Brief Communications Arising | Published:

Inclusive fitness in evolution

Nature volume 471, pages E6E8 (24 March 2011) | Download Citation

Abstract

Arising from M. A. Nowak, C. E. Tarnita & E. O. Wilson Nature 466, 1057–1062 (2010)10.1038/nature09205; Nowak et al. reply

For over fifty years, the evolution of social behaviour has been guided by the concept of inclusive fitness as a measure of evolutionary success. Nowak et al.1 argue that inclusive fitness should be abandoned. In so doing, however, they misrepresent the role that inclusive fitness has played in the theory of social evolution by which understanding social behaviour in a variety of disciplines has developed and flourished. By discarding inclusive fitness on the basis of its limitations, they create a conceptual tension which, we argue, is unnecessary, and potentially dangerous for evolutionary biology.

Access optionsAccess options

Rent or Buy article

Get time limited or full article access on ReadCube.

from$8.99

All prices are NET prices.

References

  1. 1.

    , & The evolution of eusociality. Nature 466, 1057–1062 (2010)

  2. 2.

    The theory of kin selection. Annu. Rev. Ecol. Syst. 13, 23–55 (1982)

  3. 3.

    & Adaptive topography in family structured models of kin selection. Science 210, 667–669 (1980)

  4. 4.

    Darwinian Dynamics (Princeton Univ. Press, 1999)

  5. 5.

    in Encyclopedia of Ecology (eds & ) (Elsevier, 2008)

  6. 6.

    Modeling Evolution (Oxford Univ. Press, 2010)

  7. 7.

    & The unit of selection in viscous populations and the evolution of altruism. J. Theor. Biol. 193, 631–648 (1998)

  8. 8.

    & in Dispersal (eds , , & ) 57–79 (Cambridge Univ. Press, 2001)

  9. 9.

    , , & The evolution of dispersal under demographic stochasticity. Am. Nat. 162, 427–441 (2003)

  10. 10.

    , & The adaptive dynamics of altruism in spatially heterogeneous populations. Evolution 57, 1–17 (2003)

  11. 11.

    & From infanticide to parental care: why spatial structure can help adults be good parents. Am. Nat. 170, E26–E46 (2007)

  12. 12.

    , & When does evolution optimize? Evol. Ecol. Res. 10, 629–654 (2008)

  13. 13.

    & in Evolution—Essays in Honour of John Maynard Smith Ch. 7 (eds & ) 95–104 (Cambridge Univ. Press, 1985)

  14. 14.

    & Unifying genetics and game theoretic models of kin selection for continuous traits. J. Theor. Biol. 194, 391–407 (1998)

  15. 15.

    Separation of time scales, fixation probabilities and convergence to evolutionarily stable states under isolation by distance. Theor. Popul. Biol. 69, 165–179 (2006)

Download references

Author information

Affiliations

  1. *Laboratoire Ecologie & Evolution, CNRS UMR 7625, Ecole Normale Superieure, 46 rue d’Ulm, 75005 Paris, France

    • Regis Ferriere
  2. †Department of Ecology and Evolutionary Biology, University of Arizona, Tucson, Arizona 85721, USA

    • Regis Ferriere
    •  & Richard E. Michod

Authors

  1. Search for Regis Ferriere in:

  2. Search for Richard E. Michod in:

Contributions

R.F. and R.E.M. conceived the study. R.F. analysed the model and prepared the figures. R.F. and R.E.M. wrote the paper.

Competing interests

Competing financial interests: declared none.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Regis Ferriere.

About this article

Publication history

Received

Accepted

Published

DOI

https://doi.org/10.1038/nature09834

Further reading

Comments

By submitting a comment you agree to abide by our Terms and Community Guidelines. If you find something abusive or that does not comply with our terms or guidelines please flag it as inappropriate.

Newsletter Get the most important science stories of the day, free in your inbox. Sign up for Nature Briefing