Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

SARS-CoV-2 structure and replication characterized by in situ cryo-electron tomography

Abstract

Severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2), the causative agent of the COVID19 pandemic, is a highly pathogenic β-coronavirus. As other coronaviruses, SARS-CoV-2 is enveloped, replicates in the cytoplasm and assembles at intracellular membranes. Here, we structurally characterize the viral replication compartment and report critical insights into the budding mechanism of the virus, and the structure of extracellular virions close to their native state by in situ cryo-electron tomography and subtomogram averaging. We directly visualize RNA filaments inside the double membrane vesicles, compartments associated with viral replication. The RNA filaments show a diameter consistent with double-stranded RNA and frequent branching likely representing RNA secondary structures. We report that assembled S trimers in lumenal cisternae do not alone induce membrane bending but laterally reorganize on the envelope during virion assembly. The viral ribonucleoprotein complexes (vRNPs) are accumulated at the curved membrane characteristic for budding sites suggesting that vRNP recruitment is enhanced by membrane curvature. Subtomogram averaging shows that vRNPs are distinct cylindrical assemblies. We propose that the genome is packaged around multiple separate vRNP complexes, thereby allowing incorporation of the unusually large coronavirus genome into the virion while maintaining high steric flexibility between the vRNPs.

Introduction

Coronaviridae is a large family of single-stranded positive-sense RNA viruses that infect a broad range of vertebrate hosts. β-coronaviruses, including severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 1 (SARS-CoV-1) and Middle Eastern respiratory syndrome coronavirus (MERS-CoV) are highly contagious pathogens that can cause severe lower respiratory infections. At the end of 2019, SARS-CoV-2 emerged likely through zoonotic transmission via a bat reservoir and a still unidentified intermediate host that subsequently led to a pandemic1, affecting over 40 million individuals and causing more than 1 million deaths worldwide2.

Cryo-electron microscopy (cryo-EM) studies of SARS-CoV-1 and the closely related murine hepatitis virus (MHV) show that the virions are predominantly spherical or ellipsoidal with an average envelope diameter between 80 and 90 nm3. The main structural components of coronaviruses are the glycoprotein S, the transmembrane proteins M and E, and the nucleoprotein N, which forms a viral ribonucleoprotein (vRNP) complex with the viral RNA. SARS-CoV-2 and SARS-CoV-1 S are structurally similar glycosylated homotrimers4,5, which bind to the angiotensin-converting enzyme 2 (ACE2) receptor present on the cell surface of permissive cells6. Similar to other single-stranded positive-sense RNA viruses7, coronaviruses modify cellular membranes to form double-membrane vesicles (DMVs), which are used as dedicated sites for viral RNA replication8. Several studies of SARS-CoV-1 and MERS-CoV point towards DMVs being derived from endoplasmic reticulum (ER) cisternae in a process predominantly driven by the nonstructural protein 3 and 49. In this model, the ER lumen constitutes the space between the DMV’s inner and outer membrane, while the enclosed space is of cytoplasmic origin and enriched in double-stranded RNA (dsRNA)10. A recent study by Wolff et al.11 identified a molecular pore complex, which interconnects the DMV interior with the cytoplasm, possibly allowing RNA import and export. SARS-CoV-1 M, E, and N are required for virion assembly12, which takes place on the cytoplasmic side of the ER–Golgi intermediate compartment (ERGIC) cisternae13,14. M and E proteins act as an assembly hub, interacting with both N and S proteins, thus ensuring vRNP incorporation into the nascent virion15,16.

Here, we used cryo-electron tomography (cryo-ET) on cryo-focused ion beam milled lamellae or whole-cell cryo-ET of various SARS-CoV-2-infected cell lines, which were chemically fixed for biosafety reasons, to structurally characterize DMV morphology, virus assembly, and extracellular virions close to their native state.

Results

DMVs and RNA filaments

In addition to commonly used monkey kidney derived VeroE6 cells, we included the human pulmonary cell lines Calu3 and A549, the latter stably expressing the ACE2 receptor (A549-ACE2), which renders these cells permissive for SARS-CoV-2 as reported for SARS-CoV-117 (Supplementary Fig. 1a–c). Although ACE2 mRNA levels in A549-ACE2 cells were higher than in Calu3 and VeroE6 cells, VeroE6 and Calu3 cells showed a higher proportion of infected cells at 16 h post infection (hpi) characterized by anti-dsRNA staining (Supplementary Fig. 1d, e). This indicates that ACE2 mRNA levels do not directly correlate with permissiveness of these cell lines to SARS-CoV2 infection. We first focused on the characterization of DMVs, which were found in all analyzed cell lines (Supplementary Fig. 2), and on the visualization of RNA in the DMV interior. Cryo-ET revealed that both inner and outer DMV membranes were separated by a luminal spacing of 18 nm (SD = 9 nm, n = 32) (Fig. 1). DMV appearance and size distributions were similar in all infected cell lines with an inner average diameter of 338 nm (SD = 56 nm, n = 38) (Fig. 1c). This is in agreement with the diameter of the DMVs in SARS-CoV-1-infected VeroE6 cells, which was reported 300 ± 50 nm as measured from the outer membranes10. Thin and electron-dense filaments, presumably representing vRNA, were clearly observed in all DMVs (Fig. 1 and Supplementary Movie 1). Individual vRNA filaments appeared smooth and did not organize into bundles or concentric layers (Fig. 1d, e), which were observed for the dsRNA of the Flock House Virus18. The filaments had a uniform average diameter of 2.68 nm (SD = 0.23 nm, n = 80 from two tomograms) (Fig. 1f), which corresponds well to the diameter of the A-form RNA double-stranded helix19 and is in accord with anti-dsRNA immuno-EM SARS-CoV-1 studies10. We regularly observed filament branching points (Fig. 1g, h) resembling those observed by cryo-EM studies performed on purified viral RNA20. However, we could neither identify an additional electron density that could be attributed to a replicase complex in the branching point nor a decrease in the diameter of the branched filaments that would indicate the presence of single-stranded RNA. This suggests that the branching points likely represent secondary RNA loops similar to those shown on purified viral RNA lacking any proteins20. Tracing individual RNA filaments revealed a variable length ranging from 4–263 nm with an average length of 52 nm (SD = 42 nm, n = 101) (Fig. 1i). This analysis likely underestimates the length of vRNA in DMVs, because the cryo-lamellae are 150–200 nm thick and do not contain the entire DMV. In addition, we observed several sites where the inner and outer DMV membrane were clamped together (Supplementary Fig. 3), most likely corresponding to the proteinaceous pore complex reported recently11. Together, our observations show a DMV interior containing RNA rich in secondary structures. Although DMVs might be a site of replication, it is as well possible that its purpose is to spatially separate a ready-to-use pool of RNA transcription and replication intermediates that would otherwise be recognized by pattern recognition receptors of the innate immune system. Interestingly, the vault complexes, which among other functions have a role in dsRNA or virus-induced proinflammatory response21, were observed in the proximity of DMV membranes (Supplementary Fig. 5a–f).

