Letter | Published:

Concurrent activation of striatal direct and indirect pathways during action initiation

Nature volume 494, pages 238242 (14 February 2013) | Download Citation

Subjects

Abstract

The basal ganglia are subcortical nuclei that control voluntary actions, and they are affected by a number of debilitating neurological disorders1,2,3,4. The prevailing model of basal ganglia function proposes that two orthogonal projection circuits originating from distinct populations of spiny projection neurons (SPNs) in the striatum5,6—the so-called direct and indirect pathways—have opposing effects on movement: activity of direct-pathway SPNs is thought to facilitate movement, whereas activity of indirect-pathway SPNs is presumed to inhibit movement1,2. This model has been difficult to test owing to the lack of methods to selectively measure the activity of direct- and indirect-pathway SPNs in freely moving animals. Here we develop a novel in vivo method to specifically measure direct- and indirect-pathway SPN activity, using Cre-dependent viral expression of the genetically encoded calcium indicator (GECI) GCaMP3 in the dorsal striatum of D1-Cre (direct-pathway-specific6,7) and A2A-Cre (indirect-pathway-specific8,9) mice10. Using fibre optics and time-correlated single-photon counting (TCSPC) in mice performing an operant task, we observed transient increases in neural activity in both direct- and indirect-pathway SPNs when animals initiated actions, but not when they were inactive. Concurrent activation of SPNs from both pathways in one hemisphere preceded the initiation of contraversive movements and predicted the occurrence of specific movements within 500 ms. These observations challenge the classical view of basal ganglia function and may have implications for understanding the origin of motor symptoms in basal ganglia disorders.

Access optionsAccess options

Rent or Buy article

Get time limited or full article access on ReadCube.

from$8.99

All prices are NET prices.

References

  1. 1.

    , & The functional anatomy of basal ganglia disorders. Trends Neurosci. 12, 366–375 (1989)

  2. 2.

    Primate models of movement disorders of basal ganglia origin. Trends Neurosci. 13, 281–285 (1990)

  3. 3.

    The basal ganglia and involuntary movements: impaired inhibition of competing motor patterns. Arch. Neurol. 60, 1365–1368 (2003)

  4. 4.

    , & Role of the basal ganglia in the control of purposive saccadic eye movements. Physiol. Rev. 80, 953–978 (2000)

  5. 5.

    & Functional architecture of basal ganglia circuits: neural substrates of parallel processing. Trends Neurosci. 13, 266–271 (1990)

  6. 6.

    & Modulation of striatal projection systems by dopamine. Annu. Rev. Neurosci. 34, 441–466 (2011)

  7. 7.

    et al. D1 and D2 dopamine receptor-regulated gene expression of striatonigral and striatopallidal neurons. Science 250, 1429–1432 (1990)

  8. 8.

    , & Striatal restricted adenosine A2 receptor (RDC8) is expressed by enkephalin but not by substance P neurons: an in situ hybridization histochemistry study. J. Neurochem. 57, 1062–1067 (1991)

  9. 9.

    , , , & Adenosine A2A receptors and basal ganglia physiology. Prog. Neurobiol. 83, 277–292 (2007)

  10. 10.

    et al. Targeting Cre recombinase to specific neuron populations with bacterial artificial chromosome constructs. J. Neurosci. 27, 9817–9823 (2007)

  11. 11.

    Seven problems on the basal ganglia. Curr. Opin. Neurobiol. 18, 595–604 (2008)

  12. 12.

    Abnormal oscillatory synchronisation in the motor system leads to impaired movement. Curr. Opin. Neurobiol. 17, 656–664 (2007)

  13. 13.

    , & Striatal information signaling and integration in globus pallidus: timing matters. Neurosignals 14, 281–289 (2005)

  14. 14.

    , & Intracellular responses of caudate output neurons to orthodromic stimulation. Brain Res. 96, 337–341 (1975)

  15. 15.

    et al. Organization of the basal ganglia: the importance of axonal collateralization. Trends Neurosci. 23, S20–S27 (2000)

  16. 16.

