Among mesenchymal tumors of the uterus, smooth muscle neoplasms are most common. The wide morphologic spectrum, especially within the category of leiomyomas, is responsible for diagnostic problems more frequently with leiomyosarcoma (including mitotically active, apoplectic, and leiomyoma with bizarre nuclei) but also with endometrial stromal tumors. In the former scenario, clinical information, gross appearance as well as strict utilization of morphologic criteria including cytologic atypia, mitotic activity, and tumor cell necrosis are clues in establishing the correct diagnosis. It is important to keep in mind that mitotic rate thresholds vary for the different subtypes of leiomyosarcoma. Of note, p16 should be used with caution in supporting a diagnosis of leiomyosarcoma as it is often positive in leiomyomas with bizarre nuclei and leiomyomas with apoplectic change (in the latter most frequently and more intense near areas of necrosis). MED12 mutations have also a very limited role in this differential diagnosis. Endometrial stromal tumors are by far, less common than smooth muscle tumors, but can be confused with leiomyosarcomas if they are associated with an undifferentiated uterine sarcoma and the low-grade component is overlooked or they have a myxoid/fibroblastic morphology. The differential diagnosis may be confounded if the latter is associated with a high-grade endometrial stromal sarcoma. It is important to highlight that CD10 is not a reliable marker in these differentials and should be used as a part of a panel of antibodies that also includes desmin and h-caldesmon. Two other recently categorized tumors in the uterus that merit special mention are PEComa and inflammatory myofibroblastic tumor as they enter in the differential diagnosis of smooth muscle tumors. PEComa may be part of the tuberous sclerosis syndrome and may show either a predominantly epithelioid or spindle morphology or combination thereof. Rarely, it may contain melanin pigment. There is variable positivity for HMB-45, MelanA, MiTF, and CathepsinK, and some tumors have been shown to express TFE-3 especially when associated with "clear cell" morphology. Patients with adverse outcome have tumors with ≥2 of the following features: ≥5 cm, infiltration, high-grade cytologic features, mitotic rate ≥1/50 high-power fields, necrosis, or lymphovascular invasion. Inflammatory myofibroblastic tumor is important to recognize as it often mimics myxoid smooth muscle tumors, either benign or malignant. The presence of an associated lymphoplasmacytic infiltrate should alert to that possibility and ALK studies (immunostain or FISH) are helpful in establishing this diagnosis. These tumors can behave in a malignant manner if large, associated with abundant myxoid change, brisk mitotic rate or show tumor cell necrosis.
Smooth muscle tumors represent the most common uterine mesenchymal neoplasms that may cause diagnostic dilemmas for the practicing surgical pathologist.
Benign uterine smooth muscle tumors, especially leiomyoma variants, display a wide spectrum of gross and morphologic appearances often causing concern for malignancy and thus are a common source of diagnostic problems. Correct classification is important as currently prognosis of its malignant counterpart, leiomyosarcoma, is dismal even when confined to the uterus at time of diagnosis.1, 2, 3 Interestingly, the recent AJCC staging system of soft tissue sarcomas has been recommended to stage uterine malignant smooth muscle tumors. However, it is important to note that several studies have shown no advantage of this system over the old FIGO staging system to improve prediction of overall survival in patients with leiomyosarcoma,4, 5, 6, 7 whereas neither system is ideal in classifying patients into four clinically significant stages. Furthermore, criteria for malignancy used in the classification of smooth muscle tumors in soft tissues differs significantly from those used in the uterus, likely related to the influence of the hormonal milieu in the female genital tract. For example, progestins are known to be associated with increased mitotic activity, infarction, and other morphologic changes in smooth muscle tumors that may lead to the incorrect diagnosis. Thus, inquiring about the clinical history, especially about progestin intake may be very helpful in the correct interpretation of a uterine smooth muscle tumor. A third system has been developed focusing on patient 5-year outcome based on specific parameters that include age at diagnosis, tumor size, histologic grade, mitotic index, cervical involvement, extrauterine spread, and distant metastases,8, 9 which appears to have been validated using external cohorts.10 As immunohistochemistry (mostly p16 and p53), and molecular tools including MED12 mutations have currently a very limited role in the classification of smooth muscle tumors as benign or malignant, morphologic examination remains the cornerstone in the diagnosis of these tumors.11
Uterine leiomyosarcoma, the most frequent uterine sarcoma, is seen as a large solitary mass (average 10 cm) or within a "fibroid" uterus. On sectioning, it displays a fleshy variegated cut surface with common hemorrhage and/or necrosis. When epithelioid, the consistency can be softer and if myxoid it may have a gelatinous, "sticky" cut surface. An infiltrative growth into the myometrium is often noted grossly or under the microscope, but some leiomyosarcomas may be relatively well circumscribed. The gross appearance of the smooth muscle tumor is frequently overlooked but it is often helpful either at the time of frozen section or during the final evaluation of the tumor.