Fig. 1: Spatial distribution and length of RNA filaments.
figure1

a Slice of a SIRT-like filtered tomogram of an A549-ACE2 cell infected with SARS-CoV2 showing a DMV. b Magnified slice of a tomogram (1.3 nm thick) showing RNA filaments and a branching point (arrowhead) in detail. c Distribution of DMV inner membrane diameter in three different cell lines (A549-ACE2: n = 14; VeroE6: n = 20; Calu3: n = 3). Data is shown as Box and Whiskers plots indicating the median (center of box), 25% and 75% quartiles (bounds of box), minimum and maximum values (bars), and all data points. Unpaired two-sided t-test showed no significant differences between the diameter of DMVs found in the three different cell lines. d, e Tomogram slices shown in a and d after content-aware denoising using cryo-CARE48. f Average normalized density line profile of filament cross-sections. The indicated error band shows the SD (n = 80 from two tomograms), the average gray value of the DMV interior is shown as dotted line (0.44 arbitrary units). g, h Manual segmentation of the denoised DMV (Supplementary Movie 1), inner and outer membrane are represented in light and dark green, respectively. Individual segmented filaments are colored according to their length and a branching point is indicated by an arrowhead in the magnified segmentation image (h). i Histogram of RNA length (n = 101) with a bin size of 20 nm. Branched filaments were measured individually. Bicubic interpolation was applied for image smoothing in b and e. Scale bars: a, d 100 nm; b, e 10 nm.

It has previously been shown that DMVs are part of a network and can fuse into multivesicular compartments refered to as vesicle packets (VPs)10. To provide further structural information on how DMV fusion is mechanistically governed, DMVs within close proximity to each other were analyzed (Fig. 2). Besides funnel-like connections (Fig. 2a), we observed tightly apposed DMVs where all four membranes were stacked, forming a curved junction budding into juxtaposed DMVs (Fig. 2b, c). The junction appeared to be electron dense, yet no particular features were found between the individual membranes. The membrane stack at the center of the junction had an average thickness of 19.4 nm (SD = 2.7 nm, n = 4), approximately conforming to four lipid bilayers. Consistent with a recent study, we also found VPs containing two or more vesicles surrounded by one outer membrane, presumably a product of DMV–DMV outer membrane fusion (Fig. 2d–f)22. In one case, we observed that the inner membranes of the DMVs formed a junction that resulted in an opening between two fusing inner vesicles (Fig. 2f). Based on these observations, we propose that DMV homotypic fusion occurs through membrane stacking engaging predominantly the outer, and less frequently also the inner membranes. Tight membrane apposition might lead to lipid mixing between the stacked bilayers followed by membrane fusion. As DMV fusion leads to a minimization of membrane surface to volume ratio and the number of VPs increases during the infection22, we speculate that DMV fusion is required for repurposing membranes for virion budding at advanced stages of the replication cycle, which is supported by the observation of a fully assembled virion inside the VP lumen (Fig. 2d).

Fig. 2: Juxtaposed DMVs form membrane junctions that lead to homotypic fusion.
figure2

Tomograms showing DMVs in VeroE6 (ac) and Calu3 (df) cells at 16 hpi. For each tomogram, a magnified area is shown below and indicated as a white square. 10 slices of the tomogram were averaged. a DMV–DMV interaction via a constricted outer membrane connection. b, c Tightly apposed membrane stack composed of four membranes (arrows) of varying curvature between two juxtaposed DMVs. d VP containing two inner vesicles with a tight membrane–membrane contact. e DMV interaction with a VP containing two inner vesicles. f VPs containing four inner vesicles with tight contact and an opening aperture formed by two stacked membranes indicated by white arrows. Scale bars: af 100 nm; magnified areas, 50 nm.

Virion assembly and structure of intracellular virions

The ERGIC constitutes the main assembly site of coronaviruses13 and budding events have been described by EM studies10,23,24. In situ cryo-ET allowed us here to study SARS-CoV-2 virion assembly in close to native conditions and enabled us to localize individual S trimers and vRNPs with high precision. Virus budding was mainly clustered in regions with a high vesicle density and close to ER- and Golgi-like membrane arrangements (Fig. 3a, Supplementary Fig. 5, and Supplementary Movies 2 and 3). S trimers were regularly found in low quantities with the ectodomain facing the ERGIC lumen. Even at high concentrations, in the absence of vRNPs, S trimer accumulation did not coincide with positive membrane curvature (Fig. 3b, c), indicating that S alone is unable to initiate virus budding. This is consistent with a study showing that SARS-CoV-1 virus-like particles are formed and released in the absence of S12. Early budding events with a positively curved membrane were decorated on the lumenal side with S and on the cytosolic side with vRNPs as separate cylindrical complexes (Fig. 3d, e) in all observed events (n = 19). This suggests that vRNPs may contribute to membrane curvature after recruitment to the membrane by the M protein or they might accumulate preferentially at curved membranes. Unlike matrix proteins of other enveloped viruses (e.g., influenza A and Ebola virus), our data show that M does not form a clearly discernible matrix layer and thus might alone not be able to curve the membrane. This is consistent with previous data on SARS-CoV-1 showing that expression of M alone is not sufficient to induce virion assembly but requires E and N12, whereas the assembly of other coronaviruses such as MHV is N independent25. Budded virions that were located directly adjacent to the ERGIC membrane showed a polarized distribution of S trimers facing towards the ERGIC lumen (Fig. 3f), likely due to steric hindrance. In contrast, virions that were more distant from the membrane showed a dispersed distribution of S (Fig. 3g) around the entire virion, indicating that S trimers are mobile on the virion envelope and redistribute during the budding process. Thus, the previously proposed lattice between S–M–N26 is likely not rigid and the S protein may laterally move.

Fig. 3: SARS-CoV-2 virion budding and assembly at the ERGIC membrane.
figure3

Different budding events captured in two tomograms (Supplementary Fig. 6 and Supplementary Movies 2 and 3) of VeroE6 cells infected with SARS-CoV-2 at 16 hpi. A 3D volume rendering is shown for each area with cellular and viral membranes in green and magenta, respectively. S (yellow) and vRNPs (cyan) are represented as subtomogram averages. The S and vRNP locations correspond to the location in the tomogram, vRNP orientations were randomized. A non-local means filter was applied, and 20 slices were averaged. a Overview of budding events at the ERGIC membrane and intracellular released virions inside the ERGIC lumen are indicated. b, c Accumulated S at the lumenal side of the ERGIC membrane. d, e Early virion budding stage with S and vRNPs accumulated at the lumenal and cytosolic ERGIC membrane, respectively. f Assembled viron in the ERGIC lumen in close proximity to the membrane, showing a polarized distribution of S. g Assembled virion further away from the membrane with redistributed S. Scale bars: a 200 nm, bg 100 nm.