    , , & PINP: a new method of tagging neuronal populations for identification during in vivo electrophysiological recording. PLoS ONE 4, e6099 (2009)

  17. 17.

    et al. A Cre-dependent GCaMP3 reporter mouse for neuronal imaging in vivo. J. Neurosci. 32, 3131–3141 (2012)

  18. 18.

    et al. Imaging neural activity in worms, flies and mice with improved GCaMP calcium indicators. Nature Methods 6, 875–881 (2009)

  19. 19.

    , , , & Functional imaging of hippocampal place cells at cellular resolution during virtual navigation. Nature Neurosci. 13, 1433–1440 (2010)

  20. 20.

    & Imaging in vivo: watching the brain in action. Nature Rev. Neurosci. 9, 195–205 (2008)

  21. 21.

    et al. A directional strategy for monitoring Cre-mediated recombination at the cellular level in the mouse. Nature Biotechnol. 21, 562–565 (2003)

  22. 22.

    , & Functional properties of monkey caudate neurons. II. Visual and auditory responses. J. Neurophysiol. 61, 799–813 (1989)

  23. 23.

    & Start/stop signals emerge in nigrostriatal circuits during sequence learning. Nature 466, 457–462 (2010)

  24. 24.

    , , & Representation of action-specific reward values in the striatum. Science 310, 1337–1340 (2005)

  25. 25.

    & A cortical motor nucleus drives the basal ganglia-recipient thalamus in singing birds. Nature Neurosci. 15, 620–627 (2012)

  26. 26.

    et al. Regulation of parkinsonian motor behaviours by optogenetic control of basal ganglia circuitry. Nature 466, 622–626 (2010)

  27. 27.

    et al. D2R striatopallidal neurons inhibit both locomotor and drug reward processes. Nature Neurosci. 12, 393–395 (2009)

  28. 28.

    et al. Distinct subclasses of medium spiny neurons differentially regulate striatal motor behaviors. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 107, 14845–14850 (2010)

  29. 29.

    , & Nanosecond fluorescence resonance energy transfer-fluorescence lifetime imaging microscopy to localize the protein interactions in a single living cell. J. Microsc. 205, 3–14 (2002)

  30. 30.

    et al. Towards metabolic mapping of the human retina. Microsc. Res. Tech. 70, 410–419 (2007)

  31. 31.

    et al. Live cell refractometry using Hilbert phase microscopy and confocal reflectance microscopy. J. Phys. Chem. A 113, 13327–13330 (2009)

  32. 32.

    et al. Brain refractive index measured in vivo with high-NA defocus-corrected full-field OCT and consequences for two-photon microscopy. Opt. Express 19, 4833–4847 (2011)

  33. 33.

    , & Differential corticostriatal plasticity during fast and slow motor skill learning in mice. Curr. Biol. 14, 1124–1134 (2004)

  34. 34.

    Cell-attached voltage-clamp and current-clamp recording and stimulation techniques in brain slices. J. Neurosci. Methods 154, 1–18 (2006)

Download references

Acknowledgements

We thank C. R. Gerfen for gifts of multiple bacterial artificial chromosome (BAC) transgenic mouse lines; L. L. Looger and the Howard Hughes Medical Institute (HHMI) for permission to use AAV GCaMP3 vectors and GCaMP3 mice; S. R. Ikeda for assistance with Ca2+ imaging in brain slices; G. Luo for mouse genotyping; C. Thaler for assistance with FLIM curve analysis; B. Mathur and M. Davis for assistance with brain slice electrophysiology and histology; and A. Martin for assistance with AAV vector injection. This work was supported by the Division of Intramural Clinical and Biological Research of the NIAAA, European Research Council STG 243393, an International Early Career Scientist grant from the Howard Hughes Medical Institute to R.M.C., a National Research Foundation of Korea grant (2011-0029485, 2012-0004003) and Smart IT Convergence System Research Center (SIRC-2011-0031866) from the Korean government (MEST) to S.B.J., and by an Ellison Medical Foundation grant (AG-NS-0944-12) to X.J.

