Abstract
Endogenous auxin is an important regulator of in vivo organ development, but its role in in vitro organogenesis is unclear. It has been observed that the basal end of epicotyl cuttings of juvenile citrus seedlings produces fewer shoots than the apical end. Here, we report that elevated endogenous auxin levels in the basal end of citrus epicotyl cuttings are inhibitory for in vitro shoot organogenesis. Using transgenic citrus plants expressing an auxin-inducible GUS reporter gene, we have observed elevated levels of auxin at the basal end of stem cuttings that are mediated by polar auxin transport. Depleting endogenous auxin or blocking polar auxin transport enhances shoot organogenesis. An auxin transport inhibitor, N-1-naphthylphthalamic acid (NPA), can also enhance shoot organogenesis independent of its action on polar auxin transport. Finally, we demonstrate that the promotional effects of depleting endogenous auxin or blocking polar auxin transport on shoot organogenesis are cytokinin-dependent. Our study thus provides meaningful insights into possible roles of endogenous auxin and polar auxin transport, as well as auxin–cytokinin interactions, in in vitro shoot organogenesis. Meanwhile, our results may also provide practical strategies for improving in vitro shoot organogenesis for citrus and many other plant species.
Similar content being viewed by others
Introduction
Auxin has a crucial role in the regulation of the spatial and temporal aspects of plant growth and development. Intercellular transport of auxin from shoot apexes to more basal plant tissues affects a wide array of growth and developmental processes, including cell elongation and cell division. Auxin contributes to plant organogenesis; for instance, auxin is important for determining cell division plane orientation prior to lateral root initiation.1 In addition, epidermis-localized auxin triggers leaf and flower initiation.2,3 In addition, auxin has been reported to be involved in the formation of meristems.4 Further, it has been proposed that shoot apical meristem development depends on auxin, not only through the regulation of auxin synthesis and transport but also through the creation of auxin gradients and, therefore, local auxin maxima.5 Thus, auxin is one of the most important classes of plant hormones for in vivo organ development. However, it is not well understood whether or how endogenous auxin influences shoot organogenesis under tissue culture conditions.
The presence of auxin in tissue culture medium leads to pericycle cell division, from which founder cells emerge.6–8 In an auxin-rich environment, these founder cells will undergo further cell division to form genetically distinct calli.9–11 At this stage, organogenesis will occur with shoots and/or roots developing from the calli.12 If calli are transferred to high-cytokinin and low-auxin medium, then shoot organogenesis will begin. However, on high-auxin but low-cytokinin medium, root organogenesis will occur with shoot organogenesis being inhibited.13 Although some auxin response factors, such as ARF3, may repress cytokinin biosynthesis,14 the auxin and cytokinin interactions involved in in vitro organogenesis are not well understood.15,16
Some citrus species are recalcitrant to shoot organogenesis, especially following genetic transformation. Donmez et al.17 remarked, ‘citrus transformation efficiency is generally low and protocols are dependent on species or even cultivars.’ Although reasonably high regeneration efficiencies have been achieved for some citrus cultivars using juvenile materials, many others, such as lemon (Citrus limon L.), continue to trouble researchers.18,19 We have recently demonstrated that overexpression of cytokinin-related genes such as kn1 or ipt can improve shoot organogenesis for a number of citrus cultivars, including lemon.20 However, it is not known whether endogenous auxin has a role in shoot organogenesis in citrus explants.
In this study, we explored the impact of endogenous auxin on shoot organogenesis in two citrus cultivars: ‘Carrizo’ citrange [Citrus sinensis (L.) Osbeck×Poncirus trifoliata (L.) Raf.] and ‘Eureka’ lemon [Citrus limon (L.) Burm. f.]. We found that the accumulation of endogenous auxin due to polar auxin transport inhibited shoot organogenesis at the basal end of epicotyl segment explants. We used N-1-naphthylphthalamic acid (NPA) to inhibit polar auxin transport or washed explants with liquid to remove endogenous auxin, and found that this was sufficient to promote shoot formation. Finally, we demonstrated that the promotional effect of reduced endogenous auxin on shoot organogenesis was cytokinin-dependent.
