Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

  • Letter
  • Published:

Microbe-driven turnover offsets mineral-mediated storage of soil carbon under elevated CO2

Abstract

The sensitivity of soil organic carbon (SOC) to changing environmental conditions represents a critical uncertainty in coupled carbon cycle–climate models1. Much of this uncertainty arises from our limited understanding of the extent to which root–microbe interactions induce SOC losses (through accelerated decomposition or ‘priming’2) or indirectly promote SOC gains (via ‘protection’ through interactions with mineral particles3,4). We developed a new SOC model to examine priming and protection responses to rising atmospheric CO2. The model captured disparate SOC responses at two temperate free-air CO2 enrichment (FACE) experiments. We show that stabilization of ‘new’ carbon in protected SOC pools may equal or exceed microbial priming of ‘old’ SOC in ecosystems with readily decomposable litter and high clay content (for example, Oak Ridge5). In contrast, carbon losses induced through priming dominate the net SOC response in ecosystems with more resistant litters and lower clay content (for example, Duke6). The SOC model was fully integrated into a global terrestrial carbon cycle model to run global simulations of elevated CO2 effects. Although protected carbon provides an important constraint on priming effects, priming nonetheless reduced SOC storage in the majority of terrestrial areas, partially counterbalancing SOC gains from enhanced ecosystem productivity.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution

Access options

Buy this article

Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout

Figure 1: Diagram of model structure.
Figure 2: Observed and modelled responses of soil carbon to elevated CO2.
Figure 3: Simulated priming and CO2 fertilization effects on soil carbon at global scales.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Todd-Brown, K. E. O., Hopkins, F. M., Kivlin, S. N., Talbot, J. M. & Allison, S. D. A framework for representing microbial decomposition in coupled climate models. Biogeochemistry 109, 19–33 (2011).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Kuzyakov, Y. Priming effects: Interactions between living and dead organic matter. Soil Biol. Biochem. 42, 1363–1371 (2010).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Cotrufo, M. F., Wallenstein, M. D., Boot, C. M., Denef, K. & Paul, E. A. The Microbial Efficiency-Matrix Stabilization (MEMS) framework integrates plant litter decomposition with soil organic matter stabilization: Do labile plant inputs form stable soil organic matter? Glob. Change Biol. 19, 988–995 (2013).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Von Lützow, M. et al. Stabilization of organic matter in temperate soils: Mechanisms and their relevance under different soil conditions—a review. Eur. J. Soil Sci. 57, 426–445 (2006).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Jastrow, J. D. et al. Elevated atmospheric carbon dioxide increases soil carbon. Glob. Change Biol. 11, 2057–2064 (2005).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Drake, J. E. et al. Increases in the flux of carbon belowground stimulate nitrogen uptake and sustain the long-term enhancement of forest productivity under elevated CO2 . Ecol. Lett. 14, 349–357 (2011).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Fischlin, A. et al. in Climate Change 2007: Impacts, Adaptation and Vulnerability (eds Parry, M. L., Canziani, O. F., Palutikof, J. P., van der Linden, P. J. & Hanson, C. E.) 211–272 (IPCC, Cambridge Univ. Press, 2007).

    Google Scholar 

  8. Denman, K. et al. in Climate Change 2007: The Physical Science Basis (eds Solomon, S. et al.) 499–587 (IPCC, Cambridge Univ. Press, 2007).

