Abstract

Pelagic marine predators face unprecedented challenges and uncertain futures. Overexploitation and climate variability impact the abundance and distribution of top predators in ocean ecosystems1,2,3,4. Improved understanding of ecological patterns, evolutionary constraints and ecosystem function is critical for preventing extinctions, loss of biodiversity and disruption of ecosystem services. Recent advances in electronic tagging techniques have provided the capacity to observe the movements and long-distance migrations of animals in relation to ocean processes across a range of ecological scales5,6. Tagging of Pacific Predators, a field programme of the Census of Marine Life, deployed 4,306 tags on 23 species in the North Pacific Ocean, resulting in a tracking data set of unprecedented scale and species diversity that covers 265,386 tracking days from 2000 to 2009. Here we report migration pathways, link ocean features to multispecies hotspots and illustrate niche partitioning within and among congener guilds. Our results indicate that the California Current large marine ecosystem and the North Pacific transition zone attract and retain a diverse assemblage of marine vertebrates. Within the California Current large marine ecosystem, several predator guilds seasonally undertake north–south migrations that may be driven by oceanic processes, species-specific thermal tolerances and shifts in prey distributions. We identify critical habitats across multinational boundaries and show that top predators exploit their environment in predictable ways, providing the foundation for spatial management of large marine ecosystems.

Access optionsAccess options

Rent or Buy article

Get time limited or full article access on ReadCube.

from$8.99

All prices are NET prices.

References

  1. 1.

    et al. Travelling through a warming world: climate change and migratory species. Endanger. Species Res. 7, 87–99 (2009)

  2. 2.

    et al. From anchovies to sardines and back: multidecadal change in the Pacific ocean. Science 299, 217–221 (2003)

  3. 3.

    & Rapid worldwide depletion of predatory fish communities. Nature 423, 280–283 (2003)

  4. 4.

    et al. Approaches to studying climate change and habitat selection of Antarctic pinnipeds. Integr. Comp. Biol. 50, 1018–1030 (2010)

  5. 5.

    et al. Persistent leatherback turtle migration corridor presents opportunities for conservation. PLoS Biol. 6, e171 (2008)

  6. 6.

    et al. Migratory shearwaters integrate oceanic resources across the Pacific Ocean in an endless summer. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 103, 12799–12802 (2006)

  7. 7.

    , & Cascading effects of overfishing marine systems. Trends Ecol. Evol. 20, 579–581 (2005)

  8. 8.

    et al. Sequential megafaunal collapse in the North Pacific Ocean: an ongoing legacy of industrial whaling? Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 100, 12223–12228 (2003)

  9. 9.

    & Coupling between physical and biological scales. Phil. Trans. R. Soc. Lond. B 343, 5–9 (1994)

  10. 10.

    , & Diversity of deep-water cetaceans in relation to temperature: implications for ocean warming. Ecol. Lett. 11, 1198–1207 (2008)

  11. 11.

    et al. Behavioural estimation of blue whale movements in the Northeast Pacific from state-space model analysis of satellite tracks. Endanger. Species Res. 10, 93–106 (2009)

  12. 12.

    et al. Philopatry and migration of Pacific white sharks. Proc. R. Soc. Lond. B 277, 679–688 (2010)

  13. 13.

    et al. Satellite tagging and cardiac physiology reveal niche expansion in salmon sharks. Science 310, 104–106 (2005)

  14. 14.

    , & Robust state-space modeling of animal movement data. Ecology 86, 2874–2880 (2005)

  15. 15.

    & Hypoxia-based habitat compression of tropical pelagic fishes. Fish. Oceanogr. 15, 451–464 (2006)

  16. 16.

    , , & Warm fish with cold hearts: thermal plasticity of excitation-contraction coupling of bluefin tuna. Proc. R. Soc. Lond. B 278, 18–27 (2011)

  17. 17.

