Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

  • Research Note
  • Published:

The impact of scheduled cage cleaning on older hens (Gallus gallus)

Abstract

Researchers are increasingly using the domestic hen (Gallus gallus) as an animal model for ovarian cancer. The authors analyzed mortality rates of two large flocks of older hens that were being used for ovarian adenocarcinoma studies. All hens were fed the same maintenance diets, though some hens in each flock received experimental chemopreventive treatments. Per the request of a collaborating institution, partway through the study, the authors started to remove the hens in one of the flocks for cage changing once every 4 weeks. After the authors began cleaning some of the hens' cages, the mortality rate in this flock increased significantly. Throughout the study, within each flock, hens in the treatment and control groups had similar mortality rates. These results suggest that regularly cleaning the cages of older hens may not promote better welfare or improve flock mortality.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution

Access options

Buy this article

Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout

Figure 1: Weekly mortality rates for leghorn hens age 108–200 weeks in (a) flock 1 (cared for in accordance with the FASS Guide6) and (b) flock 2 (cared for in accordance with the FASS Guide6 at first but in accordance with the ILAR Guide5 after the hens were about 160 weeks old).

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Johnson, K.A. The standard of perfection: thoughts about the laying hen model of ovarian cancer. Cancer Prev. Res. (Phila. Pa) 2, 97–99 (2009).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Hakim, A.A. et al. Ovarian adenocarcinomas in the laying hen and women share similar alterations in p53, ras, and HER-2/neu. Cancer Prev. Res. (Phila. Pa) 2, 114–121 (2009).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Vanderhyden, B.C., Shaw, T.J. & Ethier, J.F. Animal Models of ovarian cancer. Reprod. Biol. Endocrinol. 1, 67 (2003).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Wilson, J.E. Adeno-carcinomata in hens kept in a constant environment (abstract). Poult. Sci. 37, 1253 (1958).

    Google Scholar 

  5. Fredrickson, T.N. Ovarian tumors of the hen. Environ. Health Perspect. 73, 35–51 (1987).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Casagrande, J.T. et al. “Incessant ovulation” and ovarian cancer. Lancet 314, 170–173 (1979).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Rodriguez, G.C. et al. in Ovarian Cancer (eds. Jacobs, I.J. et al.) 161–170 (Oxford University Press, 2002).

    Google Scholar 

  8. Institute for Laboratory Animal Research. Guide for the Care and Use of Laboratory Animals (National Academies Press, Washington, DC, 1996).

  9. Federation of Animal Science Societies. Guide for the Care and Use of Agricultural Animals in Agricultural Research and Teaching 2nd edn. (Federation of Animal Science Societies, Savoy, IL, 1999).

  10. Anderson, K.E. Final Report of the Thirty Second North Carolina Layer performance and Management Test: Production Report 32, July 1998. (North Carolina State University, Cooperative Extension Service, Raleigh, NC, 1998). Available: http://www.ces.ncsu.edu/depts/poulsci/tech_manuals/layer_reports/32_final_report.pdf.

    Google Scholar 

  11. Anderson, K.E. Final Report of the Thirty Fifth North Carolina Layer Performance and Management Test 35, May 2005. (North Carolina State University, Cooperative Extension Service, Raleigh, NC, 2005). Available: http://www.ces.ncsu.edu/depts/poulsci/tech_manuals/layer_reports/35_final_report.pdf.

    Google Scholar 

  12. Anderson, K.E. & Havenstein, G.B. Effects of alternative molting programs and population on layer performance: results of the Thirty-fifth North Carolina Layer Performance and Management Test. J. Appl. Poult. Res. 16, 365–380 (2007).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Kenneth E. Anderson.

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing financial interests.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Anderson, K., Mozdziak, P. & Petitte, J. The impact of scheduled cage cleaning on older hens (Gallus gallus). Lab Anim 39, 210–215 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1038/laban0710-210

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/laban0710-210

Search

Quick links

Nature Briefing

Sign up for the Nature Briefing newsletter — what matters in science, free to your inbox daily.

Get the most important science stories of the day, free in your inbox. Sign up for Nature Briefing