Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

  • Opinion
  • Published:

Sentience and sensation

Lab Animal volume 37, pages 465–467 (2008)Cite this article

Abstract

When animals are used in a biomedical research activity that may result in more than mild or momentary pain or distress, humanity, federal regulations and common sense direct us to use the least sentient species that can fulfill the aims of the research. The use of a less-sentient species is in line with the concept of Replacement, one of the well-known 3Rs of laboratory animal use1. But what is a less-sentient species? Is a chimpanzee less sentient than a human; is a dog less sentient than a chimpanzee; and is a mouse less sentient than a dog? Does 'less sentient' imply that a species is less able to experience pain, is less intelligent or has less self-awareness? This essay will explore some of the relationships between sentience, pain and vertebrate phylogeny.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution

Access options

Buy this article

  • Purchase on Springer Link
  • Instant access to full article PDF
Buy now

Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout

References

  1. Russell, W.M.S. & Burch, R.L. The Principles of Humane Experimental Technique (Methuen, London, 1959)

    Google Scholar 

  2. Webster, J. Animal sentience and animal welfare: What is it to them and what is it to us? Appl. Anim. Behav. Sci. 100, 1–3 (2006).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. DeGrazia, D. The ethics of animal research: What are the prospects for agreement? Cambridge Quarterly of Healthcare Ethics 8, 23–34 (1999).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Duncan, I. The changing concept of animal sentience. Appl. Anim. Behav. Sci. 100, 11–19 (2006).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Broom, D.M. The evolution of morality. Appl. Anim. Behav. Sci. 100, 20–28 (2006).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Broom, D.M. Cognitive ability and sentience: which aquatic animals should be protected? Dis. Aquat. Organ. 75, 99–108 (2007).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Sneddon, L.U. Evolution of nociception in vertebrates: comparative analysis of lower vertebrates. Brain Res. Reviews 46, 123–130 (2004).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Stankowich, T. & Blumstein, D.T. Fear in animals: a meta-analysis and review of risk assessment. Proc. Royal Soc. B 272, 2627–2634 (2005).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Yue, S., Duncan, I.J. & Moccia, R.D. Investigating fear in rainbow trout (Oncorhynchus mykiss) using conditioned-suppression paradigm. J. Appl. Anim. Welf. Sci. 11, 14–27 (2008).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Singer, P. Animal Liberation. A new ethics for our treatment of animals. (Avon Books, New York, 1975).

  11. Hull, D.L. The Rights of Animals. Science 192, 679–680 (1976).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Nemzek, J.A., Hugunin, K.M.S. & Opp, M.R. Modeling sepsis in the laboratory: Merging sound science with animal well-being. Comp. Med. 58, 120–128 (2008).

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  13. Gipson, C., Holt, M.A. & Brown, P. A word from USDA, FDA and OLAW. Lab Anim. (NY) 37, 295 (2008).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Borolotti, L. & Harris, J. Stem cell research, personhood and sentience. Reprod. Biomed. Online. 1 (Mar. Suppl.), 68–75 (2005).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Stevens, C.W., Pezalla, P.D. & Yaksh, T.L. Spinal antinociceptive action of three representative opioid peptides in frogs. Brain Res. 402, 201–203 (1987).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Machin, K.L. Fish, amphibian, and reptile analgesia. Vet. Clin. North Am. Exot. Anim. Pract. 4, 19–33 (2001).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Singer, P. Animal Liberation 2nd edn. (New York Review, New York, 1990).

  18. Mogil, J.S., Smith S.B., O'Reilly, M.K. & Plourde, G. Influence of nociception and stress-induced antinociception on genetic variation in isoflurane anesthetic potency among mouse strains. Anesthesiology 103, 751–758 (2005).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Avsaroglu, H., van der Sar, A.S., van Lith, H.A., van Zutphen, L.F. & Hellebrekers, L.J. Differences in response to anaesthetics and analgesics between inbred rat strains. Lab. Anim. 41, 337–344 (2007).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Kazdoba, T.M., Del Vecchio, R.A. & Hyde, L.A. Automated evaluation of sensitivity to foot shock in mice: inbred strain differences and pharmacological validation. Behav. Pharmacol. 18, 89–102 (2007).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Wright-Williams, S.L., Courade, J.P., Richardson, C.A., Roughan, J.V., & Flecknell, P.A. Effects of vasectomy surgery and meloxicam treatment on faecal corticosterone levels and behaviour in two strains of laboratory mouse. Pain 130, 108–118 (2007).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. Rigaud, M. et al. Species and strain differences in rodent sciatic nerve anatomy: implications for studies of neuropathic pain. Pain 136, 188–201 (2008).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Larson, A.A., Brown, D.R., el-Atrash, S. & Walser, M.M. Pain threshold changes in adjuvant-induced inflammation: a possible model of chronic pain in the mouse. Pharmacol. Biochem. Behav. 24, 49–53 (1986).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  24. Jenkins, J.R. Surgical sterilization in small mammals. Spay and castration. Vet. Clin. North Am. Exot. Anim. Pract. 3, 617–627 (2000).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  25. LaPrairie, J.L. & Murphy, A.Z. Female rats are more vulnerable to the long-term consequences of neonatal inflammatory injury. Pain 132 (Suppl. 1), S124–S133 (2007).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. McRoberts, J.A., Li, J., Ennes, H.S. & Mayer, E.A. Sex-dependent differences in the activity and modulation of N-methyl-d-aspartic acid receptors in rat dorsal root ganglia neurons. Neuroscience 148, 1015–1020 (2007).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  27. Thomson, L. & Terman, F.W. in Translational Pain Research vol.1 (ed. Mao, J.) ch. 2 (Nova Science Publishers, New York, 2006).

    Google Scholar 

  28. Erickson, H.H. & Kitchell, R.L. Pain perception and alleviation in animals. Fed. Proc. 43, 1307–1312 (1984).

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Loeffler, K. Pain and suffering in animals. Berl. Munch. Tierarztl Wochenschr. 103, 257–261 (1990). [in German].

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Hellebrekers, L. in Animal Pain. A practice-oriented approach to an effective pain control in animals (ed. Hellenbrekers, L.) ch. 1 (Van Der Wees, Utrecht, Netherlands, 2000).

    Google Scholar 

  31. Murphy, W.J. et al. Molecular phylogenetics and the origins of placental mammals. Nature 409, 614–618 (2001).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  32. National Institutes of Health. Public Health Service Policy on Humane Care and Use of Laboratory Animals. U.S. Government Principles for the Utilization and Care of Vertebrate Animals Used in Testing, Research, and Training. (National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, 2002).

  33. Animal Welfare Act Regulations. 9 CFR, Chapter 1, Subchapter A, Part 1. Definition of Terms.

Download references

Acknowledgements

I thank Drs. Lisa Barber, Larry Carbone, Denice Godfrey, Alicia Karas, Charles Lidz and Constance Perry for their valuable critiques of this essay.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Animal Medicine and Department of Pathology, University of Massachusetts Medical School, Worcester, 01655, MA

    Jerald Silverman

Authors
  1. Jerald Silverman
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Jerald Silverman.

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

The author declares no competing financial interests.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Silverman, J. Sentience and sensation. Lab Anim 37, 465–467 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1038/laban1008-465

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/laban1008-465

This article is cited by

Search

Advanced search

Quick links

Nature Briefing

Sign up for the Nature Briefing newsletter — what matters in science, free to your inbox daily.

Get the most important science stories of the day, free in your inbox. Sign up for Nature Briefing