Further analysis of the structure of intracellular virions revealed that S trimers are not always oriented orthogonally to the membrane of the spherical virions (Supplementary Fig. 4). We observed tilting angles up to 41° (Supplementary Fig. 4d) of S trimers on intracellular virions, supporting the observation in two recent studies27,28, which report that S trimers can tilt up to 60° in purified virions. Importantly, our study rules out that this tilting is caused by forces exerted on the virion during ultracentrifugation or blotting during the sample preparation, since the intracellular virions were protected during sample preparation by the cellular environment. Previous ultrastructural studies of other coronaviruses reported average virion diameters of 85 ± 5 nm for MHV3 and 88 ± 6 nm for SARS-CoV-126. We did not observe significant differences in the average diameters of virions derived from the three cell lines (Fig. 4c) and calculated an average diameter of 89.8 nm (SD = 13.7 nm, n = 74). Subtomogram averaging of 219 individual S trimers from intracellular virions yielded a low-resolution structure with a total height of approximately 25 nm measured from the virion envelope and a total width of 13 nm (Fig. 4d–f). The density map featured a well-defined trimeric structure with a height of 16 nm, which is in agreement with the published structure solved by single particle analysis of the purified S ectodomain in pre-fusion conformation truncated at serine residue 1147 (6VXX, https://doi.org/10.2210/pdb6VXX/pdb)4, indicating that the S trimer is fully formed during virion budding and that samples are well preserved, despite the chemical fixation step that we had to use for biosafety reasons. The approximately 9 nm long gap between the trimeric density and the virion envelope that can be attributed to the triple-stranded coiled-coil heptad repeat 2 (HR2) was not resolved, because of the presence of three flexible hinges in the stem region as shown by two recent studies27,28. To estimate the number of S trimers per virion, we extracted the three-dimensional (3D) coordinates of all identifiable S trimers on nine intracellular virions and determined the average nearest-neighbor distance to be 23.6 nm (SD = 8.1 nm, n = 100) (Fig. 4g). Based on the mathematical problem of arranging any number of points on a sphere to maximize their minimum distance, known also as the “Tammes Problem”29,30, we estimated the average number of S trimers per virion to be 48 with a range of 25–127 (Supplementary Fig. 8). This is in line with our observation of heterogeneous S trimer densities on the surface of different virions and concurs with previously reported estimates of 50–100 S trimers per virion26,31.

Fig. 4: Structural analysis of intracellular virions.
figure4

a Tomogram showing an intracellular virion of VeroE6 cells infected with SARS-CoV-2 at 16 hpi. 20 slices of the tomogram were averaged and a median filter (radius = 1 pixel) was applied. b 3D volume rendering of a with the viral envelope shown in magenta, with both leaflets of the membrane resolved. S (yellow) and vRNPs (cyan) are represented as subtomogram averages. The S and vRNP locations correspond to the location in the tomogram, vRNP orientations were randomized. c Distributions of intracellular virion diameters measured in A549-ACE2 (n = 52), VeroE6 (n = 20), and Calu3 cells (n = 3). Box and whiskers plots indicate the median (center of box), 25% and 75% quartiles (bounds of box), minimum and maximum values (bars), as well as all data points. Unpaired two-sided t-test showed no significant differences between the diameter of intracellular virions found in the three different cell lines. d, e Central longitudinal (d) and cross-sectional slice (e) showing the subtomogram average of the S trimer of intracellular virions. f Orthogonal views of the S trimer subtomogram average (yellow) and the virion envelope (magenta). Fitted structure of the S trimer ectodomain (6VXX, 10.2210/pdb6VXX/pdb)4 and the HR2 domain of SARS-CoV-1 (2FXP, 10.2210/pdb2FXP/pdb)50 are shown in black and orange, respectively (Supplementary Movie S4). g Plot showing the distribution of S nearest-neighbor distances (n = 100) on the surface of virions with an average of 23.6 nm (SD = 8.1 nm, n = 100). Scale bars: a, b 50 nm; df 5 nm.

Structure of extracellular virions

We next analyzed extracellular virions in the vicinity of infected cells to provide insights into conformational changes of the S trimers and vRNP structure, and their arrangement within the virion. Virions were found close to the plasma membranes of all host cells, albeit with notable differences in the number of virions directly attached. We found few virions around A549-ACE2 cells, all of which appeared to directly interact with the cell surface (Fig. 5a). In contrast, a high concentration of virions from VeroE6 cells were covering the surface of filopodia and protrusions that interconnected neighboring cells (Fig. 5b and Supplementary Fig. 9). Similar observations have been made in a recent study on VeroE6 and Caco-2 cells showing that SARS-CoV-2 infection induces the formation of virion decorated filopodia32. These observations are reminiscent of the cell-to-cell transmission via viral surfing as reported for HIV33 and could argue for a yet undescribed mode of transmission for SARS-CoV-2. In contrast, no virions were found attached to the surface of Calu3 cells (Fig. 5c). Differences in the number of virions attached to the analyzed cell lines might be explained by different levels of surface proteases such as TMPRSS2 or ADAM17, which cleave ACE2 receptors and thereby controlling its abundance on the cell surface34. In this scenario, SARS-CoV-2 virions remain attached to the cell surface after exocytosis due to S interactions with ACE2, which could control not only virion entry but also release into the surrounding environment. In agreement with our observations in intracellular virions, extracellular virions released from VeroE6 cells were studded with S trimers in pre-fusion conformation that were often tilted and had an average length of 23.4 nm (SD = 2.3 nm, n = 48) (Fig. 5e). Noticeably, extracellular virions from A549-ACE2 cells exhibited almost exclusively thin, rod-shaped S trimers resembling the post-fusion conformation35,36 with an overall length of 23.2 nm (SD = 2.3 nm, n = 8) and thickness of 3.8 nm (SD = 0.7 nm, n = 9) (Fig. 5d). Virions from Calu3 cells displayed a mixture of both spike conformations (Fig. 5f). The host cell-type dependent difference in the number of pre-fusion and post-fusion conformations may be explained by different levels of TMPRSS2 proteases37 and ACE2 receptors that trigger S conformational changes. Consistently, S trimers in post-fusion conformation were primarily detected on virions directly interacting with A549-ACE2 cells expressing high levels of ACE2 (Fig. 5d and Supplementary Fig. 1). In contrast, S present on virions in ACE2 low-expressing VeroE6 cells (Supplementary Fig. 1) were almost exclusively in pre-fusion conformation.

