Genomic analysis provides insights into the role of copy number variation in disease, but most methods are not designed to resolve mixed populations of cells. In tumours, where genetic heterogeneity is common1,2,3, very important information may be lost that would be useful for reconstructing evolutionary history. Here we show that with flow-sorted nuclei, whole genome amplification and next generation sequencing we can accurately quantify genomic copy number within an individual nucleus. We apply single-nucleus sequencing to investigate tumour population structure and evolution in two human breast cancer cases. Analysis of 100 single cells from a polygenomic tumour revealed three distinct clonal subpopulations that probably represent sequential clonal expansions. Additional analysis of 100 single cells from a monogenomic primary tumour and its liver metastasis indicated that a single clonal expansion formed the primary tumour and seeded the metastasis. In both primary tumours, we also identified an unexpectedly abundant subpopulation of genetically diverse ‘pseudodiploid’ cells that do not travel to the metastatic site. In contrast to gradual models of tumour progression, our data indicate that tumours grow by punctuated clonal expansions with few persistent intermediates.
This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution
Open Access articles citing this article.
Experimental Hematology & Oncology Open Access 09 January 2023
SIEVE: joint inference of single-nucleotide variants and cell phylogeny from single-cell DNA sequencing data
Genome Biology Open Access 30 November 2022
Genome Biology Open Access 14 November 2022
Subscribe to Journal
Get full journal access for 1 year
only $3.90 per issue
All prices are NET prices.
VAT will be added later in the checkout.
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.
Get time limited or full article access on ReadCube.
All prices are NET prices.
Park, S. Y., Gonen, M., Kim, H. J., Michor, F. & Polyak, K. Cellular and genetic diversity in the progression of in situ human breast carcinomas to an invasive phenotype. J. Clin. Invest. 120, 636–644 (2010)
Torres, L. et al. Intratumor genomic heterogeneity in breast cancer with clonal divergence between primary carcinomas and lymph node metastases. Breast Cancer Res. Treat. 102, 143–155 (2007)
Farabegoli, F. et al. Clone heterogeneity in diploid and aneuploid breast carcinomas as detected by FISH. Cytometry 46, 50–56 (2001)
Chiang, D. Y. et al. High-resolution mapping of copy-number alterations with massively parallel sequencing. Nature Methods 6, 99–103 (2009)
Yoon, S., Xuan, Z., Makarov, V., Ye, K. & Sebat, J. Sensitive and accurate detection of copy number variants using read depth of coverage. Genome Res. 19, 1586–1592 (2009)
Alkan, C. et al. Personalized copy number and segmental duplication maps using next-generation sequencing. Nature Genet. 41, 1061–1067 (2009)
Geigl, J. B. et al. Identification of small gains and losses in single cells after whole genome amplification on tiling oligo arrays. Nucleic Acids Res. 37, e105 (2009)
Fuhrmann, C. et al. High-resolution array comparative genomic hybridization of single micrometastatic tumor cells. Nucleic Acids Res. 36, e39 (2008)
Pugh, T. J. et al. Impact of whole genome amplification on analysis of copy number variants. Nucleic Acids Res. 36, e80 (2008)
Talseth-Palmer, B. A., Bowden, N. A., Hill, A., Meldrum, C. & Scott, R. J. Whole genome amplification and its impact on CGH array profiles. BMC Res. Notes 1, 56 (2008)
Hughes, S. et al. Use of whole genome amplification and comparative genomic hybridisation to detect chromosomal copy number alterations in cell line material and tumour tissue. Cytogenet. Genome Res. 105, 18–24 (2004)
Huang, J., Pang, J., Watanabe, T., Ng, H. K. & Ohgaki, H. Whole genome amplification for array comparative genomic hybridization using DNA extracted from formalin-fixed, paraffin-embedded histological sections. J. Mol. Diagn. 11, 109–116 (2009)
Navin, N. et al. Inferring tumor progression from genomic heterogeneity. Genome Res. 20, 68–80 (2010)
Saitou, N. & Nei, M. The neighbor-joining method: a new method for reconstructing phylogenetic trees. Mol. Biol. Evol. 4, 406–425 (1987)
Hicks, J. et al. Novel patterns of genome rearrangement and their association with survival in breast cancer. Genome Res. 16, 1465–1479 (2006)
Prelic, A. et al. A systematic comparison and evaluation of biclustering methods for gene expression data. Bioinformatics 22, 1122–1129 (2006)
Liu, W. et al. Copy number analysis indicates monoclonal origin of lethal metastatic prostate cancer. Nature Med. 15, 559–565 (2009)
Ding, L. et al. Genome remodelling in a basal-like breast cancer metastasis and xenograft. Nature 464, 999–1005 (2010)
Yachida, S. et al. Distant metastasis occurs late during the genetic evolution of pancreatic cancer. Nature 467, 1114–1117 (2010)
Nowell, P. C. The clonal evolution of tumor cell populations. Science 194, 23–28 (1976)
Loeb, L. A., Springgate, C. F. & Battula, N. Errors in DNA replication as a basis of malignant changes. Cancer Res. 34, 2311–2321 (1974)
Bielas, J. H., Loeb, K. R., Rubin, B. P., True, L. D. & Loeb, L. A. Human cancers express a mutator phenotype. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 103, 18238–18242 (2006)
Heng, H. H. et al. Stochastic cancer progression driven by non-clonal chromosome aberrations. J. Cell. Physiol. 208, 461–472 (2006)
Gould, S. J. & Eldredge, N. Punctuated equilibria comes of age. Nature 366, 223–227 (1993)
Langmead, B., Trapnell, C., Pop, M. & Salzberg, S. L. Ultrafast and memory-efficient alignment of short DNA sequences to the human genome. Genome Biol. 10, R25 (2009)
We thank M. Ronemus, T. Spencer, A. Leotta, J. Meth, M. Kramer, L. Gelley, E. Ghiban. We also thank P. Blake and N. Navin at Sophic Systems Alliance. This work was supported by the NCI T32 Fellowship to N.N., and grants to M.W. and J.H. from the Department of the Army (W81XWH04-1-0477), the Breast Cancer Research Foundation, and the Simons Foundation. M.W. is an American Cancer Society Research Professor.
The authors declare no competing financial interests.
This file contains Supplementary Figures 1-8 with legends and Supplementary Methods. (PDF 4792 kb)
This table shows a summary of 100 Single Cells in the Polygenomic Tumor T10. (XLS 42 kb)
This table shows a summary of 100 Single Cells in T16P and T16M Metastatic Tumor Pair. (XLS 45 kb)
This table shows LOH and Copy Number in Tumor Subpopulations. (XLS 28 kb)
About this article
Cite this article
Navin, N., Kendall, J., Troge, J. et al. Tumour evolution inferred by single-cell sequencing. Nature 472, 90–94 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1038/nature09807
This article is cited by
Experimental Hematology & Oncology (2023)
Genome Biology (2022)
HBV genome-enriched single cell sequencing revealed heterogeneity in HBV-driven hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC)
BMC Medical Genomics (2022)
Genome Biology (2022)
BMC Genomics (2022)