Leiomyosarcomas are divided into spindled, epithelioid and myxoid, but variable admixtures thereof are not uncommon. Most spindled and epithelioid leiomyosarcomas are hypercellular but they can be normo- or hypocellular, the latter being more common in the myxoid variant where cells are embedded in an abundant weakly basophilic matrix, strongly positive with Alcian blue and colloidal iron. Spindle cell leiomyosarcoma shows long compact intersecting fascicles of fusiform cells with eosinophilic cytoplasm and elongated "blunt-ended" nuclei. The neoplastic cells in myxoid leiomyosarcoma have scant cytoplasm and oval, spindle, or stellate nuclei that may or not be arranged in loose fascicles, whereas epithelioid neoplasms are composed of sheets, nests, or cords of cells with abundant typically eosinophilic cytoplasm, although clear cells may be present and rarely predominate.12 To establish a diagnosis of myxoid leiomyosarcoma, studies have used variable thresholds ranging from 30 to 60%. In general >50% component of myxoid or epithelioid component is desired to render a diagnosis of either myxoid or epithelioid leiomyosarcoma although minor components should be noted in the pathology report as it may be the only morphology present in metastases.13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20
In general, to render a diagnosis of malignancy in smooth muscle tumors of the uterus is relatively straightforward as leiomyosarcomas usually display marked nuclear atypia, high mitotic rate, and tumor cell necrosis. However, it is important to keep in mind that the diagnostic threshold for mitotic rate differs for the different leiomyosarcoma variants.
To establish a diagnosis of spindle cell leiomyosarcoma a combination of two of three of the following features are needed: tumor cells necrosis, marked moderate to severe cytologic atypia and/or ≥10 mitoses/10 high-power fields (HPFs). An epithelioid leiomyosarcoma should show ≥4 mitoses/10 HPFs with either tumor cell necrosis or at least moderate cytologic atypia, whereas a myxoid leiomyosarcoma can be diagnosed with the finding of either tumor cell necrosis or marked cytologic atypia; in their absence, ≥2 mitoses/10 HPFs is diagnostic of malignancy. Notice that the threshold to establish a diagnosis of myxoid leiomyosarcoma is much lower than hat used for the spindle cell variant, thus, it is important to sample extensively any smooth muscle tumor particularly if myxoid in order to identify the most mitotically active areas. Furthermore, sampling may show an infiltrative growth, lymphovascular invasion, or presence of conventional and/or epithelioid components, which will facilitate the diagnosis of malignancy.
Morphologic Evaluation of Diagnostic Criteria
Even though mitotic index is important in establishing the diagnosis of leiomyosarcoma, this finding in isolation is not enough to render such diagnosis as some leiomyoma variants may occasionally have brisk mitotic activity. As mentioned above, a cutoff of 10, ≥4, and ≥2 mitoses/10 HPFs is used for spindle (Figure 1), epithelioid or myxoid leiomyosarcomas, respectively.12 Thus, objective mitotic count is crucial but at the same time it is often difficult to be certain about it as apoptotic cells with karyorrhectic nuclei can be easily misinterpreted as mitoses. Karyorrhectic nuclei/apoptotic cells often have dense "pink" retractile cytoplasm and coarse/granular chromatin in contrast to delicate appearance of the chromatin associated with a pale cytoplasm and absence of nuclear membranes seen in true mitoses.18 When scrutinizing a smooth muscle tumor for mitotic activity and considering "atypical mitoses" in the absence of typical ones should alert to the possibility of being confronted with apoptotic cells. Ki-67 is often performed to aid in the differential diagnosis between leiomyoma variants and leiomyosarcoma, but is infrequently helpful as typically overestimates mitotic index and furthermore, results show extensive overlap between the most problematic leiomyoma variants and leiomyosarcoma. PHH3 may be more helpful than Ki-67 when it is difficult to be certain about mitotic rate based on routine examination, and it may be particularly useful in leiomyomas with bizarre nuclei, although still not completely reliable.21