Fig. 5: Structural analysis of extracellular virions.
figure5

ac Slices of tomograms showing extracellular virions released from A549-ACE2, VeroE6, and Calu3 cells, respectively. df magnified views of (a–c), for better visualization, 10 slices were averaged. Exemplarily, S glycoproteins in a pre-fusion (arrow) or post-fusion conformation (arrowhead) are marked, vRNP complexes are encircled with dashed lines. g Plot profile through the viral envelope (VE, magenta) of virions released from VeroE6 cells and adjacent plasma membrane (PM, green) to determine monolayer separation (n = 129 and 49, respectively, SD indicated). h Number of vRNP complexes per virion (n = 28) released from VeroE6 cells. Data are represented as a histogram with a bin size of 3 and Gaussian fit (R2 = 0.8645). i, j Subtomogram average of vRNP complexes from 1570 individual vRNPs found in 15 tomograms. Central XZ-slice (i) and XY-slice (j) are shown. k, l Isosurface representation of the subtomogram average (Movie S5) shown from the top (k) and side view (l). Scale bars: ac 100 nm; df 50 nm; il 5 nm.

Based on a previous cryo-ET study revealing an unusual membrane thickness of MHV virions of 7–8 nm3, we measured the lipid bilayer separation of SARS-CoV-2 virions. Density line profiles across the membranes showed a phospholipid monolayer separation of 3.6 nm (SD = 0.5 nm, n = 129) (Fig. 5g), whereas the host cell plasma membrane was slightly but significantly thicker (3.9 nm, SD = 0.5 nm, n = 49) as evaluated by a two-sided t-test (p = 0.003). Thus, the 25 kDa type III transmembrane glycoprotein M and the membrane spanning E protein do not increase the thickness of the viral envelope. The M protein C-terminal endodomain facing the virion interior is an amphipathic, approximately 100 amino acids long domain that has been predicted to be positioned along the viral membrane38,39. Consistent with the predicted position and the small size of this endodomain, our data does not reveal a well-discernable matrix layer underneath the viral envelope such as for example the M1 layer in influenza A viruses40. Extracellular virions displayed on average 38 vRNPs per virion (SD = 10, n = 28) (Fig. 5h). Individual vRNPs associated with viral envelopes were often aligned in stacks, forming filaments with a width of approximately 14 nm (Fig. 5d–f and Supplementary Fig. 10), indicating a preferred stacking orientation of vRNPs.

Subtomogram averaging of 1570 vRNPs yielded a structure with a determined average resolution of 33 Å (Supplementary Fig. 11). The compact, cylindrical assembly of 14 nm in length and a quasi-circular base with a similar diameter (Fig. 5i–l, Supplementary Fig. 11, and Supplementary Movie 5). The assembly is composed of parallel-stacked, pillar-shaped densities, presumably formed by multiple linearly aligned N proteins. Pillar-shaped densities form two densely-packed curved walls opposing each other and surrounding a central density (Fig. 5i–l). Although the walls are connected by an additional pillar on one side, the other side appears more flexible with two pillar-like densities creating an opening. A recent study by Yao et al.41 reported a SARS-CoV-2 vRNP structure with a similar morphology to the here presented subtomogram average. Previous EM studies of vRNPs isolated from MHV and SARS-CoV-1 virions described a helical nucleocapsid3,42 or a coiled vRNP that forms a membrane-proximal lattice26. Here we propose that vRNPs are composed of N proteins in complex with the viral genome, which links neighboring vRNPs like “beads on a string.” This would allow for efficient packing of the unusually large vRNA genome into the virus particles while maintaining high steric flexibility between the individual vRNPs required during their incorporation into budding virions. Based on our data, we can distinguish individual vRNPs, whereas it remains to be investigated how the individual N proteins and RNA are organized in the vRNPs.

Discussion

Our report provides in situ cryo-ET analysis of SARS-CoV-2 and induced DMVs at high preservation levels. Direct visualization of DMVs unveils a high concentration of branched double stranded RNA filaments as the major constituents of the DMV interior. Given the lack of protein densities in the DMV interior, it is conceivable that the viral replicase complex is tightly associated with the inner DMV membrane and releases viral RNA into the DMV lumen. Alternatively, the DMV interior might serve the selective accumulation of RNA intermediates that are imported into the DMV via the recently discovered pore complex11 to evade the antiviral innate immune response. Our data indicate that S trimers alone do not induce membrane curvature during budding into the ERGIC lumen but are remarkably motile and flexible. We report that vRNPs are individual complexes that are often associated with the membrane. We propose that the cylindrical assembly of vRNPs enables efficient packaging of the genome in a nucleosome-like manner.

Methods

Cells and viruses

VeroE6, HEK293T, and A549 cells were obtained from American Type Culture Collection (ATCC) and were maintained in Dulbecco’s modified Eagle medium (DMEM) containing 2 mM L-glutamine, non-essential amino acids, 100 U/ml penicillin, 100 µg/ml streptomycin and 10% fetal calf serum (DMEM complete). Calu3 cells were a kind gift from Dr. Manfred Frey, Mannheim, and were maintained in DMEM complete supplemented with 10 mM sodium pyruvate and a final concentration of 20% fetal bovine serum. For generation of A549 cells stably expressing ACE2, lentivirus was generated by co-transfection of HEK293T cells with pWPI plasmid encoding for ACE2, and the pCMV-Gag-Pol and pMD2-VSV-G packaging plasmids (kind gifts from Dr. D. Trono, Geneva). Supernatant containing lentiviruses were collected 2 days post transfection, filtered through a 0.44 µm filter, and used for transduction of A549 cells followed by selection with neomycin (0.5 mg/ml). The Bavpat1/2020 SARS-CoV-2 virus isolate (provided by Professor Christian Drosten at the Charité in Berlin, Germany, and provided by the European Virology Archive (Ref-SKU: 026V-03883) was used. A passage 4 working stock of this isolate was generated by passaging the virus twice in VeroE6 cells.

Sample inactivation by chemical fixation

Cells (VeroE6, Calu3, A549-ACE2) were seeded in 35 mm Petri dishes containing Quantifoil 200 mesh R2/2 Au or Ti grids at seeding density of 2 × 105 cells/dish 1 day before infection. A549-ACE2, Calu3, and VeroE6 were infected at different multiplication of infection (MOI) (Supplementary Table 1) with SARS-CoV-2, respectively. For optimal sample preservation, all fixation steps were performed with electron microscopy grade paraformaldehyde (PFA) (Electron Microscopy Sciences) and glutaraldehyde (GA) (Electron Microscopy Sciences) and all fixation solutions were buffered in 0.1 M PHEM (60 mM PIPES, 25 mM HEPES, 10 mM EGTA, 2 mM MgCl2) buffer at pH 7.4. Infected cells were chemically fixed at 16 hpi by addition of a double-concentrated fixative solution (8% PFA, 0.2% GA, 0.2 M PHEM  buffer pH 7.4) directly into an equal volume of growing medium for 10 min at room temperature (RT). Subsequently, the medium containing fixative was removed, and cells were chemically fixed for 30 min at RT with 4% PFA and 0.1% GA, 0.1 M PHEM buffer pH 7.4. For a comparison of structure preservation, a subset of samples was inactivated by using 4% PFA and 0.1% GA in 0.1 M PHEM pH 7.4 for 30 min at RT omitting the double-concentrated fixative solution. Finally, all 35 mm dishes containing infected cells were completely submerged into a container with 100 ml of 4% PFA in 0.1 M PHEM pH 7.4 and carried out of the BSL3 facility to be immediately plunge-frozen.

