Hypertension is prevalent in the adult population within Japan, especially among men over 50 years of age and women over 60 years of age.1 Forty-three million adults in Japan and ~1 billion adults worldwide have high blood pressure. Hypertension is considered to be strongly associated with cardiovascular diseases including stroke, myocardial infarction and heart failure. Treatment of hypertension can reduce the risk of these diseases, and targeting systolic pressure will be discussed herein. A recent clinical trial, SPRINT,2 demonstrated that targeting a systolic blood pressure of <120 mm Hg, compared with <140 mm Hg, resulted in fewer fatal and nonfatal major cardiovascular events and death from any cause among patients without diabetes who are at a high risk for cardiovascular events. Targeting a systolic blood pressure of <120 mm Hg greatly reduced the rate of heart failure and death from cardiovascular events.2 In the SPRINT trial, the results showed that diuretics such as thiazides are broadly recommended, and diuretics may reduce the occurrence of heart failure. Although the SPRINT trial includes important data on target systolic blood pressures for Americans that could apply to the Japanese population, physicians need to thoroughly consider the differences between the two populations before broadly applying these blood pressure criteria to Japanese patients. The beneficial effect of diuretics, such as thiazide, was also recognized in the ALLHAT trial.3 The diuretic effect of the SGLT2 inhibitor empagliflozin may reduce cardiovascular events, as shown in the EMPA-REG OUTCOME trial.4 The neprilysin inhibitor of LCZ696 may reduce the risk of death and hospitalization for heart failure through its diuretic effect as shown in the PARADIGM-HF trial.5 In addition, a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials from 1997 through 2009 published in the PubMed and EMBASE database (n=223 313) indicates that diuretics is the most effective class of drugs in preventing heart failure, followed by renin–angiotensin inhibitors.6 Overall, diuretics are currently being reassessed for the treatment of hypertensive patients.
Of note, Higaki et al.7 reported a clinical trial in Japan regarding diuretic additives entitled ‘The efficacy and long-term safety of a triple combination of 80 mg telmisartan, 5 mg amlodipine and 12.5 mg hydrochlorothiazide in Japanese patients with essential hypertension: a randomized, double-blind study with open-label extension’. The trial demonstrated that the combination of telmisartan, amlodipine and diuretics (hydrochlorothiazide; n=149) is more effective than the combination of telmisartan and amlodipine (n=160) at reducing blood pressure in hypertensive patients after 8 weeks of treatment (−5.6 mm Hg for systolic pressure and −4.0 mm Hg for diastolic pressure). The result of this study is consistent with a previous report.8 According to the Japanese Society of Hypertension Guidelines for the Management of Hypertension (JSH 2014),1 angiotensin II receptor blockers (ARBs), angiotensin-converting enzyme (ACE) inhibitors, calcium channel blockers and diuretics are all first-line drugs for treating hypertension. As shown in Figure 1,1 combination therapies of calcium channel blockers and ARBs/ACE inhibitors, diuretics and ARBs/ACE inhibitors, and calcium channel blockers and diuretics are recommended. We should decide on utilizing one of these combinations according to the differences in patient backgrounds and the results of previous clinical trials. For example, Saruta et al.9 demonstrated in the COLM trial that ARBs and calcium channel blockers are superior to ARBs and diuretics in terms of adverse events for elderly hypertensive patients aged 65–84 years. In any case, the administration of diuretics should be attempted first for patients whose blood pressure is not controlled with ARBs/ACE inhibitors and calcium channel blocker treatment; the strategy of this clinical trial is reasonable.
Higaki et al.7 reported that an elevated blood uric acid level and hyperuricemia are more frequent when the combination of telmisartan, amlodipine and hydrochlorothiazide is administered compared with that of telmisartan and amlodipine. These adverse events have also been observed in a previous study.8 However, these adverse events are common, and the side effects of diuretics are manageable. In this study, serum sodium and potassium were not significantly different between the two groups, but we should continue to monitor serum electrolytes, hydration status and renal function.
There are several limitations to the study by Higaki et al.7 For example, the patient follow-up period was relatively short, and the sample size of patients was small. With consideration of these limitations, the addition of diuretics (hydrochlorothiazide) to the anti-hypertensive regimen for uncontrolled Japanese hypertensive patients taking ARBs and calcium channel blockers is effective and well tolerated.
References
Shimamoto K, Ando K, Fujita T, Hasebe N, Higaki J . The Japanese Society of Hypertension Guidelines for the Management of Hypertension (JSH 2014). Hypertens Res 2014; 37: 253–253.