Evaluation of cytologic atypia is subjective and may vary greatly among pathologists; thus, it is important to keep in mind the following: (1) evaluate atypia at medium power magnification (× 10); (2) compare cytologic features of tumor with surrounding myometrium if possible; and (3) look for background nuclear atypia not atypia of "bizarre" type that often is confined to groups of cells in an otherwise banal appearing leiomyoma. Cytologic atypia often includes more than one of the following features; (a) high nuclear size (high nuclear to cytoplasmic ratio); (b) irregular nuclear membranes; (c) nuclear pleomorphism; (d) hyperchromatism; and (d) prominent nucleoli or more than one nucleoli.18, 22
There are several grading systems that could be applied to uterine leiomyosarcomas as they are used in soft tissues including the Broders system (grade 1—mild cytologic atypia; grade 2—more nuclear irregularity, grade 3—between grade 2 and 4, grade 4—presence of bizarre cells)23 and the French classification (FNCLCC) that divides soft tissues sarcomas into three categories based on tumor cell necrosis, mitoses, and degree of differentiation.24, 25 However, all of these systems fail in identifying bona fide low-grade leiomyosarcomas. On the basis of the Stanford criteria for malignancy in smooth muscle tumors, the vast majority of leiomyosarcomas are also by definition high grade.22 In one recent study, tumors initially diagnosed as low-grade leiomyosarcoma were proved to be a heterogeneous group of tumors that comprised atypical smooth muscle tumors as well as other mesenchymal neoplasms including endometrial stromal sarcomas with smooth muscle differentiation. Other tumors within that category that were diagnosed as low grade were histologically indistinguishable from conventional leiomyosarcomas aside from having a lower prevalence of tumor cell necrosis.26 Despite the infrequency of the latter feature, patient outcome was basically identical to that of high-grade tumors. Thus, even though low-grade leiomyosarcomas exist, they are rare and criteria to recognize this subset of tumors is currently lacking.
Tumor cell necrosis
Three types of necrosis can be encountered in smooth muscle tumors: (1) Ulceration with underlying necrosis if submucosal; (2) infarct-type necrosis in benign and malignant neoplasms; and (3) tumor cell necrosis (Figure 2a and b), which is only seen in leiomyosarcomas. The latter is defined by an abrupt transition from necrotic to non-necrotic areas without interposed granulation tissue. Viable tumor cells typically have a perivascular distribution. Most importantly in both necrotic and preserved areas, marked cytologic atypia is noticeable, usually without associated inflammation.22 However, interobserver agreement in the interpretation of tumor cell necrosis is inconsistent and it was only fair even among experienced gynecologic pathologists in one recent study.27 Another study showed that tumor cell necrosis was present in about one third of leiomyosarcomas studied (26 out of 72) and all but one with tumor cell necrosis (44 spindle, 22 epithelioid, 6 myxoid), also showed marked cytologic atypia as well as ≥10 mitoses/10 HPFs.28 These studies highlight the importance of evaluating both cytologic atypia and mitotic activity, as most leiomyosarcomas show these features. Many leiomyosarcomas also have infarct-type necrosis, the latter being more common than tumor cell necrosis. In contrast to the latter, infarct-type necrosis is characterized by finding granulation tissue or hyalinization between necrotic and non-necrotic areas, frequently associated with recent or old hemorrhage. The necrotic areas have a mummified appearance and both tumor and vessels appear dead. However, it is important to keep in mind that (a) when infarct-type necrosis is seen at a very early stage, typical features are absent, and (b) infarct-type necrosis may be superimposed to tumor cell necrosis, both making the distinction from tumor cell necrosis difficult which underscores evaluation of "early" non well-characterized necrosis to be made in conjunction with nuclear atypia and mitotic activity (Figure 2c and d).
As mentioned earlier, it is most important not to confuse leiomyoma variants with the different subtypes of leiomyosarcoma. Within the category of spindle leiomyosarcoma the most common variants in this differential diagnosis include: apoplectic leiomyoma, leiomyoma with bizarre nuclei and mitotically active leiomyoma. Other tumors that may enter in this differential diagnosis although by far much less common are spindle rhabdomyosarcoma and undifferentiated uterine sarcoma.