Materials and methods
Plant materials
‘Carrizo’ citrange [Citrus sinensis (L.) Osbeck×Poncirus trifoliata (L.) Raf.] seeds were bought from Tree Source Citrus Nursery (504 N Kaweah Ave., Exeter, CA 93221 USA), and ‘Eureka’ lemon [Citrus. limon (L.) Burm. f.] seeds were bought from Pearson Ranch California Oranges (1018W. Teapot Dome Ave., Porterville, CA 93257 Usa). Outer seed coats were removed manually, and seeds were treated with 75% alcohol for 1 min., followed by 1% sodium hypochlorite for 20 min., and then rinsed four times with sterile distilled water. Internal seed coats were removed under sterile conditions, and seeds were cultured in vitro on MS medium 21 with 30 g L−1sucrose and 7 g L−1 agar at pH 5.7. Seedlings were stored in the dark for 15 days before being transferred to light conditions (~60 μmol m-2 s-1 PPFD) with a 16-h photoperiod. Internodal stem segments from young branches of greenhouse-grown DR5::uidA ‘Carrizo’ citrange plants were used as explants for GUS staining experiments.
Shoot regeneration
The epicotyls of 30-day-old citrus seedlings were sectioned into 1-cm internodal segments using two different cutting styles: (1) A transecting (‘blunt’) cut at the apical end of the explant and a slant cut at the basal end, or (2) A transecting (‘blunt’) cut at both ends of the explant. The explants were then cultured on shoot regeneration medium (SRM), which was composed of MS medium, 30 g L−1 of sucrose, 7 g L-1 of agar, 0–3 mg L-1 benzylaminopurine (BAP) and 0–20 mg L-1 NPA, depending on treatment type. All SRM contained 3 mg L-1 BAP and 0 mg L-1 NPA unless stated otherwise. The explant tissues were cultured under light conditions (60 μmol m-2 s-1) at a 16-h photoperiod (26±2 °C) and were transferred onto fresh SRM every 3 weeks.
GUS histochemical assays
DR5::uidA internodal stem segments (~1 cm in length) from the greenhouse were used for histochemical GUS staining. Histochemical assays of GUS activity were carried out at 37 °C for 16 h in a solution consisting of 100 mM potassium phosphate buffer with pH 7, 10 mM Na2EDTA, 0.5 mM K3Fe(CN)6, 0.5 mM K4Fe(CN)6, 0.1% Triton X-100 and 1 g L-1 X-gluc (5-bromo-4-chloro-3-indolyl-β-D-glucuronic acid). The plant tissues were destained in ethanol to gradually remove chlorophyll and other pigments before photographs were taken.22
Auxin treatment and incubation
Auxin treatment: Blunt-cut DR5::uidA internodal stem explants were incubated in a 10 mM potassium phosphate buffer (pH 6) containing 50 μg mL-1 chloramphenicol with or without auxin (IAA). The tissues were incubated in the dark with gentle agitation on a rotary shaker at room temperature for 24 h before being analyzed for GUS activity.
Incubation to remove endogenous auxin: Blunt-cut DR5::uidA internodal stem explants were incubated in liquid MS medium in the dark to remove their endogenous auxin. The tissues were incubated in the dark with gentle agitation on a rotary shaker at room temperature for 24 h before being analyzed for GUS activity.
Statistical analyses
Statistical analysis was performed using h SPSS 21.0 software (IBM, New York, NY, USA). The statistical significance of the experiment was determined either by the two-tailed Student’s t-test with α=0.05 (comparison between two treatments) or by the single-factor ANOVA (comparison among three or more treatments).
