scales: within sites based on distance from an adult tree and between sites based on site level contrasts in density. In both cases, the proximate mechanism for seedling mortality appears to be pathogen abundance, which on the between-site scale is strongly affected by conspecific adult abundance, but on the within-site scale the distance effect was only observed in abundant sites. As such, there is an interaction between the two scales: reduction in pathogenicity at low-density sites is associated with the absence of a within-site effect of distance from a conspecific tree. This outcome suggests that a host density above some threshold is necessary to maintain the relevant pathogens on the site scale similar to the behaviour of disease in epidemiological studies24.

Our experiments also imply that the relevant pathogens are host specific, which is a key feature of the Janzen–Connell mechanism. The identification of F. oxysporum as a pathogen for O. glaberrima28 supports this conclusion. In an inoculation experiment, this fungus caused rapid death of O. glaberrima seedlings (see rotten seed and sick seedling in Fig. 4) but failed to infect three other common tree species of different families that grow with O. glaberrima in the same sites, namely Castanopsis fabri, Cryptocarya concinna and Schefflera octophylla28. Although we cannot rule out the possibility that the pathogen might also infest other tree species, the immunity of the three common tree species to F. oxysporum suggests a high degree of host specificity of the pathogen to O. glaberrima. The dilution experiment shown in Fig. 3 indicates that the survival of O. glaberrima seedlings was no longer affected by the pathogen inoculum if the proportion of untreated soil was approximately lower than 10%.

Figure 4: Symptoms of a rotten seed and an infected seedling of O. glaberrima.
figure 4

Left photo shows an infected seed with filaments of pathogenic fungi including F. oxysporum in the soil collected within 5 m from focal adult trees in abundant sites, which were found to contain the pathogen infesting O. glaberrima. Right photo shows an infected seedling (damping-off symptom) with lower part of stem covered with fungal spores in the abundant sites. Image credit: Yu Liu.

Although this study has exploited naturally occurring major density differences between sites to demonstrate the density dependence of pathogen effects, less clear is the origin of this between-site variation in density. We found that seedlings are not limited by pathogens in low-density sites, but that outcome does not appear to be translating into an overall low-density advantage, and increasing low populations. No juveniles and only one premature tree were found in the three low-density sites (Table 3) despite current high initial seedling densities and seedling survival rates in the sites (Fig. 1b). This finding suggests that most seedlings of O. glaberrima in low-density sites fail to reach the juvenile or premature tree stages. Seedling recruitment is the first of the many bottleneck processes a species population has to overcome to establish in a community12. The lack of the fungal pathogen effect in low-density population provides an initial fitness advantage for the species when at low density. However, a high seedling survival is necessary but not sufficient to ensure the subsequent establishment of the population. It seems likely to be that some environmental factors in these low-density sites are limiting success beyond the seedling stage but at the present time we can only speculate on what it might be. Whatever the mechanisms, the outcome has been the maintenance of low-density sites enabling a between-site adult density contrast in what is in effect a natural experiment.

Table 3 Population structures (by DBH classes) of O. glaberrima trees in the three abundant populations (A1–A3) and the three rare populations (R1–R3).

Study of the Janzen–Connell hypothesis has so far been a mixture of both theories and empirical tests. A large number of studies have modelled and analysed spatial patterns or temporal dynamics of demographic rates of tree species9,11,29,30. These studies do not actually test for the Janzen–Connell hypothesis but use the hypothesis to interpret the patterns or dynamics observed. However, in the literature there is a widespread misunderstanding on these analyses and they are cited as if they tested the Janzen–Connell hypothesis. Before now, experimental evidence has not been available to evaluate the strength of the Janzen–Connell effect in tree populations beyond the seedling stage.

