Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

Formation of current coils in geodynamo simulations


Computer simulations have been playing an important role in the development of our understanding of the geodynamo1,2,3, but direct numerical simulation of the geodynamo with a realistic parameter regime is still beyond the power of today’s supercomputers. Difficulties in simulating the geodynamo arise from the extreme conditions of the core, which are characterized by very large or very small values of the non-dimensional parameters of the system. Among them, the Ekman number, E, has been adopted as a barometer of the distance of simulations from real core conditions, in which E is of the order of 10-15. Following the initial computer simulations of the geodynamo4,5, the Ekman number achieved has been steadily decreasing, with recent geodynamo simulations6,7,8 performed with E of the order of 10-6. Here we present a geodynamo simulation with an Ekman number of the order of 10-7—the highest-resolution simulation yet achieved, making use of 4,096 processors of the Earth Simulator. We have found that both the convection flow and magnetic field structures are qualitatively different from those found in larger-Ekman-number dynamos. The convection takes the form of sheet plumes or radial sheet jets9, rather than the columnar cell structures10 that are usually found. We have found that this sheet plume convection is an effective dynamo and the generated current is organized as a set of coils in the shape of helical springs or at times as a torus.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution

Relevant articles

Open Access articles citing this article.

Access options

Buy article

Get time limited or full article access on ReadCube.


All prices are NET prices.

Figure 1: Equatorial and meridional cross-sections of the axial component of the vorticity, ωz .
Figure 2: Sheet plumes observed in experiment and simulation.
Figure 3: Current field structure near the inner core at t = 430.
Figure 4: Detailed structure of two typical current coils (blue) with their associated magnetic field lines (pink).


  1. Roberts, P. H. & Glatzmaier, G. A. Geodynamo theory and simulations. Rev. Mod. Phys. 72, 1081–1123 (2000)

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  2. Jones, C. A. Convection-driven geodynamo models. Phil. Trans. R. Soc. Lond. A 358, 873–897 (2000)

    Article  ADS  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  3. Kono, M. & Roberts, P. H. Recent geodynamo simulations and observations of the geomagnetic field. Rev. Geophys. 40 1013 10.1029/2000RG000102 (2002)

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  4. Kageyama, A. et al. Computer simulation of a magnetohydrodynamic dynamo. II. Phys. Plasmas 2, 1421–1431 (1995)

    Article  ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Glatzmaier, G. A. & Roberts, P. H. A three-dimensional self-consistent computer simulation of a geomagnetic field reversal. Nature 377, 203–209 (1995)

    Article  ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Takahashi, F., Matsushima, M. & Honkura, Y. Simulations of a quasi-Taylor state geomagnetic field including polarity reversals on the Earth simulator. Science 309, 459–461 (2005)

    Article  ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Christensen, U. & Aubert, J. Scaling properties of convection-driven dynamos in rotating spherical shells and applications to planetary magnetic fields. Geophys. J. Int. 166, 97–114 (2006)

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  8. Sakuraba, A. & Hamano, Y. Turbulent structure in Earth’s fluid core inferred from time series of geomagnetic dipole moment. Geophys. Res. Lett. 34 L15308 10.1029/2007GL029898 (2007)

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  9. Sumita, I. & Olson, P. Laboratory experiments on high Rayleigh number thermal convection in a rapidly rotating hemispherical shell. Phys. Earth Planet. Inter. 117, 153–170 (2000)

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  10. Busse, F. A model of the geodynamo. Geophys. J. R. Astron. Soc. 42, 437–459 (1975)

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  11. Gilman, P. & Glatzmaier, G. Compressible convection in a rotating spherical shell. I. Anelastic equations. Astrophys. J. 45 (Suppl.). 335–349 (1981)

    Article  ADS  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  12. Zhang, K. & Schubert, G. Comparison of terrestrial and solar dynamos. Rep. Prog. Phys. 69, 1581–1605 (2006)

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  13. Kageyama, A. & Sato, T. “Yin-Yang grid”: An overset grid in spherical geometry. Geochem. Geophys. Geosyst. 5 10.1029/2004GC000734 (2004)

  14. Kageyama, A. et al. A 15.2 TFlops simulation of geodynamo on the earth simulator. Proc. ACM/IEEE SC2004 Conf.–35–43 (2004)

  15. Chesshire, G. & Henshaw, W. Composite overlapping meshes for the solution of partial differential equations. J. Comput. Phys. 90, 1–64 (1990)