Results
Polar auxin transport-mediated increases in endogenous auxin content inhibit in vitro shoot organogenesis of citrus epicotyl explants
Figures 1a and e show that shoot organogenesis was biased towards the apical end of the explants for both blunt and slant cuts of ‘Carrizo’ citrange. When slant cuts were used, shoot initiation occurred at the sub-apical region of the basal end (the apical end of the cut). To examine effects of endogenous auxin and polar auxin transport on shoot initiation, especially regarding the repression of shoot initiation at the basal end, we examined GUS expression in blunt-cut and slant-cut transgenic DR5::uidA stem segments. DR5 is a synthetic auxin-responsive promoter;23 therefore, GUS expression could be indicative of relative auxin levels and localizations in these explants. We detected higher GUS activity, and presumably elevated auxin levels, in the basal end of explants (Figures 1c and g). GUS gene activation, indicative of an elevated auxin level, provides an explanation of why shoot organogenesis was inhibited in the basal end of explants.
To obtain more evidence for the involvement of endogenous auxin and polar auxin transport on the inhibition of in vitro shoot organogenesis, we treated blunt-cut and slant-cut ‘Carrizo’ citrange explants with NPA, a polar auxin transport inhibitor. Figures 1b and f show that shoot initiation also occurred in the basal end of epicotyl segments if NPA was applied. NPA blocked auxin accumulation in the basal end of explants, as indicated by the equal distribution of GUS activity (expression of the DR5::uidA gene) along the entire explant (Figures 1d and h). These results provide evidence that the elevated auxin level observed in the basal end of the ‘Carrizo’ citrange epicotyl explants caused by polar auxin transport inhibits shoot organogenesis.
We treated ‘Carrizo’ citrange and ‘Eureka’ lemon (Citrus limon L.) epicotyl segments with NPA and examined shoot organogenesis of the explants. We observed that NPA treatment significantly enhanced shoot organogenesis for both ‘Carrizo’ citrange (increased from 3.93 to 7.48 shoots per explant) and ‘Eureka’ lemon (increased from 0.79 to 1.97 shoots per explant) (Figures 2a–d; Table 1). NPA treatment significantly enhanced shoot organogenesis at the basal end of these explants, with increases from 1.55 to 3.61 shoots per explant for ‘Carrizo’ citrange and from 0 to 0.80 shoots per explant for ‘Eureka’ lemon. NPA also enhanced shoot growth (likely due to the earlier initiation of buds) for both ‘Carrizo’ citrange and ‘Eureka’ lemon (Figures 2c and d). These results demonstrate that when polar auxin transport is inhibited by NPA, shoot organogenesis from epicotyl segments is enhanced, providing additional evidence that elevated endogenous auxin is inhibitory for in vitro shoot organogenesis.
Additional evidence supports endogenous auxin-mediated inhibition of shoot organogenesis
To further explore the role that auxin has in shoot organogenesis, we treated ‘Carrizo’ citrange epicotyl segments with 0.5 mg L-1 exogenous indole-3-acetic acid (IAA). These IAA-treated explants had reduced shoot organogenesis, as well as increased callus formation (Figure 3c), compared to untreated explants (Figure 3a). In addition, we incubated ‘Carrizo’ citrange epicotyl segments in hormone-free MS liquid medium with moderate agitation (explant wash) for 2 h to deplete endogenous auxin. The wash significantly enhanced shoot organogenesis from the basal end of explants from 1.35 to 2.95 shoots per explant (Figure 3e; Table 2). With the application of NPA, we also observed enhanced shoot organogenesis, with 2.81 shoots produced per explant. An increase to 3.67 shoots per explant was observed if the use of NPA was combined with the explant wash (Table 2). These results also demonstrate that NPA can enhance shoot organogenesis independent of its effect on polar auxin transport.