Another controversy arises regarding the observations that rare species suffer stronger negative density-dependent effects than common species do9,10,11. This is probably due to the use of different modelling methods or the interpretation of the models12. These studies compare the variation in demographic rates among species with varying abundance and their response to specialized enemies10, but the significance of such an interspecific comparison could be compromised by the fact that different species can have different co-evolutionary history with their own host-specific pathogens and, as such, more common species do not necessarily suffer from stronger or weaker pathogen attack than rarer species. For example, Dostál et al.31 found that the effect of soil pathogens on an invasive species Heracleum mantegazzianum (Apiaceae) depended on the invasion history of the species31.

Our study did not consider interspecific variation in demography but intraspecific variation. Although we did not directly test the CCT hypothesis, we showed how NDD can emerge for a species, which is a prerequisite of the CCT2,7,8. If there were no NDD on the individual species level, there would be no CCT on the community level. Our results support the NDD on two spatial scales, giving as strong an affirmation of NDD as might be expected from natural contrasts in densities. Our results support the idea that the observed NDD arises from a pathogen that is weakened by low host density. Although we have not identified the factors responsible for our low-density sites, they are not necessarily explained by a density-dependent factor and so are not support for stronger NDD for rare species. We argue that manipulative experiments are urgently needed to extend the current study to test interspecific responses to specialized pathogens, to identify and understand the mechanisms of the CCT in maintaining species diversity in communities. Our results suggest also that approaches combining the effects of physical environmental factors with studies of pathogens are needed to understand major spatial differences in abundance and a better perspective on species’ rarity.

Methods

Study sites

The sites are located in the Heishiding Nature Reserve, a subtropical, evergreen broadleaf forest, China (N23°27′12″, E111°53′26″). O. glaberrima Wu (Fabaceae) is a native legume tree common to the region. Its seeds are dispersed by gravity in late September and >90% seeds (based on our visual estimation in the field) fall within 8 m from their parent trees. After one-year storage, O. glaberrima seeds still have a high germination rate (94.22±2.61%). Three low-density and three abundant population sites (1-ha plot each) of this species were selected in March 2012, including the two sites studied in ref. 28. A low-density site had a density of 1 adult tree per hectare, whereas an abundant site had a tree density >20 adult trees per hectare (Table 3). The distances between these six populations were at least 1 km apart. In each site, all individuals of this species with diameter at breast height ≥1 cm were mapped. In the meantime, seeds were collected from the ground from these six populations for the growth-room experiments (described below).

In each of the three abundant sites, five adult O. glaberrima trees with similar diameter at breast height sizes were selected as focal trees, while a single adult O. glaberrima tree was selected as a focal tree in each of the three rare sites. A 1 × 20 m seedling belt was established away from each focal tree in such a way that the focal tree was the nearest conspecific adult to any point within the seedling belt. The belt was divided to five segments: 0–4, 4–8, 8–12, 12–16 and 16–20 m (but because there were very few seedlings at distance >12 m, the data of the last two segments were combined in subsequent analyses). Most seeds of O. glaberrima started to germinate in early April and completed germination within the first three weeks of April, although they could germinate in other months. Newly emerged seedlings were counted and tagged with unique numbers in each segment. The survival status of all tagged seedlings was recorded at the end of each month from April to December 2012.

Growth-room experiment

Next to each seedling belt, soil samples from the top soil (ca. 10 cm in depth) were collected at 0, 5, 10, 15 and 20 m away from a focal tree in March 2012 (corresponding to the five segments of each belt). Soil samples were sieved (mesh diameter: 0.2 cm) to eliminate seeds. In total, 90 soil samples (for abundant populations: 3 populations × 5 focal trees per population × 5 distances=75; for low-density populations: 3 populations × 1 focal tree per population × 5 distances=15) were shipped to a growth room at the Guangzhou Institute of Landscape Gardening for growth-room experiments. Each soil sample was divided into three parts: untreated, fungicide-treated (a mixture of two fungicides Celest Gold and Ridomil Gold; Syngenta Ltd, Basel, Switzerland) and γ-radiated. Celest Gold (active ingredient: fludioxonil) offers the best control for Fusarium spp. and Microdochium nivale. Ridomil Gold (active ingredient: mefenoxam) preferentially acts against fungus-like oomycetes and has been applied in previous studies18,32.

