Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

  • Letter
  • Published:

Structure and assembly of the Ebola virus nucleocapsid

Abstract

Ebola and Marburg viruses are filoviruses: filamentous, enveloped viruses that cause haemorrhagic fever1. Filoviruses are within the order Mononegavirales2, which also includes rabies virus, measles virus, and respiratory syncytial virus. Mononegaviruses have non-segmented, single-stranded negative-sense RNA genomes that are encapsidated by nucleoprotein and other viral proteins to form a helical nucleocapsid. The nucleocapsid acts as a scaffold for virus assembly and as a template for genome transcription and replication. Insights into nucleoprotein–nucleoprotein interactions have been derived from structural studies of oligomerized, RNA-encapsidating nucleoprotein3,4,5,6, and cryo-electron microscopy of nucleocapsid7,8,9,10,11,12 or nucleocapsid-like structures11,12,13. There have been no high-resolution reconstructions of complete mononegavirus nucleocapsids. Here we apply cryo-electron tomography and subtomogram averaging to determine the structure of Ebola virus nucleocapsid within intact viruses and recombinant nucleocapsid-like assemblies. These structures reveal the identity and arrangement of the nucleocapsid components, and suggest that the formation of an extended α-helix from the disordered carboxy-terminal region of nucleoprotein-core links nucleoprotein oligomerization, nucleocapsid condensation, RNA encapsidation, and accessory protein recruitment.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution

Access options

Buy this article

Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout

Figure 1: Structure of Ebola NP 1–450.
Figure 2: Structure of Ebola NP–VP24–VP35–VP40 VLPs.
Figure 3: Structure of Ebola and Marburg NCs from intact viruses.

Similar content being viewed by others

Accession codes

Primary accessions

Electron Microscopy Data Bank

Protein Data Bank

References

  1. Feldmann, H., Sanchez, A. & Geisbert, T. in Fields Virology (eds Knipe, D. M. & Howley, P. M. ) 923–956 (Lippincott Williams & Wilkins, 2013)

  2. Lamb, R. A. in Fields Virology (eds Knipe, D. M. & Howley, P. M. ) 880–884 (Lippincott Williams & Wilkins, 2013)

  3. Albertini, A. A. V. et al. Crystal structure of the rabies virus nucleoprotein-RNA complex. Science 313, 360–363 (2006)

    Article  ADS  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Green, T. J., Zhang, X., Wertz, G. W. & Luo, M. Structure of the vesicular stomatitis virus nucleoprotein-RNA complex. Science 313, 357–360 (2006)

    Article  ADS  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Tawar, R. G. et al. Crystal structure of a nucleocapsid-like nucleoprotein-RNA complex of respiratory syncytial virus. Science 326, 1279–1283 (2009)

    Article  ADS  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Alayyoubi, M., Leser, G. P., Kors, C. A. & Lamb, R. A. Structure of the paramyxovirus parainfluenza virus 5 nucleoprotein-RNA complex. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 112, E1792–E1799 (2015)

    Article  ADS  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  7. Ge, P. et al. Cryo-EM model of the bullet-shaped vesicular stomatitis virus. Science 327, 689–693 (2010)

    Article  ADS  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  8. Cox, R. et al. Structural studies on the authentic mumps virus nucleocapsid showing uncoiling by the phosphoprotein. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 111, 15208–15213 (2014)

    Article  ADS  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  9. Gutsche, I. et al. Near-atomic cryo-EM structure of the helical measles virus nucleocapsid. Science 348, 704–707 (2015)

    Article  ADS  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Bharat, T. A. M. et al. Cryo-electron tomography of Marburg virus particles and their morphogenesis within infected cells. PLoS Biol. 9, e1001196 (2011)

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  11. Bharat, T. A. M. et al. Structural dissection of Ebola virus and its assembly determinants using cryo-electron tomography. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 109, 4275–4280 (2012)

    Article  ADS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  12. Beniac, D. R. et al. The organisation of Ebola virus reveals a capacity for extensive, modular polyploidy. PLoS ONE 7, e29608 (2012)

    Article  ADS  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  13. Bakker, S. E. et al. The respiratory syncytial virus nucleoprotein-RNA complex forms a left-handed helical nucleocapsid. J. Gen. Virol. 94, 1734–1738 (2013)

