Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

  • Letter
  • Published:

Rab11 regulates cell–cell communication during collective cell movements

Abstract

Collective cell movements contribute to development and metastasis. The small GTPase Rac is a key regulator of actin dynamics and cell migration but the mechanisms that restrict Rac activation and localization in a group of collectively migrating cells are unknown. Here, we demonstrate that the small GTPases Rab5 and Rab11 regulate Rac activity and polarization during collective cell migration. We use photoactivatable forms of Rac to demonstrate that Rab11 acts on the entire group to ensure that Rac activity is properly restricted to the leading cell through regulation of cell–cell communication. In addition, we show that Rab11 binds to the actin cytoskeleton regulator Moesin and regulates its activation in vivo during migration. Accordingly, reducing the level of Moesin activity also affects cell–cell communication, whereas expressing active Moesin rescues loss of Rab11 function. Our model suggests that Rab11 controls the sensing of the relative levels of Rac activity in a group of cells, leading to the organization of individual cells in a coherent multicellular motile structure.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution

Access options

Buy this article

Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout

Figure 1: Rab proteins regulate actin dynamics and Rac activity and polarization.
Figure 2: Local activation of Rac does not rescue the Rab11 loss-of-function phenotype.
Figure 3: Local inactivation of Rac reveals a role in cell–cell communication for Rab11.
Figure 4: Rab11 interacts with and controls Moesin activity.
Figure 5: Moesin regulates protrusion distribution, polarization of Rac activity and cell–cell communication.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Rorth, P. Collective cell migration. Annu. Rev. Cell Dev. Biol. 25, 407–429 (2009).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Yilmaz, M. & Christofori, G. Mechanisms of motility in metastasizing cells. Mol. Cancer Res. 8, 629–642 (2010).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Thiery, J. P. Metastasis: alone or together? Curr. Biol. 19, R1121–R1123 (2009).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Montell, D. J. Morphogenetic cell movements: diversity from modular mechanical properties. Science 322, 1502–1505 (2008).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Friedl, P. & Gilmour, D. Collective cell migration in morphogenesis, regeneration and cancer. Nat. Rev. Mol. Cell Biol. 10, 445–457 (2009).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Prasad, M., Wang, X., He, L. & Montell, D. J. Border cell migration: a model system for live imaging and genetic analysis of collective cell movement. Methods Mol. Biol. 769, 277–286 (2011).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Brumby, A. M. & Richardson, H. E. Using Drosophila melanogaster to map human cancer pathways. Nat. Rev. Cancer 5, 626–639 (2005).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Montell, D. J. Border-cell migration: the race is on. Nat. Rev. Mol. Cell Biol. 4, 13–24 (2003).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Rorth, P. Initiating and guiding migration: lessons from border cells. Trends Cell Biol. 12, 325–331 (2002).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Montell, D. J., Yoon, W. H. & Starz-Gaiano, M. Group choreography: mechanisms orchestrating the collective movement of border cells. Nat. Rev. Mol. Cell Biol. 13, 631–645 (2012).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. McDonald, J. A., Pinheiro, E. M., Kadlec, L., Schupbach, T. & Montell, D. J. Multiple EGFR ligands participate in guiding migrating border cells. Dev. Biol. 296, 94–103 (2006).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Duchek, P. & Rorth, P. Guidance of cell migration by EGF receptor signaling during Drosophila oogenesis. Science 291, 131–133 (2001).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Duchek, P., Somogyi, K., Jekely, G., Beccari, S. & Rorth, P. Guidance of cell migration by the Drosophila PDGF/VEGF receptor. Cell 107, 17–26 (2001).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. McDonald, J. A., Pinheiro, E. M. & Montell, D. J. PVF1, a PDGF/VEGF homolog, is sufficient to guide border cells and interacts genetically with Taiman. Development 130, 3469–3478 (2003).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Murphy, A. M. & Montell, D. J. Cell type-specific roles for Cdc42, Rac, and RhoL in Drosophila oogenesis. J. Cell Biol. 133, 617–630 (1996).