Leiomyomas with bizarre nuclei (Symplastic leiomyoma) (Figure 3a)12 often cause concern for malignancy as display large atypical multinucleated or mononucleated cells that may have an extensive/diffuse distribution within the tumor or may show high density in some areas, nuclei display prominent nucleoli as well as karyorrhectic nuclei with coarse chromatin simulating abnormal mitoses (Figure 3b), and focal increased mitotic activity (up to 8/10 HPFs) may be noted.29, 30, 31 On the other hand, it is well known that some leiomyosarcomas have multinucleated cells similar to those found in leiomyomas with bizarre nuclei as well as "leiomyoma-like" areas increasing confusion between these two entities.32 Finally, it has been shown that leiomyomas with bizarre nuclei are commonly p16 and p53 positive (Figure 3c and d) as reported in leiomyosarcomas. Thus, although has been emphasized the usefulness of p53 and p16 in the distinction between leiomyoma and leiomyosarcoma,31, 33, 34, 35, 36 these markers should not be used when confronted with this differential diagnosis, except if wild-type p53 expression and negative p16 that support a diagnosis of leiomyoma with bizarre nuclei. Ki67 also shows a remarkable degree of overlap between leiomyoma with bizarre nuclei and leiomyosarcoma, and thus, it is not helpful in most instances.34, 37, 38, 39 Yet, other cell cycle regulatory markers including p21 and p27 appear to show extensive overlap between these two categories of smooth muscle tumors.31 MED12 mutations that are common in typical leiomyomas40, 41, 42, 43 are uncommon in leiomyomas with bizarre nuclei but also rare in leiomyosarcomas.44, 45, 46 It is important to establish the correct diagnosis as often patients with leiomyomas with bizarre nuclei are in their reproductive age and the initial treatment may only be myomectomy.29, 30, 31 Helpful features to establish the diagnosis of leiomyoma with bizarre nuclei include a patchy distribution of the "atypical" cells in most tumors, prominent nuclear pseudoinclusions, and degenerative-type atypia with pyknotic nuclei. Average mitotic count is typically 1–2/10 HPFs, although isolated counts up to 7–8 mitoses/10 HPFs may be noted. It is very important to recognize that areas not containing bizarre cells (background smooth muscle cells) show bland cytologic features. It is also important not to confuse karyorrhectic nuclei with atypical mitoses in the absence of typical ones. Other helpful associated features include the finding of cells with rhabdoid morphology. In these tumors, there are often associated vascular changes that include fibrinoid necrosis of vessels wall as well as vessel lumen obliteration and perivascular inflammatory infiltrate.29 Tumor cell necrosis is not seen. Compiled experience with these tumors has shown that they are benign even when they are associated with diffuse distribution of the bizarre nuclei.29, 30, 31
Recently, it has been shown that some leiomyomas that contain bizarre nuclei may be associated with the leiomyomatosis–renal cell carcinoma syndrome, in which patients develop uterine and cutaneous leiomyomas and papillary renal cell carcinoma. The syndrome has an autosomal dominant inheritance with alteration of fumarate hydratase (FH) gene located in the long arm of chromosome 1.47 These leiomyomas are characterized by prominent eosinophilic macronucleoli with a perinucleolar halo, the presence of bizarre nuclei, as well as a fascicular growth of spindle cells with increased cellularity, staghorn-type vessels, fibrillary cytoplasm, rhabdoid-like inclusions, and alveolar-type edema (Figure 4a–c).48, 49, 50 However, these features are not easily reproducible and it has been shown that leiomyomas with bizarre nuclei that are not associated with this syndrome can also show absence of staining for FH (Figure 4d) with positive S2C in the same cells, indicating that the above morphologic features are not diagnostic of this syndrome.48, 51 Thus, absence of staining should be used as a "triage" for further genetic testing but not as a diagnostic tool in this scenario.
Finally, the term atypical leiomyoma for a leiomyoma with bizarre nuclei/symplastic leiomyoma as this term is used in the most recent WHO classification as a synonym of smooth muscle tumor of uncertain/low malignant potential.12
Mitotically active leiomyoma has as concerning morphologic feature its increased mitotic activity, especially when >5 mitoses/10 HPFs are noted. Some tumors may have up to 10–15 mitoses. It is important to note that mitoses should not be sought near areas of ulceration or infarction where are typically increased. These tumors lack any degree of cytologic atypia, which is the most important diagnostic feature to establish a benign diagnosis. Thus, sampling is important especially of any grossly non-typical areas to rule out a leiomyosarcoma. Tumor cell necrosis should be absent. In contrast to leiomyosarcomas, these tumors almost always occur in women of reproductive age and are associated with the secretory phase of the menstrual cycle, pregnancy, or the use of exogenous hormones, consistent with the effect of progestins on uterine leiomyomas.52, 53 Tumors with >15 mitoses/10 HPFs may be clinically benign, but as experience is exceedingly limited they may be better classified as "leiomyoma with increased mitotic activity, but experience limited" or "smooth muscle tumor of uncertain/low malignant potential/atypical leiomyoma" advising close follow-up.12