Seed provenance of O. glaberrima was divided into two types (local seed: seeds planted in soil sampled from the same population where seeds were collected; non-local seed: seeds mixed from the other five populations). The local and non-local seeds were cross-planted in soils from focal trees and non-focal trees, to test the consequences of co-adapted soil pathogens for seed flow33. In total, there were 180 cross-plantings (90 × 2=180).

After treatment with 98% concentrated sulfuric acid for 30 min (for sterilizing seed surface and breaking physical dormancy of seeds), seeds were transferred into a 250-ml soil sample in a sterilized 12 × 12 × 20 cm plastic vessel (upper vessel), which was linked with a cotton wick to a similar vessel (lower vessel containing sterilized water). A 1-cm layer of sterilized expanded clay (ca. 1 mm in diameter) was covered onto the soil sample to block ambient microbes28.

The planting experiment set three densities (low density: one seed per vessel, intermediate density: four seeds per vessel and high density: nine seeds per vessel) and three replicates per density treatment. All the experiments were carried out in a growth-room with 24±2 °C, 80–95% relative humidity and low-light ambient conditions (ca. 8% of outdoor light intensity in the daytime), similar to conditions under canopy. The growth-room experiment lasted from April to December 2012 and seedling survival was recorded every 2 weeks.

Dilution treatment

We tested whether a decreasing pathogen concentration in the soil caused the increased seedling survival observed in the growth-room experiment. In this dilution experiment, done in the same facility as for the above growth-room experiment, untreated soil sampled around the focal adult O. glaberrima trees (<5 m) from abundant sites was mixed, at different ratios, with soil sampled from the same location but γ-radiated. In total, five dilution ratios were tested and the ratios of untreated soil to γ-radiated soil by volume were 100:0, 50:50, 10:90, 5:95 and 0:100. The mixed soil was then divided into two halves. One was further treated with the two aforementioned fungicides and the other half was without. Three replicated experiments were conducted for each half. The effects of the dilution treatment on seed germination and seedling survival were observed biweekly from April to December 2012.

Statistical analysis

To analyse the data of the field survey (see Table 1 for the results), a GLMM was used to test for the effects of adult abundance (abundant versus low-density populations), distance from focal trees and the interaction term (abundance × distance) on seedling survival of O. glaberrima. Population sites were treated as a random effect, to control for the variation in seedling survival among sites. The dependent variable of the GLMM was the count of dead and live seedlings by the end of the field observation (that is, December 2012). The live seedlings were those that survived up to December 2012 from the beginning of field observation in April, whereas the dead seedlings were those dead during the period. The per-capita seedling survival rate in a month as shown in Fig. 1d was calculated by dividing the number of live seedlings survived up to that month by the total of the emerging seedlings (live+dead) from April up to that month. A similar GLMM (see Table 2 for the results) was also used to model seedling survival data obtained from the growth-room experiment, to test for the effects of adult abundance (abundant versus low-density populations), distance from focal trees, soil fungicides treatment, seed provenance (local versus non-local seeds) and seeding density on seedling survival. Population sites were treated as a random effect. Both of the above GLMM models assumed a binomial error and overdispersion was included in these two GLMMs by estimating an additional random effect for each observation34,35.

All the data in this study were analysed using R (http://www.r-project.org/). The GLMMs were estimated using R package ‘lme4’. The 95% confidence intervals reported in this study are the bootstrap-accelerated bias-corrected confidence intervals calculated from R package ‘boot’.

Additional information

How to cite this article: Liu, Y. et al. The effect of soil-borne pathogens depends on the abundance of host tree species. Nat. Commun. 6:10017 doi: 10.1038/ncomms10017 (2015).

