Main

Positive immunostaining for the complement split product C4d within peritubular capillaries is critical for the diagnosis of antibody-mediated rejection in renal allograft biopsies. Diffuse C4d positivity, defined as >50% peritubular capillary involvement, is highly correlated to the presence of circulating donor-specific antibodies and is required by the Banff 07 Classification of Renal Allograft Pathology for the diagnosis of acute and chronic antibody-mediated rejection.1 However, the clinical significance of focal (<50%) peritubular capillary C4d positivity remains unclear. Some studies suggest that even focal C4d staining may have significant clinical ramifications, while other studies fail to show such outcomes.2, 3, 4, 5 Nevertheless, the data are limited and further evaluation with regard to long-term graft survival is needed.

In order to make any headway into tackling this issue, a reliable method for assessing the extent of C4d-positive peritubular capillaries is essential. Currently, indirect immunofluorescence staining with anti-C4d antibody on frozen sections of fresh/unfixed tissues is the most widely used method and offers slightly higher sensitivity than immunohistochemical stains.6, 7, 8 Although the fraction of C4d-positive peritubular capillaries can be visually estimated using this method, it is not uncommon to come across situations where single-channel C4d immunofluorescence is extremely difficult to interpret. This obstacle is especially evident in biopsies with significant interstitial fibrosis and tubular atrophy where the density of peritubular capillaries is uncertain. Furthermore, positive C4d signal in other structures, such as tubular basement membranes, may mimic peritubular capillaries. Therefore, an accurate and reproducible method for assessing the percentage of peritubular capillary C4d positivity is greatly needed.

In this study, we improve on single-channel C4d immunofluorescence by using C4d in combination with the vascular endothelial marker CD34 to implement a C4d/CD34 double-immunofluorescence staining protocol for frozen tissue. This method of dual-channel immunofluorescence evaluation not only allows for rapid and sensitive detection of C4d positivity in renal allograft biopsies, but it also provides improved accuracy when assessing the extent of C4d-positive peritubular capillaries.

Materials and methods

Seventeen renal allograft biopsies with positive peritubular capillary C4d staining, as determined by single-channel C4d immunofluorescence on frozen sections, were used for the study. The biopsies were chosen to represent a range of positive C4d intensities and extent of peritubular capillary staining as reported previously in the diagnostic pathology report. Four renal allograft biopsies negative for C4d immunofluorescence were used as negative controls.

Four-micrometer-thick frozen sections of the biopsies were fixed in acetone for 5 min at −20 °C and incubated with a mixture of polyclonal rabbit anti-C4d (ALPCO, Salem, NH, USA) and mouse monoclonal anti-CD34 (DAKO, Carpinteria, CA, USA) antibodies for 60 min at a dilution of 1:50 and 1:100, respectively. Subsequently, the slides were incubated with a mixture of fluorescein isothiocyanate (FITC)-labeled goat anti-rabbit (Vector, Burlingame, CA, USA) and Texas Red-labeled horse anti-mouse (Vector) antibodies for 30 min. Both secondary antibodies were used at a dilution of 1:100. All incubations were performed in a humidified chamber in the dark at room temperature.

C4d/CD34 double-immunofluorescence frozen section slides were visually examined under immunofluorescence microscopy using an Olympus BX41 fluorescence microscope (Olympus, Center Valley, PA, USA), and digital images were captured using an attached Olympus DP71 digital camera with the × 20 objective. Multiple non-overlapping fields were captured in order to provide full coverage of the entire biopsy tissue. For each field, two images were captured, one using a green filter for FITC fluorescence and one using a red filter for Texas Red fluorescence. The digital images were saved as 24-bit RGB TIFF files with a final resolution of 2040 × 1536 pixels. These files were imported into the freely available image processing computer program ImageJ, converted to 8-bit grayscale images, and background subtraction was performed using a ‘rolling ball radius’ of 50 pixels and with the ‘sliding parabaloid’ function set to on (National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD, USA, http://imagej.nih.gov/ij/). Next, glomeruli and large vessels were manually masked. Subsequently, a pixel intensity threshold was automatically set using the built-in ‘moments’ thresholding method. Finally, each processed image for the C4d/FITC green channel along with its corresponding CD34/Texas Red channel was imported into the ImageJ plugin Just Another Colocalization Plugin (JACoP) to calculate Manders coefficient M2.9

Results

Visual examination of C4d/CD34 double-immunofluorescence sections revealed excellent signal with low background in both channels. These sections exhibited comparable C4d intensities as sections stained for C4d alone (Table 1). The CD34 immunostain highlighted peritubular capillaries and allowed determination of overall peritubular capillary density. This channel also provided a basis of comparison for estimating the percentage of C4d-positive peritubular capillaries.

Table 1 Comparison of various methodologies for the assessment of C4d positivity in peritubular capillaries

A common diagnostic dilemma encountered in routine single channel C4d immunofluorescence is differentiating between positive signals in tubular basement membranes versus dilated peritubular capillaries. C4d/CD34 double immunofluorescence helps resolve this problem. Positive C4d staining in tubular basement membranes does not co-localize with CD34-positive peritubular capillaries, while co-localization of the C4d and CD34 signals indicates peritubular capillary C4d positivity (Figure 1a).