    Google Scholar 

  9. Carney, K. M., Hungate, B. A., Drake, B. G. & Megonigal, J. P. Altered soil microbial community at elevated CO2 leads to loss of soil carbon. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 104, 4990–4995 (2007).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Panikov, N. Understanding and prediction of soil microbial community dynamics under global change. Appl. Soil Ecol. 11, 161–176 (1999).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Schmidt, M. W. I. et al. Persistence of soil organic matter as an ecosystem property. Nature 478, 49–56 (2011).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Wieder, W. R., Bonan, G. B. & Allison, S. D. Global soil carbon projections are improved by modelling microbial processes. Nature Clim. Change 3, 909–912 (2013).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Norby, R. J. & Zak, D. R. Ecological lessons from Free-Air CO2 Enrichment (FACE) experiments. Annu. Rev. Ecol. Evol. Syst. 42, 181–203 (2011).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Phillips, R. P., Finzi, A. C. & Bernhardt, E. S. Enhanced root exudation induces microbial feedbacks to N cycling in a pine forest under long-term CO2 fumigation. Ecol. Lett. 14, 187–194 (2011).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Talhelm, A. F., Pregitzer, K. S. & Zak, D. R. Species-specific responses to atmospheric carbon dioxide and tropospheric ozone mediate changes in soil carbon. Ecol. Lett. 12, 1219–1228 (2009).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Hoosbeek, M. R. More new carbon in the mineral soil of a poplar plantation under Free Air Carbon Enrichment (POPFACE): Cause of increased priming effect? Glob. Biogeochem. Cycles 18, GB1040 (2004).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Van Groenigen, K-J., Qi, X., Osenberg, C. W., Luo, Y. & Hungate, B. A. Faster decomposition under increased atmospheric CO2 limits soil carbon storage. Science 344, 508–509 (2014).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Zaehle, S. et al. Evaluation of 11 terrestrial carbon–nitrogen cycle models against observations from two temperate Free-Air CO2 Enrichment studies. New Phytol. 202, 803–822 (2014).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Cheng, W. et al. Synthesis and modeling perspectives of rhizosphere priming. New Phytol. 201, 31–44 (2014).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Foereid, B., Ward, D. S., Mahowald, N., Paterson, E. & Lehmann, J. The sensitivity of carbon turnover in the Community Land Model to modified assumptions about soil processes. Earth Syst. Dynam. 5, 211–221 (2014).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Davidson, E. A. & Janssens, I. A. Temperature sensitivity of soil carbon decomposition and feedbacks to climate change. Nature 440, 165–173 (2006).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. Lichter, J. et al. Soil carbon sequestration and turnover in a pine forest after six years of atmospheric CO2 enrichment. Ecology 86, 1835–1847 (2005).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Norby, R. J., Warren, J. M., Iversen, C. M., Medlyn, B. E. & McMurtrie, R. E. CO2 enhancement of forest productivity constrained by limited nitrogen availability. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 107, 19368–19373 (2010).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  24. Shevliakova, E. et al. Carbon cycling under 300 years of land use change: Importance of the secondary vegetation sink. Glob. Biogeochem. Cycles 23, GB2022 (2009).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Milly, P. C. D. et al. An enhanced model of land water and energy for global hydrologic and earth-system studies. J. Hydrometeorol. 15, 1739–1761 (2014).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Six, J., Elliott, E. & Paustian, K. Soil macroaggregate turnover and microaggregate formation: A mechanism for C sequestration under no-tillage agriculture. Soil Biol. Biochem. 32, 2099–2103 (2000).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  27. Wu, J., Brookes, P. C. & Jenkinson, D. S. Formation and destruction of microbial biomass during the decomposition of glucose and ryegrass in soil. Soil Biol. Biochem. 25, 1435–1441 (1993).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  28. Dunne, J. P. et al. GFDL’s ESM2 global coupled climate–carbon earth system models. Part I: Physical formulation and baseline simulation characteristics. J. Clim. 25, 6646–6665 (2012).

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

Thanks to E. Brzostek and M. Midgley for helpful comments on the manuscript and to S. Malyshev for providing the high-frequency GFDL ESM forcing. B.N.S., E.S. and S.W.P. acknowledge support in parts from the NOAA (US Department of Commerce) grant NA08OAR4320752, the USDA grant 2011-67003-30373 and the Carbon Mitigation Initiative at Princeton University, sponsored by BP. The statements, findings and conclusions are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect the views of the NOAA, the US Department of Commerce, the US Department of Agriculture, or BP.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

B.N.S. developed the model, designed and conducted experiments, analysed the data, and wrote the paper. E.S. and S.W.P. contributed to model development and experimental design and helped write the paper. R.P.P. and A.C.O. contributed data and expertise for set-up and interpretation of site-level simulations, and helped write the paper.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Benjamin N. Sulman.

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing financial interests.

Supplementary information

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Sulman, B., Phillips, R., Oishi, A. et al. Microbe-driven turnover offsets mineral-mediated storage of soil carbon under elevated CO2. Nature Clim Change 4, 1099–1102 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1038/nclimate2436

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/nclimate2436

This article is cited by

Search

Quick links

Nature Briefing Microbiology

Sign up for the Nature Briefing: Microbiology newsletter — what matters in microbiology research, free to your inbox weekly.

Get the most important science stories of the day, free in your inbox. Sign up for Nature Briefing: Microbiology