Letter | Published:

Directed evolution of genetic parts and circuits by compartmentalized partnered replication

Nature Biotechnology volume 32, pages 97101 (2014) | Download Citation

Abstract

Most existing directed evolution methods, both in vivo1,2,3 and in vitro4,5,6, suffer from inadvertent selective pressures (i.e., altering organism fitness), resulting in the evolution of products with unintended or suboptimal function. To overcome these barriers, here we present compartmentalized partnered replication (CPR). In this approach, synthetic circuits are linked to the production of Taq DNA polymerase so that evolved circuits that most efficiently drive Taq DNA polymerase production are enriched by exponential amplification during a subsequent emulsion PCR step. We apply CPR to evolve a T7 RNA polymerase variant that recognizes an orthogonal promoter and to reengineer the tryptophanyl tRNA-synthetase:suppressor tRNA pair from Saccharomyces cerevisiae7 to efficiently and site-specifically incorporate an unnatural amino acid into proteins. In both cases, the CPR-evolved parts were more orthogonal and/or more active than variants evolved using other methods. CPR should be useful for evolving any genetic part or circuit that can be linked to Taq DNA polymerase expression.

Access optionsAccess options

Rent or Buy article

Get time limited or full article access on ReadCube.

from$8.99

All prices are NET prices.

References

  1. 1.

    , & Dual selection enhances the signaling specificity of a variant of the quorum-sensing transcriptional activator LuxR. Nat. Biotechnol. 24, 708–712 (2006).

  2. 2.

    , & Reprogramming bacteria to seek and destroy an herbicide. Nat. Chem. Biol. 6, 464–470 (2010).

  3. 3.

    , & A system for the continuous directed evolution of biomolecules. Nature 472, 499–503 (2011).

  4. 4.

    & In vitro selection of RNA molecules that bind specific ligands. Nature 346, 818–822 (1990).

  5. 5.

    & Man-made cell-like compartments for molecular evolution. Nat. Biotechnol. 16, 652–656 (1998).

  6. 6.

    , & Direct selection of trans-acting ligase ribozymes by in vitro compartmentalization. RNA 11, 1555–1562 (2005).

  7. 7.

    & Rational design of an orthogonal tryptophanyl nonsense suppressor tRNA. Nucleic Acids Res. 38, 6813–6830 (2010).

  8. 8.

    , & Gene synthesis: methods and applications. Methods Enzymol. 498, 277–309 (2011).

  9. 9.

    Enzymatic assembly of overlapping DNA fragments. Methods Enzymol. 498, 349–361 (2011).

  10. 10.

    , & Refactoring the nitrogen fixation gene cluster from Klebsiella oxytoca. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 109, 7085–7090 (2012).

  11. 11.

    , & Emergent bistability by a growth-modulating positive feedback circuit. Nat. Chem. Biol. 5, 842–848 (2009).

  12. 12.

    et al. Programming cells by multiplex genome engineering and accelerated evolution. Nature 460, 894–898 (2009).

  13. 13.

    , & Directed evolution of polymerase function by compartmentalized self-replication. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 98, 4552–4557 (2001).

  14. 14.

    & Compartmentalized self-replication: a novel method for the directed evolution of polymerases and other enzymes. Methods Mol. Biol. 352, 237–248 (2007).

  15. 15.

    , & Structural basis for initiation of transcription from an RNA polymerase-promoter complex. Nature 399, 80–83 (1999).

  16. 16.

    , & T7 RNA polymerase mutants with altered promoter specificities. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 90, 3147–3151 (1993).

  17. 17.

    , & A combined in vitro/in vivo selection for polymerases with novel promoter specificities. BMC Biotechnol. 1, 13 (2001).

  18. 18.

    , , , & Modular control of multiple pathways using engineered orthogonal T7 polymerases. Nucleic Acids Res. 40, 8773–8781 (2012).

  19. 19.

    , , , & Crystal structures of Saccharomyces cerevisiae tryptophanyl-tRNA synthetase: new insights into the mechanism of tryptophan activation and implications for anti-fungal drug design. Nucleic Acids Res. 38, 3399–3413 (2010).

  20. 20.

    et al. Complete protein characterization using top-down mass spectrometry and ultraviolet photodissociation. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 135, 12646–12651 (2013).

  21. 21.

    , , & An enhanced system for unnatural amino acid mutagenesis in E. coli. J. Mol. Biol. 395, 361–374 (2010).

