Letter | Published:

A spin transition mechanism for cooperative adsorption in metal–organic frameworks

Nature volume 550, pages 96100 (05 October 2017) | Download Citation

Abstract

Cooperative binding, whereby an initial binding event facilitates the uptake of additional substrate molecules, is common in biological systems such as haemoglobin1,2. It was recently shown that porous solids that exhibit cooperative binding have substantial energetic benefits over traditional adsorbents3, but few guidelines currently exist for the design of such materials. In principle, metal–organic frameworks that contain coordinatively unsaturated metal centres could act as both selective4,5,6,7 and cooperative adsorbents if guest binding at one site were to trigger an electronic transformation that subsequently altered the binding properties at neighbouring metal sites8,9,10. Here we illustrate this concept through the selective adsorption of carbon monoxide (CO) in a series of metal–organic frameworks featuring coordinatively unsaturated iron(ii) sites. Functioning via a mechanism by which neighbouring iron(ii) sites undergo a spin-state transition above a threshold CO pressure, these materials exhibit large CO separation capacities with only small changes in temperature. The very low regeneration energies that result may enable more efficient Fischer–Tropsch conversions and extraction of CO from industrial waste feeds, which currently underutilize this versatile carbon synthon11. The electronic basis for the cooperative adsorption demonstrated here could provide a general strategy for designing efficient and selective adsorbents suitable for various separations.

Access optionsAccess options

Rent or Buy article

Get time limited or full article access on ReadCube.

from$8.99

All prices are NET prices.

References

  1. 1.

    Mechanism of Cooperativity and Allosteric Regulation in Proteins (Cambridge Univ. Press, 1990)

  2. 2.

    & CO ligation intermediates and the mechanism of hemoglobin cooperativity. J. Biol. Chem. 274, 2605–2608 (1999)

  3. 3.

    et al. Cooperative insertion of CO2 in diamine-appended metal-organic frameworks. Nature 519, 303–308 (2015)

  4. 4.

    , & Dramatic tuning of carbon dioxide uptake via metal substitution in a coordination polymer with cylindrical pores. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 130, 10870–10871 (2008)

  5. 5.

    et al. Carbon dioxide capture in metal–organic frameworks. Chem. Rev. 112, 724–781 (2012)

  6. 6.

    , & Hydrocarbon separations in metal–organic frameworks. Chem. Mater. 26, 323–338 (2014)

  7. 7.

    et al. Selective, tunable O2 binding in cobalt(II)–triazolate/pyrazolate metal–organic frameworks. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 138, 7161–7170 (2016)

  8. 8.

    & Spin-transition polymers: from molecular materials toward memory devices. Science 279, 44–48 (1998)

  9. 9.

    , , , & Cooperative spin crossover behavior in cyanide-bridged Fe(II)–M(II) bimetallic 3D Hofmann-like networks (M = Ni, Pd, Pt). Inorg. Chem. 40, 3838–3839 (2001)

  10. 10.

    , , , & Organometallic ferrocenyl polymers displaying tunable cooperative interactions between transition metal centers. Angew. Chem. Int. Edn Engl. 32, 1709–1711 (1993)

  11. 11.

    Industrial Gas Handbook: Gas Separation and Purification Ch. 8 (CRC, 2007)

  12. 12.

    , & Introduction to metal–organic frameworks. Chem. Rev. 112, 673–674 (2012)

  13. 13.

    , , & The chemistry and applications of metal-organic frameworks. Science 341, 1230444 (2013)

  14. 14.

    , & Selective gas adsorption and separation. Chem. Soc. Rev. 38, 1477–1504 (2009)

  15. 15.

    et al. Flexible metal–organic frameworks. Chem. Soc. Rev. 43, 6062–6096 (2014)

  16. 16.

    et al. An explanation for the very large breathing effect of a metal–organic framework during CO2 adsorption. Adv. Mater. 19, 2246–2251 (2007)

  17. 17.

    et al. Understanding inflections and steps in carbon dioxide adsorption isotherms in metal–organic frameworks. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 130, 406–407 (2008)

  18. 18.

    , , & Reactivity of coordinatively unsaturated iron complexes towards carbon monoxide: to bind or not to bind? Dalton Trans. 40, 4778–4792 (2011)

  19. 19.

    et al. Reversible CO scavenging via adsorbate-dependent spin state transitions in an iron(II)–triazolate metal–organic framework. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 138, 5594–5602 (2016)

  20. 20.

    et al. Drastic enhancement of catalytic activity via post-oxidation of a porous MnII triazolate framework. Chem. Eur. J. 20, 11303–11307 (2014)

  21. 21.

    et al. Monodentate hydroxide as a super strong yet reversible active site for CO2 capture from high-humidity flue gas. Energy Environ. Sci. 8, 1011–1016 (2015)

  22. 22.

    , & High and reversible ammonia uptake in mesoporous azolate metal–organic frameworks with open Mn, Co, and Ni sites. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 138, 9401–9404 (2016)

  23. 23.

