Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

Social networks and cooperation in hunter-gatherers

Abstract

Social networks show striking structural regularities1,2, and both theory and evidence suggest that networks may have facilitated the development of large-scale cooperation in humans3,4,5,6,7. Here, we characterize the social networks of the Hadza, a population of hunter-gatherers in Tanzania8. We show that Hadza networks have important properties also seen in modernized social networks, including a skewed degree distribution, degree assortativity, transitivity, reciprocity, geographic decay and homophily. We demonstrate that Hadza camps exhibit high between-group and low within-group variation in public goods game donations. Network ties are also more likely between people who give the same amount, and the similarity in cooperative behaviour extends up to two degrees of separation. Social distance appears to be as important as genetic relatedness and physical proximity in explaining assortativity in cooperation. Our results suggest that certain elements of social network structure may have been present at an early point in human history. Also, early humans may have formed ties with both kin and non-kin, based in part on their tendency to cooperate. Social networks may thus have contributed to the emergence of cooperation.

Access options

Rent or Buy article

Get time limited or full article access on ReadCube.

from$8.99

All prices are NET prices.

Figure 1: Structural features of modern social networks also exist in Hadza networks.
Figure 2: Donations in the public goods game are associated with social network characteristics.

References

  1. 1

    Onnela, J. P. et al. Structure and tie strengths in mobile communication networks. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 104, 7332–7336 (2007)

    ADS  CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  2. 2

    Barabási, A. L. & Albert, R. Emergence of scaling in random networks. Science 286, 509–512 (1999)

    ADS  MathSciNet  Article  Google Scholar 

  3. 3

    Nowak, M. A., Tarnita, C. & Wilson, E. O. The evolution of eusociality. Nature 466, 1057–1062 (2010)

    ADS  CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  4. 4

    Boyd, R. & Richerson, P. J. The evolution of reciprocity in sizable groups. J. Theor. Biol. 132, 337–356 (1988)

    MathSciNet  CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  5. 5

    Eshel, I. & Cavalli-Sforza, L. L. Assortment of encounters and evolution of cooperativeness. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 79, 1331–1335 (1982)

    ADS  MathSciNet  CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  6. 6

    Bowles, S. Group competition, reproductive levelling, and the evolution of human altruism. Science 314, 1569–1572 (2006)

    ADS  CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  7. 7

    Ohtsuki, H., Hauert, C., Lieberman, E. & Nowak, M. A. A simple rule for the evolution of cooperation on graphs and social networks. Nature 441, 502–505 (2006)

    ADS  CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  8. 8

    Marlowe, F. W. The Hadza: Hunter-gatherers of Tanzania (University of California Press, 2010)

    Google Scholar 

  9. 9

    Hruschka, D. J. Friendship: Development, Ecology, and Evolution of a Relationship (University of California Press, 2010)

    Book  Google Scholar 

  10. 10

    Boyd, R. & Richerson, P. J. Why culture is common but cultural evolution is rare. Proc. Br. Acad. 88, 73–93 (1996)

    Google Scholar 

  11. 11

    Badham, J. & Stocker, R. The impact of network clustering and assortativity on epidemic behaviour. Theor. Popul. Biol. 77, 71–75 (2010)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. 12

    Krebs, D. Empathy and altruism. J. Pers. Soc. Psychol. 32, 1134–1146 (1975)

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  13. 13

    Fowler, J. H., Dawes, C. T. & Christakis, N. A. Model of genetic variation in human social networks. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 106, 1720–1724 (2009)

    ADS  CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  14. 14

    Fowler, J. H., Settle, J. E. & Christakis, N. A. Correlated genotypes in friendship networks. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 108, 1993–1997 (2011)

    ADS  CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  15. 15

    Boyd, R. & Richerson, P. J. The evolution of indirect reciprocity. Soc. Networks 11, 213–236 (1989)

    MathSciNet  Article  Google Scholar 

  16. 16

    Bowles, S. & Gintis, H. The evolution of strong reciprocity: cooperation in heterogeneous populations. Theor. Popul. Biol. 65, 17–28 (2004)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. 17

    Hamilton, M. J. et al. The complex structure of hunter–gatherer social networks. Proc. R. Soc. Lond. B 274, 2195–2203 (2007)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. 18

    Hill, K. R. et al. Co-residence patterns in hunter-gatherer societies show unique human social structure. Science 331, 1286–1289 (2011)

    ADS  CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  19. 19

    Gurven, M., Hill, K. & Kaplan, H. From forest to reservation: transitions in food sharing behavior among the Ache of Paraguay. J. Anthropol. Res. 58, 93–120 (2002)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. 20

    Onnela, J. P., Arbesman, S., Gonzalez, M. C., Barabasi, A. L. & Christakis, N. A. Geographic constraints on social network groups. PLoS ONE 6, e16939 (2011)

    ADS  CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  21. 21

    Smith, E. A. et al. Wealth transmission and inequality among hunter-gatherers. Curr. Anthropol. 51, 19–34 (2010)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. 22

    Fehr, E. & Fischbacher, U. The nature of human altruism. Nature 425, 785–791 (2003)