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  14. Noda, T., Hagiwara, K., Sagara, H. & Kawaoka, Y. Characterization of the Ebola virus nucleoprotein-RNA complex. J. Gen. Virol. 91, 1478–1483 (2010)

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  15. Huang, Y., Xu, L., Sun, Y. & Nabel, G. J. The assembly of Ebola virus nucleocapsid requires virion-associated proteins 35 and 24 and posttranslational modification of nucleoprotein. Mol. Cell 10, 307–316 (2002)

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Dziuban´ ska, P. J., Derewenda, U., Ellena, J. F., Engel, D. A. & Derewenda, Z. S. The structure of the C-terminal domain of the Zaire ebolavirus nucleoprotein. Acta Crystallogr. D 70, 2420–2429 (2014)

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Leung, D. W. et al. An Intrinsically disordered peptide from Ebola virus VP35 controls viral RNA synthesis by modulating nucleoprotein-RNA interactions. Cell Reports 11, 376–389 (2015)

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Dong, S. et al. Insight into the Ebola virus nucleocapsid assembly mechanism: crystal structure of Ebola virus nucleoprotein core domain at 1.8 Å resolution. Protein Cell 6, 351–362 (2015)

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  19. Kirchdoerfer, R. N., Abelson, D. M., Li, S., Wood, M. R. & Saphire, E. O. Assembly of the Ebola virus nucleoprotein from a chaperoned VP35 complex. Cell Rep. 12, 140–149 (2015)

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  20. Ruigrok, R. W., Crépin, T. & Kolakofsky, D. Nucleoproteins and nucleocapsids of negative-strand RNA viruses. Curr. Opin. Microbiol. 14, 504–510 (2011)

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Noda, T., Aoyama, K., Sagara, H., Kida, H. & Kawaoka, Y. Nucleocapsid-like structures of Ebola virus reconstructed using electron tomography. J. Vet. Med. Sci. 67, 325–328 (2005)

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Zhang, A. P. P. et al. The ebolavirus VP24 interferon antagonist: know your enemy. Virulence 3, 440–445 (2012)

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  23. Zhang, A. P. P. et al. The Ebola virus interferon antagonist VP24 directly binds STAT1 and has a novel, pyramidal fold. PLoS Pathog. 8, e1002550 (2012)

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  24. Leung, D. W. et al. Structure of the Ebola VP35 interferon inhibitory domain. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 106, 411–416 (2009)

    Article  ADS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  25. Leung, D. W. et al. Structural basis for dsRNA recognition and interferon antagonism by Ebola VP35. Nat. Struct. Mol. Biol. 17, 165–172 (2010)

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  26. Schur, F. K. M. et al. An atomic model of HIV-1 capsid-SP1 reveals structures regulating assembly and maturation. Science 353, 506–508 (2016)

    Article  ADS  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Mastronarde, D. N. Automated electron microscope tomography using robust prediction of specimen movements. J. Struct. Biol. 152, 36–51 (2005)

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Hagen, W. J. H., Wan, W. & Briggs, J. A. G. Implementation of a cryo-electron tomography tilt-scheme optimized for high resolution subtomogram averaging. J. Struct. Biol. 197, 191–198 (2017)

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  29. Li, X. et al. Electron counting and beam-induced motion correction enable near-atomic-resolution single-particle cryo-EM. Nat. Methods 10, 584–590 (2013)

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  30. Rohou, A. & Grigorieff, N. CTFFIND4: fast and accurate defocus estimation from electron micrographs. J. Struct. Biol. 192, 216–221 (2015)

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  31. Grant, T. & Grigorieff, N. Measuring the optimal exposure for single particle cryo-EM using a 2.6 Å reconstruction of rotavirus VP6. eLife 4, e06980 (2015). vol no

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  32. Xiong, Q., Morphew, M. K., Schwartz, C. L., Hoenger, A. H. & Mastronarde, D. N. CTF determination and correction for low dose tomographic tilt series. J. Struct. Biol. 168, 378–387 (2009)

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  33. Kremer, J. R., Mastronarde, D. N. & McIntosh, J. R. Computer visualization of three-dimensional image data using IMOD. J. Struct. Biol. 116, 71–76 (1996)

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  34. Pruggnaller, S., Mayr, M. & Frangakis, A. S. A visualization and segmentation toolbox for electron microscopy. J. Struct. Biol. 164, 161–165 (2008)

