Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

  • Research Article
  • Published:

Engineering receptor-mediated cytotoxicity into human ribonucleases by steric blockade of inhibitor interaction

Abstract

Several nonmammalian members of the RNase A superfamily exhibit anticancer activity that appears to correlate with resistance to the cytosolic ribonuclease inhibitor (RI). We mutated two human ribonucle- ases—pancreatic RNase (hRNAse) and eosinophil-derived neurotoxin (EDN)—to incorporate cysteine residues at putative sites of close contact to RI, but distant from the catalytic sites. Coupling of Cys89 of RNase and Cys87 of EDN to proteins at these sites via a thioether bond produced enzymatically active conjugates that were resistant to RI. To elicit cellular targeting as well as to block RI binding, transferrin was conjugated to a mutant human RNase, rhRNase(Gly89→Cys) and a mutant EDN (Thr87→Cys). The transferrin–rhRNase(Gly89→Cys) thioether conjugate was 5000-fold more toxic to U251 cells than recombinant wild-type hRNase. In addition, transferrin-targeted EDN exhibited tumor cell toxicities similar to those of hRNase. Thus, we endowed two human RI-sensitive RNases with greater cytotoxicity by increasing their resistance to RI. This strategy has the potential to generate a novel set of recombinant human proteins useful for targeted therapy of cancer.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution

Access options

Buy this article

Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout

Figure 1: Representation of the structure of the 1:1 complex between porcine RI and RNase A generated with TURBO FRODO (A. Roussel, A.-G. Inisan & C. Cambillau, AFMB and Bio Graphics, Marseille, France).
Figure 2: List of various constructs of rhRNase(G89C) and rhEDN(T87C) conjugates.
Figure 3: SDS-PAGE of rhRNase(Gly89C→Cys) conjugates on 10–20% gradient gel.
Figure 4: Enzyme activity and RI resistance of RNase conjugates.
Figure 5: Cellular protein synthesis inhibition by RNase conjugates.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. D'Alessio, G. & Riordan, J.F. Ribonucleases: Structures and Functions (Academic Press, New York, 1997).

    Google Scholar 

  2. Domachowske, J.B. & Rosenberg, H.F. Eosinophils inhibit retroviral transduction of human target cells by a ribonuclease-dependent mechanism. J. Leukoc. Biol. 62, 363– 368 (1997).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Lehrer, R.I. et al. Antibacterial properties of eosinophil major basic protein and eosinophil cationic protein. J. Immunol. 142, 4428– 4434 (1989).

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Rosenberg, H.F. Recombinant human eosinophil cationic protein. Ribonuclease activity is not essential for cytotoxicity. J. Biol. Chem. 270, 7876–7881 (1995).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Durack, D.T., Ackerman, S.J., Loegering, D.A. & Gleich, G.J. Purification of human eosinophil-derived neurotoxin. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 78, 5165–5169 (1981).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Newton, D.L. et al. Toxicity of an antitumor ribonuclease to Purkinje neurons. J. Neurosci. 14, 538–544 (1994).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Nitta, K. et al. Inhibition of cell proliferation by Rana catesbeiana and Rana japonica lectins belonging to the ribonuclease superfamily. Cancer Res. 54, 920–927. ( 1994).

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Mikulski, S.M., Grossman, A.M., Carter, P.W., Shogen, K. & Costanzi, J.J. Phase I human clinical trial of ONCONASE (P-30 protein) administered intravenously on a weekly schedule in cancer patient with solid tumors. Int. J. Oncol. 3, 57–64 (1993).

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Vescia, S., Tramontano, D., Augusti-Tocco, G. & D'Alessio, G. In vitro studies on selective inhibition of tumor cell growth by seminal ribonuclease. Cancer Res. 40, 3740–3744 (1980).

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Laccetti, P. et al. In vivo and in vitro growth-inhibitory effect of bovine seminal ribonuclease on a system of rat thyroid epithelial transformed cells and tumors. Cancer Res. 52, 4582–4586 (1992).

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Wu, Y., Mikulski, S.M., Ardelt, W., Rybak, S.M. & Youle, R.J. A cytotoxic ribonuclease. Study of the mechanism of onconase cytotoxicity. J. Biol. Chem. 268, 10686–10693 (1993).

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Murthy, B.S. & Sirdeshmukh, R. Sensitivity of monomeric and dimeric forms of bovine seminal ribonuclease to human placental ribonuclease inhibitor. Biochem J. 281, 343– 348 (1992).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Saxena, S.K. et al. Comparison of RNases and toxins upon injection into Xenopus oocytes. J. Biol. Chem. 266, 21208– 21214 (1991).