Author information

Author notes

    • Guohong Cui
    •  & Sang Beom Jun

    These authors contributed equally to this work.

Affiliations

  1. Section on In Vivo Neural Function, Laboratory for Integrative Neuroscience, National Institute on Alcohol Abuse and Alcoholism, National Institutes of Health, 5625 Fishers Lane, Bethesda, Maryland 20892-9412, USA

    • Guohong Cui
    • , Xin Jin
    • , Michael D. Pham
    • , David M. Lovinger
    •  & Rui M. Costa
  2. Department of Electronics Engineering, Ewha Womans University, Seoul 120-750, Korea

    • Sang Beom Jun
  3. Molecular Neurobiology Laboratory, The Salk Institute for Biological Studies, 10010 North Torrey Pines Road, La Jolla, California 92037, USA

    • Xin Jin
  4. Section on Cellular Biophotonics, Laboratory for Molecular Physiology, National Institute on Alcohol Abuse and Alcoholism, National Institutes of Health, 5625 Fishers Lane, Bethesda 20892-9412, Maryland, USA

    • Steven S. Vogel
  5. Section on Synaptic Pharmacology, Laboratory for Integrative Neuroscience, National Institute on Alcohol Abuse and Alcoholism, National Institutes of Health, 5625 Fishers Lane, Bethesda, Maryland 20892-9412, USA

    • David M. Lovinger
  6. Champalimaud Neuroscience Programme at Instituto Gulbenkian de Ciência and Champalimaud Centre for the Unknown, Lisbon 1400-038, Portugal

    • Rui M. Costa

Authors

  1. Search for Guohong Cui in:

  2. Search for Sang Beom Jun in:

  3. Search for Xin Jin in:

  4. Search for Michael D. Pham in:

  5. Search for Steven S. Vogel in:

  6. Search for David M. Lovinger in:

  7. Search for Rui M. Costa in:

Contributions

R.M.C. and S.S.V. conceived the original idea of using the TCSPC technique for optical measurements in freely moving mice. G.C., D.M.L. and R.M.C. designed the experiments. G.C. and S.B.J. set up equipment and optimized procedures for in vivo optical recording. G.C. and S.B.J. carried out the in vivo experiments and analysed data. G.C. performed in vitro experiments and analysed data. X.J. helped with programming and data analysis. M.D.P. performed initial in vitro experiments using the TCSPC system and analysed data. G.C., S.S.V., D.M.L. and R.M.C. wrote the paper.

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing financial interests.

Corresponding authors

Correspondence to Steven S. Vogel or David M. Lovinger or Rui M. Costa.

Supplementary information

PDF files

  1. 1.

    Supplementary Figures

    This file contains Supplementary Figures 1-14.

Videos

  1. 1.

    In-Vivo optical recording of striatal neural activity in an animal performing a two-lever free choice operant task

    A food pellet was delivered into the food magazine when the animal had made a total of 10 lever-presses, regardless of left or right lever.

  2. 2.

    Action potential-triggered GCAMP3 fluorescence transient in a striatal SPN evoked by current injection

    A 400 pA, 487.5 ms square pulse current was injected through a patch pipette in tight-seal cell-attached configuration to evoke a burst of action potentials. See Supplementary Fig.10a,b for more detailed description.

  3. 3.

    Action potential-triggered GCAMP3 fluorescence transient in a striatal SPN evoked by synaptic stimulation

    A train of 3 pulses at 200 uA, 100 Hz was delivered by a concentric bipolar electrode to evoke a burst of action potentials. See Supplementary Fig.11a, b for more detailed description.

About this article

Publication history

Received

Accepted

Published

DOI

https://doi.org/10.1038/nature11846

Further reading

Comments

By submitting a comment you agree to abide by our Terms and Community Guidelines. If you find something abusive or that does not comply with our terms or guidelines please flag it as inappropriate.