    Article  ADS  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  16. Busse, F. Convective flows in rapidly rotating spheres and their dynamo action. Phys. Fluids 14, 1301–1314 (2002)

    Article  ADS  MathSciNet  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Plaut, E. & Busse, F. Multicellular convection in rotating annuli. J. Fluid Mech. 528, 119–133 (2005)

    Article  ADS  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  18. Aubert, J., Brito, D., Nataf, H.-C., Cardin, P. & Masson, J.-P. A systematic experimental study of rapidly rotating spherical convection in water and liquid gallium. Phys. Earth Planet. Inter. 128, 51–74 (2001)

    Article  ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Stellmach, S. & Hansen, U. Cartesian convection driven dynamos at low Ekman number. Phys. Rev. E 70, 056312 (2004)

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  20. Kageyama, A. & Sato, T. Generation mechanism of a dipole field by a magnetohydrodynamic dynamo. Phys. Rev. E 55, 4617–4626 (1997)

    Article  ADS  MathSciNet  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Davidson, P. An Introduction to Magnetohydrodynamics (Cambridge Univ. Press, 2001)

    Book  Google Scholar 

  22. Aubert, J., Aurnou, J. & Wicht, J. The magnetic structure of convection-driven numerical dynamos. Geophys. J. Int. 172, 945–956 (2008)

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  23. Kageyama, A., Tamura, Y. & Sato, T. Visualization of vector field by virtual reality. Prog. Theor. Phys. 138 (Suppl.). 665–673 (2000)

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  24. Ohno, N. & Kageyama, A. Scientific visualization of geophysical simulation data by the CAVE VR system with volume rendering. Phys. Earth Planet. Inter. 163, 305–311 (2007)

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  25. Olson, P. & Christensen, U. R. Dipole moment scaling for convection-driven planetary dynamos. Earth Planet. Sci. Lett. 250, 561–571 (2006)

    Article  ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  26. Ochi, M. M., Kageyama, A. & Sato, T. Dipole and octupole field reversals in a rotating spherical shell: Magnetohydrodynamic dynamo simulation. Phys. Plasmas 6, 777–787 (1999)

    Article  ADS  MathSciNet  CAS  Google Scholar 

  27. Kageyama, A., Ochi, M. M. & Sato, T. Flip-flop transitions of the magnetic intensity and polarity reversals in the magnetohydrodynamic dynamo. Phys. Rev. Lett. 82, 5409–5412 (1999)

    Article  ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  28. Li, J., Sato, T. & Kageyama, A. Repeated and sudden reversals of the dipole field generated by a spherical dynamo action. Science 295, 1887–1890 (2002)

    Article  ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  29. Cruz-Neira, C., Sandin, D. & DeFanti, T. Surrounded-screen projection-based virtual reality. Proc. SIGGRAPH 93, 135–142 (1993)

    Google Scholar 

Download references


We thank P. Olson and J. Aurnou for pointing out the close connection between the sheet plume structure observed in this simulation and the experiments of ref. 9. We thank I. Sumita for a detailed explanation of his laboratory experiments and comments, and for providing Fig. 2a. We thank N. Ohno for helping with the visualization. This work was supported by KAKENHI (17540404) and The Mitsubishi Foundation.

Author Contributions A.K. was involved in project planning, simulation code development, simulation runs, data analysis and manuscript preparation. T.M. was involved in a part of the simulation runs, data analysis and manuscript preparation. T.S. was involved in project planning and manuscript preparation.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations


Corresponding author

Correspondence to Akira Kageyama.

Supplementary information

Supplementary Figures

The file contains Supplementary Figures 1-2 and Legends. Supplementary Figure 1 shows an equatorial cross section of the convection velocity at Ekman number E=2.3e-7. Supplementary Figure 2 shows the current field at E=2.6e-6. Characteristic feature of the current field lines of helical coils is less distinctive in this case. (PDF 1230 kb)

PowerPoint slides

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Kageyama, A., Miyagoshi, T. & Sato, T. Formation of current coils in geodynamo simulations. Nature 454, 1106–1109 (2008).

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI:

This article is cited by


By submitting a comment you agree to abide by our Terms and Community Guidelines. If you find something abusive or that does not comply with our terms or guidelines please flag it as inappropriate.


Quick links

Nature Briefing

Sign up for the Nature Briefing newsletter — what matters in science, free to your inbox daily.

Get the most important science stories of the day, free in your inbox. Sign up for Nature Briefing