Nature 442, 71–74 (2006)

There was a plotting error in Fig. 1 that inadvertently displays earthquakes for the incorrect time interval. The location of earthquakes during the two-day-long slow-slip event of January 2005 are shown here in the corrected Fig. 1. Because the incorrect locations were also used in the Coulomb stress-change (CSC) calculation, the error could potentially have biased our interpretation of the depth of the slow-slip event, although in fact it did not. Because nearly all of the earthquakes, both background and triggered, are landward of the slow-slip event and at similar depths (6.5–8.5 km), the impact on the CSC calculations is negligible (Fig. 2; compare with Fig. 4 in original paper). The error does not alter our conclusion that the triggered events during the January 2005 slow-slip event were located on a subhorizontal plane at a depth of 7.5 ± 1 km. This is therefore the most likely depth of the slow-slip events. We thank Cecily J. Wolfe for pointing out the error in the original Fig. 1.

Figure 1: Displacements and inferred slip zones for four silent slip events.
figure 1

a, Map view. Vectors indicate displacements determined as the difference between mean position before and after the event. Ellipses represent 95% confidence intervals. Rectangles show surface projections of best-fitting dislocations found by nonlinear optimization, using a simulated annealing procedure. Asterisks represent earthquakes during the 2.2 days of the slow-slip event beginning 00 h utc on 26 January 2005. b, Cross-section. Dashed lines represent dislocations from inversion of Global Positioning System (GPS)-derived displacements. The solid red line indicates the 2005 event with depth constrained by seismicity. GPS station location names are given by their abbreviations.

Figure 2: Earthquake locations in relation to CSC due to fault slip.
figure 2

a, Triggered earthquakes for the 2.2-day event beginning 00 h utc on 26 January 2005 and isosurface of constant CSC on horizontal planes. Outside the green surface the stress change encourages slip. For a dislocation surface at a depth of 4–5 km, a majority of the earthquakes fall within the zone of negative CSC. b, Fraction of earthquakes for which CSC < 0 as a function of the depth of the slow-slip event (shown in grey in the original paper, here shown in blue in the corrected figure). The minimum at a depth of 6.5–8.5 km indicates the preferred depth of the slow-slip zone.