Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

Reliability of flipper-banded penguins as indicators of climate change

A Corrigendum to this article was published on 09 March 2011

Abstract

In 2007, the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change highlighted an urgent need to assess the responses of marine ecosystems to climate change1. Because they lie in a high-latitude region, the Southern Ocean ecosystems are expected to be strongly affected by global warming. Using top predators of this highly productive ocean2 (such as penguins) as integrative indicators may help us assess the impacts of climate change on marine ecosystems3,4. Yet most available information on penguin population dynamics is based on the controversial use of flipper banding. Although some reports have found the effects of flipper bands to be deleterious5,6,7,8, some short-term (one-year) studies have concluded otherwise9,10,11, resulting in the continuation of extensive banding schemes and the use of data sets thus collected to predict climate impact on natural populations12,13. Here we show that banding of free-ranging king penguins (Aptenodytes patagonicus) impairs both survival and reproduction, ultimately affecting population growth rate. Over the course of a 10-year longitudinal study, banded birds produced 39% fewer chicks and had a survival rate 16% lower than non-banded birds, demonstrating a massive long-term impact of banding and thus refuting the assumption that birds will ultimately adapt to being banded6,12. Indeed, banded birds still arrived later for breeding at the study site and had longer foraging trips even after 10 years. One of our major findings is that responses of flipper-banded penguins to climate variability (that is, changes in sea surface temperature and in the Southern Oscillation index) differ from those of non-banded birds. We show that only long-term investigations may allow an evaluation of the impact of flipper bands and that every major life-history trait can be affected, calling into question the banding schemes still going on. In addition, our understanding of the effects of climate change on marine ecosystems based on flipper-band data should be reconsidered.

This is a preview of subscription content

Access options

Buy article

Get time limited or full article access on ReadCube.

$32.00

All prices are NET prices.

Figure 1: Survival of banded and non-banded king penguins during the 10-year study period.
Figure 2: Simulated population growth rates of banded and non-banded penguins as functions of SST.
Figure 3: Potential mechanisms involved in negative impacts of flipper bands on life-history traits and population dynamics in king penguins.

References

  1. Richardson, A. J. & Poloczanska, E. S. Ocean science: under-resourced, under threat. Science 320, 1294–1295 (2008)

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Tynan, C. T. Ecological importance of the southern boundary of the Antarctic Circumpolar current. Nature 392, 708–710 (1998)

    ADS  CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Croxall, J. P., Trathan, P. N. & Murphy, E. J. Environmental change and Antarctic seabird populations. Science 297, 1510–1514 (2002)

    ADS  CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Durant, J. M. et al. The pros and cons of using seabirds as ecological indicators. Clim. Res. 39, 115–129 (2009)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Jackson, S. & Wilson, R. P. The potential costs of flipper-bands to penguins. Funct. Ecol. 16, 141–148 (2002)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Fallow, P., Chiaradia, A., Ropert-Coudert, Y., Kato, A. & Reina, R. Flipper-bands modify the short-term diving behaviour of Little penguins. J. Wildl. Mgmt 73, 1348–1354 (2009)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Gauthier-Clerc, M. et al. Long-term effects of flipper-bands on penguins. Proc. R. Soc. Lond. B 271, S423–S426 (2004)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Dugger, K., Ballard, G., Ainley, D. & Barton, K. Effects of flipper-bands on foraging behavior and survival of Adélie penguins (Pygoscelis Adeliae). Auk 123, 858–869 (2006)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Boersma, D. P. & Rebstock, G. A. Effects of double bands on Magellanic penguins. J. Field Ornithol. 81, 195–205 (2010)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Boersma, D. P. & Rebstock, G. A. Flipper-bands do not affect foraging-trip duration of Magellanic penguins. J. Field Ornithol. 80, 408–418 (2009)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Hindell, M. A., Lea, M.-A. & Hull, C. L. The effects of flipper bands on adult survival rate and reproduction in the royal penguin, Eudyptes schlegeli . Ibis 138, 557–560 (1996)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Barbraud, C. & Weimerskirch, H. Emperor penguins and climate change. Nature 411, 183–186 (2001)

    ADS  CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Jenouvrier, S. et al. Demographic models and IPCC climate projections predict the decline of an emperor penguin population. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 106, 1844–1847 (2009)

    ADS  CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Croxall, J. P., McCann, T. S., Prince, P. A. & Rothery, P. in Antarctic Ocean and Resources Variability (ed. Sahrhage, D. ) 261–285 (Springer, 1988)

    Book  Google Scholar 

  15. Le Maho, Y. et al. Undisturbed breeding penguins as indicators of changes in marine Resources. Mar. Ecol. Prog. Ser. 95, 1–6 (1993)

    ADS  Article  Google Scholar 

  16. May, R. M. Ethics and amphibians. Nature 431, 403 (2004)

    ADS  CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Lebreton, J. D. & Clobert, J. in Bird Population Studies: their Relevance to Conservation and Management (eds Perrins, C. M., Lebreton., J. D. & Hirons, G. J. M. ) 105–125 (Oxford Univ. Press, 1991)

    Google Scholar 

  18. Stearns, S. C. The Evolution of Life Histories (Oxford Univ. Press, 1992)

    Google Scholar 

  19. Pfister, C. A. Patterns of variance in stage-structured populations: evolutionary predictions and ecological implications. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 95, 213–218 (1998)

    ADS  CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Gaillard, J.-M., Festa-Bianchet, M. & Yoccoz, N. G. Population dynamics of large herbivores: variable recruitment with constant adult survival. Trends Ecol. Evol. 13, 58–63 (1998)