  22. 22.

    et al. RF1 knockout allows ribosomal incorporation of unnatural amino acids at multiple sites. Nat. Chem. Biol. 7, 779–786 (2011).

  23. 23.

    & Emergence of a replicating species from an in vitro RNA evolution reaction. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 91, 6093–6097 (1994).

  24. 24.

    & Why is the polymerase chain reaction resistant to in vitro evolution? J. Mol. Evol. 41, 1160–1164 (1995).

  25. 25.

    & Potential role of phenotypic mutations in the evolution of protein expression and stability. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 106, 6197–6202 (2009).

  26. 26.

    , , , & Experimental interrogation of the path dependence and stochasticity of protein evolution using phage-assisted continuous evolution. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 110, 9007–9012 (2013).

  27. 27.

    , & RNA mimics of green fluorescent protein. Science 333, 642–646 (2011).

  28. 28.

    , , , & An in vitro Autogene. ACS Synth. Biol. 1, 190–196 (2012).

  29. 29.

    , & Direct random mutagenesis of gene-sized DNA fragments using polymerase chain reaction. Anal. Biochem. 224, 347–353 (1995).

  30. 30.

    , & FACS-optimized mutants of the green fluorescent protein (GFP). Gene 173, 33–38 (1996).

  31. 31.

    & Amino acid substrate specificity of Escherichia coli phenylalanyl-tRNA synthetase altered by distinct mutations. J. Mol. Biol. 222, 99–124 (1991).

  32. 32.

    , & Engineered rRNA enhances the efficiency of selenocysteine incorporation during translation. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 135, 2–5 (2013).

  33. 33.

    , , & Expanding the genetic code of Escherichia coli. Science 292, 498–500 (2001).

  34. 34.

    et al. Tyrosine sulfation in a Gram-negative bacterium. Nat. Commun. 3, 1153 (2012).

  35. 35.

    , , , & Tryptophanyl-tRNA synthetase/tRNA pair for unnatural amino acid mutagenesis in E. coli. Angew Chem. Int. Ed. Engl. 52, 5106–5109 (2013).

Download references

Acknowledgements

This work was supported by the National Security Science and Engineering Faculty (FA9550–10-1-0169) the Welch Foundation (F–1654 to A.D.E. and F-1155 to J.S.B.), the National Science Foundation (CHE1012622 to J.S.B.), and the Defense Advanced Research Projects Agency (HR–0011-12-C-0066). J.S.B. thanks Thermo Fisher Scientific with helping on the modifications to the Orbitrap Elite mass spectrometer to allow UVPD.

Author information

Author notes

    • Jared W Ellefson
    •  & Adam J Meyer

    These authors contributed equally to this work.

Affiliations

  1. Institute for Cellular and Molecular Biology, University of Texas at Austin, Austin, Texas, USA.

    • Jared W Ellefson
    • , Adam J Meyer
    • , Randall A Hughes
    •  & Andrew D Ellington
  2. Applied Research Laboratories, University of Texas at Austin, Austin, Texas, USA.

    • Randall A Hughes
    •  & Andrew D Ellington
  3. Department of Chemistry and Biochemistry, University of Texas at Austin, Austin, Texas, USA.

    • Joe R Cannon
    • , Jennifer S Brodbelt
    •  & Andrew D Ellington
  4. Center for Systems & Synthetic Biology, University of Texas at Austin, Austin, Texas, USA.

    • Andrew D Ellington

Authors

  1. Search for Jared W Ellefson in:

  2. Search for Adam J Meyer in:

  3. Search for Randall A Hughes in:

  4. Search for Joe R Cannon in:

  5. Search for Jennifer S Brodbelt in:

  6. Search for Andrew D Ellington in:

Contributions

J.W.E. conceived of the selection scheme. A.J.M. carried out experiments with T7 RNA polymerase. J.W.E. carried out experiments on the ScWRS and tRNA with input from R.A.H. J.R.C. and J.S.B. performed mass spectrometry and analysis. J.W.E., A.J.M. and A.D.E. wrote the manuscript with contributions from R.A.H., J.R.C. and J.S.B.

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing financial interests.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Andrew D Ellington.

Supplementary information

PDF files

  1. 1.

    Supplementary Text and Figures

    Supplementary Figures 1–21 and Supplementary Tables 1–4

About this article

Publication history

Received

Accepted

Published

DOI

https://doi.org/10.1038/nbt.2714

Further reading