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  35. Nickell, S. et al. TOM software toolbox: acquisition and analysis for electron tomography. J. Struct. Biol. 149, 227–234 (2005)

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  36. Förster, F., Medalia, O., Zauberman, N., Baumeister, W. & Fass, D. Retrovirus envelope protein complex structure in situ studied by cryo-electron tomography. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 102, 4729–4734 (2005)

    Article  ADS  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  37. Castaño-Díez, D., Kudryashev, M., Arheit, M. & Stahlberg, H. Dynamo: a flexible, user-friendly development tool for subtomogram averaging of cryo-EM data in high-performance computing environments. J. Struct. Biol. 178, 139–151 (2012)

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  38. Frangakis, A. S. et al. Identification of macromolecular complexes in cryoelectron tomograms of phantom cells. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 99, 14153–14158 (2002)

    Article  ADS  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  39. Pettersen, E. F. et al. UCSF Chimera—a visualization system for exploratory research and analysis. J. Comput. Chem. 25, 1605–1612 (2004)

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  40. Chen, S. et al. High-resolution noise substitution to measure overfitting and validate resolution in 3D structure determination by single particle electron cryomicroscopy. Ultramicroscopy 135, 24–35 (2013)

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  41. Rosenthal, P. B. & Henderson, R. Optimal determination of particle orientation, absolute hand, and contrast loss in single-particle electron cryomicroscopy. J. Mol. Biol. 333, 721–745 (2003)

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  42. Emsley, P., Lohkamp, B., Scott, W. G. & Cowtan, K. Features and development of Coot. Acta Crystallogr. D 66, 486–501 (2010)

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  43. Trabuco, L. G., Villa, E., Schreiner, E., Harrison, C. B. & Schulten, K. Molecular dynamics flexible fitting: a practical guide to combine cryo-electron microscopy and X-ray crystallography. Methods 49, 174–180 (2009)

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  44. Phillips, J. C. et al. Scalable molecular dynamics with NAMD. J. Comput. Chem. 26, 1781–1802 (2005)

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  45. Edwards, M. R. et al. The Marburg virus VP24 protein interacts with Keap1 to activate the cytoprotective antioxidant response pathway. Cell Rep. 6, 1017–1025 (2014)

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The Briggs laboratory acknowledges financial support from the European Molecular Biology Laboratory and from the European Research Council (ERC) under the European Union’s Horizon 2020 research and innovation programme (ERC-CoG-648432 MEMBRANEFUSION). The Becker group was supported by the Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft (Sonderforschungsbereich 1021) and by the German Center for Infection Research (DZIF). This work was supported by an EMBO long-term fellowship, ALTF 748-2014, awarded to W.W. We thank Y. Kawaoka for support during this collaborative study and W. J. H. Hagen for assistance during tomographic data collection.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

W.W., S.B., and J.A.G.B. designed and interpreted experiments. L.K., M.C., A.K., and T.N. prepared specimens. W.W. collected data and performed image processing. W.W. and J.A.G.B. analysed data and wrote the manuscript with support from all authors.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to John A. G. Briggs.

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing financial interests.

Additional information

Reviewer Information Nature thanks I. Gutsche, M. Luo and E. Saphire for their contribution to the peer review of this work.

Publisher's note: Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Extended data figures and tables

Extended Data Figure 1 Representative orthoslices of tomograms and subtomogram averages.

Top row, orthoslices through the middle of representative tomograms of the NC and NC-like assemblies. Bottom row, orthoslices taken through the structures determined by subtomogram averaging. The inside of the NC helix is on the left. Scale bars, 20 nm.

Extended Data Figure 2 Local resolution maps and FSCs of NC and NC-like assemblies.

In each panel, the small inset shows the full subtomogram averaging structure of part of the helix with a central subunit coloured. Subtomogram averaging maps are locally filtered and sharpened. The isolated central subunits are shown zoomed in. The surface is coloured according to local resolution in ångströms, as defined by the colour map on the right. FSC curves are calculated using cylindrical masks, with a circular cross-section of approximately one viral subunit (two NPs and outer protrusions) and height centred at each protein layer; green is for NP core, yellow is for VP24 layer, and red is for outer unassigned density layer. In general, the NP core has high, homogeneous resolutions while outer subunits have decreasing resolution with respect to their distance from the NP core.