SPRINT Research Group SPRINT Research Group Wright JT SPRINT Research Group Williamson JD SPRINT Research Group Whelton PK SPRINT Research Group Snyder JK SPRINT Research Group Sink KM SPRINT Research Group Rocco MV SPRINT Research Group Reboussin DM SPRINT Research Group Rahman M SPRINT Research Group Oparil S SPRINT Research Group Lewis CE SPRINT Research Group Kimmel PL SPRINT Research Group Johnson KC SPRINT Research Group Goff DC SPRINT Research Group Fine LJ SPRINT Research Group Cutler JA SPRINT Research Group Cushman WC SPRINT Research Group Cheung AK SPRINT Research Group Ambrosius WT . A Randomized Trial of Intensive vs. Standard Blood-Pressure Control. N Engl J Med 2015; 373: 2103–2116.
ALLHAT Officers and Coordinators for the ALLHAT Collaborative Research Group The Antihypertensive and Lipid-Lowering Treatment to Prevent Heart Attack Trial. Major outcomes in high-risk hypertensive patients randomized to angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitor or calcium channel blocker vs. diuretic: The Antihypertensive and Lipid-Lowering Treatment to Prevent Heart Attack Trial (ALLHAT). JAMA 2002; 288: 2981–2997.
Zinman B, Wanner C, Lachin JM, Fitchett D, Bluhmki E, Hantel S, Mattheus M, Devins T, Johansen OE, Woerle HJ, Broedl UC, Inzucchi SE . Empagliflozin, cardiovascular outcomes, and mortality in type 2 diabetes. N Engl J Med 2015; 373: 2117–2128.
McMurray JJV, Packer M, Desai AS, Gong J, Lefkowitz MP, Rizkala AR, Rouleau JL, Shi VC, Solomon SD, Swedberg K, Zile MR . Angiotensin-neprilysin inhibition vs. enalapril in heart failure. N Engl J Med 2014; 371: 993–1004.
Sciarretta S, Palano F, Tocci G, Volpe M . Antihypertensive treatment and development of heart failure in hypertension: a Bayesian network meta-analysis of studies in patients with hypertension and high cardiovascular risk. Arch Intern Med 2001; 171: 384–394.
Higaki J, Komuro I, Shiki K, Ugai H, Taniguchi A, Ikeda H, Kuroki D, Nishimura S, Ogihara T . The efficacy and long-term safety of a triple combination of 80 mg telmisartan, 5 mg amlodipine and 12.5 mg hydrochlorothiazide in Japanese patients withessential hypertension: a randomized, double-blind study with open-label extension. Hypertens Res 2017; 40: 51–60.
Rakugi H, Tsuchihashi T, Shimada K, Numaguchi H, Nishida C, Yamaguchi H, Shirakawa M, Azuma K, Fujita KP . Add-on effect of hydrochlorothiazide 12.5 mg in Japanese subjects with essential hypertension uncontrolled with losartan 50 mg and amlodipine 5 mg. Hypertens Res 2015; 38: 329–335.
Saruta T, Ogihara T, Saito I, Rakugi H, Shimamoto K, Matsuoka H, Teramukai S, Higaki J, Ito S, Shimada K . Comparison of olmesartan combined with a calcium channel blocker or a diuretic in elderly hypertensive patients (COLM Study): safety and tolerability. Hypertens Res 2015; 38: 132–136.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding authors
Ethics declarations
Competing interests
The Department of Clinical Gene Therapy is sponsored by Rohto, Fancl, Saisei Mirai, Novartis, Boehringer Ingelheim, Shionogi and Anges MG as an endowed chair and funded research department. The commissioned research funds were supported by Rohto, Fancl, Saisei Mirai, Novartis, Boehringer Ingelheim, Shionogi and Anges MG. The grants and endowment were supported by Astellas, MSD, Daiichi-Sankyo, Tanabe-Mitsubishi, Nikko, Takeda, Novartis, Anges MG, POC Clinical Research and Bayer. The lecture honoraria for RM was disbursed by Takeda, Boehringer Ingelheim, Daiichi-Sankyo, Astellas, Tanabe-Mitsubishi, Shionogi, MSD, Novartis, AstraZeneca and Bayer. The remaining author declares no conflict of interests.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Taniyama, Y., Morishita, R. Are diuretic additives fit for uncontrolled hypertensive patients receiving telmisartan and amlodipine treatment?. Hypertens Res 40, 346–347 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1038/hr.2016.154
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/hr.2016.154