Apoplectic leiomyoma is also designated as hemorrhagic cellular leiomyoma, as this term appropriately emphasizes the multifocal nature of the hemorrhagic foci on gross and microscopic examination. On gross examination, these multiple hemorrhagic areas may be accompanied by cystic change and typically show a stellate contour on microscopic scrutiny (Figure 5a and b). In the surrounding hypercellular areas, the cells appear "plumper" or slightly pseudoepithelioid with enlarged nuclei, nucleoli, and often visible mitotic activity (up to 8–9/10 HPFs) but average mitotic count is <2/10 HPFs (Figure 5c).38, 54 These hypercellular areas often cause concern for malignancy, especially when multiple foci are close together imparting a "busy" appearance. Another confounding feature is the presence of associated myxoid change in these areas. Keep in mind that these hypercellular areas typically show increased Ki-67 expression and not infrequently display p16 positivity, which can be relatively striking (Figure 5d).55 As the lesion evolves, there also may be myxoid degeneration of the hemorrhagic focus itself as well as bands of hyalinization of the surrounding cellular smooth muscle. If the affected smooth muscle area has not yet become overtly hemorrhagic, one can often notice at low power a vague nodular configuration of hypercellular smooth muscle with scattered erythrocytes as well as single or groups of apoptotic cells, which often also have a pseudoepithelioid morphology and are associated with hyperchromatic nuclei that cause concern for tumor cell necrosis.18 There are two important clues to the diagnosis of apoplectic leiomyoma: (1) low-power appearance, where a "zonation" phenomenon may be appreciated moving away from the hemorrhagic focus and the cellularity and cytologic features in the latter areas are those of a conventional leiomyoma, and (2) history of contraceptive intake. As this leiomyoma variant typically occurs in reproductive-age women either taking oral contraceptives or who are pregnant/postpartum, it is crucial to inquire about that possibility as this history may help to point towards the correct diagnosis.18
Highly cellular leiomyoma. Increased cellularity in a smooth muscle tumor potentially may cause concern for malignancy. This feature was used in the past as an important criterion in the diagnosis of leiomyosarcoma, but is currently well established that benign smooth muscle tumors may be highly cellular in the absence of cytologic atypia, brisk mitotic activity, and tumor cell necrosis.56 However, it is important to keep in mind that any given combination(s) of leiomyoma variants can occur, thus a cellular or highly cellular leiomyoma may be associated with increased mitotic activity and in such case the tumor would be designated as a mitotically active cellular/highly cellular leiomyoma. As mentioned earlier, no cytologic atypia or tumor cell necrosis should be noted and thus it is important to sample extensively these tumors.
Undifferentiated endometrial/uterine sarcoma and spindle cell rhabdomyosarcoma should be considered in the differential diagnosis of a spindle leiomyosarcoma. Although the former is a diagnosis of exclusion,57,12 its distinction from a leiomyosarcoma may be very difficult either because the leiomyosarcoma is poorly differentiated or it is associated with dedifferentiation (dedifferentiated leiomyosarcoma).58 However, the latter will display, in most cases, a discrete transition from better-differentiated to high-grade pleomorphic areas lacking smooth muscle differentiation. These dedifferentiated areas do not express muscle markers increasing the degree of confusion. Thus, sampling may be important to identify the differentiated areas, although prognosis is dismal in all patients. Spindle cell rhabdomyosarcoma shows cells with bright eosinophilic cytoplasm, which at least should alert one to search for cross striations and perform immunohistochemical stains for skeletal markers. Of note, as rhabdomyosarcomas are also positive for desmin, this antibody alone should not be used in this differential diagnosis.59
Within the category of myxoid leiomyosarcoma the main differential diagnosis includes hydropic change within a leiomyoma and much less frequently myxoid leiomyoma, intravenous leiomyomatosis with myxoid/hydropic change, myxoid variant of endometrial stromal sarcoma, or even rarely inflammatory myofibroblastic tumor or myxoid change within the myometrium (associated with lupus erythematosus or neurofibromatosis).
