Abstract
The ERK (extracellular signal-regulated kinase) MAPK (mitogen-activated protein kinase) cascade (Raf–MEK–ERK) mediates mitogenic signalling, and is frequently hyperactivated by Ras oncogenes in human cancer. The entire range of activities of multifunctional Ras in carcinogenesis remains elusive. Here we report that the ERK pathway is downregulated by MEK (MAPK–ERK kinase) SUMOylation, which is inhibited by oncogenic Ras. MEK SUMOylation blocked ERK activation by disrupting the specific docking interaction between MEK and ERK. Expression of un-SUMOylatable MEK enhanced ERK activation, cell differentiation, proliferation and malignant transformation by oncogenic ErbB2 or Raf, but not by active Ras. Interestingly, MEK SUMOylation was abrogated in cancer cells harbouring Ras mutations. Oncogenic Ras inhibits MEK SUMOylation by impairing the function of the MEKK1 MAPKKK as a SUMO-E3 ligase specific for MEK. Furthermore, forced enhancement of MEK SUMOylation suppressed Ras-induced cell transformation. Thus, oncogenic Ras efficiently activates the ERK pathway both by activating Raf and by inhibiting MEK SUMOylation, thereby inducing carcinogenesis.
This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution
Access options
Subscribe to this journal
Receive 12 print issues and online access
$209.00 per year
only $17.42 per issue
Buy this article
- Purchase on Springer Link
- Instant access to full article PDF
Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Calvo, F., Agudo-Ibanez, L. & Crespo, P. The Ras-ERK pathway: understanding site-specific signaling provides hope of new anti-tumor therapies. Bioessays 32, 412–421 (2010).
Yao, Z. & Seger, R. The ERK signaling cascade—views from different subcellular compartments. Biofactors 35, 407–416 (2009).
Avruch, J. MAP kinase pathways: the first twenty years. Biochim. Biophys. Acta 1773, 1150–1160 (2007).
Raman, M., Chen, W. & Cobb, M. H. Differential regulation and properties of MAPKs. Oncogene 26, 3100–3112 (2007).
Dhanasekaran, D. N. & Johnson, G. L. MAPKs: function, regulation, role in cancer and therapeutic targeting. Oncogene 26, 3097–3099 (2007).
Rajakulendran, T., Sahmi, M., Lefrancois, M., Sicheri, F. & Therrien, M. A dimerization-dependent mechanism drives RAF catalytic activation. Nature 461, 542–545 (2009).
Heidorn, S. J. et al. Kinase-dead BRAF and oncogenic RAS cooperate to drive tumor progression through CRAF. Cell 140, 209–221 (2010).
Poulikakos, P. I., Zhang, C., Bollag, G., Shokat, K. M. & Rosen, N. RAF inhibitors transactivate RAF dimers and ERK signalling in cells with wild-type BRAF. Nature 464, 427–430 (2010).
Hatzivassiliou, G. et al. RAF inhibitors prime wild-type RAF to activate the MAPK pathway and enhance growth. Nature 464, 431–435 (2010).
Meloche, S. & Pouyssegur, J. The ERK1/2 mitogen-activated protein kinase pathway as a master regulator of the G1- to S-phase transition. Oncogene 26, 3227–3239 (2007).
Malumbres, M. & Barbacid, M. RAS oncogenes: the first 30 years. Nat. Rev. Cancer 3, 459–465 (2003).
Schubbert, S., Shannon, K. & Bollag, G. Hyperactive Ras in developmental disorders and cancer. Nat. Rev. Cancer 7, 295–308 (2007).
Young, A. et al. Ras signaling and therapies. Adv. Cancer Res. 102, 1–17 (2009).
Mody, A., Weiner, J. & Ramanathan, S. Modularity of MAP kinases allows deformation of their signalling pathways. Nat. Cell Biol. 11, 484–491 (2009).
Johnson, G. L. & Gomez, S. M. Sequence patches on MAPK surfaces define protein–protein interactions. Genome Biol. 10, 222 (2009).
Tanoue, T., Adachi, M., Moriguchi, T. & Nishida, E. A conserved docking motif in MAP kinases common to substrates, activators and regulators. Nat. Cell Biol. 2, 110–116 (2000).