Plaque assay

VeroE6 cells were seeded into 24-well plates at seeding density of 2.5 × 105 cells/well. Serial dilutions of infectious supernatants were prepared and added to the cells in duplicates. Infection was performed at 37 °C for 1 h followed by removal of the supernatants and overlaying with 1 ml of plaquing medium (0.8% carboxymethyl-cellulose in Minimum Essential Medium (MEM)). Cells were incubated at 37 °C for 3 days followed by fixation in 5% formaldehyde for 1 h. Plates were submerged in a solution of 6% formaldehyde for 30 min before being carried out of the BSL3 area. Plates were washed with water and 1 ml of staining solution (1% crystal violet in 10% ethanol) was added for 15 min. Staining solution was removed, plates were rinsed again with water, plaques were counted, and titers were calculated.

Light microscopy

Infected cells grown on glass coverslips were fixed with 4% PFA in PBS for 30 min at RT. Plates were then submerged in a solution of 6% formaldehyde for 30 min before being carried out of the BSL3 area. Samples were rinsed twice in PBS, permeabilized with 0.2% Triton-X100 in PBS for 10 min, rinsed again twice with PBS, and incubated for 1 h with blocking buffer containing 2% milk in PBS. Samples were incubated with dsRNA antibody (Scicons, catalog number 10010200) diluted 1:1000 in blocking buffer for 1 h at RT, washed three times in washing buffer (PBS, 0.02% Tween-20), and incubated with a secondary goat anti-mouse Alexa Fluor 488 antibody (Thermo Fisher, A-21131) diluted 1:1000 in blocking buffer for 45 min at RT. Coverslips were mounted on glass slides with Fluoromount-G mounting media containing DAPI (Biozol).

Reverse-transcription quantitative PCR

The NucleoSpin RNA extraction kit (Macherey-Nagel) was used to isolate total intracellular RNA according to the manufacturer’s specification. cDNA was synthesized from the total RNA using a high capacity cDNA reverse-transcription kit (Thermo Fisher Scientific) according to the manufacturer’s specifications. Each cDNA sample was diluted 1:15 and used directly for quantitative PCR (qPCR) analysis using specific primers and the iTaq Universal SYBR green master mix (Bio-Rad). Primers for qPCR were designed using the Primer3 software43: ACE2 (forward) 5′-CACGAAGGTCCTCTGCACAA-3′, ACE2 (reverse) 5′-ATGCTAGGGTCCAGGGTTCT-3′, SARS-CoV-2-N (forward) 5′-GCCTCTTCTCGTTCCTCATCAC-3′, SARS-CoV-2-N (reverse) 5′-AGCAGCATCACCGCCATTG-3′, hypoxanthine phosphoribosyltransferase 1 (HPRT) (forward) 5′-CCTGGCGTCGTGATTAGTG-3′, and HPRT (reverse) 5′-ACACCCTTTCCAAATCCTCAG-3′. To obtain the relative abundance of specific RNAs from each sample, cycle threshold (ct) values were corrected for the PCR efficiency of the specific primer set and normalized to HPRT transcript levels.

Sample processing for cryo-EM

To generate the dataset for this study, two independent infections of cells grown on electron microscopy grids were done for A549-ACE2 cells and one infection on VeroE6 and Calu3 cells. Detailed overview of sample processing is shown in Supplementary Table 1. Tomograms containing cellular structures that were partially compromised by fixation or poor vitrification as apparent from increased local membrane undulation and increased aggregation in the cytosol were excluded from the analysis.

Plunge freezing

Chemically fixed infected cells grown on grids were plunge-frozen in liquid ethane cooled to −183 °C by liquid nitrogen using a Leica GP2 plunger. Before plunge freezing, 3 µl of 0.1 M PHEM buffer pH 7.4 was applied on a grid in the chamber set to 70% humidity and 24 °C. Grids were blotted for 3 seconds using No. 1 Whatman paper and clipped into Autogrids (Thermo Fisher Scientific) dedicated for cryo-focused ion beam milling and stored in liquid nitrogen.

Cryo-focused ion beam milling

Lamellae were prepared using a focused Gallium ion beam on an Aquilos dual-beam focused ion beam-scanning electron microscope (FIB-SEM) at the stage temperature around −180 °C (Thermo Fisher Scientific). Cells positioned in the center of the grid squares were selected for milling and the eucentric height for each of the cells was set using the routines in the MAPS software. An organo-metallic platinum protective layer was applied for 5–6 s onto the cells before milling. Rough milling was performed gradually in four steps at a stage angle of 15–18° using a Ga+ beam to obtain 500 nm-thick lamellae. Final milling was performed at the end of the milling session to yield lamellae with nominal thickness of 150 nm. To minimize lamella bending, a micro-expansion joints milling pattern was applied as described by Wolff et al.44. Progress was monitored by SEM imaging at 2.2–10 kV with ETD and T2 detectors.

Cryo-electron tomography

Cryo-ET was performed using the Titan Krios cryo-TEM (Thermo Fisher Scientific) operated at 300 kV equipped with a K3 direct electron detector and a Gatan imaging filter (Gatan) in EFTEM nanoprobe mode. Lamellae or whole cells were mapped at a magnification of ×6500 at defocus −50 μm to localize DMVs and virions. Tilt series (TS) were acquired at magnifications of ×26,000, ×33,000, or ×64,000 (corresponding pixel sizes at the specimen level: 3.356 Å, 2.671 Å, and 1.379 Å respectively) using SerialEM45. A dose-symmetric acquisition scheme46 with a constant electron dose of ~3 e2 per projection, target defocus ranging from −5 to −2.5 μm and energy filter slit at 20 eV was used covering the tilt range from 60° to −60° with 3° increments. When possible, TS acquired on lamellae were tilted to 6° as a starting angle to compensate for the pre-tilt of the lamella with respect to the grid. Individual projections were acquired in counting mode using dose fractionation. Ten to 20 individual frames per projections were aligned and summed on-the-fly using the SEMCCD plugin in SerialEM.