Leiomyoma with hydropic change (hydropic leiomyoma). Clinically, especially intraoperatively, a fast-growing smooth muscle tumor is often suspected by the surgeon to be a leiomyosarcoma. When opening the uterus, the tumor may have an unusual multinodular or poorly demarcated appearance and may exude fluid, which is not infrequently suspected by the pathologist to be "myxoid" in nature. It is important to keep in mind that myxoid matrix, if striking, imparts a sticky "touch" to the cut surface, but it does not typically exudes watery fluid, especially if "squeezed", an important gross difference.60 On microscopic examination, hydropic (edema) change may be confused with myxoid matrix, more so if the hydropic change extends beyond the confines of the leiomyoma mimicking an infiltrative growth and if obliterates the usual tumor architecture.61 However, the overall appearance of a leiomyoma with hydropic change differs from that seen in a smooth muscle tumor with myxoid change. Typically, the hydropic change is often accompanied by numerous thick-walled blood vessels and only threads, cords, or trabeculae of smooth muscle cells may be seen although complete "dropout" of cells may occur, which contrast with myxoid tumors, where free floating stellate or spindle cells are seen within the intervening myxoid matrix. Hydropic areas may alternate with hyalinized areas, and no cytologic atypia and only rare mitoses are noted in leiomyomas with hydropic change. Although watery fluid is typically pale eosinophilic and myxoid matrix tends to be basophilic, Alcian blue or colloidal iron are helpful in this distinction as they are typically negative in leiomyomas with hydropic change.61
Myxoid leiomyoma is even rarer that myxoid leiomyosarcoma and this diagnosis should only be made in tumors that are small (essentially <5 cm), completely well circumscribed, with no cytologic atypia and minimal to absent mitotic activity (<2/10 HPFs) after extensive sampling (Figures 6a–d).13, 14, 15, 19, 62 It is important to be aware that a benign smooth muscle tumor may be only partially myxoid, and that if the non-myxoid areas are misconstrued as myometrium, the tumor may be interpreted as having infiltrative margins and likely to be a myxoid leiomyosarcoma. Myxoid change may occur in leiomyomas in pregnant women and also near areas of infarction.54, 63 Distinction between a benign and malignant myxoid smooth muscle tumor may be difficult in curettage specimens and the pathologist should be very cautious in this scenario. When confronted with a frozen section/or curettage of a myxoid proliferation without obvious features of malignancy, it is best to indicate the myxoid nature of the tumor to the surgeon and defer the final interpretation after extensive sampling has been performed. Intravenous leiomyomatosis may be rarely associated with prominent myxoid change, an appearance that occasionally can be prominent in leiomyosarcoma.64, 65 The finding of any degree of cytologic atypia or mitotic activity should favor the diagnosis of leiomyosarcoma.
Myxoid endometrial stromal sarcoma comprises a subset of endometrial stromal sarcomas with prominent myxoid and/or fibroblastic background62, 66, 67 that are often confused with myxoid leiomyosarcoma (the latter more common).68 This differential diagnosis may be confounded by the fact that some low-grade endometrial stromal sarcomas are associated with a high-grade component (high-grade endometrial stromal sarcoma with t(10,17)69 showing relatively small but epithelioid tumor cells forming nests that can be confused with an epithelioid smooth muscle component. Helpful features to establish the diagnosis of low-grade endometrial stromal sarcoma include; (a) typical tongue-like pattern of infiltration, (b) absence of fascicular growth, (c) arteriole-like vessels, (d) in most cases, areas of conventional endometrial stromal neoplasia,70 and (e) lack of positivity for h-caldesmon.71 In the high-grade areas, the tumor cells are small with very brisk mitotic activity and are associated with a prominent sinusoidal vasculature. Although CD10, ER, and PR are typically positive in low-grade endometrial stromal sarcomas, it is important to keep in mind that the high-grade component is typically negative for these markers (but diffusely positive for cyclin D1)72 and that very commonly leiomyosarcomas express CD10 as well as ER and PR.73, 74, 75, 76, 77, 78 Thus, when using immunohistochemistry, a panel rather than a single marker that includes desmin and h-caldesmon is necessary. Of note, myxoid smooth muscle tumors may show less expression of smooth muscle markers when compared to other leiomyosarcoma subtypes.
Inflammatory myofibroblastic tumor (Figure 7a and b) has a variably myxoid stroma and may present as a bulky myometrial mass with focally irregular borders that infiltrates surrounding tissues including parametrium and cervical stroma, not uncommonly having a gelatinous cut surface. These tumors often show mitotic activity, necrosis, and positivity for muscle markers. All these features raise as initial working diagnosis myxoid leiomyosarcoma. On microscopic examination, tumors grow in three main patterns: hypocellular/myxoid, fascicular, and less commonly hyalinized, patterns that can also be observed in leiomyosarcomas. Helpful morphologic features include: (1) usually striking lymphoplasmacytic infiltrate; (2) tissue culture-like appearance; (3) minimal cytologic atypia; (4) cells with a "ganglion-like" morphology; and (5) ALK cytoplasmic immunopositivity that tends to be stronger if the myofibroblastic tumor is predominantly myxoid.79, 80, 81 ALK gene rearrangements have been recently reported (Figure 7c).80 The latter is helpful as no ALK expression has been identified in uterine smooth muscle tumors or endometrial stromal sarcomas up to date. These tumors can behave in a malignant manner if large, associated with abundant myxoid change, brisk mitotic rate, or tumor cell necrosis.80
Rarely, myxoid change can occur in the myometrium in patients with lupus erythematosus (with secondary muscle hypertrophy, termed as "myxoidosis")82 or neurofibromatosis, type I83 forming variably circumscribed nodules. This phenomenon may raise problems in the differential diagnosis with a "low-grade" myxoid smooth muscle tumor in a curettage/biopsy specimen but not in hysterectomy specimens. Knowledge of the clinical history and awareness of its diffuse distribution may be helpful.
