Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

  • Review
  • Published:

Developing a systems approach to prevent meconium aspiration syndrome: lessons learned from multinational studies

Abstract

Passage of fetal bowel movement (meconium) is common (in about one out of six births), and in some the staining of the amniotic fluid is a sign of fetal distress. Inhalation of meconium (aspiration syndrome, in upto one out of five to eight such births) just before or at birth may be preventable by a coordinated approach by well-trained and informed birth attendants. Respiratory failure secondary to meconium aspiration syndrome (MAS) remains a major cause of morbidity and mortality in the neonatal population. Infants with hypoxemic respiratory failure because of MAS, persistent pulmonary hypertension of the newborn and pneumonia/sepsis have an increased survival with extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO). Other treatment options earlier limited to inotropic support, continuous airway pressure (CPAP), conventional ventilatory management, respiratory alkalosis, paralysis and intravenous vasodilators have been replaced by synchronized intermittent mandatory ventilation (SIMV), high-frequency oscillatory ventilation (HFOV), surfactant and inhaled nitric oxide (iNO). HFOV has been advocated for use to improve lung inflation while potentially decreasing lung injury through volutrauma. Other reports describe the enhanced efficacy of HFOV when combined with iNO. Subsequent to studies reporting that surfactant deficiency or inactivation may contribute to neonatal respiratory failure, exogenous surfactant therapy has been implemented with apparent success. Recent studies have shown that iNO therapy in the neonate with hypoxemic respiratory failure can result in improved oxygenation and decreased need for ECMO. However, these innovative interventions are costly, require a sophisticated infrastructure and are not universally accessible. In this paper, a context of systems-approach for prenatal, natal and postnatal management of babies delivered through meconium stained amniotic fluid (MSAF) so that adverse outcomes are minimized and the least number of babies require innovative ventilatory support is described. Previously reported data from a single urban perinatal center (Philadelphia, PA, USA), over a 6-year period (1995–2000), demonstrated that 14.5% (3370/23175 of live births babies were delivered with MSAF. These data also showed that 4.6% of babies (155/3370) with MSAF sustained MAS. Overall, 26% of babies (40/155) with MAS needed ventilatory support (or 0.17% of all live births); of these, only 20% (8/40 or 0.035% of live births) needed innovative ventilatory support. None died or needed ECMO. These data describe the components for a systems approach to prevent and manage adverse outcomes related to MSAF at the regional level II or III perinatal center. Replication of a similar strategy may be more relevant to cost containment and be a safer approach for neonates at risk for MAS-related respiratory failure. This paper assess the evidence for pivotal steps needed to prevent MAS and ensuing neonatal death and disease in the context of diverse perinatal health services.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution

Access options

Buy this article

Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout

Figure 1
Figure 2
Figure 3
Figure 4

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Usta IM, Mercer BM, Sibai BM . Predictive risk factors for meconium aspiration syndrome. Obstet Gynecol 1996; 86: 230–234.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. International Liaison Committee on Resuscitation (ILCOR). Consensus on science with treatment recommendations for pediatric and neonatal patients: part 7—neonatal resuscitation. Pediatrics 2006; 117: e978–e988.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. National Neonatal-Perinatal Database (NNPD). Morbidity and mortality among outborn neonates at 10 tertiary care institutions in India during the year 2000. J Trop Pediatr 2004; 50: 170–174.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Dooley SL, Pesavento DJ, Depp R, Socol ML, Tamura RK, Wiringa KS . Meconium below the vocal cords at delivery: correlation with intrapartum events. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1985; 153: 767–770.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Davis RO, Philips III JB, Harris Jr BA, Wilson ER, Huddleston JF . Fatal meconium aspiration syndrome occurring despite airway management considered appropriate. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1985; 151: 731–736.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Wiswell TE, Henley MA . Intratracheal suctioning, systemic infection, and the meconium aspiration syndrome. Pediatrics 1992; 89: 203–206.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Chaturvedi P, Yadav B, Bharambe MS . Delivery room management of neonates born through meconium stained amniotic fluid. Indian Pediatr 2000; 37: 1251–1255.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Mahomed K, Nyoni R, Masona D . Meconium staining of the liquor in a low-risk population. Paediatr Perinat Epidemiol 1994; 8: 292–300.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Ziadeh SM, Sunna E . Obstetric and perinatal outcome of pregnancies with term labour and meconium-stained amniotic fluid. Arch Gynecol Obstet 2000; 264: 84–87.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Falciglia HS . Failure to prevent meconium aspiration syndrome. Obstet Gynecol 1988; 71: 349–353.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Yoder BA . Meconium-stained amniotic fluid and respiratory complications: impact of selective tracheal suction. Obstet Gynecol 1994; 83: 77–84.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Vidyasagar D, Harris V, Pildes RS . Assisted ventilation in infants with meconium aspiration syndrome. Pediatrics 1975; 56: 208–213.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Rossi EM, Philipson EH, Williams TG, Kalhan SC . Meconium aspiration syndrome: intrapartum and neonatal attributes. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1989; 161: 1106–1110.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Falciglia HS, Henderschott C, Potter P, Helmchen R . Does DeLee suction at the perineum prevent meconium aspiration syndrome? Am J Obstet Gynecol 1992; 167: 1243–1249.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Bhutani VK, Chima R, Sivieri EM . Innovative neonatal ventilation and meconium aspiration syndrome. Indian J Pediatr 2003; 70: 421–427.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Carson BS, Losey RW, Bowes Jr WA, Simmons MA . Combined obstetric and pediatric approach to prevent meconium aspiration syndrome. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1976; 126: 712–715.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Wiswell TE, Gannon CM, Jacob J, Goldsmith L, Szyld E, Weiss K et al. Delivery room management of the apparently vigorous meconium-stained neonate: results of the multicenter, international collaborative trial. Pediatrics 2000; 105: 1–7.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Vain NE, Szyld EG, Prudent LM, Wiswell TE, Aguilar AM, Vivas NI . Oropharyngeal and nasopharyngeal suctioning of meconium-stained neonates before delivery of their shoulders: multicentre, randomised controlled trial. Lancet 2004; 364: 597–602.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Lawn JE, Cousens S, Zupan J . 4 million neonatal deaths: when? Where? Why? Lancet 2005; 365: 891–900.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to V K Bhutani.

Additional information

Disclosure

The author has declared no financial interests.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Bhutani, V. Developing a systems approach to prevent meconium aspiration syndrome: lessons learned from multinational studies. J Perinatol 28 (Suppl 3), S30–S35 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1038/jp.2008.159

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/jp.2008.159

This article is cited by

Search

Quick links