We used DR5::uidA stem segments to monitor changes in endogenous auxin levels after the explant wash. We observed significant amounts of GUS activity in non-washed explants but undetectable GUS activity in washed explants (Figure 3f), demonstrating the drastic reduction of endogenous auxin levels in the washed explants. Our results show that the explant wash is effective for removing endogenous auxin from explants. Table 2 shows that shoot organogenesis in the basal end of explants was negatively correlated with auxin content, with an increase in shoot organogenesis from 1.35 shoots (unwashed) to 2.95 shoots (washed) per explant. In contrast, treatment with exogenous IAA led to a significant reduction in the total number of shoots produced from both apical and basal ends of explants (reduced from 5.12 shoots to 2.71 shoots per explant) (Figure 3g). These results demonstrate that relatively high auxin concentrations suppress shoot organogenesis from the basal end of epicotyl segments and suppress total numbers of shoots from these explants.
Cytokinin is required for the NPA promotional effect on in vitro shoot organogenesis
To determine the impact of polar auxin transport on in vitro organogenesis with and without exogenously applied cytokinin, we treated ‘Carrizo’ citrange epicotyl segments with NPA and various concentrations of 6-benzylaminopurine (BAP) and tracked shoot organogenesis. Without exogenous cytokinin, 1.11 shoots were produced per explant if no NPA was used, and 1.14 shoots were produced per explant if NPA was used (Table 3), indicating that NPA has no effect if no cytokinin is used. If 3 mg L-1 BAP was used, we observed a total of 3.93 shoots produced per explant when no NPA was used. Under the same concentration of BAP, the application of NPA-enhanced shoot organogenesis to a total of 6.47 shoots produced per explant, demonstrating NPA can have a promotional effect if cytokinin is present. We also observed that NPA’s ability to alleviate auxin-mediated repression of shoot organogenesis at the basal end of epicotyl segments was dependent on the presence of cytokinin. At the same NPA concentration (20 mg L-1), the shoot organogenesis rate was 1.03 shoots per basal end of explants if 0.5 mg L-1 BAP was used and 2.61 shoots per basal end of explants if 3 mg L-1 BAP was used (Table 3).
Discussion
In this study, we have demonstrated that elevated levels of endogenous auxin in the basal end of epicotyl segments inhibit shoot organogenesis. We have also shown that the elevated auxin levels at the basal end of epicotyl explants are caused by polar auxin transport. We further show that reducing endogenous auxin content in explants by washing or blocking polar auxin transport with an auxin transport inhibitor (NPA) promotes shoot organogenesis. Our results indicate that NPA also enhances shoot organogenesis independent of its involvement in auxin transport. Finally, we have demonstrated that the promotional effect of NPA on shoot organogenesis is cytokinin-dependent. Our findings thus provide some insights into the involvement of auxin polar transport, auxin and auxin’s interaction with cytokinin in in vitro shoot organogenesis, as well as possible strategies for improving the efficiency of shoot organogenesis for citrus and other plant species.
We have shown that polar auxin transport is responsible for the smaller number of shoots regenerated from the basal end of explants. Auxin is generally synthesized in young leaves and shoot apical meristems, after which it is transported basipetally in the stem.24 The distribution of endogenous auxin, controlled mainly by the activity of polar auxin transporters, is known to be vital during organogenesis and various tropisms.25,26 During early embryogenesis, auxin has a major role in the determination of important cell lineages, such as the apical cell.27 During plant development, auxin is involved in leaf, flower and root development, as well as the maintenance of meristems, mostly through the creation of auxin gradients, which is facilitated by polar auxin transport.4,12,28–30 Our study has demonstrated that endogenous auxin in the basal end of explants is too high for shoot organogenesis and thus produces inhibitory effects. Further, we provide experimental evidence that the higher auxin level in the basal end of epicotyl or stem explants is caused by polar auxin transport.