Epithelioid leiomyosarcomas have typically a broader differential diagnosis among uterine leiomyosarcomas as they have the most varied morphology including diffuse, nested, pseudoalveolar, corded, and trabecular growths or combination thereof. Before making a diagnosis of epithelioid smooth muscle tumor, a pseudoepithelioid appearance (Figure 8a) should be excluded as in fact it is more common than true epithelioid morphology and can be seen with: cross section of smooth muscle fascicles (Figure 8c), hydropic change often associated with hyalinization (Figure 8d), viable areas of smooth muscle neoplasia close to infarct-type necrosis, rhabdoid change, and leiomyomas from pregnant women.18 After excluding this pseudoepithelioid morphology, tumors in the differential diagnosis of epithelioid leiomyosarcoma include: PEComa, poorly differentiated carcinoma, uterine tumor resembling an ovarian sex-cord tumor, tumors derived from intermediate trophoblast, malignant melanoma (primary and metastatic) and less commonly other primary sarcomas including alveolar soft-part sarcoma, epithelioid angiosarcoma, epithelioid endometrial stromal sarcoma, pleomorphic rhabdomyosarcoma, or rhabdoid tumor. If the tumor is subserosal, the differential diagnosis may also include a gastrointestinal stromal tumor. Of note, leiomyosarcomas may be c-kit positive,75, 84, 85 but lack c-kit mutations and are negative for DOG1 (with rare exceptions) and CD34.86
PEComa belongs to the family of lesions that originate from the perivascular epithelioid cell (PEC). The PEC cell has abundant clear to eosinophilic granular cytoplasm (Figures 9a and b) and variably stains for melanocytic markers (HMB45, MelanA, MiTF, cathepsinK, and TFE3) (Figures 9c and d) with variable expression of smooth muscle markers.87, 88, 89, 90, 91, 92 A strong association with lymphangiomyomatosis and tuberous sclerosis exists.88, 90, 91 PEComa may share with epithelioid leiomyosarcoma the following features: (1) infiltrative growth; (2) nested or diffuse growth; (3) spindle cell component; (4) hyalinization; (5) cells with abundant clear or eosinophilic cytoplasm and round to oval nuclei; and (6) common expression of smooth muscle markers. Features that favor an epithelioid smooth muscle tumor over a PEComa include: (a) diffuse cytoplasmic eosinophilia with no prominent granular quality; (b) spindle cell component with cells showing perinuclear vacuoles; (c) no delicate vasculature; (d) MelanA and TFE3 typically negative; (e) keratin and/or EMA (Figure 8b) often positive; (f) basal lamina and pinocytotic vesicles but no premelanosomes seen by electron microscopy.93, 94, 95 Features that favor PEComa over an epithelioid leiomyosarcoma include: (1) association with tuberous sclerosis; (2) coexistence of lymphangiomyomatosis in the uterus, lymph nodes, or other locations; (3) delicate sinusoidal vasculature (Figure 9a); (4) fibrillary quality of the cell cytoplasm; (5) multinucleated giant cells and ‘spider’-like cells; (6) cells with glycogen or lipid-distended cytoplasm; (7) melanin pigment; (8) Melan A, MiTF, cathepsinK, and/or TFE3 expression; and (9) lack of expression of epithelial markers (keratin and EMA). Among melanocytic markers Melan A is most frequently expressed although expression of any of these markers (especially HMB45 and melanA) is often focal.89 PEComas with a predominant component of clear cells also show extensive TFE3 and cathepsinK positivity with variably HMB45 positivity and they are not typically associated with TSC mutations.96, 97 Among smooth muscle markers, desmin followed by actin and h-caldesmon are most commonly expressed especially in the spindle areas of the tumor. Remember that smooth muscle tumors may focally express HMB45, thus, when applying immunohistochemistry, the diagnosis of PEComa is made when two melanocytic markers are positive (HMB45, cathepsinK, MelanA) with +/− positivity for muscle markers (desmin, smooth muscle actin, h-caldesmon). As occurs with smooth muscle tumors, some PEComas are associated with adverse outcome if they show ≥2 of the following features: ≥5 cm, infiltration, high-grade cytologic features, mitotic rate ≥1/50 HPFs, necrosis, or lymphovascular invasion.88, 89
Poorly differentiated carcinoma (primary or metastatic) may have eosinophilic or clear cells growing in sheets, cords, or nests but will exhibit, at least focally, glandular or squamous differentiation. The distinction may be more problematic in a biopsy or curettage specimen as foci of better-differentiated carcinoma may not have been sampled. When applying immunohistochemistry to aid in this differential diagnosis it is important to keep in mind that smooth muscle tumors in general, but in particular epithelioid ones, are often positive for epithelial markers including keratins and EMA and may be less often/less extensively positive for muscle markers.93 Thus, a panel of antibodies that also includes PAX8, HNF1b, and Napsin A (the latter two if clear cells are present), and more than one smooth muscle marker should be used.98, 99, 100, 101 Leiomyosarcomas are also typically ER, PR, p16, and p53 positive, thus these markers are not helpful in this scenario.11, 31, 34, 37, 73, 76, 102, 103, 104
