Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

  • Clinical Feature
  • Published:

A rat-friendly modification of the non-invasive tail-cuff to record blood pressure

Lab Animal volume 46, pages 251–253 (2017)Cite this article

Recording accurate blood pressure data is critical for research into a variety of topics, including hypertension. In animal models, blood pressure measurement methods can be either invasive (direct) or non-invasive (indirect). Correlation between these two methods was presented in former papers1,2. Invasive methods generally require the use of anesthesia. However, evidence indicates that anesthesia can disturb the physiology of the laboratory animal3,4,5; this can be problematic when interpreting results and can lead to potentially false conclusions6. The non-invasive alternative involves applying a tail-cuff for blood pressure measurement. This method is commonly used in basic and preclinical research with rats. Different laboratories, however, apply the method in different ways. Many authors fail to give details of their protocols in the Material and Methods sections of their studies. This can lead to inconsistent findings and issues with reproducibility, especially if no detailed description of each step used is available.

Current standardized restraint methods involve confining the laboratory animal in plastic chambers7,8,9,10. Although they are acclimated and trained to be in the chamber before measurements are taken, the animals often struggle under such conditions nevertheless. This reduced comfort and raised fear can lead to panic and anxiety in the animals11. Defecation and urination often accompany struggling, along with light to moderate, but often very hard, cheeping. The panic reaction of the animal can also influence others that may be waiting in the testing room. These important practical facts and observations are, however, sparsely published12.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution

Access options

Buy this article

  • Purchase on Springer Link
  • Instant access to full article PDF
Buy now

Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout

Figure 1: Blood pressure of Wistar rats following the classical restraint using a plastic container and the new covered technique.
Figure 2: Blood pressure measurement results of all three groups prior to the diet and in the fifth and eighth week of the diet.
Figure 3: Heart rate measurements recorded parallel with blood pressure measurements following the new technique, prior to the diet and then in the fifth and eighth week of the diet.

References

  1. Ikeda, K., Nara, Y. & Yamori, Y. Lab. Anim. 25, 26–29 (1991).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Widdop, R. & Li, X.C. Clin. Sci. 93, 191–194 (1997).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Black, R.W., Fowler, R.L. & Kimbrell, G. J. Comp. Physiol. Psychol. 57, 422–425 (1964).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Crawford, M.W., Lerman, J., Saldivia, V. & Carmichael, F.J. Anesth. Analg. 75, 1000–1006 (1992).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. De Rossi, L.W. et al. Anesth. Analg. 98, 1007–1012 (2004).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Inoue, K. et al. Inflamm. Res. 65, 563–571 (2016).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Lee, R.P., Wang, D., Lin, N.T., Chou, Y.W. & Chen, H.I. J. Biomed. Sci. 9, 424–427 (2002).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Kubota, Y. et al. Biol. Pharm. Bull. 29, 1756–1758 (2006).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Puzserova, A., Slezak, P., Balis, P. & Bernatova, I. Stress 16, 331–339 (2013).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Ribeiro, S. et al. Life Sci. 151, 147–156 (2016).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Kumar, V., Bhat, Z.A. & Kumar, D. J. Pharmacol. Toxicol Methods 68, 175–183 (2013).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. O'Hara, B. Nature 471, 448–449 (2011).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Zicha, J. et al. Physiol. Res. 55 supplement 1, S49–S63 (2006).

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Štolba, P. et al. Life Sci. 51, 733–740 (1992).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Török, J. et al. Ann. NY Acad. Sci. 967, 469–475 (2002).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Wilde, D.W., Massey, K.D., Walker, G.K., Volmr, A. & Grekin, G.J. Hypertension 35, 832–837 (2000).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Kuneš, J., Dobešová, Z. & Zicha, J. Clin. Sci. 102, 269–277 (2002).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Farah, V.M.A., Joaquim, L.F., Bernatova, I. & Morris, M. Physiol. Behav. 83, 135–142 (2004).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Peck, J. et al. FASEB J. 23 (supplement 1), 1017.6 (2009).

    Google Scholar 

  20. Sorge, R.E. et al. Nat. Methods 11, 629–632 (2014).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The authors thank Mrs. Katarína Vandáková for her excellent technical assistance during the experiments.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Institute of Experimental Pharmacology and Toxicology, Slovak Academy of Sciences, Dúbravská cesta 9, Bratislava, 841 04, Slovakia

    Boris Lipták, Barbara Kaprinay & Zdenka Gáspárová

  2. Department of Pharmacology, Jessenius Faculty of Medicine, Comenius University in Bratislava, BioMed, Malá Hora 4C, 036 01, Martin, Slovakia

    Boris Lipták & Barbara Kaprinay

Authors
  1. Boris Lipták
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Barbara Kaprinay
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Zdenka Gáspárová
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Boris Lipták.

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing financial interests.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Lipták, B., Kaprinay, B. & Gáspárová, Z. A rat-friendly modification of the non-invasive tail-cuff to record blood pressure. Lab Anim 46, 251–253 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1038/laban.1272

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/laban.1272

Search

Advanced search

Quick links

Nature Briefing

Sign up for the Nature Briefing newsletter — what matters in science, free to your inbox daily.

Get the most important science stories of the day, free in your inbox. Sign up for Nature Briefing