The higher shoot regeneration rates observed in the apical end of epicotyl explants are also due to polar auxin transport. Polar auxin transport reduces auxin content in the apical end of epicotyl explants. Previously, it was shown that the application of exogenous auxin can have a negative effect on shoot regeneration in tissue culture.31,32 For example, cucumber explants exposed to auxin-rich media preferentially produced calli while experiencing a reduction in direct shoot regeneration.33 Like citrus, some other woody plant taxa are also recalcitrant to shoot organogenesis in tissue culture.34 In light of our recent findings, it is possible that this recalcitrance may be partially due to relatively high concentrations of endogenous auxin. Neutralizing the negative effects of endogenous auxin, either through its removal (washing the explants with liquid) or through the inhibition of polar auxin transport, may enhance shoot organogenesis in many plant species.
The effects of auxin and cytokinin on in vitro organogenesis are well known.15,16,21,35,36 When explants are placed on a medium that has a high auxin-to-cytokinin ratio, they will develop calli.10,11 If they are on a medium with a high cytokinin-to-auxin ratio, they will develop buds/shoots.37–39 Our results suggest that cytokinin is the primary factor for shoot organogenesis, and auxin inhibits the effect of cytokinin in shoot organogenesis. We have observed that NPA has a promotional effect on shoot organogenesis from citrus epicotyl explants only in the presence of exogenous cytokinin. Without added cytokinin, NPA has little effect on in vitro organogenesis.
We have demonstrated that either the use of auxin transport inhibitors or the physical depletion of endogenous auxin from explants may improve in vitro shoot organogenesis for some recalcitrant plant species. Our results are consistent with the findings of previous studies using NPA to increase shoot organogenesis in tobacco 40,41 or PCIB, an anti-auxin, to enhance shoot regeneration in guar (Cyamopsis tetragonoloba).42 In addition, we have observed that NPA enhances shoot organogenesis, even after endogenous auxin is washed off of the explants via incubation in hormone-free liquid medium, which suggests that NPA has additional activity independent of blocking auxin transport.
References
Marhavý P, Montesinos JC, Abuzeineh A et al. Targeted cell elimination reveals an auxin-guided biphasic mode of lateral root initiation. Genes Dev 2016; 30: 471–483.
Martinez CC, Koenig D, Chitwood DH, Sinha NR . A sister of PIN1 gene in tomato (Solanum lycopersicum) defines leaf and flower organ initiation patterns by maintaining epidermal auxin flux. Dev Biol 2016; 419: 85–98.
Lee B-H, Johnston R, Yang Y et al. Studies of aberrant phyllotaxy1 mutants of maize indicate complex interactions between auxin and cytokinin signaling in the shoot apical meristem. Plant Physiol 2009; 150: 205–216.
Blakesley D, Weston G, Hall J . The role of endogenous auxin in root initiation. Plant Growth Regul 1991; 10: 341–353.
Vernoux T, Besnard F, Traas J . Auxin at the shoot apical meristem. Cold Spring Harb Perspect Biol 2010; 2: a001487.
Atta R, Laurens L, Boucheron-Dubuisson E et al. Pluripotency of Arabidopsis xylem pericycle underlies shoot regeneration from root and hypocotyl explants grown in vitro. Plant J 2009; 57: 626–644.
Che P, Lall S, Howell SH . Developmental steps in acquiring competence for shoot development in Arabidopsis tissue culture. Planta 2007; 226: 1183–1194.
Delbarre A, Muller P, Imhoff V, Guern J . Comparison of mechanisms controlling uptake and accumulation of 2, 4-dichlorophenoxy acetic acid, naphthalene-1-acetic acid, and indole-3-acetic acid in suspension-cultured tobacco cells. Planta 1996; 198: 532–541.
Bayliss M, Dunn SD . Factors affecting callus formation from embryos of barley (Hordeum vulgare). Plant Sci Lett 1979; 14: 311–316.
Kandasamy MK, Gilliland LU, McKinney EC, Meagher RB . One plant actin isovariant, ACT7, is induced by auxin and required for normal callus formation. Plant Cell 2001; 13: 1541–1554.
Roy J, Banerjee N . Induction of callus and plant regeneration from shoot-tip explants of Dendrobium fimbriatum Lindl. var. oculatum Hk. f. Sci Hort 2003; 97: 333–340.