Tomogram reconstruction and volume rendering

TS were aligned and reconstructed with the IMOD software package47. The stack was aligned using patch tracking for TS acquired on lamellae or gold fiducial markers for TS acquired in the periphery of whole cells. After contrast transfer function (CTF) correction by phase-flipping and dose-filtration, the final reconstruction was performed by weighted back-projection with a Simultaneous Iterative Reconstruction Technique (SIRT)-like filter equivalent to 10 iterations. For volume rendering, the pre-aligned TS stack from IMOD was reconstructed and denoised with the cryo-CARE library using the Tomo2Tomo even-odd scheme48 on 4x binned data. This denoised tomogram was further processed with Amira 2019.3 (Thermo Fisher Scientific) using the Membrane Enhancement Filter with a feature scale of 6.5 nm. An initial segmentation was created using the Top-hat tool. This initial segmentation was manually refined by removing segmented sections derived from noise and by manually adding segmentations of membranes where automated segmentation failed.

Subtomogram averaging

To obtain the average of the S trimer present on the surface of intracellular virions during and after budding into the ERGIC, 219 positions corresponding to the center of the S trimers on the virion surface were manually picked from six tomograms acquired on cryo-lamellae using the general model available in Dynamo49. Subsequently, subtomograms with a cubic side length of 160 voxels size were cropped from tomograms and were iteratively aligned against a reference composed of two overlapping cylinders approximately matching the S trimer and globular region diameters. C3 symmetry was applied during the alignment steps since the C3 symmetry was revealed when it was not imposed (Supplementary Fig. 7a). The atomic structures of the pre-fusion SARS-CoV-2 S ectodomain (6VXX, https://doi.org/10.2210/pdb6VXX/pdb)4 and the HR2 domain of SARS-CoV-1 (2FXP, https://doi.org/10.2210/pdb2FXP/pdb)50 were automatically placed using the fitting tool or manually placed into the density map in ChimeraX51, respectively. The average of the vRNP complexes within extracellular virions was obtained from 1570 particles manually picked from 15 tomograms using the general model in Dynamo. Subtomograms with a cubic side length of 168 voxels were cropped and 200 particles were iteratively averaged using a cylindrical mask adjusted to the dimensions of the vRNP to obtain a reference template. The initial average was then used as a template to obtain a refined average using 1570 particles.

Resolution estimation and 3D visualization of subtomogram averages

The Dynamo alignment projects for both S trimer and vRNP were recalculated with settings described above, but using two references, resulting in two subtomogram averages. Using the Fourier Shell Correlation (FSC) server of PDBe52, which is based on EMAN253, FSC curves were calculated. Using a correlation threshold of 0.5, the resolution of the subtomogram was estimated. The subtomogram averages were low-pass filtered to the estimated resolution using IMOD and the isosurfaces were visualized using UCSF Chimera.

Estimation of number of S trimers per virion

Arranging a specific number of points on a sphere with a largest possible minimum distance between any point is a mathematical problem called “Tammes Problem”29 or the seventh unsolved mathematical problem listed by Steve Smale54. It has been solved only for a few configurations30, although was heuristically approximated for others. Based on these estimates and considering two simplified postulates, i.e., (i) virions are spherical and (ii) S trimers are evenly distributed on the viral envelope, we can determine the number of S trimers per virion.

First, we determined the average distance of S trimers on SARS-CoV-2 virions. S trimers were manually picked in reconstructed tomograms using the IMOD software package47 and their 3D coordinates were extracted. For each individual S trimer, the nearest-neighboring S trimer on the same virion was identified and the Euclidean distance was calculated using the pandas (https://pandas.pydata.org/pandas-docs/stable/whatsnew/v1.0.4.html) and numpy software libraries55. If two S trimers were reciprocal nearest neighbors, their distance was counted only once. To estimate the mean number of S trimers per virion, we calculated the central angle α for two points on a sphere with the previously determined average virion radius r and S trimer distance d:

$$\alpha = \cos ^{ - 1}\left( {1 - \frac{{d^2}}{{2r^2}}} \right)$$
(1)

The error of the central angle αerr was determined by error propagation with with spike distance error derr and virion radius error rerr:

$$\alpha _{{\mathrm{err}}} = \sqrt {\frac{1}{{r^2}}\left( {1 - \frac{{d^2}}{{4r^2}}} \right)^{ - 1}{\mathrm{d}}_{{\mathrm{err}}}^2 + \frac{{d^2}}{{r^4}}\left( {1 - \frac{{d^2}}{{4r^2}}} \right)^{ - 1}{\mathrm{r}}_{{\mathrm{err}}}^2}$$
(2)

By comparing the determined central angle with the estimated results for configurations of N points on a sphere by Sloane et al. (http://neilsloane.com/packings/) (Supplementary Fig. S6d), we can determine the total number of S trimers per virion.

Measurement of phospholipid bilayer distance of membranes

Membrane thickness of the virion envelope and cellular membranes was measured as the distance between phospholipid head groups of the bilayer. Line density profiles (10 pixels in width, 0.41 Å/pixel) of ~20 nm in length were determined across the respective membrane using the plot profile tool in FIJI/ImageJ56. For each membrane, 49–129 measurements were performed and normalized against the maxima of each measurement separately. Densities were aligned to the first maxima and plotted against the distance from the start of the line profile. The distances between the two global maxima corresponding to the phospholipid bilayer were then measured for each plot profile.

RNA segmentation and measurement of thickness

Tracing was done manually in Amira 2019.3 using the filament editor in linear tracing mode. The reconstructed tomogram was 4× binned and either SIRT-like filtered equivalent to ten iterations or denoised with cryo-CARE as described above. The total filament lengths were extracted from the resulting spatial graph statistics. The RNA filament diameter was measured on the unbinned SIRT-like filtered reconstructed tomogram in FIJI by smoothing the image using gaussian blur (σ = 2 px) and measuring the line profiles perpendicular to RNA filaments using FIJI’s plot profile tool (10 pixels in width, 1.379 Å/pixel). The gray value profiles were normalized, aligned to their respective maxima and averaged. The diameter was defined as the distance between the two centermost intersection points of the normalized line profile with the line corresponding to the average gray values of the DMV internal space.

Statistics and reproducibility

A summary of biological replicas, number of milled lamellas, and number of acquired and analyzed tomograms (technical replicas) from each cell line used in the study can be found in Supplementary Tables 1 and 2.

Reporting summary

Further information on research design is available in the Nature Research Reporting Summary linked to this article.

Data availability

The data that support this study are available from the corresponding author upon reasonable request. EM data are provided on the EMDB database under the accession numbers EMD-11863, EMD-11865, EMD-11866, EMD-11867, and EMD-11868Source data are provided with this paper.

References

  1. 1.

    Zhou, P. et al. A pneumonia outbreak associated with a new coronavirus of probable bat origin. Nature 579, 270–273 (2020).