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Rybak, S.M., Saxena, S.K., Ackerman, E.J. & Youle, R.J. Cytotoxic potential of ribonuclease and ribonuclease hybrid proteins. J. Biol. Chem. 266, 21202–21207 (1991).

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Newton, D.L. et al. 1992.Cytotoxic ribonuclease chimeras. Targeted tumoricidal activity in vitro and in vivo. J. Biol. Chem. 267, 19572–19578.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Newton, D.L., Nicholls, P.J., Rybak, S.M. & Youle, R.J. Expression and characterization of recombinant human eosinophil-derived neurotoxin and eosinophil-derived neurotoxin-anti-transferrin receptor sFv. J. Biol. Chem. 269, 26739–26745 (1994).

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Lee, F.S., Shapiro, R. & Vallee, B.L. Tight-binding inhibition of angiogenin and ribonuclease A by placental ribonuclease inhibitor. Biochemistry 28, 225–230 (1989).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Kobe, B. & Deisenhofer, J. Mechanism of ribonuclease inhibition by ribonuclease inhibitor protein based on the crystal structure of its complex with ribonuclease A. J. Mol. Biol. 264, 1028–1043 (1996).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Shapiro, R. & Vallee, B.L. Interaction of human placental ribonuclease with placental ribonuclease inhibitor. Biochemistry 30, 2246–2255 ( 1991).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Papageorgiou, A.C., Shapiro, R. & Acharya, K.R. Molecular recognition of human angiogenin by placental ribonuclease inhibitor—an x-ray crystallographic study at 2.0 Å resolution. Embo J. 16, 5162– 5177 (1997).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Piccoli, R. et al. The dual-mode quaternary structure of seminal RNase. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 89, 1870– 1874 (1992).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. Kim, J.S., Soucek, J., Matousek, J. & Raines, R.T. Mechanism of ribonuclease cytotoxicity. J. Biol. Chem. 270, 31097–31102 (1995).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. Laske, D.W., Youle, R.J. & Oldfield, E.H. 1997.Tumor regression with regional distribution of the targeted toxin TF- CRM107 in patients with malignant brain tumors. Nat. Med. 3, 1362– 1368.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  24. Recht, L., Torres, C.O., Smith, T.W., Raso, V. & Griffin, T.W. Transferrin receptor in normal and neoplastic brain tissue: implications for brain-tumor immunotherapy. J. Neurosurg. 72, 941–945 (1990).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  25. Jain, R.K. Barriers to drug delivery in solid tumors. Sci. Am. 271, 58–65 (1994).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  26. Boix, E. et al. Role of the N terminus in RNase A homologues: differences in catalytic activity, ribonuclease inhibitor interaction and cytotoxicity. J. Mol. Biol. 257, 992–1007. ( 1996).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  27. Ho, S.N., Hunt, H.D., Horton, R.M., Pullen, J.K. & Pease, L.R. Site-directed mutagenesis by overlap extension using the polymerase chain reaction. Gene 77, 51–59 (1989).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  28. Yakovlev, G., Moiseyev, G.P., Sorrentino, S., De Prisco, R. & Libonati, M. Single-strand-preferring RNases degrade double-stranded RNAs by destabilizing its secondary structure. J. Biomol. Struct. Dyn. 15, 243–250 (1997).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  29. Johnson, V.G., Wilson, D., Greenfield, L. & Youle, R.J. The role of the diphtheria toxin receptor in cytosol translocation. J. Neurosurg. 68, 1295–1300 (1988).

    Google Scholar 

  30. Wu, Y. et al. A study of the intracellular routing of cytotoxic ribonucleases. J. Biol. Chem. 270, 17476–17481 (1995).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  31. Leland, P.A., Schultz, L.W., Kim, B.M., & Raines, R.T. Ribonuclease A variants with potent cytotoxic activity. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 95, 10407–10412 ( 1998).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

We thank Pat Johnson and Joan Barrick for technical assistance, and JoAnn Castelli for reading the manuscript. Certain commercial equipment, instruments, and materials are identified in this paper in order to specify the experimental procedure. Such identification does not imply recommendation or endorsement by the National Institute of Standards and Technology, nor does it imply that the materials or equipment are necessarily the best available for the purpose.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Richard J. Youle.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Suzuki, M., Saxena, S., Boix, E. et al. Engineering receptor-mediated cytotoxicity into human ribonucleases by steric blockade of inhibitor interaction. Nat Biotechnol 17, 265–270 (1999). https://doi.org/10.1038/7010

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/7010

This article is cited by

Search

Quick links

Nature Briefing

Sign up for the Nature Briefing newsletter — what matters in science, free to your inbox daily.

Get the most important science stories of the day, free in your inbox. Sign up for Nature Briefing