Enslen, H. & Davis, R. J. Regulation of MAP kinases by docking domains. Biol. Cell 93, 5–14 (2001).
Bardwell, A. J., Frankson, E. & Bardwell, L. Selectivity of docking sites in MAPK kinases. J. Biol. Chem. 284, 13165–13173 (2009).
Takekawa, M., Tatebayashi, K. & Saito, H. Conserved docking site is essential for activation of mammalian MAP kinase kinases by specific MAP kinase kinase kinases. Mol. Cell 18, 295–306 (2005).
Geiss-Friedlander, R. & Melchior, F. Concepts in SUMOylation: a decade on. Nat. Rev. Mol. Cell Biol. 8, 947–956 (2007).
Melchior, F., Schergaut, M. & Pichler, A. SUMO: ligases, isopeptidases and nuclear pores. Trends Biochem. Sci. 28, 612–618 (2003).
Johnson, E. S. Protein modification by SUMO. Annu Rev. Biochem. 73, 355–382 (2004).
Seeler, J. S. & Dejean, A. Nuclear and unclear functions of SUMO. Nat. Rev. Mol. Cell Biol. 4, 690–699 (2003).
Hay, R. T. SUMO-specific proteases: a twist in the tail. Trends Cell Biol. 17, 370–376 (2007).
Muller, S., Hoege, C., Pyrowolakis, G. & Jentsch, S. SUMO, ubiquitin’s mysterious cousin. Nat. Rev. Mol. Cell Biol. 2, 202–210 (2001).
Kim, J. H. et al. Roles of SUMOylation of a reptin chromatin-remodelling complex in cancer metastasis. Nat. Cell Biol. 8, 631–639 (2006).
Steffan, J. S. et al. SUMO modification of Huntingtin and Huntington’s disease pathology. Science 304, 100–104 (2004).
Cheng, J., Kang, X., Zhang, S. & Yeh, E. T. SUMO-specific protease 1 is essential for stabilization of HIF1α during hypoxia. Cell 131, 584–595 (2007).
Kamitani, T., Nguyen, H. P. & Yeh, E. T. Preferential modification of nuclear proteins by a novel ubiquitin-like molecule. J. Biol. Chem. 272, 14001–14004 (1997).
Uchimura, Y., Nakamura, M., Sugasawa, K., Nakao, M. & Saitoh, H. Overproduction of eukaryotic SUMO-1- and SUMO-2-conjugated proteins in Escherichia coli. Anal Biochem. 331, 204–206 (2004).
Ohren, J. F. et al. Structures of human MAP kinase kinase 1 (MEK1) and MEK2 describe novel noncompetitive kinase inhibition. Nat. Struct. Mol. Biol. 11, 1192–1197 (2004).
Kranenburg, O., Verlaan, I. & Moolenaar, W. H. Dynamin is required for the activation of mitogen-activated protein (MAP) kinase by MAP kinase kinase. J. Biol. Chem. 274, 35301–35304 (1999).
Ory, S., Zhou, M., Conrads, T. P., Veenstra, T. D. & Morrison, D. K. Protein phosphatase 2A positively regulates Ras signaling by dephosphorylating KSR1 and Raf-1 on critical 14-3-3 binding sites. Curr. Biol. 13, 1356–1364 (2003).
Terai, K. & Matsuda, M. Ras binding opens c-Raf to expose the docking site for mitogen-activated protein kinase kinase. EMBO Rep. 6, 251–255 (2005).
Xu, J. et al. Insulin enhances growth hormone induction of the MEK/ERK signaling pathway. J. Biol. Chem. 281, 982–992 (2006).
Galperin, E. & Sorkin, A. Endosomal targeting of MEK2 requires RAF, MEK kinase activity and clathrin-dependent endocytosis. Traffic 9, 1776–1790 (2008).
Liu, Y., Fisher, D. A. & Storm, D. R. Intracellular sorting of neuromodulin (GAP-43) mutants modified in the membrane targeting domain. J. Neurosci. 14, 5807–5817 (1994).