    ADS  CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  23. 23

    Davis, J. A. Clustering and hierarchy in inter-personal relations: testing two graph theoretical models in 742 sociomatrices. Am. Sociol. Rev. 35, 843–851 (1970)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. 24

    Kaplan, H. & Gurven, M. in Moral Sentiments and Material Interests: The Foundations of Cooperation in Economic Life (eds Gintis, H., Bowles, S., Boyd, R. & Fehr, E. ) 75–113 (MIT Press, 2005)

    Google Scholar 

  25. 25

    Cole, T. & Teboul, B. J. C. Non-zero-sum collaboration. reciprocity, and the preference for similarity: developing an adaptive model of close relational functioning. Personal Relationships 11, 135–160 (2004)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. 26

    Brent, L. J. H., Lehmann, J. & Ramos-Fernández, G. Social network analysis in the study of nonhuman primates: a historical perspective. Am. J. Primatol. 73, 720–730 (2011)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. 27

    Whitehead, H. Analyzing Animal Societies: Quantitative Methods for Vertebrate Social Analysis (University of Chicago Press, 2008)

    Book  Google Scholar 

  28. 28

    Nowak, M. A. Five rules for the evolution of cooperation. Science 314, 1560–1563 (2006)

    ADS  CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  29. 29

    Rand, D., Arbesman, S. & Christakis, N. A. Dynamic social networks promote cooperation in experiments with humans. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 108, http://dx.doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1108243108 (2011)

  30. 30

    Fowler, J. H. & Christakis, N. A. Cooperative behavior cascades in human social networks. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 107, 5334–5338 (2010)

    ADS  CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  31. 31

    Berbesque, J. C. & Marlowe, F. W. Sex differences in food preferences of Hadza hunter-gatherers. Evol. Psychol. 7, 601–616 (2009)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. 32

    Henrich, J. et al. In search of Homo economicus: behavioral experiments in 15 small-scale societies. Am. Econ. Rev. 91, 73–78 (2001)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  33. 33

    Campbell, K. E. & Lee, B. A. Name generators in surveys of personal networks. Soc. Networks 13, 203–221 (1991)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  34. 34

    Hawkes, K., O’Connell, J. F. & Blurton Jones, N. Hadza meat sharing. Evol. Hum. Behav. 22, 113–142 (2001)

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  35. 35

    Smith, E. A. in Hunter Gatherers Vol. 1 History, Evolution and Social Change (eds Ingold, T., Riches, D. & Woodburn, J. ) 222–251 (Berg, 1988)

    Google Scholar 

  36. 36

    Liang, K. Y. & Zeger, S. Longitudinal data analysis using generalized linear models. Biometrika 73, 13–22 (1986)

    MathSciNet  Article  Google Scholar 

  37. 37

    Schildcrout, J. S. Regression analysis of longitudinal binary data with time-dependent environmental covariates: bias and efficiency. Biostatistics 6, 633–652 (2005)

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

This work was supported by grant P01-AG031093 from the National Institute on Aging and by the Science of Generosity Initiative of the University of Notre Dame (supported by the John Templeton Foundation). We are grateful for comments from S. Bowles, D. Eisenberg, F. Fu, H. Gintis, J. Henrich, P. Hooper, D. Hruschka, M. Nowak, D. Rand, P. Richerson and C. Tarnita. We thank A. Mabulla, I. Mabulla, M. Peterson, C. Bauchner and L. Meneades for help with data collection and preparation. We are grateful to D. Stafford and A. Hughes for sharing data regarding two villages in Honduras, as used in the Supplementary Information.

Author information

Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

C.L.A., J.H.F. and N.A.C. designed the study and experiments. C.L.A. and F.W.M. collected data. C.L.A., J.H.F. and N.A.C. analysed the data. C.L.A., J.H.F. and N.A.C. wrote the manuscript. F.W.M. provided technical support. J.H.F. and N.A.C. secured funding.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Nicholas A. Christakis.

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing financial interests.

Supplementary information

Supplementary Information

This file contains Supplementary Methods, Supplementary Statistics and Results, Supplementary Tables 1-51, Supplementary Figures 1-13 with legends and Supplementary References. (PDF 9453 kb)

Supplementary Movie 1

This file contains a 3-D movie of the male and female campmate social networks - see page 9 of the Supplementary Information file for full legend. (MOV 13586 kb)

Supplementary Movie 2

This file contains a 3-D movie of the male and female campmate social networks - see page 9 of the Supplementary Information file for full legend. (MOV 13944 kb)

PowerPoint slides

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Apicella, C., Marlowe, F., Fowler, J. et al. Social networks and cooperation in hunter-gatherers. Nature 481, 497–501 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1038/nature10736

Download citation

Further reading

Comments

By submitting a comment you agree to abide by our Terms and Community Guidelines. If you find something abusive or that does not comply with our terms or guidelines please flag it as inappropriate.

Search

Quick links

Nature Briefing

Sign up for the Nature Briefing newsletter — what matters in science, free to your inbox daily.

Get the most important science stories of the day, free in your inbox. Sign up for Nature Briefing