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Weimerskirch, H., Stahl, J. C. & Jouventin, P. The breeding biology and population-dynamics of king penguins Aptenodytes patagonica on the Crozet Islands. Ibis 134, 107–117 (1992)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Olsson, O. Seasonal effects of timing and reproduction in the king penguin: a unique breeding cycle. J. Avian Biol. 27, 7–14 (1996)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Koslov, A. N. & Tarverdiyevma, I. Feeding of different species of Myctophidae in different parts of the Southern Ocean. J. Ichthyol. 29, 160–167 (1989)

    Google Scholar 

  24. Groscolas, R. & Robin, J.-P. Long-term fasting and re-feeding in penguins. Comp. Biochem. Physiol. A 128, 645–655 (2001)

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Boulinier, T., McCoy, K. D., Yoccoz, N. G., Gasparini, J. & Tveraa, T. Public information affects breeding dispersal in a colonial bird: kittiwakes cue on neighbours. Biol. Lett. 4, 538–540 (2008)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Le Bohec, C. et al. King penguin population threatened by Southern Ocean warming. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 105, 2493–2497 (2008)

    ADS  CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Deser, C. & Wallace, J. M. El Niño events and their relation to the southern oscillation: 1925–1986. Geophys. Res. Lett. 92, 14189–14196 (1987)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Wolfaardt, A. C. & Nel, D. C. in The Rehabilitation of Oiled African Penguins: A Conservation Success Story (eds Nel, D. C. & Whittington, P. A. ) 18–24 (Birdlife South Africa, 2003)

    Google Scholar 

  29. Descamps, S., Gauthier-Clerc, M., Gendner, J. P. & Le Maho, Y. The annual breeding cycle of unbanded king penguins Aptenodytes patagonicus on Possession Island (Crozet). Avian Sci. 2, 87–98 (2002)

    Google Scholar 

  30. Caswell, H. Matrix Population Models: Construction, Analysis and Interpretation 72–76, 300–306 (Sinuaer, 2001)

    Google Scholar 

  31. Gendner, J. P., Gauthier-Clerc, M., Le Bohec, C., Descamps, S. & Le Maho, Y. A new application for transponders in studying penguins. J. Field Ornithol. 76, 138–142 (2005)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. Froget, G., Gauthier-Clerc, M., Le Maho, Y. & Handrich, Y. Is penguin banding harmless? Polar Biol. 20, 409–413 (1998)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  33. Nicolaus, M., Bouwman, K. & Dingemanse, N. Effect of PIT tags on the survival and recruitment of Great tits. Ardea 96, 286–292 (2009)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  34. Barrat, A. Quelques aspects de la biologie et de l’écologie du Manchot Royal (Aptenodytes patagonicus) des îles Crozet. Com. Natl Fr. Rech. Antarct. 40, 9–51 (1976)

    Google Scholar 

  35. Stonehouse, B. The king penguin Aptenodytes patagonica of South Georgia. I. Breeding behaviour and development. Falkl. Isl. Depend. Surv. Sci. Rep. 23, 1–81 (1960)

    Google Scholar 

  36. Bates, D. & Maechler, M. lme4: Linear mixed-effects models using S4 classes. CRAN - Package lme4http://CRAN.R-project.org/package=lme4〉 (2009)

Download references

Acknowledgements

We thank P. Trathan for his comments on the paper. We are grateful to C. Salmon for his help in pre-analysing data. We thank M. Ballesteros, C. Bricaud, N. Chatelain, G. Conan, S. Descamps, J. Dutel, C. Gilbert, S. Gravier, A. Hergott, G. Kuntz, N. Lambert, T. Lebard, N. Lecomte, J. Legrand, S. Mangin, V. Mosch, S. Quéméneur, A. Simon, E. Taquet and C. Villemin, for their help with field work. We also thank I. Durant for her help with chlorophyll data. This work was supported by the Institut Polaire Français–Paul-Emile Victor, the Fondation Bettencourt-Schueller, the Fondation des Treilles and the Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique (Programme Zone Atelier de Recherches sur l’Environnement Antarctique et Subantarctique), and grants from the European Commission (Marie Curie, to C.L.B.), the Norwegian Research Council through the Match/Mismatch and Ecosystem project (to J.M.D.) and the YGGDRASIL programme (to C.S.).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

C.S. did the analyses and co-wrote the paper; C.L.B. helped in the analyses, the organization of the paper and the writing; Y.L.M. designed the study and co-wrote the paper; V.A.V. provided ideas on the analyses and co-wrote the paper; N.G.Y. proposed one of the analyses and helped with statistics; J.M.D. supplied ideas on the analyses and the organization of the paper; M.G.-C. and N.C.S. added some very useful comments and modifications to the manuscript; D.B. ran some pre-analyses; and Y.-H.P. provided climatic data.

Corresponding authors

Correspondence to Claire Saraux or Yvon Le Maho.

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing financial interests.

Supplementary information

Supplementary Information

The file contains Supplementary Tables 1-3 and Supplementary Figures 1-4 with legends. (PDF 286 kb)

PowerPoint slides

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Saraux, C., Le Bohec, C., Durant, J. et al. Reliability of flipper-banded penguins as indicators of climate change. Nature 469, 203–206 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1038/nature09630

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/nature09630

Further reading

Comments

By submitting a comment you agree to abide by our Terms and Community Guidelines. If you find something abusive or that does not comply with our terms or guidelines please flag it as inappropriate.

Search

Quick links

Nature Briefing

Sign up for the Nature Briefing newsletter — what matters in science, free to your inbox daily.

Get the most important science stories of the day, free in your inbox. Sign up for Nature Briefing