Liang, X., Lu, Y., Neubert, T. A. & Resh, M. D. Mass spectrometric analysis of GAP-43/neuromodulin reveals the presence of a variety of fatty acylated species. J. Biol. Chem. 277, 33032–33040 (2002).
Jakobs, A. et al. Ubc9 fusion-directed SUMOylation (UFDS): a method to analyse function of protein SUMOylation. Nat. Methods 4, 245–250 (2007).
Bardwell, A. J., Flatauer, L. J., Matsukuma, K., Thorner, J. & Bardwell, L. A conserved docking site in MEKs mediates high-affinity binding to MAP kinases and cooperates with a scaffold protein to enhance signal transmission. J. Biol. Chem. 276, 10374–10386 (2001).
Xu, B., Stippec, S., Robinson, F. L. & Cobb, M. H. Hydrophobic as well as charged residues in both MEK1 and ERK2 are important for their proper docking. J. Biol. Chem. 276, 26509–26515 (2001).
Chiu, V. K. et al. Ras signalling on the endoplasmic reticulum and the Golgi. Nat. Cell Biol. 4, 343–350 (2002).
Lerner, E. C. et al. Inhibition of the prenylation of K-Ras, but not H- or N-Ras, is highly resistant to CAAX peptidomimetics and requires both a farnesyltransferase and a geranylgeranyltransferase I inhibitor in human tumor cell lines. Oncogene 15, 1283–1288 (1997).
Karandikar, M., Xu, S. & Cobb, M. H. MEKK1 binds raf-1 and the ERK2 cascade components. J. Biol. Chem. 275, 40120–40127 (2000).
Saltzman, A. et al. hUBC9 associates with MEKK1 and type I TNF-α receptor and stimulates NFκB activity. FEBS Lett. 425, 431–435 (1998).
Li, T. et al. SUMOylation of heterogeneous nuclear ribonucleoproteins, zinc finger proteins, and nuclear pore complex proteins: a proteomic analysis. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 101, 8551–8556 (2004).
Russell, M., Lange-Carter, C. A. & Johnson, G. L. Direct interaction between Ras and the kinase domain of mitogen-activated protein kinase kinase kinase (MEKK1). J. Biol. Chem. 270, 11757–11760 (1995).
Eletr, Z. M., Huang, D. T., Duda, D. M., Schulman, B. A. & Kuhlman, B. E2 conjugating enzymes must disengage from their E1 enzymes before E3-dependent ubiquitin and ubiquitin-like transfer. Nat. Struct. Mol. Biol. 12, 933–934 (2005).
Dadke, S. et al. Regulation of protein tyrosine phosphatase 1B by SUMOylation. Nat. Cell Biol. 9, 80–85 (2007).
Marshall, C. J. Specificity of receptor tyrosine kinase signaling: transient versus sustained extracellular signal-regulated kinase activation. Cell 80, 179–185 (1995).
Murphy, L. O. & Blenis, J. MAPK signal specificity: the right place at the right time. Trends Biochem. Sci. 31, 268–275 (2006).
Yamamoto, T. et al. Continuous ERK activation downregulates antiproliferative genes throughout G1 phase to allow cell-cycle progression. Curr. Biol. 16, 1171–1182 (2006).
Lu, Z., Xu, S., Joazeiro, C., Cobb, M. H. & Hunter, T. The PHD domain of MEKK1 acts as an E3 ubiquitin ligase and mediates ubiquitination and degradation of ERK1/2. Mol. Cell 9, 945–956 (2002).
Witowsky, J. A. & Johnson, G. L. Ubiquitylation of MEKK1 inhibits its phosphorylation of MKK1 and MKK4 and activation of the ERK1/2 and JNK pathways. J. Biol. Chem. 278, 1403–1406 (2003).
Sobko, A., Ma, H. & Firtel, R. A. Regulated SUMOylation and ubiquitination of DdMEK1 is required for proper chemotaxis. Dev. Cell 2, 745–756 (2002).
Kang, J. S., Saunier, E. F., Akhurst, R. J. & Derynck, R. The type I TGF-β receptor is covalently modified and regulated by SUMOylation. Nat. Cell Biol. 10, 654–664 (2008).