Benková E, Michniewicz M, Sauer M et al. Local, efflux-dependent auxin gradients as a common module for plant organ formation. Cell 2003; 115: 591–602.
Thimann KV, Bonner J . The mechanism of the action of the growth substance of plants. Proc R Soc Lond Ser B 1933; 113: 126–149.
Cheng ZJ, Wang L, Sun W et al. Pattern of auxin and cytokinin responses for shoot meristem induction results from the regulation of cytokinin biosynthesis by AUXIN RESPONSE FACTOR3. Plant Physiol 2013; 161: 240–251.
Pretto FR, Santarém ER . Callus formation and plant regeneration from Hypericum perforatum leaves. Plant Cell Tissue Organ Culture 2000; 62: 107–113.
Tao H, Shaolin P, Gaofeng D, Lanying Z, Gengguang L . Plant regeneration from leaf-derived callus in Citrus grandis (pummelo): effects of auxins in callus induction medium. Plant Cell Tissue Organ Culture 2002; 69: 141–146.
Donmez D, Simsek O, Izgu T, Yalcin Mendi Y . Genetic transformation in citrus. Sci World J 2013, 2013.
Dutt M, Orbovic V, Grosser JW . Cultivar dependent gene transfer into citrus using Agrobacterium. Proc Florida State Hort Soc 2009; 2009: 85–89.
Ghorbel R, La-Malfa S, López MM, Petit A, Navarro L, Peña L . Additional copies of virG from pTiBo542 provide a super-transformation ability to Agrobacterium tumefaciens in citrus. Physiol Mol Plant Pathol 2001; 58: 103–110.
Hu W, Li W, Xie S et al. Kn1 gene overexpression drastically improves genetic transformation efficiencies of citrus cultivars. Plant Cell Tissue Organ Culture 2016; 125: 81–91.
Murashige T, Skoog F . A revised medium for rapid growth and bio assays with tobacco tissue cultures. Physiol Plant 1962; 15: 473–497.
Li Y, Wu YH, Hagen G, Guilfoyle T . Expression of the auxin-inducible GH3 promoter/GUS fusion gene as a useful molecular marker for auxin physiology. Plant Cell Physiol 1999; 40: 675–682.
Ulmasov T, Murfett J, Hagen G, Guilfoyle TJ . Aux/IAA proteins repress expression of reporter genes containing natural and highly active synthetic auxin response elements. Plant Cell 1997; 9: 1963–1971.
Baluška F, Volkmann D, Menzel D . Plant synapses: actin-based domains for cell-to-cell communication. Trends Plant Sci 2005; 10: 106–111.
Tanaka H, Dhonukshe P, Brewer P, Friml J . Spatiotemporal asymmetric auxin distribution: a means to coordinate plant development. Cell Mol Life Sci 2006; 63: 2738–2754.
Whippo CW, Hangarter RP . Phototropism: bending towards enlightenment. Plant Cell 2006; 18: 1110–1119.
Friml J . Auxin transport—shaping the plant. Curr Opin Plant Biol 2003; 6: 7–12.
Dubrovsky JG, Sauer M, Napsucialy-Mendivil S et al. Auxin acts as a local morphogenetic trigger to specify lateral root founder cells. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 2008; 105: 8790–8794.
Blilou I, Xu J, Wildwater M et al. The PIN auxin efflux facilitator network controls growth and patterning in Arabidopsis roots. Nature 2005; 433: 39–44.
Li W, Fang C, Krishnan S et al. Elevated auxin and reduced cytokinin contents in rootstocks improve their performance and grafting success. Plant Biotechnol J 2017; 15: 1556–1565.
Ball ST, Zhou H, Konzak CF . Influence of 2, 4-D, IAA, and duration of callus induction in anther cultures of spring wheat. Plant Sci 1993; 90: 195–200.