Extended Data Figure 3 Model of NP from subtomogram averaging compared with NP crystal structure and with modelled RNA.

a, Different views of the subtomogram averaging derived NP model (cyan) and the NP crystal structure17 (pink, PDB accession number 4YPI). Left is a view from inside the NC helix, centre is a cross-sectional view of the NC, and right is a view from outside the NC. b, The NP model in the EM density from our NP 1–450 subtomogram averaging structure. Left shows a cross-sectional view of NC. In the RNA density (yellow) is a rigid-body fit of the six-nucleotide RNA segment from measles virus NP9 (PDB accession number 4UFT). Centre and right, three NP–RNA models from the left panel are fitted as rigid bodies. Centre is a view from the outside of the NC, and right is a focused view of the RNA density. Scale bars, 20 Å.

Extended Data Figure 4 Sequence and secondary structure of NP model.

Our NP model contains NP residues 16–405. Secondary structure elements are highlighted and coloured according to Fig. 1j. Secondary structure labels follow that of crystal structure 4YPI17.

Extended Data Figure 5 Comparison of mononegavirus NPs and encapsidated RNA.

Each row shows two views of each NP: left is a cross-sectional view of the NC, with the centre of the NC axis to the left; right is a view of the NP from outside the NC. Scale bar, 20 Å.

Extended Data Figure 6 Global fit of Ebola crystal structures into the subtomogram averaging structure of Ebola NP–VP24–VP35–VP40 NC-like assembly.

Left column shows histograms for random rigid-body fits. Coloured arrows identify the fits illustrated in the other columns. Second column shows the top two scoring fits within the targeted density. The last two columns show detailed views of the highest and second-highest scoring fits, respectively. a, Fits into the full outer densities; densities are shown at 1.5σ, except the detailed view of the VP24 fits, which are shown at 2.5σ. The fits of VP24 are high-scoring outliers indicating correct fits, and are those shown in Fig. 2. b, Fits into the VP24-subtracted outer protrusion densities; densities are shown at 1.2σ.

Extended Data Figure 7 Stabilization of NP helix 6 upon outer protein binding.

The top of each panel shows the cross-section of NC-like structures. In light grey are two NC subunits. The bottom of each panel shows a detailed view of the two NC subunits with molecular models fitted. Helix 6 (arrow) in NP 1–450 shows nearly no density, while in NP–VP24–VP35–VP40, binding of VP24 stabilizes this helix. Scale bars, 50 Å.

Extended Data Figure 8 Different inter-rung contacts between Ebola NP 1–450 and NP–VP24–VP35–VP40.

Top row shows part of the helix viewed from the inside. Subunits on adjacent rungs are highlighted in grey; these correspond to the subunits fitted by the NP models on the bottom rows. The relative positions of NP molecules across the inter-rung contact differ by 8.3 Å. Scale bars, 20 Å.

Extended Data Figure 9 Lattice map revealing the helical symmetry of Ebola NC.

Cyan arrows denote the positions of one asymmetric unit (two copies of NP, each of which has VP24 bound in a different orientation), as determined by subtomogram averaging. Orange arrows denote positions where a single NP subunit is present that disrupts the normal alternating arrangement of VP24 binding position. Single NP subunits often appear on consecutive rungs along higher-order helical symmetries, forming ‘seams’ along the NC helix. This suggests that VP24 binding is not only influenced by the neighbouring subunits along the NP helix, but also by neighbouring subunits on adjacent rungs.

Extended Data Table 1 Summary of tomographic data acquisition and image processing

Supplementary information

Life Sciences Reporting Summary (PDF 68 kb)

A tour of the NC structures presented in this manuscript

A 3D visualization of the structures presented in Figures 1-3. (MP4 27390 kb)

PowerPoint slides

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Wan, W., Kolesnikova, L., Clarke, M. et al. Structure and assembly of the Ebola virus nucleocapsid. Nature 551, 394–397 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1038/nature24490

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/nature24490

This article is cited by

Comments

By submitting a comment you agree to abide by our Terms and Community Guidelines. If you find something abusive or that does not comply with our terms or guidelines please flag it as inappropriate.

Search

Quick links

Nature Briefing

Sign up for the Nature Briefing newsletter — what matters in science, free to your inbox daily.

Get the most important science stories of the day, free in your inbox. Sign up for Nature Briefing