References

  1. Chesson, P. Mechanism of maintenance of species diversity. Annu. Rev. Ecol. Syst. 31, 343–366 (2000).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Siepielski, A. M. & McPeek, M. A. On the evidence for species coexistence: a critique of the coexistence program. Ecology 91, 3153–3164 (2010).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. MacArthur, R. Geographical Ecology Princeton Univ. Press (1972).

  4. Adler, P. B., HilleRisLambers, J. & Levine, J. M. A niche for neutrality. Ecol. Lett. 10, 95–104 (2007).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Wilson, J. B. The twelve theories of co-existence in plant communities: the doubtful, the important and the unexplored. J. Veg. Sci. 22, 184–195 (2011).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Chesson, P. in Unity in Diversity: Reflections on Ecology after the Legacy of Ramon Margalef eds Valladares F.et al. 119–164Fundacion BBVA (2008).

  7. Connell, J. H., Tracey, J. G. & Webb, L. J. Compensatory recruitment, growth, and mortality as factors maintaining rain forest tree diversity. Ecol. Monogr. 54, 141–164 (1984).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Webb, C. O. & Peart, D. R. Seedling density dependence promotes coexistence of Bornean rain forest trees. Ecology 80, 2006–2017 (1999).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Comita, L. S., Muller-Landau, H. C., Aguilar, S. & Hubbell, S. P. Asymmetric density dependence shapes species abundances in a tropical tree community. Science 329, 330–332 (2010).

    CAS  ADS  Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Mangan, S. A. et al. Negative plant–soil feedback predicts tree-species relative abundance in a tropical forest. Nature 466, 752–756 (2010).

    CAS  ADS  Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Johnson, D. J., Beaulieu, W. T., Bever, J. D. & Clay, K. Conspecific negative density dependence and forest diversity. Science 336, 904–907 (2012).

    CAS  ADS  Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Kobe, R. K. & Vriesendorp, C. F. Conspecific density dependence in seedlings varies with species shade tolerance in a wet tropical forest. Ecol. Lett. 14, 503–510 (2011).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Janzen, D. H. Herbivores and the number of tree species in tropical forests. Am. Nat. 104, 501–528 (1970).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Connell, J. H. in Dynamics of Populations eds Boer P. J. D., Gradwell G. R. 298–312Center for Agriculture Publishing and Documentation (1971).

  15. Augspurger, C. K. Seed dispersal by the tropical tree, Platypodium elegans, and the escape of its seedling from fungal pathogens. J. Ecol. 71, 759–771 (1983).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Clark, D. A. & Clark, D. B. Spacing dynamics of a tropical rain forest tree: evaluation of the Janzen-Connell model. Am. Nat. 124, 769–788 (1984).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Packer, A. & Clay, K. Soil pathogens and spatial patterns of seedling mortality in a temperate tree. Nature 404, 278–281 (2000).

    CAS  ADS  Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Bell, T., Freckleton, R. P. & Lewis, O. T. Plant pathogens drive density-dependent seedling mortality in a tropical tree. Ecol. Lett. 9, 569–574 (2006).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Bagchi, R. et al. Testing the Janzen-Connell mechanism: pathogens cause overcompensating density dependence in a tropical tree. Ecol. Lett. 13, 1262–1269 (2010).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. McCarthy-Neumann, S. & Ibáñez, I. Tree range expansion may be enhanced by escape from negative plant–soil feedbacks. Ecology 93, 2637–2649 (2012).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Terborgh, J. Enemies maintain hyperdiverse tropical forests. Am. Nat. 179, 303–314 (2012).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Bagchi, R. et al. Pathogens and insect herbivores drive rainforest plant diversity and composition. Nature 506, 85–88 (2014).

    CAS  ADS  Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Chesson, P. & Kuang, J. J. The interaction between predation and competition. Nature 456, 235–238 (2008).