Kochba J, Spiegel-Roy P . The effects of auxins, cytokinins and inhibitors on embryogenesis in habituated ovular callus of the «Shamouti» orange (Citrus sinensis). Zeitschrift für Pflanzenphysiologie 1977; 81: 283–288.
Shukla PS, Das AK, Jha B, Agarwal PK . High-frequency in vitro shoot regeneration in Cucumis sativus by inhibition of endogenous auxin. In Vitro Cell Dev Biol Plant 2014; 50: 729–737.
MacRae S, Van Staden J . Transgenic eucalyptus. Transgenic Trees 2000, 88–114.
Ji X-H, Wang Y-T, Zhang R et al. Effect of auxin, cytokinin and nitrogen on anthocyanin biosynthesis in callus cultures of red-fleshed apple (Malus sieversii f. niedzwetzkyana). Plant Cell Tissue Organ Culture 2015; 120: 325–337.
Liu Z, Li J, Wang L et al. Repression of callus initiation by the miRNA-directed interaction of auxin–cytokinin in Arabidopsis thaliana. Plant J 2016; 87: 391–402.
Curaba J, Singh MB, Bhalla PL . miRNAs in the crosstalk between phytohormone signalling pathways. J Exp Bot 2014; 65: 1425–1438.
Motte H, Vereecke D, Geelen D, Werbrouck S . The molecular path to in vitro shoot regeneration. Biotechnol Adv 2014; 32: 107–121.
Schaller GE, Bishopp A, Kieber JJ . The yin-yang of hormones: cytokinin and auxin interactions in plant development. Plant Cell 2015; 27: 44–63.
FENG KA, Linck A . Effects of N-1-naphthylphthalamic acid on the growth and bud formation of tobacco callus grown in vitro. Plant Cell Physiol 1970; 11: 589–598.
Strabala TJ, Wu YH, Li Y . Combined effects of auxin transport inhibitors and cytokinin: alterations of organ development in tobacco. Plant Cell Physiol 1996; 37: 1177–1182.
Jørsboe M, Okkels FT . Transformation of guar. U.S. Patent 6,307,127, 2001.
Acknowledgements
The work was performed in The Li Laboratory at the University of Connecticut. WH is a PhD intern from Hunan Agricultural University in China working in the Li Laboratory. ZD and SX are WH’s advisors in China. The work and WH are financially supported by the Citrus Research and Development Foundation (Projects Li-749 and 16-001 to YL). YL held a Shennong Visiting Professorship at Hunan Agricultural University from 2012 to 2015.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding authors
Ethics declarations
Competing interests
The authors declare no conflict of interest.
Rights and permissions
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons license, unless indicated otherwise in the credit line; if the material is not included under the Creative Commons license, users will need to obtain permission from the license holder to reproduce the material. To view a copy of this license, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
About this article
Cite this article
Hu, W., Fagundez, S., Katin-Grazzini, L. et al. Endogenous auxin and its manipulation influence in vitro shoot organogenesis of citrus epicotyl explants. Hortic Res 4, 17071 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1038/hortres.2017.71
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/hortres.2017.71
This article is cited by
-
In vitro propagation and DNA barcoding of the rare near endemic Plantago sinaica (Barnéoud) plant in Saint Katherine, Sinai
Plant Cell, Tissue and Organ Culture (PCTOC) (2024)
-
Optimized protocol for high-frequency papaya propagation: morpho-stereomicroscopic analysis and genetic fidelity assessment
Plant Cell, Tissue and Organ Culture (PCTOC) (2024)
-
A Useful Pathway for Gnetum Planting Material Production: Effect of Exogenous Application of Auxin on Root and Shoot Expression of Gnetum Cuttings
Agricultural Research (2024)
-
Molecular identification and in vitro propagation of the endangered medicinal Cleome droserifolia plant of Saint Katherine
SN Applied Sciences (2023)
-
An efficient method for economic micropropagation of three aquatic plant species (Lobelia cardinalis, Staurogyne repens, and Alternanthera reineckii)
Aquaculture International (2023)