Figure 1
figure 1

C4d and CD34 immunofluorescence co-localization. (a) Dilated peritubular capillaries with C4d positivity may mimic staining of tubular basement membranes of atrophic tubules (top row, left image). Using CD34 as a basis of comparison (top row, center image), co-localization of C4d and CD34 confirms C4d in peritubular capillaries (top row, right image). Tubular basement membrane C4d positivity is confirmed by the lack of CD34 co-localization (bottom row). (b) Examples of C4d (green), CD34 (red) and co-localized (overlay) staining showing extent of C4d-positive peritubular capillaries. Approximate percentages of C4d-positive peritubular capillaries by visual inspection are shown to the left.

Consistent with single-channel C4d immunofluorescence results, several of the biopsies exhibited focal C4d positivity on C4d/CD34 double immunofluorescence (Figure 1b). The percentage of C4d-positive peritubular capillary was visually estimated for each case using C4d/CD34 double immunofluorescence and compared with the results from single-channel C4d immunofluorescence. In most cases, estimated peritubular capillary C4d extent was comparable for the two methods; however, a few cases showed dramatic differences (Table 1). The disagreement arose from inaccurate assessment of overall peritubular capillary density with single-channel C4d immunofluorescence. With the aid of the CD34 channel, accuracy for the extent of peritubular capillary C4d staining by visual estimation was improved. Of note, the extent of peritubular capillary C4d staining demonstrated no correlation with the degree of chronicity (interstitial fibrosis and tubular atrophy) or concurrent pathology seen in the corresponding paraffin-embedded tissue for each case (Table 1).

As C4d/CD34 double immunofluorescence exhibits strong signal with low background, computer-assisted morphometric analysis to calculate the extent of C4d positivity in peritubular capillaries is also applicable. Using the freely available image analysis program ImageJ, the green and red channel immunofluorescence images corresponding to the C4d and CD34 immunostains, respectively, were processed, overlaid, and the Manders coefficients (M2) were calculated (Figure 2 and Table 1). M2 represents the fraction of CD34-positive pixels that overlap/co-localize with C4d-positive pixels and ranges from 0 to 1. A high M2 value indicates substantial co-localization of the two channels, whereas lower M2 values represent a lesser degree of co-localization. M2 values determined from morphometric evaluation correlated well with visual evaluation of C4d/CD34 double-immunofluorescence-stained sections (Figure 3).

Figure 2
figure 2

Image processing for computer-assisted morphometric evaluation of immunofluorescence signal. The original image of the green channel representing C4d immunofluorescence (a) is converted to a grayscale image, and the built-in ImageJ function for background subtraction is applied (b). Subsequently, the threshold for determining positive signal is applied and the glomeruli are masked (c, yellow circle) to produce the final processed image (c) for co-localization evaluation using the JACoP plugin for ImageJ.

Figure 3
figure 3

Computer-assisted morphometric quantitation versus visual estimation of the extent of peritubular capillary C4d positivity using C4d/CD34 double immunofluorescence. X-axis displays values for visual estimation. Y-axis indicates M2 values as determined by morphometric quantitation and represents the fraction of CD34-positive pixels with co-localization of C4d-positive pixels. Linear regression was performed and the R2 is indicated.

Discussion

Standard single-channel C4d immunofluorescence on frozen sections has inherent disadvantages that limit accurate assessment of positive signal in peritubular capillaries. Apparent ‘focal’ staining using this standard method likely constitutes one of two situations: (1) true focal staining in which only a portion of the peritubular capillaries show C4d positivity or (2) diffuse peritubular capillary C4d positivity with focal loss of peritubular capillaries in the renal cortex. Distinguishing between these two possibilities is especially difficult when the distribution of peritubular capillary density is uncertain, as is often the case in biopsies with tubulointerstitial chronicity. In addition, positive signal in dilated peritubular capillaries and tubular basement membranes often mimic one another, further complicating the interpretation of single-channel C4d immunofluorescence results. The implementation of concurrent CD34 immunostain offers a simple solution to these problems by highlighting the peritubular capillaries within the renal parenchyma and establishing a basis of comparison for C4d-positive structures.

A simple computer-assisted morphometric quantitation protocol can be applied to the images captured from the C4d and CD34 immunofluorescence channels to calculate the fraction of C4d and CD34 co-localization. Our results indicate that M2 calculated by the JACoP plugin for ImageJ is comparable to visual estimation; however, M2 is generally slightly lower than the expected fraction of C4d/CD34 co-localization based on visual assessment. The reason for this difference is that this program uses a pixel-to-pixel comparison between the two channels when determining the degree of co-localization. Minor signal bleed into adjacent pixels on brighter stains can contribute to slight pixel non-overlap between channels, resulting in lower M2. However, M2 shows excellent correlation to visual estimation and may provide a more consistent and reproducible quantitative method for assessing the fraction of positive C4d peritubular capillaries.

In summary, C4d/CD34 double immunofluorescence is a useful yet low-cost and convenient method for C4d detection in renal allograft biopsies. It requires minimal optimization and no additional staining time. The CD34 antibody is simply mixed with the C4d antibody, as are the secondary fluorophore-labeled antibodies for each channel. Thus, laboratories currently using single-channel C4d immunofluorescence can easily implement this technique.