    CAS  ADS  Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Ostfeld, R. S., Keesing, F. & Eviner, V. T. Infectious Disease Ecology: the Effects of Ecosystems on Disease, and the Effects of Disease on Ecosystems Princeton Univ. Press (2008).

  25. Klironomos, J. N. Feedback with soil biota contributes to plant rarity and invasiveness in communities. Nature 417, 67–70 (2002).

    CAS  ADS  Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Petermann, J. S., Fergus, A. J. F., Turnbull, L. A. & Schmid, B. Janzen-Connell effects are widespread and strong enough to maintain diversity in grasslands. Ecology 89, 2399–2406 (2008).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Reinhart, K. O. & Clay, K. Spatial variation in soil-borne disease dynamics of a temperate tree, Prunus serotina. Ecology 90, 2984–2993 (2009).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Liu, Y., Yu, S., Xie, Z. P. & Staehelin, C. Analysis of a negative plant-soil feedback in a subtropical monsoon forest. J. Ecol. 100, 1019–1028 (2012).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Harms, K. E., Wright, S. J., Calderón, O., Hernández, A. & Herre, E. A. Pervasive density-dependent recruitment enhances seedling diversity in a tropical forest. Nature 404, 493–495 (2000).

    CAS  ADS  Article  Google Scholar 

  30. HilleRisLambers, J., Clark, J. S. & Beckage, B. Density-dependent mortality and the latitudinal gradient in species diversity. Nature 417, 732–735 (2002).

    CAS  ADS  Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Dostál, P., Müllerová, J., Pyšek, P., Pergl, J. & Klinerová, T. The impact of an invasive plant changes over time. Ecol. Lett. 16, 1277–1284 (2013).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. Maron, J. L., Marler, M., Klironomos, J. N. & Cleveland, C. C. Soil fungal pathogens and the relationship between plant diversity and productivity. Ecol. Lett. 14, 36–41 (2011).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  33. Bever, J. D. et al. Rooting theories of plant community ecology in microbial interactions. Trends Ecol. Evol. 25, 468–478 (2010).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  34. Collett, D. Modelling Binary Data 2nd edn 293Chapman & Hall/CRC (2003).

  35. Harrison, X. A. Using observation-level random effects to model overdispersion in count data in ecology and evolution. PeerJ 2, e616 (2014).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  36. He, F. L., Legendre, P. & LaFrankie, J. V. Distribution patterns of tree species in a Malaysian tropical rain forest. J. Veg. Sci. 8, 105–114 (1997).

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

We thank Inés Ibáñez and Sarah McCarthy-Neumann for helpful comments on the study. Y.L. thanks Professors Christian Staehelin and Zhi-Ping Xie for mentoring his PhD study from which he learned how to conduct soil pathogen experiments. This research was supported by the Guangdong Key Laboratory for Biodiversity Dynamics and Conservation, the Postdoctoral Science Foundation of China, the National Science Foundation of China, the NSERC (Canada) and NSF USA (grant DEB-1353715).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

Y.L. and F.H. designed the study and analysed the data. Y.L. conducted the field and growth-room experiments. Y.L., P.C. and F.H. led the writing. All authors contributed to the discussion and the writing of the paper.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Fangliang He.

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing financial interests.

Rights and permissions

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons license, unless indicated otherwise in the credit line; if the material is not included under the Creative Commons license, users will need to obtain permission from the license holder to reproduce the material. To view a copy of this license, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Liu, Y., Fang, S., Chesson, P. et al. The effect of soil-borne pathogens depends on the abundance of host tree species. Nat Commun 6, 10017 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1038/ncomms10017

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/ncomms10017

Further reading

Comments

By submitting a comment you agree to abide by our Terms and Community Guidelines. If you find something abusive or that does not comply with our terms or guidelines please flag it as inappropriate.

Search

Quick links

Nature Briefing

Sign up for the Nature Briefing newsletter — what matters in science, free to your inbox daily.

Get the most important science stories of the day, free in your inbox. Sign up for Nature Briefing