Uterine tumor resembling an ovarian sex-cord tumor shows patterns and cells that may overlap to a striking degree with epithelioid smooth muscle tumors. Their immunohistochemical profile is also quite similar as they are often positive for actin, desmin and to a less extend h-caldesmon and often show keratin (50%), but only uncommonly EMA (<10%) expression. Helpful diagnostic clues include more pronounced epithelial appearance in most UTROSCTs seen as tubular and retiform differentiation, vacuolated cell cytoplasm (although typically focal), and variable expression of sex-cord stromal markers (inhibin, calretinin, and melan A)105, 106, 107, 108, 109, 110 and sometimes FOXL2 expression, although without associated mutations.111
Intermediate-type trophoblastic tumors have cells with abundant eosinophilic or clear cytoplasm showing variable degree of cytologic atypia and mitotic activity and grow in a diffuse or nested pattern, features that overlap with those seen in epithelioid leiomyosarcomas. These trophoblastic tumors also express cytokeratins, and may express CD10 and p16 as leiomyosarcomas.112, 113, 114 Placental site trophoblastic tumors have a very characteristic infiltrative growth of single cells or small aggregates of cells that dissect individual muscle fibers and often replace endothelial cells with associated fibrinoid change recapitulating the physiologic implantation site.115, 116 The finding of islands or nests of cells surrounded by extensive necrosis or hyaline-like matrix that are p63-positive support the diagnosis of epithelioid trophoblastic tumor.117, 118 Trophoblastic tumors are typically positive for hPL (PSTT> ETT), CK18, and inhibin, markers that not expressed in epithelioid smooth muscle tumors.119, 120, 121 A history of recent pregnancy or abortion and an elevated serum hCG level may also be helpful, although tumors may occur after years of a pregnancy.
Alveolar soft-part sarcoma is rare in the female genital tract, the uterus being the most common location. Finding an alveolar growth, PAS-positive diastase resistant granules and/or crystals, and TFE3 positivity in the tumor cells supports this diagnosis.114, 122, 123 Epithelioid endometrial stromal sarcoma is an exceedingly rare variant of endometrial stromal tumor in which cells have abundant eosinophilic cytoplasm.124 The morphologic and immunohistochemical features discussed in the differential diagnosis between myxoid endometrial stromal sarcoma and leiomyosarcoma can be applied. Melanomas, either primary or metastatic, are rare. Finding of pigment, sometimes a preexistent benign lesion, or prior history may be helpful in making such diagnosis. When in doubt, a panel of antibodies including more than one melanocytic marker is advised.
Inquire about clinical history, especially patient"s age and progestin intake, as it may explain the "potentially worrisome" morphologic features of the smooth muscle tumor.
Correlate the gross appearance of the tumor with its morphology. A smooth muscle tumor unlikely will be malignant if it grossly has the typical white, firm and whorly cut surface.
It is important to extensively sample a smooth muscle tumor if an unusual appearance is noted in order to identify morphologic features that will help in its correct classification.
Pathologists must use caution in interpreting "atypical mitoses" as such in absence of conventional ones, as they are likely to represent karyorrhectic nuclei, typically noted in leiomyomas with bizarre nuclei.
Evaluate necrosis of uncertain nature in conjunction with nuclear atypia and mitoses, as overlapping appearance can be seen on occasion between tumor cell and infarct-type necrosis. Remember that both benign and malignant smooth muscle tumors may have infarct-type necrosis.
p16, p53, Ki-67, and other cell cycle regulatory markers are often not helpful in the distinction between leiomyomas with unusual features (mostly leiomyomas with bizarre nuclei) and leiomyosarcoma, as overlap in their expression is common.
Before classifying a smooth muscle tumor as epithelioid, exclude a pseudoepithelioid appearance given by any of the following: cross section of smooth muscle fascicles, hydropic change often associated with hyalinization, viable areas of smooth muscle neoplasia close to infarct-type necrosis, rhabdoid change, or leiomyomas from pregnant women.
Criteria for malignancy are hard to define with certainty particularly in epithelioid/myxoid smooth muscle tumors as experience with these tumors is not as extensive as with spindle cell leiomyosarcomas. Thus, sampling as well as exclusion of other entities in the differential diagnosis, is key.