    PICES. Marine Ecosystems of the North Pacific. PICES Spec. Publ. 1 (North Pacific Marine Science Organization, 2004)

  18. 18.

    , , & The transition zone chlorophyll front, a dynamic global feature defining migration and forage habitat for marine resources. Prog. Oceanogr. 49, 469–483 (2001)

  19. 19.

    Generalized Additive Models: An Introduction with R (Chapman & Hall/CRC, 2006)

  20. 20.

    et al. Global patterns and predictors of marine biodiversity across taxa. Nature 466, 1098–1101 (2010)

  21. 21.

    , , & Biomass, size and trophic status of top predators in the Pacific ocean. Science 314, 1773–1776 (2006)

  22. 22.

    et al. Population dynamics of the porbeagle in the northwest Atlantic Ocean. N. Am. J. Fish. Manag. 22, 106–121 (2002)

  23. 23.

    & Predicted extirpation of the dominant demersal fish in a large marine ecosystem: Atlantic cod (Gadus morhua) in the southern Gulf of St. Lawrence. Can. J. Fish. Aquat. Sci. 65, 2315–2319 (2008)

  24. 24.

    et al. Small-scale fisheries bycatch jeopardizes endangered Pacific loggerhead turtles. PLoS ONE 2, e1041 (2007)

  25. 25.

    & Estimating fishery bycatch and effects on a vulnerable seabird population. Ecol. Appl. 13, 743–753 (2003)

  26. 26.

    et al. Mapping cumulative human impacts to California Current marine ecosystems. Conserv. Lett. 2, 138–148 (2009)

  27. 27.

    et al. Satellite telemetry suggests high levels of fishing-induced mortality in marine turtles. Mar. Ecol. Prog. Ser. 262, 305–309 (2003)

  28. 28.

    & Estimation of mortality of juvenile blacktip sharks, Carcharhinus limbatus, within a nursery area using telemetry data. Can. J. Fish. Aquat. Sci. 59, 624–632 (2002)

  29. 29.

    et al. A sequential Bayesian methodology to estimate movement and exploitation rates using electronic and conventional tag data: application to Atlantic bluefin tuna (Thunnus thynnus). Can. J. Fish. Aquat. Sci. 66, 321–342 (2009)

  30. 30.

    et al. Association between blue whale (Balaenoptera musculus) mortality and ship strikes along the California coast. Aquat. Mamm. 36, 59–66 (2010)

Download references

Acknowledgements

This manuscript is the culmination of a Census of Marine Life cross-project synthesis between TOPP and Future of Marine Animal Populations (FMAP). Funding for this work was provided by the Sloan Foundation’s Census of Marine Life programme. TOPP research was funded by the Sloan, Packard and Moore foundations. FMAP was funded by the Sloan Foundation. Electronic tagging and tracking in TOPP was also supported by the Office of Naval Research, the NOAA, the E&P Sound and Marine Life JIP under contract from the OGP, and the Monterey Bay Aquarium Foundation. We thank the TOPP scientific teams and all those who supported animal tagging efforts, R. Kochevar and D. Kohrs for their dedication and their effort on behalf of the Census of Marine Life. We are grateful to the numerous captains and crews who provided ship time and logistical support, and to the US Fish and Wildlife Service in Hawaii for further logistical support. We thank the Mexican authorities and collaborating TOPP partners (O. Sosa-Nishizki) for permitting and assisting in research in their waters. All animal research was conducted in accordance with IACUC protocols from Stanford University and the University of California.