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Wang, X., He, L., Wu, Y. I., Hahn, K. M. & Montell, D. J. Light-mediated activation reveals a key role for Rac in collective guidance of cell movement in vivo. Nat. Cell Biol. 12, 591–597 (2010).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Assaker, G., Ramel, D., Wculek, S. K., Gonzalez-Gaitan, M. & Emery, G. Spatial restriction of receptor tyrosine kinase activity through a polarized endocytic cycle controls border cell migration. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 107, 22558–22563 (2010).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Pinheiro, E. M. & Montell, D. J. Requirement for Par-6 and Bazooka in Drosophila border cell migration. Development 131, 5243–5251 (2004).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Palamidessi, A. et al. Endocytic trafficking of Rac is required for the spatial restriction of signaling in cell migration. Cell 134, 135–147 (2008).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Itoh, R. E. et al. Activation of rac and cdc42 video imaged by fluorescent resonance energy transfer-based single-molecule probes in the membrane of living cells. Mol. Cell Biol. 22, 6582–6591 (2002).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Wu, Y. I., Wang, X., He, L., Montell, D. & Hahn, K. M. Spatiotemporal control of small GTPases with light using the LOV domain. Methods Enzymol. 497, 393–407 (2011).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. Cao, J., Albertson, R., Riggs, B., Field, C. M. & Sullivan, W. Nuf a Rab11 effector, maintains cytokinetic furrow integrity by promoting local actin polymerization. J. Cell Biol. 182, 301–313 (2008).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. Riggs, B. et al. The concentration of Nuf, a Rab11 effector, at the microtubule-organizing center is cell cycle regulated, dynein-dependent, and coincides with furrow formation. Mol. Biol. Cell 18, 3313–3322 (2007).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  24. Chen, W., Feng, Y., Chen, D. & Wandinger-Ness, A. Rab11 is required for trans-Golgi network-to-plasma membrane transport and a preferential target for GDP dissociation inhibitor. Mol. Biol. Cell 9, 3241–3257 (1998).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  25. Fehon, R. G., McClatchey, A. I. & Bretscher, A. Organizing the cell cortex: the role of ERM proteins. Nat. Rev. Mol. Cell Biol. 11, 276–287 (2010).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  26. Roubinet, C. et al. Molecular networks linked by Moesin drive remodeling of the cell cortex during mitosis. J. Cell Biol. 195, 99–112 (2011).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  27. Laflamme, C. et al. Evi5 promotes collective cell migration through its Rab–GAP activity. J. Cell Biol. 198, 57–67 (2012).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  28. Polesello, C., Delon, I., Valenti, P., Ferrer, P. & Payre, F. Dmoesin controls actin-based cell shape and polarity during Drosophila melanogaster oogenesis. Nat. Cell Biol. 4, 782–789 (2002).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  29. Aoki, K. & Matsuda, M. Visualization of small GTPase activity with fluorescence resonance energy transfer-based biosensors. Nat. Protocols 4, 1623–1631 (2009).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  30. Yoshimura, S., Haas, A. K. & Barr, F. A. Analysis of Rab GTPase and GTPase-activating protein function at primary cilia. Methods Enzymol. 439, 353–364 (2008).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  31. Christoforidis, S. & Zerial, M. Purification and identification of novel Rab effectors using affinity chromatography. Methods 20, 403–410 (2000).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

We thank the Bloomington Stock Collection and the Vienna Drosophila RNAi Center for fly stocks. We thank G. Assaker, C. Iampietro and C. Charbonneau for technical assistance and helpful discussions. We also thank S. Carreno for providing important insights on Moesin experiments. This work was supported by grants from the Canadian Institute for Health Research (CIHR) to G.E. (MOP-114899). G.E. holds a Canada Research Chair (Tier II) in Vesicular Trafficking and Cell Signalling. D.R. and C.L. are supported by Fonds de Recherche Québec Santé (FRQS). X.W. is supported by the Atip-Avenir programme and the Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique (CNRS). D.M. is supported by grants R01GM46425 and R01GM73164. IRIC is supported in part by the Canadian Center of Excellence in Commercialization and Research (CECR), the Canada Foundation for Innovation (CFI) and by the Fonds de Recherche du Québec en Santé (FRQS). This paper is dedicated to the memory of A. Ruffé.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

