In our recent paper, Zhou, B. P. et al. Nature Cell Biology 3, 973–982 (2001), we reported incorrect references for mapping the p14Arf binding site on MDM2. These references should have been Mol. Cell. Biol. 20, 2517–2528 (2000) and J. Mol. Biol. 314, 263–277 (2001). In these papers, the authors demonstrated that the p14Arf binding site on MDM2 is found in residues 235–264 and 270–289.
In addition, our interpretation of the data on p19ARF in Fig. 7a is incorrect. The NIH3T3 cell line used in Fig. 7a has bi-allelic deletion of the ARF/Ink4a locus (Oncogene 11, 635–64 (1995)). The antibody originally used in Fig. 7a recognizes p19Ink4d, and not p19ARF. To clarify these results, we repeated the experiments using the p19ARF antibody in p19ARF-expressing cells (mouse embryonic fibroblasts (MEFs) and DM3T3 cells; Oncogene, 11, 635–645 (1995)). The results shown in Fig. 1 indicate that blockage of phosphatidylinositol-3-OH kinase (PI(3)K/Akt activity with wortmannin enhanced the interaction of p19ARF and MDM2. Thus, these results and the original results from Fig. 7c, support the conclusion that blockage of the PI(3)K/Akt pathway enhances the binding affinity between p19ARF and MDM2. Although the Akt phosphorylation sites on MDM2 did not overlap with the binding region for p19ARF (Ser 166, Ser 186 versus the regions of amino acids 235–264 and 270–289), phosphorylation of MDM2 by Akt in these sites may induce conformation changes and consequently affect the binding of p19ARF.
Additional information
The online version of the original article can be found at 10.1038/ncb1101-973
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Correction: Corrigendum. Nat Cell Biol 4, 736 (2002). https://doi.org/10.1038/ncb831
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/ncb831