Letter | Published:

Distinct extended amygdala circuits for divergent motivational states

Nature volume 496, pages 224228 (11 April 2013) | Download Citation

Subjects

Abstract

The co-morbidity of anxiety and dysfunctional reward processing in illnesses such as addiction1 and depression2 suggests that common neural circuitry contributes to these disparate neuropsychiatric symptoms. The extended amygdala, including the bed nucleus of the stria terminalis (BNST), modulates fear and anxiety3,4, but also projects to the ventral tegmental area (VTA)5,6, a region implicated in reward and aversion7,8,9,10,11,12,13, thus providing a candidate neural substrate for integrating diverse emotional states. However, the precise functional connectivity between distinct BNST projection neurons and their postsynaptic targets in the VTA, as well as the role of this circuit in controlling motivational states, have not been described. Here we record and manipulate the activity of genetically and neurochemically identified VTA-projecting BNST neurons in freely behaving mice. Collectively, aversive stimuli exposure produced heterogeneous firing patterns in VTA-projecting BNST neurons. By contrast, in vivo optically identified glutamatergic projection neurons displayed a net enhancement of activity to aversive stimuli, whereas the firing rate of identified GABAergic (γ-aminobutyric acid-containing) projection neurons was suppressed. Channelrhodopsin-2-assisted circuit mapping revealed that both BNST glutamatergic and GABAergic projections preferentially innervate postsynaptic non-dopaminergic VTA neurons, thus providing a mechanistic framework for in vivo circuit perturbations. In vivo photostimulation of BNST glutamatergic projections resulted in aversive and anxiogenic behavioural phenotypes. Conversely, activation of BNST GABAergic projections produced rewarding and anxiolytic phenotypes, which were also recapitulated by direct inhibition of VTA GABAergic neurons. These data demonstrate that functionally opposing BNST to VTA circuits regulate rewarding and aversive motivational states, and may serve as a crucial circuit node for bidirectionally normalizing maladaptive behaviours.

Access optionsAccess options

Rent or Buy article

Get time limited or full article access on ReadCube.

from$8.99

All prices are NET prices.

References

  1. 1.

    & Drug addiction, dysregulation of reward, and allostasis. Neuropsychopharmacology 24, 97–129 (2001)

  2. 2.

    & The mesolimbic dopamine reward circuit in depression. Biol. Psychiatry 59, 1151–1159 (2006)

  3. 3.

    , , & Phasic vs sustained fear in rats and humans: role of the extended amygdala in fear vs anxiety. Neuropsychopharmacology 35, 105–135 (2010)

  4. 4.

    & Role of the extended amygdala in short-duration versus sustained fear: a tribute to Dr. Lennart Heimer. Brain Struct. Funct. 213, 29–42 (2008)

  5. 5.

    & Afferents of the ventral tegmental area in the rat-anatomical substratum for integrative functions. J. Comp. Neurol. 490, 270–294 (2005)

  6. 6.

    & Potent regulation of midbrain dopamine neurons by the bed nucleus of the stria terminalis. J. Neurosci. 21, RC160 (2001)

  7. 7.

    , , , & Neuron-type-specific signals for reward and punishment in the ventral tegmental area. Nature 482, 85–88 (2012)

  8. 8.

    , , & Ventral tegmental area neurons in learned appetitive behavior and positive reinforcement. Annu. Rev. Neurosci. 30, 289–316 (2007)

  9. 9.

    et al. Input-specific control of reward and aversion in the ventral tegmental area. Nature 491, 212–217 (2012)

  10. 10.

    & Activation of lateral habenula inputs to the ventral midbrain promotes behavioral avoidance. Nature Neurosci. 15, 1105–1107 (2012)

  11. 11.

    et al. GABA neurons of the VTA drive conditioned place aversion. Neuron 73, 1173–1183 (2012)

  12. 12.

    et al. Dopamine neurons modulate neural encoding and expression of depression-related behaviour. Nature 493, 537–541 (2012)

  13. 13.

    , , & Activation of VTA GABA neurons disrupts reward consumption. Neuron 73, 1184–1194 (2012)

  14. 14.

    , & Differential expression of intrinsic membrane currents in defined cell types of the anterolateral bed nucleus of the stria terminalis. J. Neurophysiol. 98, 638–656 (2007)

  15. 15.

    & Organization of axonal projections from the anterolateral area of the bed nuclei of the stria terminalis. J. Comp. Neurol. 468, 277–298 (2004)

  16. 16.

    & Noradrenaline triggers GABAA inhibition of bed nucleus of the stria terminalis neurons projecting to the ventral tegmental area. J. Neurosci. 24, 8198–8204 (2004)

  17. 17.

    , , , & Role of the bed nucleus of the stria terminalis in the control of ventral tegmental area dopamine neurons. Prog. Neuropsychopharmacol. Biol. Psychiatry 33, 1336–1346 (2009)

  18. 18.

    et al. Three types of neurochemical projection from the bed nucleus of the stria terminalis to the ventral tegmental area in adult mice. J. Neurosci. 32, 18035–18046 (2012)

  19. 19.

