Letter | Published:

A substantial population of low-mass stars in luminous elliptical galaxies

Nature volume 468, pages 940942 (16 December 2010) | Download Citation


The stellar initial mass function (IMF) describes the mass distribution of stars at the time of their formation and is of fundamental importance for many areas of astrophysics. The IMF is reasonably well constrained in the disk of the Milky Way1 but we have very little direct information on the form of the IMF in other galaxies and at earlier cosmic epochs. Here we report observations of the Na i doublet2,3 and the Wing–Ford molecular FeH band4,5 in the spectra of elliptical galaxies. These lines are strong in stars with masses less than 0.3M (where M is the mass of the Sun) and are weak or absent in all other types of stars5,6,7. We unambiguously detect both signatures, consistent with previous studies8 that were based on data of lower signal-to-noise ratio. The direct detection of the light of low-mass stars implies that they are very abundant in elliptical galaxies, making up over 80% of the total number of stars and contributing more than 60% of the total stellar mass. We infer that the IMF in massive star-forming galaxies in the early Universe produced many more low-mass stars than the IMF in the Milky Way disk, and was probably slightly steeper than the Salpeter form9 in the mass range 0.1M to 1M.

Access optionsAccess options

Rent or Buy article

Get time limited or full article access on ReadCube.


All prices are NET prices.


  1. 1.

    On the variation of the initial mass function. Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc. 322, 231–246 (2001)

  2. 2.

    & Possible M dwarf enrichment in the semistellar nucleus of M31. Astrophys. J. 235, 405–412 (1980)

  3. 3.

    , , & The near-infrared Na i doublet feature in M stars. Astrophys. J. 479, 902–908 (1997)

  4. 4.

    & The infrared spectrum of the cool dwarf Wolf 359. Publ. Astron. Soc. Pacif. 81, 527–529 (1969)

  5. 5.

    , & The FeH Wing-Ford band in spectra of M stars. Astrophys. J. 484, 499–510 (1997)

  6. 6.

    , & Near-infrared spectral features in single-aged stellar populations. Astrophys. J. 532, 453–460 (2000)

  7. 7.

    , , & FeH absorption in the near-infrared spectra of late M and L dwarfs. Astrophys. J. 582, 1066–1072 (2003)

  8. 8.

    & The low-mass stellar content of galaxies—constraints through hybrid population synthesis near 1 micron. Astrophys. J. 406, 142–157 (1993)

  9. 9.

    The luminosity function and stellar evolution. Astrophys. J. 121, 161–167 (1955)

  10. 10.

    et al. The Keck low-resolution imaging spectrometer. Publ. Astron. Soc. Pacif. 107, 375–385 (1995)

  11. 11.

    et al. Can the faint submillimetre galaxies be explained in the Λ cold dark matter model? Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc. 356, 1191–1200 (2005)

  12. 12.

    , & The propagation of uncertainties in stellar population synthesis modeling. I. The relevance of uncertain aspects of stellar evolution and the initial mass function to the derived physical properties of galaxies. Astrophys. J. 699, 486–506 (2009)

  13. 13.

    , & The Infrared Telescope Facility (IRTF) spectral library: cool stars. Astrophys. J. Suppl. 185 289–432 (2009)

  14. 14.

    Evidence of cosmic evolution of the stellar initial mass function. Astrophys. J. 674, 29–50 (2008)

  15. 15.

    , , & On the evolutionary history of stars and their fossil mass and light. Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc. 379, 985–1002 (2007)

  16. 16.

    The galaxy stellar mass-star formation rate relation: evidence for an evolving stellar initial mass function? Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc. 385, 147–160 (2008)

  17. 17.

    , , & Formation of early-type galaxies from cosmological initial conditions. Astrophys. J. 658, 710–720 (2007)

  18. 18.

    et al. The growth of massive galaxies since z = 2. Astrophys. J. 709, 1018–1041 (2010)

  19. 19.

    & Color distributions in early type galaxies. III – Radial gradients in spectral features. Astron. J. 101, 111–126 (1991)

  20. 20.

    , , , & Near-infrared line-strengths in elliptical galaxies: evidence for initial mass function variations? Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc. 339, L12–L16 (2003)

  21. 21.

    Carter, D. Visvanathan, N. & Pickles, A. J. The dwarf star content of elliptical and lenticular galaxies. Astrophys. J. 311, 637–650 (1986)

  22. 22.

    et al. The initial mass function of early-type galaxies. Astrophys. J. 709, 1195–1202 (2010)

  23. 23.

    & Jetzer, Ph. Mancini, L. & Scarpetta, G. Microlensing constraints on the Galactic bulge initial mass function. Astron. Astrophys. 480, 723–733 (2008)

  24. 24.

    et al. Recent structural evolution of early-type galaxies: size growth from z = 1 to z = 0. Astrophys. J. 688, 48–58 (2008).

  25. 25.

    Thermal physics, cloud geometry and the stellar initial mass function. Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc. 359, 211–222 (2005)

  26. 26.

    & The origin of the initial mass function and its dependence on the mean Jeans mass in molecular clouds. Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc. 356, 1201–1221 (2005)

  27. 27.

    , & Gravitational fragmentation and the formation of brown dwarfs in stellar clusters. Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc. 389, 1556–1562 (2008)

  28. 28.

    & Metals, dust and the cosmic microwave background: fragmentation of high-redshift star-forming clouds. Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc. 402, 429–435 (2010)

  29. 29.

    , , & Timescales for low-mass star formation in extragalactic environments: implications for the stellar initial mass function. Astrophys. J. 692, 283–289 (2009)

  30. 30.

    et al. Star formation rates and stellar masses of z = 7–8 galaxies from IRAC observations of the WFC3/IR Early Release Science and the HUDF fields. Astrophys. J. 716, L103–L108 (2010)

Download references


We thank R. Bezanson, J. Brinchmann, R. Larson and R. Zinn for discussions. We thank R. Schiavon for comments that improved the manuscript. This study is based on observations obtained at the W. M. Keck Observatory. We recognize and acknowledge the very significant cultural role and reverence that the summit of Mauna Kea has always had within the indigenous Hawaiian community and consider ourselves fortunate to have the opportunity to conduct observations from this mountain.

Author information


  1. Astronomy Department, Yale University, New Haven, Connectitcut, USA

    • Pieter G. van Dokkum
  2. Department of Astrophysical Sciences, Princeton University, Princeton, New Jersey, USA

    • Charlie Conroy
  3. Harvard-Smithsonian Center for Astrophysics, Cambridge, Massachusetts, USA

    • Charlie Conroy


  1. Search for Pieter G. van Dokkum in:

  2. Search for Charlie Conroy in:


P.G.v.D. obtained and analysed the data and contributed to the analysis and interpretation. C.C. constructed the stellar population synthesis models and contributed to the analysis and interpretation.

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing financial interests.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Pieter G. van Dokkum.

Supplementary information

PDF files

  1. 1.

    Supplementary Information

    The file contains Supplementary Text on stellar population synthesis modelling, additional references and Supplementary Figures 1-2 with legends.

About this article

Publication history






Further reading


By submitting a comment you agree to abide by our Terms and Community Guidelines. If you find something abusive or that does not comply with our terms or guidelines please flag it as inappropriate.