    ADS  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  2. 2.

    Dong, E., Du, H. & Gardner, L. An interactive web-based dashboard to track COVID-19 in real time. Lancet Infect. Dis. 20, 533–534 (2020).

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  3. 3.

    Barcena, M. et al. Cryo-electron tomography of mouse hepatitis virus: Insights into the structure of the coronavirion. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 106, 582–587 (2009).

    ADS  CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  4. 4.

    Walls, A. C. et al. Structure, function, and antigenicity of the SARS-CoV-2 spike glycoprotein. Cell 181, 281–292 e286 (2020).

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  5. 5.

    Li, F. Structure, function, and evolution of coronavirus spike. Proteins Annu Rev. Virol. 3, 237–261 (2016).

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  6. 6.

    Hoffmann, M. et al. SARS-CoV-2 cell entry depends on ACE2 and TMPRSS2 and is blocked by a clinically proven protease inhibitor. Cell 181, 271–280 e278 (2020).

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  7. 7.

    Romero-Brey, I. & Bartenschlager, R. Membranous replication factories induced by plus-strand RNA viruses. Viruses 6, 2826–2857 (2014).

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  8. 8.

    Snijder, E. J. et al. A unifying structural and functional model of the coronavirus replication organelle: tracking down RNA synthesis. PLoS Biol. 18, e3000715 (2020).

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  9. 9.

    Oudshoorn, D. et al. Expression and cleavage of middle east respiratory syndrome coronavirus nsp3-4 polyprotein induce the formation of double-membrane vesicles that mimic those associated with coronaviral RNA replication. mBio 8, https://doi.org/10.1128/mBio.01658-17 (2017).

  10. 10.

    Knoops, K. et al. SARS-coronavirus replication is supported by a reticulovesicular network of modified endoplasmic reticulum. PLoS Biol. 6, e226 (2008).

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. 11.

    Wolff, G. et al. A molecular pore spans the double membrane of the coronavirus replication organelle. Science https://doi.org/10.1126/science.abd3629 (2020).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. 12.

    Siu, Y. L. et al. The M, E, and N structural proteins of the severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus are required for efficient assembly, trafficking, and release of virus-like particles. J. Virol. 82, 11318–11330 (2008).

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  13. 13.

    de Haan, C. A. M. & Rottier, P. J. M. in Virus Structure and Assembly Advances in Virus Research 165–230 (Elsevier, 2005).

  14. 14.

    Krijnse-Locker, J., Ericsson, M., Rottier, P. J. & Griffiths, G. Characterization of the budding compartment of mouse hepatitis virus: evidence that transport from the RER to the Golgi complex requires only one vesicular transport step. J. Cell Biol. 124, 55–70 (1994).

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  15. 15.

    Godeke, G. J., de Haan, C. A., Rossen, J. W., Vennema, H. & Rottier, P. J. Assembly of spikes into coronavirus particles is mediated by the carboxy-terminal domain of the spike protein. J. Virol. 74, 1566–1571 (2000).

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  16. 16.

    Escors, D., Ortego, J., Laude, H. & Enjuanes, L. The membrane M protein carboxy terminus binds to transmissible gastroenteritis coronavirus core and contributes to core stability. J. Virol. 75, 1312–1324 (2001).

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  17. 17.

    Mossel, E. C. et al. Exogenous ACE2 expression allows refractory cell lines to support severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus replication. J. Virol. 79, 3846–3850 (2005).

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  18. 18.

    Ertel, K. J. et al. Cryo-electron tomography reveals novel features of a viral RNA replication compartment. Elife 6, https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.25940 (2017).

  19. 19.

    Arias-Gonzalez, J. R. Single-molecule portrait of DNA and RNA double helices. Integr. Biol. 6, 904–925 (2014).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  20. 20.

    Gopal, A., Zhou, Z. H., Knobler, C. M. & Gelbart, W. M. Visualizing large RNA molecules in solution. RNA 18, 284–299 (2012).

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  21. 21.

    Peng, N. et al. Inducible major vault protein plays a pivotal role in double-stranded RNA- or virus-induced proinflammatory response. J. Immunol. 196, 2753–2766 (2016).

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  22. 22.

    Ogando, N. S. et al. SARS-coronavirus-2 replication in Vero E6 cells: replication kinetics, rapid adaptation and cytopathology. J. Gen. Virol. https://doi.org/10.1099/jgv.0.001453 (2020).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. 23.

    McIntosh, K. & Perlman, S. in Mandell, Douglas, and Bennett’s Principles and Practice of Infectious Diseases, Updated Edition 8th edn (Elsevier Saunders, Philadelphia, 2015).

  24. 24.

    Stertz, S. et al. The intracellular sites of early replication and budding of SARS-coronavirus. Virology 361, 304–315 (2007).

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  25. 25.

    Vennema, H. et al. Nucleocapsid-independent assembly of coronavirus-like particles by co-expression of viral envelope protein genes. EMBO J. 15, 2020–2028 (1996).

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  26. 26.

    Neuman, B. W. et al. Supramolecular architecture of severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus revealed by electron cryomicroscopy. J. Virol. 80, 7918–7928 (2006).

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  27. 27.

    Turonova, B. et al. In situ structural analysis of SARS-CoV-2 spike reveals flexibility mediated by three hinges. Science https://doi.org/10.1126/science.abd5223 (2020).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. 28.

    Ke, Z. et al. Structures and distributions of SARS-CoV-2 spike proteins on intact virions. Nature https://doi.org/10.1038/s41586-020-2665-2 (2020).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. 29.

    Tammes, P. M. L. On the origin of number and arrangement of the places of exit on the surface of pollen-grains. Recl. Trav. Botaniques Néerlandais 27, 1–84 (1930).

    Google Scholar 

  30. 30.

    Saff, E. B. & Kuijlaars, A. B. J. Distributing many points on a sphere. Math. Intell. 19, 5–11 (1997).

    MathSciNet  MATH  Article  Google Scholar 

  31. 31.

    Neuman, B. W. et al. A structural analysis of M protein in coronavirus assembly and morphology. J. Struct. Biol. 174, 11–22 (2011).

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  32. 32.

    Bouhaddou, M. et al. The global phosphorylation landscape of SARS-CoV-2 infection. Cell 182, 685–712 e619 (2020).

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  33. 33.

    Mothes, W., Sherer, N. M., Jin, J. & Zhong, P. Virus cell-to-cell transmission. J. Virol. 84, 8360–8368 (2010).

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  34. 34.

    Heurich, A. et al. TMPRSS2 and ADAM17 cleave ACE2 differentially and only proteolysis by TMPRSS2 augments entry driven by the severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus spike protein. J. Virol. 88, 1293–1307 (2014).

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  35. 35.