    , , , & Ventral tegmental afferents in stress-induced reinstatement: the role of cAMP response element-binding protein. J. Neurosci. 30, 16149–16159 (2010)

  20. 20.

    et al. Safety signals mitigate the consequences of uncontrollable stress via a circuit involving the sensory insular cortex and bed nucleus of the stria terminalis. Biol. Psychiatry 70, 458–464 (2011)

  21. 21.

    & Fos activation of selective afferents to ventral tegmental area during cue-induced reinstatement of cocaine seeking in rats. J. Neurosci. 32, 13309–13325 (2012)

  22. 22.

    , , , & Millisecond-timescale, genetically targeted optical control of neural activity. Nature Neurosci. 8, 1263–1268 (2005)

  23. 23.

    & Determination of antidromic excitation by the collision test: problems of interpretation. Brain Res. 112, 283–298 (1976)

  24. 24.

    et al. Construction of implantable optical fibers for long-term optogenetic manipulation of neural circuits. Nature Protocols 7, 12–23 (2012)

  25. 25.

    & Timing of impulses from the central amygdala and bed nucleus of the stria terminalis to the brain stem. J. Neurophysiol. 100, 3429–3436 (2008)

  26. 26.

    et al. Leptin action on GABAergic neurons prevents obesity and reduces inhibitory tone to POMC neurons. Neuron 71, 142–154 (2011)

  27. 27.

    et al. Excitatory transmission from the amygdala to nucleus accumbens facilitates reward seeking. Nature 475, 377–380 (2011)

  28. 28.

    , & Stress-induced relapse to drug seeking in the rat: role of the bed nucleus of the stria terminalis and amygdala. Stress 4, 289–303 (2001)

  29. 29.

    , , & Compensation in the neural circuitry of fear conditioning awakens learning circuits in the bed nuclei of the stria terminalis. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 107, 14881–14886 (2010)

  30. 30.

    & Contributions of the amygdala to emotion processing: from animal models to human behavior. Neuron 48, 175–187 (2005)

  31. 31.

    , & Nucleus accumbens neurons are innately tuned for rewarding and aversive taste stimuli, encode their predictors, and are linked to motor output. Neuron 45, 587–597 (2005)

  32. 32.

    & Amygdala neurons differentially encode motivation and reinforcement. J. Neurosci. 27, 3937–3945 (2007)

Download references

Acknowledgements

We thank M. Patel, J. Phillips and S. Maciver for assistance; V. Gukassyan and the UNC Neuroscience Center Microscopy Core (P30 NS045892), and members of the Stuber laboratory for discussion. We thank K. Deisseroth for viral constructs and the UNC Vector Core Facility for viral packaging. We thank B. Lowell and L. Vong for providing the Vgat-ires-cre and Vglut2-ires-cre mice. This study was supported by The Whitehall Foundation, The Foundation of Hope, National Institutes of Health grants DA029325 and DA032750 (to G.D.S.), AA018610 and AA007573 (to D.R.S.), NS007431 and DA034472 (to A.M.S.) and AA021043 (to K.P.), and the UNC NIAAA alcohol research center (AA011605).

Author information

Author notes

    • Joshua H. Jennings
    •  & Dennis R. Sparta

    These authors contributed equally to this work.

Affiliations

  1. Department of Psychiatry, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, North Carolina 27599, USA

    • Joshua H. Jennings
    • , Dennis R. Sparta
    • , Alice M. Stamatakis
    • , Randall L. Ung
    •  & Garret D. Stuber
  2. Neurobiology Curriculum, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, North Carolina 27599, USA

    • Joshua H. Jennings
    • , Alice M. Stamatakis
    • , Thomas L. Kash
    •  & Garret D. Stuber
  3. Bowles Center for Alcohol Studies, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, North Carolina 27599, USA

    • Dennis R. Sparta
    • , Kristen E. Pleil
    • , Thomas L. Kash
    •  & Garret D. Stuber
  4. Department of Pharmacology, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, North Carolina 27599, USA

    • Kristen E. Pleil
    •  & Thomas L. Kash
  5. Neuroscience Center, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, North Carolina 27599, USA

    • Thomas L. Kash
    •  & Garret D. Stuber
  6. Department of Cell Biology and Physiology, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, North Carolina 27599, USA

    • Garret D. Stuber

Authors

  1. Search for Joshua H. Jennings in:

  2. Search for Dennis R. Sparta in:

  3. Search for Alice M. Stamatakis in:

  4. Search for Randall L. Ung in:

  5. Search for Kristen E. Pleil in:

  6. Search for Thomas L. Kash in:

  7. Search for Garret D. Stuber in:

Contributions

D.R.S., J.H.J. and G.D.S. designed all experiments and wrote the manuscript. All authors collected, analysed and discussed the data.

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing financial interests.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Garret D. Stuber.

Supplementary information

PDF files

  1. 1.

    Supplementary Information

    This file contains Supplementary Figures 1-19 and Supplementary Table 1.

About this article

Publication history

Received

Accepted

Published

DOI

https://doi.org/10.1038/nature12041

Further reading

Comments

By submitting a comment you agree to abide by our Terms and Community Guidelines. If you find something abusive or that does not comply with our terms or guidelines please flag it as inappropriate.