Tissue Culture Regeneration of Plants in Zea diploperennis, a Close Relative of Corn


High frequency and reliable plant regeneration from somatic cells of Zea mays is the key step in allowing the tools of soma-clonal variation, somatic cell hybridization, and recombinant DNA to be used in the development of improved breeding lines. This communication describes high frequency plant regeneration from somatic stem donor tissue of field-grown Zea diploperennis. Reliable plant regeneration has now been achieved in a perennial diploid relative of corn (Zea diploperennis), which, like perennials in general, is highly tillered. This species is being used in our maize improvement program as a source of germplasm for the unique trait of high tillering and its associated capacity for plantlet regeneration. After 3–4 subcultures of cultured somatic tissues on a primary medium, small callus fragments are transferred to secondary medium devoid of the auxin, 2,4-D. After a few days, numerous shoots regenerate and develop into normal plantlets which are then separated and transferred to a tertiary medium for root development. The selection of somaclonal variants from cultured somatic cells of interspecific hybrids between corn and teosinte holds promise for the synthesis of breeding lines suited for the development of improved corn varieties.

Access options

Rent or Buy article

Get time limited or full article access on ReadCube.


All prices are NET prices.


  1. 1

    Sheridan, W.F. 1982. Anther culture of maize, pp. 389–396. In: Maize for Biological Research. W.F. Sheridan (ed.), Plant Mol. Biol. Assoc., Charlottesville, VA.

    Google Scholar 

  2. 2

    Harms, C.T. 1982. Maize and cereal protoplasts. Factors and perspectives, pp. 373–384. In: Maize for Biological Research. W.F. Sheridan (ed.), Plant Mol. Biol. Assoc., Charlottesville, VA.

    Google Scholar 

  3. 3

    Vasil, I.K. 1982. Plant cell cultures and somatic cell genetics of cereals and grasses, pp.179–203. In: Plant Improvement and Somatic Cell Genetics. I.K. Vasil, W.R. Scowcroft, K.J. Frey (eds.), Academic Press, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  4. 4

    Beadle, G. W. 1939. Teosinte and the origin of maize. J. Heredity 30: 245–247.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. 5

    Beadle, G.W. 1978. Teosinte and the origin of maize, pp. 113–128. In: Maize Breeding and Genetics. D.B. Walden (cd.), John Wiley and Sons, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  6. 6

    Beadle, G.W. 1980. The ancestry of corn. Sci. Amer. 242: 112–119.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. 7

    Doebley, J.F. and Iltis, H.H. 1980. Taxonomy of Zea (Gramineae). I. A Subgeneric classification with key to taxa. Amer. J. Bot. 67: 982–993.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. 8

    Iltis, H.H. 1983. From Teosinte to maize: The catastrophic sexual transmutation. Science 222: 886–894.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  9. 9

    Iltis, H.H., Doebley, J.F., Guzman, M.R., and Pazy, B. 1979. Zea diploperennis (Gramineae) a new teosinte from Mexico. Science 203: 186–188.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  10. 10

    Pasupulet, C.V. and Galinat, W.C. 1982. Zea diploperennis I. Its chromosomes and comparative cytology. J. Hered. 73: 168–170.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. 11

    Galinat, W.C. and Pasupulet, C.V. 1982. Zea diploperennis II. A review-on its significance and potential value for maize improvement. May-dica 27: 213–220.

    Google Scholar 

  12. 12

    Galinat, W.C. 1982. Maize, breeding and its raw material, pp. 331–340. In: Maize for Biological Research. W.F. Sheridan (ed.), Plant Molec. Biol. Assoc., Charlottesville, VA.

    Google Scholar 

  13. 13

    Nault, L.R. 1980. Maize bushy stunt and corn stunt: a comparison of disease symptoms, pathogen host ranges, and vectors. Phytopath. 70: 659–662.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. 14

    Nault, L.R., Gordon, D.T., Damsteegt, V.D., and Iltis, H.H. 1982. Response of annual and perennial teosintes (Zea) to six maize viruses. Plant Disease 66: 61–62.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. 15

    Nault, L.R., Gingery, R.E. and Gordon, D.T. 1980. Lcafhopper transmission and host range of maize rayado lino virus. Phytopath. 70: 709–712.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. 16

    Evans, D.A., Sharp, W.R., and Flick, C.E. 1981. Growth and behavior of cell cultures; embryogenesis and organogencsis, pp. 45–113. In: Plant Tissue Culture: Methods and Applications in Agriculture. T.A. Thorpe (ed.), Academic Press, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  17. 17

    Dhaliwal, H.S. and Lorz, H. 1979. In vitro shoot cultures of teosinte and corn. Maize Genetics Coop. News Letter. 53: 14.

    Google Scholar 

  18. 18

    Liu, M.C. 1981. In vitro methods applied to sugarcane improvement, pp. 299–324. In: Plant Tissue Culture: Methods and Applications in Agriculture. T.A. Thorpe (ed.), Academic Press, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  19. 19

    Green, C.E. and Phillips, R.L. 1975. Plant regeneration from tissue cultures of maize. Crop Sci. 15: 417–421.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. 20

    Ozias-Akins, P. and Vasil, I.K. 1982. Plant regeneration from cultured immature embryos and influorescences of Triticum aestivum L. (wheat): evidence for somatic embryogenesis. Protoplasrna 110: 95–105.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. 21

    Cure, W.W. and Mott, R.L. 1978. A comparative anatomical study of organogcnesis in cultured tissues of maize, wheat and oats. Physiol. Plant. 42: 91–96.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. 22

    Orton, T.J. and Mott, R.L. 1980. Chromosomal variability in tissue culture and regenerated plants in Hordeum. Thcoret Appl. Genet. 56: 101–112.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  23. 23

    Edallo, S., Zuccinali, C., Perenzin, M., and Salamini, F. 1981. Chromosomal variation and frequence of spontaneous mutation associated with in vitro culture and plant regeneration in maize. Maydica 26: 39–56.

    Google Scholar 

  24. 24

    Umbeck, P.F. and Gengenbach, B.G. 1983. Reversion of male-sterile T-cytoplasm maize to male fertility in tissue culture. Crop Science 23: 584–588.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  25. 25

    Evans, D.A., Flick, C.E., and Jensen, R.A. 1981. Somatic hybrid plants between sexually incompatible species of the genus Nicotiana . Science 213: 907–909.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  26. 26

    Timothy, D.H., Levings, C.S., Hu, W.W., and Goodman, M.M. 1983. Plasmid-like mitochondrial DNA's in diploperennial teosinte. Maydica 28: 139–149.

    Google Scholar 

  27. 27

    Murashige, T. and Skoog, F. 1962. A revised medium for rapid growth and bioassays with lobacco tissue culture. Physiol. Plant. 15: 473–497.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information



Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Sondahl, M., Evans, D., Prioli, L. et al. Tissue Culture Regeneration of Plants in Zea diploperennis, a Close Relative of Corn. Nat Biotechnol 2, 455–458 (1984). https://doi.org/10.1038/nbt0584-455

Download citation

Further reading