    , , & Spin crossover in 1D, 2D, and 3D polymeric Fe(II) networks. Top. Curr. Chem. 233, 229–257 (2004)

  24. 24.

    et al. Reversible CO binding enables tunable CO/H2 and CO/N2 separations in metal-organic frameworks with exposed divalent metal cations. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 136, 10752–10761 (2014)

  25. 25.

    International Energy Agency. Global Action to Advance Carbon Capture and Storage: A Focus on Industrial Applications (IEA, 2013)

  26. 26.

    & Developments in CO separation. Gas. Sep. Purif. 9, 277–283 (1995)

  27. 27.

    et al. Self-accelerating CO sorption in a soft nanoporous crystal. Science 343, 167–170 (2014)

  28. 28.

    et al. A supported Cu(I)@MIL-100(Fe) adsorbent with high CO adsorption capacity and CO/N2 selectivity. Chem. Eng. J. 270, 282–289 (2015)

  29. 29.

    , , , & Integrated reformer process for the production of carbon black. US patent 5,011,670 (1991)

  30. 30.

    , , , & Guest-dependent spin crossover in a nanoporous molecular framework material. Science 298, 1762–1765 (2002)

  31. 31.

    et al. Elucidating gating effects for hydrogen sorption in MFU-4-type triazolate-based metal–organic frameworks featuring different pore sizes. Chem. Eur. J. 17, 1837–1848 (2011)

  32. 32.

    Indexing of powder diffraction patterns by iterative use of singular value decomposition. J. Appl. Cryst. 36, 86–95 (2003)

  33. 33.

    TOPAS-Academic, version 4.1 (Coelho Software, 2007)

Download references

Acknowledgements

This research was supported through the Center for Gas Separations Relevant to Clean Energy Technologies, an Energy Frontier Research Center funded by the US Department of Energy, Office of Science, Office of Basic Energy Sciences under award DE-SC0001015. Powder X-ray diffraction data were collected at Beamline 11-BM and Beamline 17-BM at the Advanced Photon Source, a DOE Office of Science User Facility, operated by Argonne National Laboratory under contract DE-AC02-06CH11357. We thank P. C. Bunting, R. L. Siegelman and J. E. Bachman for discussions, and H. Z. H. Jiang for experimental assistance. D.A.R., J.O., J.A.M., D.J.X. and L.E.D. thank the National Science Foundation for graduate fellowship support.

Author information

Author notes

    • Douglas A. Reed
    •  & Benjamin K. Keitz

    These authors contributed equally to this work.

Affiliations

  1. Department of Chemistry, University of California, Berkeley, California 94720, USA

    • Douglas A. Reed
    • , Benjamin K. Keitz
    • , Julia Oktawiec
    • , Jarad A. Mason
    • , Tomče Runčevski
    • , Dianne J. Xiao
    • , Lucy E. Darago
    •  & Jeffrey R. Long
  2. McKetta Department of Chemical Engineering, University of Texas, Austin, Texas 78712, USA

    • Benjamin K. Keitz
  3. Materials Sciences Division, Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory, Berkeley, California 94720, USA

    • Tomče Runčevski
    •  & Jeffrey R. Long
  4. Chemistry Department, NIS and INSTM Centre of Reference, University of Turin, Via Quarello 15, I-10135 Torino, Italy

    • Valentina Crocellà
    •  & Silvia Bordiga
  5. Department of Chemical and Biomolecular Engineering, University of California, Berkeley, California 94720, USA

    • Jeffrey R. Long

Authors

  1. Search for Douglas A. Reed in:

  2. Search for Benjamin K. Keitz in:

  3. Search for Julia Oktawiec in:

  4. Search for Jarad A. Mason in:

  5. Search for Tomče Runčevski in:

  6. Search for Dianne J. Xiao in:

  7. Search for Lucy E. Darago in:

  8. Search for Valentina Crocellà in:

  9. Search for Silvia Bordiga in:

  10. Search for Jeffrey R. Long in:

Contributions

D.A.R., B.K.K. and J.R.L. formulated the project. D.A.R. and B.K.K. synthesized the compounds. D.A.R. and B.K.K. collected and analysed the gas adsorption data. J.O., J.A.M. and T.R. collected and analysed the X-ray diffraction data. D.J.X. collected and analysed the Mössbauer spectra. L.E.D. collected and analysed the magnetic susceptibility data. V.C. and S.B. collected and analysed the infrared spectra. D.A.R., B.K.K. and J.R.L. wrote the paper, and all authors contributed to revising it.

Competing interests

J.R.L., D.A.R., B.K.K. and the University of California, Berkeley have filed for a patent on some of the results contained herein.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Jeffrey R. Long.

Publisher's note: Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Supplementary information

PDF files

  1. 1.

    Supplementary Information

    This file contains supplementary discussion, tables S1-S10 and figures S1-S21.

About this article

Publication history

Received

Accepted

Published

DOI

https://doi.org/10.1038/nature23674

Comments

By submitting a comment you agree to abide by our Terms and Community Guidelines. If you find something abusive or that does not comply with our terms or guidelines please flag it as inappropriate.