Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

  • Brief Communication
  • Published:

Differential contribution of cytoplasmic Ca2+ and Ca2+ influx to gamete fusion and egg activation in maize

Abstract

In multicellular organisms, gamete fusion triggers a set of events, collectively known as egg activation, that leads to the development of a new individual. Every species that has been studied shows at least one rise in cytoplasmic Ca2+ concentration ([Ca2+]Cyt) after gamete fusion1 which is believed to be involved in activation. Yet the source and regulation of this Ca2+ signal and the way it is transduced inside the zygote are controversial1. In higher plants, in vitro fertilization (IVF)2,3 has enabled the description of a rise in [Ca2+]Cyt (ref. 4) that is sufficient for activation5, and of a Ca2+ influx that spreads as a wavefront from the fusion site5 The relationship between these two responses is unknown. Using a new combination of methods that simultaneously monitor the extracellular flux with a Ca2+-vibrating probe, and [Ca2+]Cyt by widefield imaging, we directly determined that the Ca2+ influx precedes the [Ca2+]Cyt elevation by 40–120 s. In addition, results from experiments using the Ca2+-channel inhibitor gadolinium (Gd3+) suggest that the Ca2+ influx may be necessary for sperm incorporation. We also present evidence for a putative sperm-dependent Gd3+-insensitive localized Ca2+ influx confined to the fusion point.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution

Access options

Buy this article

Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout

Figure 1: Simultaneous measurement of Ca2+ flux and [Ca2+]Cyt during maize IVF.
Figure 2: Increase in [Ca2+]Cyt but no Ca2+ influx during maize IVF in the presence of 10 μM GdCl3.
Figure 3: Gamete fusion without sperm incorporation during maize IVF in the presence of 10 μM GdCl3.
Figure 4: Spatial pattern of the Ca2+ fluxes during maize IVF in the presence of 10 μM GdCl3.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Stricker, S. A. Dev. Biol. 211, 157–176 (1999).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Kranz, E. in Methods in Molecular Biology (Plant Cell Culture Protocols, Vol. 111) (ed Hall, R. D.) 259–267 (Humana Press, Totowa, NJ, 1999).

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  3. Antoine, A., Dumas, C., Faure, J.-E., Feijó, J. & Rougier, M. Sex. Pl. Reprod. 14, 21–26 (2001).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Digonnet, C., Aldon, D., Leduc, N., Dumas, C. & Rougier, M. Development 124, 2867–2874 (1997).

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Antoine, A. F., Faure, J. E., Cordeiro, S., Dumas, C., Rougier, M. & Feijo, J. A. Proc. Natl Acad Sci USA 97, 10643–10648 (2000).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Faure, J.-E., Mogensen, H., Kranz, E., Digonnet, C. & Dumas, C. Protoplasma 171, 97–103 (1992).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Kranz, E., von Wiegen, P. & Lörz, H. Plant J. 8, 9–23 (1995).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Morris, S. J., Zimmerberg, J., Sarkar, D. P. & Blumenthal, R. Methods Enzymol. 221, 42–58 (1993).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Faure, J.-E., Digonnet, C. & Dumas, C. Science 263, 1598–1600 (1994).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. 12. Smith, P. J. S., Sanger, R. H. & Jaffe, L. F. Methods Cell Biol. 40, 115–134 (1994).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Shipley, A. M. & Feijó, J. A. in Fertilization in Higher Plants: Molecular and Cytological Aspects (eds Cresti, M., Cai, G. & Moscatelli, S.)235–252 (Springer-Verlag, Heidelberg/Berlin, 1999).

    Book  Google Scholar 

  12. Antoine, A.-F. PhD.Thesis (ENS Lyon, Lyon, 2000)

  13. Jaffe, L. A. Ann. N. Y. Acad. Sci. 339, 86–101 (1980).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Lee, K. W., Webb, S. E. & Miller, A. L. Dev. Biol. 214, 168–180 (1999).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Lindsay, L. L., Hertzler, P. L. & Clark, W. H. J. Dev. Biol. 152, 94–102 (1992).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. McDougall, A., Sardet, C. & Lambert, C. C. Zygote 3, 251–258 (1995).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Lynn, J. W. & Chambers, E. L. Dev. Biol. 102, 98–109 (1984).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Lynn, J. W., McCulloh, D. H. & Chambers, E. L. Dev. Biol. 128, 305–323 (1988).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. David, C., Halliwell, J. & Whitaker, M. J. Physiol. 402, 139–154 (1988).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Shen, S. S. & Buck, W. R. Dev. Biol. 157, 157–169 (1993).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Eisen, A., Kiehart, D. P., Wieland, S. J. & Reynolds, G. T. J. Cell Biol. 99, 1647–1654 (1984).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. Mohri, T., Miyaki, S., Shirakawa, H. & Ikegami, S. Development 125, 293–300 (1998).

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Shen, S. S. & Burgart, L. J. J. Cell Biol. 101, 420–426 (1985).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  24. Eddy, E. M. & Shapiro, B. M. J. Cell Biol. 71, 35–48 (1976).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  25. Jones, K. T., Soeller, C. & Cannell, M. B. Development 125, 4627–4635 (1998).

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Frey, T. Cytometry 21, 265–274 (1995).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The present collaboration between the ENS and IGC was funded by a ICCTI/CNRS protocol (9607/CNRS). We thank M. Beckert (INRA, Clermont-Ferrand) for providing A188, A6 and DH5×DH7 seeds. We also thank F. Rozier for technical help and C. Arnoult for very helpful comments. J.A.F. and the vibrating-probe set-up were partly funded by Fundação Luso-Americana para o Desenvolvimento and Fundação para a Ciência e Tecnologia (PRAXIS/C/BIA/11034/1998). J.-E.F. was supported by CNRS.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Anne-Frédérique Antoine.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Antoine, AF., Faure, JE., Dumas, C. et al. Differential contribution of cytoplasmic Ca2+ and Ca2+ influx to gamete fusion and egg activation in maize. Nat Cell Biol 3, 1120–1123 (2001). https://doi.org/10.1038/ncb1201-1120

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/ncb1201-1120

This article is cited by

Search

Quick links

Nature Briefing

Sign up for the Nature Briefing newsletter — what matters in science, free to your inbox daily.

Get the most important science stories of the day, free in your inbox. Sign up for Nature Briefing