G.E. and D.R. conceived the project and G.E. directed it. D.R. designed and performed FRET experiments, staining of border cells and egg chambers, quantified migration, and developed the method for determination of the orientation of the protrusions. D.R. and X.W. performed photoactivation experiments. C.L. developed mass spectrometry analysis and immunoprecipitations. D.R., D.J.M. and G.E. wrote the manuscript.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Gregory Emery.

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing financial interests.

Supplementary information

Supplementary Information

Supplementary Information (PDF 1048 kb)

Supplementary Table 1

Supplementary Information (XLSX 13 kb)

PA-RacQ61L photoactivation in a control background.

Border cells expressing UAS-PA-RacQ61L at the onset of migration were recorded by time-lapse microscopy and subjected to photoactivation (as described in Methods). The green circle represents the area of photoactivation. (AVI 6481 kb)

PA-RacQ61L photoactivation in a Rab11SN background.

Border cells expressing UAS-PA-RacQ61L and Rab11SN at the onset of migration were recorded by time-lapse microscopy and subjected to photoactivation (as described in Methods). The green circle represents the area of photoactivation. (AVI 7812 kb)

PA-RacQ61L photoactivation in a Rab5SN background.

Border cells expressing UAS-PA-RacQ61L and Rab5SN at the onset of migration were recorded by time-lapse microscopy and subjected to photoactivation (as described in Methods). The green circle represents the area of photoactivation. (AVI 8702 kb)

Light-insensitive RacQ61L photoactivation in a Rab11SN background.

Border cells expressing UAS-PA-RacQ61L C450M and Rab11SN at the onset of migration were recorded by time-lapse microscopy and subjected to photoactivation (as described in Methods). The green circle represents the area of photoactivation. (AVI 9817 kb)

Light-insensitive RacQ61L photoactivation in a Rab5SN background.

Border cells expressing UAS-PA-RacQ61L C450M and Rab5SN at the onset of migration were recorded by time-lapse microscopy and subjected to photoactivation (as described in Methods). The green circle represents the area of photoactivation. (AVI 8046 kb)

PA-RacT17N photoactivation in a control background.

Border cells expressing UAS-PA-RacT17N at the onset of migration were recorded by time-lapse microscopy and subjected to photoactivation as described in Materials and Methods. The green circle represents the area of photoactivation. (AVI 2686 kb)

PA-RacT17N Photoactivation in a Rab11SN background.

Border cells expressing UAS-PA-RacT17N and Rab11SN at the onset of migration were recorded by time-lapse microscopy and subjected to photoactivation (as described in Methods). The green circle represents the area of photoactivation. (AVI 3385 kb)

PA-RacT17N photoactivation in a Rab5SN background.

Border cells expressing UAS-PA-RacT17N and Rab5SN at the onset of migration were recorded by time-lapse microscopy and subjected to photoactivation (as described in Methods). The green circle represents the area of photoactivation. (AVI 5977 kb)

PA-RacT17N photoactivation in an RNAi Moesin background.

Border cells expressing UAS-PA-RacT17N and RNAi Moesin at the onset of migration were recorded by time-lapse microscopy and subjected to photoactivation (as described in Methods). The green circle represents the area of photoactivation. (AVI 2150 kb)

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Ramel, D., Wang, X., Laflamme, C. et al. Rab11 regulates cell–cell communication during collective cell movements. Nat Cell Biol 15, 317–324 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1038/ncb2681

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/ncb2681

This article is cited by

Search

Quick links

Nature Briefing

Sign up for the Nature Briefing newsletter — what matters in science, free to your inbox daily.

Get the most important science stories of the day, free in your inbox. Sign up for Nature Briefing