Desterro, J. M., Rodriguez, M. S. & Hay, R. T. SUMO-1 modification of IκBα inhibits NF-κB activation. Mol. Cell 2, 233–239 (1998).
Sebolt-Leopold, J. S. & Herrera, R. Targeting the mitogen-activated protein kinase cascade to treat cancer. Nat. Rev. Cancer 4, 937–947 (2004).
Arimoto, K., Fukuda, H., Imajoh-Ohmi, S., Saito, H. & Takekawa, M. Formation of stress granules inhibits apoptosis by suppressing stress-responsive MAPK pathways. Nat. Cell Biol. 10, 1324–1332 (2008).
Akiyama, T. et al. The transforming potential of the c-erbB-2 protein is regulated by its autophosphorylation at the carboxyl-terminal domain. Mol. Cell Biol. 11, 833–842 (1991).
Giroux, S. et al. Embryonic death of Mek1-deficient mice reveals a role for this kinase in angiogenesis in the labyrinthine region of the placenta. Curr. Biol. 9, 369–372 (1999).
Wohlschlegel, J. A., Johnson, E. S., Reed, S. I. & Yates, J. R. 3rd Improved identification of SUMO attachment sites using C-terminal SUMOmutants and tailored protease digestion strategies. J. Proteome Res. 5, 761–770 (2006).
Morita, S., Kojima, T. & Kitamura, T. Plat-E: an efficient and stable system for transient packaging of retroviruses. Gene Ther. 7, 1063–1066 (2000).
Cowley, S., Paterson, H., Kemp, P. & Marshall, C. J. Activation of MAP kinase kinase is necessary and sufficient for PC12 differentiation and for transformation of NIH 3T3 cells. Cell 77, 841–852 (1994).
Cuevas, B. D., Winter-Vann, A. M., Johnson, N. L. & Johnson, G. L. MEKK1 controls matrix degradation and tumor cell dissemination during metastasis of polyoma middle-T driven mammary cancer. Oncogene 25, 4998–5010 (2006).
Acknowledgements
This work was supported in part by a Grant-in-Aid for Scientific Research on Innovative Areas and other grants from the Ministry of Education, Culture, Sports, Science and Technology (MEXT) of Japan (M.T. and H.S.), by the Takeda Science Foundation, the Naito foundation and the DAIKO foundation (M.T.) and by the Global COE Program from MEXT, Japan. We thank J. Charron (Université Laval, Québec) for the M E K1−/− MEFs, T. Kitamura (University of Tokyo) for Plat-E cells and H. Saitoh (Kumamoto University), T. Yamamoto (University of Tokyo), T. Kataoka (Kobe University) and S. Iwata (University of Tokyo) for plasmids.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Contributions
Y.K., P.O’G. and M.T. designed and carried out the experiments; Y.K., P.O’G., H.S. and M.T. analysed the data and wrote the paper.
Corresponding authors
Ethics declarations
Competing interests
The authors declare no competing financial interests.
Supplementary information
Supplementary Information
Supplementary Information (PDF 1295 kb)
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Kubota, Y., O’Grady, P., Saito, H. et al. Oncogenic Ras abrogates MEK SUMOylation that suppresses the ERK pathway and cell transformation. Nat Cell Biol 13, 282–291 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1038/ncb2169
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/ncb2169
This article is cited by
-
ERK-mediated NELF-A phosphorylation promotes transcription elongation of immediate-early genes by releasing promoter-proximal pausing of RNA polymerase II
Nature Communications (2022)
-
A deficiency in SUMOylation activity disrupts multiple pathways leading to neural tube and heart defects in Xenopus embryos
BMC Genomics (2019)
-
A guanine derivative as a new MEK inhibitor produced by Streptomyces sp. MK63-43F2
The Journal of Antibiotics (2018)
-
A functional SUMO-motif in the active site of PIM1 promotes its degradation via RNF4, and stimulates protein kinase activity
Scientific Reports (2017)
-
A comprehensive compilation of SUMO proteomics
Nature Reviews Molecular Cell Biology (2016)