    Walls, A. C. et al. Tectonic conformational changes of a coronavirus spike glycoprotein promote membrane fusion. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 114, 11157–11162 (2017).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  36. 36.

    Song, W., Gui, M., Wang, X. & Xiang, Y. Cryo-EM structure of the SARS coronavirus spike glycoprotein in complex with its host cell receptor ACE2. PLoS Pathog. 14, e1007236 (2018).

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  37. 37.

    Matsuyama, S. et al. Enhanced isolation of SARS-CoV-2 by TMPRSS2-expressing cells. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 117, 7001–7003 (2020).

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  38. 38.

    Arndt, A. L., Larson, B. J. & Hogue, B. G. A conserved domain in the coronavirus membrane protein tail is important for virus assembly. J. Virol. 84, 11418–11428 (2010).

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  39. 39.

    Rottier, P. J. M. in The Coronaviridae Vol. 98 (ed Stuart G. Siddell) Ch. Chapter 6, 115–139 (Springer, 1995).

  40. 40.

    Peukes, J. et al. The native structure of the assembled matrix protein 1 of influenza A virus, Naturehttps://doi.org/10.1038/s41586-020-2696-8 (2020).

  41. 41.

    Yao, H. et al. Molecular architecture of the SARS-CoV-2 virus. Cell https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cell.2020.09.018 (2020).

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  42. 42.

    Gui, M. et al. Electron microscopy studies of the coronavirus ribonucleoprotein complex. Protein Cell 8, 219–224 (2017).

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  43. 43.

    Untergasser, A. et al. Primer3–new capabilities and interfaces. Nucleic Acids Res 40, e115 (2012).

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  44. 44.

    Wolff, G. et al. Mind the gap: Micro-expansion joints drastically decrease the bending of FIB-milled cryo-lamellae. J. Struct. Biol. 208, 107389 (2019).

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  45. 45.

    Mastronarde, D. N. Automated electron microscope tomography using robust prediction of specimen movements. J. Struct. Biol. 152, 36–51 (2005).

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  46. 46.

    Hagen, W. J. H., Wan, W. & Briggs, J. A. G. Implementation of a cryo-electron tomography tilt-scheme optimized for high resolution subtomogram averaging. J. Struct. Biol. 197, 191–198 (2017).

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  47. 47.

    Mastronarde, D. N. & Held, S. R. Automated tilt series alignment and tomographic reconstruction in IMOD. J. Struct. Biol. 197, 102–113 (2017).

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  48. 48.

    Buchholz, T. O. et al. Content-aware image restoration for electron microscopy. Methods Cell Biol. 152, 277–289 (2019).

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  49. 49.

    Castano-Diez, D., Kudryashev, M., Arheit, M. & Stahlberg, H. Dynamo: a flexible, user-friendly development tool for subtomogram averaging of cryo-EM data in high-performance computing environments. J. Struct. Biol. 178, 139–151 (2012).

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  50. 50.

    Hakansson-McReynolds, S., Jiang, S., Rong, L. & Caffrey, M. Solution structure of the severe acute respiratory syndrome-coronavirus heptad repeat 2 domain in the prefusion state. J. Biol. Chem. 281, 11965–11971 (2006).

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  51. 51.

    Goddard, T. D. et al. UCSF ChimeraX: meeting modern challenges in visualization and analysis. Protein Sci. 27, 14–25 (2018).

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  52. 52.

    Gutmanas, A. et al. PDBe: Protein Data Bank in Europe. Nucleic Acids Res. 42, D285–D291 (2014).

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  53. 53.

    Tang, G. et al. EMAN2: an extensible image processing suite for electron microscopy. J. Struct. Biol. 157, 38–46 (2007).

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  54. 54.

    Beltrán, C., Cucker, F., Krick, T., Pinkus, A. & Szanto, A. in Foundations of Computational Mathematics, Budapest 2011 Ch. 1, 1–15 (Cambridge Univ. Press, 2012).

  55. 55.

    van der Walt, S., Colbert, S. C. & Varoquaux, G. The NumPy Array: a structure for efficient numerical computation. Comput. Sci. Eng. 13, 22–30 (2011).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  56. 56.

    Schindelin, J. et al. Fiji: an open-source platform for biological-image analysis. Nat. Methods 9, 676–682 (2012).

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

We thank Dr. Manfred Frey, Mannheim, for kindly providing Calu3 cell line, Dr. Christian Drosten and the European Virus Archive-Global for providing the SARS-CoV-2 seed virus (strain Bavpat1/2020), and Christian Willig for help with the error propagation calculation. We thank Dr. Ivonne Morales and Dimitris Papagiannidis for critical reading of the manuscript. We acknowledge microscopy support from the Infectious Diseases Imaging Platform (IDIP) at the Center for Integrative Infectious Disease Research Heidelberg. We acknowledge access to the infrastructure and support provided by the Cryo-EM Network at the Heidelberg University (HD-cryoNet). This work was supported by a research grant from the Chica and Heinz Schaller Foundation (Schaller Research Group Leader Program) to P.C., S.L.W., and M.W.-M. and by the Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft (DFG, German Research Foundation), project number 240245660 – SFB 1129 to P.C., S.K., S.B., B.C., and R.B. Work of R.B. was additionally funded by the DFG, project number 112927078 – TRR 83. S.B. is supported by the Heisenberg program, project number 415089553 and M.L.S. is supported by the DFG, project number 41607209.

Funding

Open Access funding enabled and organized by Projekt DEAL.

Author information

Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

Sample preparation: S.K., M.C., S.L.W., M.W.-M., C.N., B.C., M.L.S., S.B., and P.C. Study conceptualization and design: S.K., M.C., S.L.W., P.C., and R.B. Data collection: S.K., M.C., S.L.W., M.W.-M., and P.C. Analysis: S.K., M.C., S.L.W., M.W.-M., and P.C. Preparation of the manuscript: S.K., M.C., S.L.W, M.W.-M, P.C., and R.B.

Corresponding authors

Correspondence to Ralf Bartenschlager or Petr Chlanda.

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing interests.

Additional information

Peer review information Nature Communications thanks the anonymous reviewers for their contribution to the peer review of this work. Peer reviewer reports are available.

Publisher’s note Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Supplementary information

Source data

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons license, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons license and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this license, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Klein, S., Cortese, M., Winter, S.L. et al. SARS-CoV-2 structure and replication characterized by in situ cryo-electron tomography. Nat Commun 11, 5885 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-020-19619-7

Download citation

Further reading

Comments

By submitting a comment you agree to abide by our Terms and Community Guidelines. If you find something abusive or that does not comply with our terms or guidelines please flag it as inappropriate.

Search

Quick links

Nature Briefing

Sign up for the Nature Briefing newsletter — what matters in science, free to your inbox daily.

Get the most important science stories of the day, free in your inbox. Sign up for Nature Briefing