Author information

Affiliations

  1. Stanford University, Biology Department, Hopkins Marine Station, Pacific Grove, California 93950, USA

    • B. A. Block
    • , S. J. Jorgensen
    • , J. E. Ganong
    • , A. Swithenbank
    • , M. Castleton
    •  & G. L. Shillinger
  2. Dalhousie University, Department of Biology, Halifax, Nova Scotia B3H 4J1, Canada

    • I. D. Jonsen
    • , A. J. Winship
    •  & G. A. Breed
  3. San Jose State University, Department of Biological Sciences, San Jose, California 95192, USA

    • S. A. Shaffer
  4. NOAA Southwest Fisheries Science Center, Environmental Research Division, Pacific Grove, California 93950, USA

    • S. J. Bograd
    • , E. L. Hazen
    •  & D. G. Foley
  5. University of California, Santa Cruz, Department of Ecology & Evolutionary Biology, Long Marine Laboratory, Santa Cruz, California 95060, USA

    • G. A. Breed
    • , A.-L. Harrison
    • , M. J. Weise
    • , R. W. Henry
    •  & D. P. Costa
  6. NOAA Southwest Fisheries Science Center, Fisheries Research Division, La Jolla, California 92037, USA

    • H. Dewar
  7. Oregon State University, Hatfield Marine Science Center, Newport, Oregon 97365, USA

    • B. R. Mate
  8. Inter-American Tropical Tuna Commission, La Jolla, California 92037, USA

    • K. M. Schaefer
  9. NOAA Southwest Fisheries Science Center, Protected Resources Division, La Jolla, California 92037, USA

    • S. R. Benson

Authors

  1. Search for B. A. Block in:

  2. Search for I. D. Jonsen in:

  3. Search for S. J. Jorgensen in:

  4. Search for A. J. Winship in:

  5. Search for S. A. Shaffer in:

  6. Search for S. J. Bograd in:

  7. Search for E. L. Hazen in:

  8. Search for D. G. Foley in:

  9. Search for G. A. Breed in:

  10. Search for A.-L. Harrison in:

  11. Search for J. E. Ganong in:

  12. Search for A. Swithenbank in:

  13. Search for M. Castleton in:

  14. Search for H. Dewar in:

  15. Search for B. R. Mate in:

  16. Search for G. L. Shillinger in:

  17. Search for K. M. Schaefer in:

  18. Search for S. R. Benson in:

  19. Search for M. J. Weise in:

  20. Search for R. W. Henry in:

  21. Search for D. P. Costa in:

Contributions

This synthesis study was initiated by B.A.B. and I.D.J. The TOPP project was designed and coordinated by B.A.B., D.P.C. and S.J.B. B.A.B., S.J.J., H.D. and K.M.S. designed experiments and deployed electronic tags on fish and sharks. D.P.C., S.A.S., R.W.H., M.J.W. and B.R.M. designed experiments and deployed electronic tags on marine mammals and birds. G.L.S., B.A.B. and S.R.B. designed experiments and deployed electronic tags on sea turtles. Tracking data were compiled by S.J.J., S.A.S., G.A.B., A.-L.H., B.A.B., G.L.S. and M.C. Data management was coordinated by A.S. and J.E.G. Oceanographic data were compiled by S.J.B., E.L.H. and D.G.F. Analyses were conducted by A.J.W., S.J.J., I.D.J., G.A.B, E.L.H., D.G.F., A.-L.H., J.E.G. and A.S. Figures were created by B.A.B., M.C., A.-L.H., I.D.J., S.J.J., A.J.W., J.E.G., A.S., E.L.H. and D.G.F. The manuscript was drafted by B.A.B. and edited by I.D.J., D.P.C., S.J.J., S.A.S., S.J.B., E.L.H., A.-L.H., A.J.W., H.D., G.L.S. and B.R.M.

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing financial interests.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to B. A. Block.

Supplementary information

PDF files

  1. 1.

    Supplementary Information

    The file contains Supplementary Figures 1-13 with legends, Supplementary text, Supplementary Tables 1-11 and additional references.

About this article

Publication history

Received

Accepted

Published

DOI

https://doi.org/10.1038/nature10082

Further reading

Comments

By submitting a comment you agree to abide by our Terms and Community Guidelines. If you find something abusive or that does not comply with our terms or guidelines please flag it as inappropriate.