Abstract
The confidence interval for the map location of quantitative trait loci (QTL) is a very important quantity for geneticists. The one LOD support interval has been proved to be a biased confidence interval. Moreover the distribution of the LOD score has been shown to depend on the value of the QTL effect, which is why the LOD score cannot be used to build an unbiased confidence interval when the value of the QTL effect is unknown. A new confidence interval based on a maximun likelihood ratio test and using statistics whose asymptotic distribution does not depend on the QTL effect, has been proposed and proved to lead to an asymptotically similar confidence interval. The major difficulty of this method is the computation of the correct threshold for the maximum likelihood ratio test. An approximation for the threshold is proposed in this paper. When the value of the QTL effect is known, an unbiased confidence region could be built using the LOD score. A simulation study is carried out to compare the average length of this region, which is unobtainable for an unknown value of the QTL effect, to the average length of the asymptotically similar confidence interval. It shows that the required property of similarity does not increase the confidence interval length significantly for QTL having a small effect, and leads to an increase of about 5cM length for a 1 Morgan chromosome when the value of the QTL is great. An empirical symmetrical confidence interval could be constructed with the empirical distribution function of the maximun likelihood estimation for the QTL position. The simulation study shows that, when a QTL is detected, the average length of the asymptotically similar confidence interval could be half the length of the empirical symmetrical one. This great difference can be explained by the fact that the asymptotically similar confidence interval is dependent of the interval mapping test of detection whereas the empirical symmetrical one is independent of the actual data.
Similar content being viewed by others
Article PDF
References
Char, B W, Geddes, K O, Gonnet, G H, Monagan, M B, and Watt, S M. 1988. MAPLE Reference Manual. Symbolic Computation Group, Waterloo, Ontario, Canada.
Cox, D R, and Hinkley, D V. 1974. Theoretical Statistics. Chapman and Hall, London.
Darvasi, A, Weinreb, A, Minke, V, Weller, J I, and Soller, M. 1993. Detecting marker QTL gene effect and map location using a saturated genetic map. Genetics, 134, 943–951.
Davies, R B. 1977. Hypothesis testing when a nuisance parameter is present only under the alternative. Biometrika, 64, 247–254.
Davies, R B. 1987. Hypothesis testing when a nuisance parameter is present only under the alternative. Biometrika, 74, 33–43.
Haley, C S, and Knott, S A. 1992. A simple regression method for mapping quantitative trait loci in line crosses using flanking markers. Heredity, 69, 315–324.
Jansen, R C. 1993. Interval mapping of multiple quantitative trait loci. Genetics, 135, 205–211.
Knapp, S J, Bridges, W C, and Birkes, D. 1990. Mapping quantitative trait loci using molecular linkage maps. Theor Appl Genet, 79, 583–592.
Lander, E S, and Botstein, D. 1989. Mapping Mendelian factors underlying quantitative traits using RFLP linkage maps. Genetics, 121, 185–199.
Mangin, B, Goffinet, B, and Rebaï, A. 1994. Constructing confidence intervals for QTL location. Genetics, 138, 1301–1308.
Rebaï, A, and Goffinet, B. 1993. Power of tests for QTL detection using replicated progenies derived from diallel cross. Theor Appl Genet, 86, 1014–1022.
Rebaï, A, Goffinet, B, and Mangin, B. 1994. Approximate thresholds of interval mapping tests for QTL detection. Genetics, 138, 235–240.
Rebai, A, Goffinet, B, and Mangin, B. 1995. Comparing power of different methods for QTL detection. Biometrics, 51, 87–99.
Van Ooijen, J W. 1992. Accuracy of mapping quantitative trait loci in autogamous species. Theor Appl Genet, 84, 803–811.
Zeng, Z B. 1993. Theoretical basis of separation of multiple linked gene effects on mapping quantitative trait loci. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA, 136, 1457–1468.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Mangin, B., Goffinet, B. Comparison of several confidence intervals for QTL location. Heredity 78, 345–353 (1997). https://doi.org/10.1038/hdy.1997.57
Received:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/hdy.1997.57
Keywords
This article is cited by
-
Quantitative trait loci for leaf chlorophyll fluorescence parameters, chlorophyll and carotenoid contents in relation to biomass and yield in bread wheat and their chromosome deletion bin assignments
Molecular Breeding (2013)
-
Fine mapping of complex traits in non-model species: using next generation sequencing and advanced intercross lines in Japanese quail
BMC Genomics (2012)
-
Identification of QTL controlling meat quality traits in an F2 cross between two chicken lines selected for either low or high growth rate
BMC Genomics (2007)
-
The genetics of nitrogen use in hexaploid wheat: N utilisation, development and yield
Theoretical and Applied Genetics (2007)
-
Analysis of the Relationships between Growth, Photosynthesis and Carbohydrate Metabolism Using Quantitative Trait Loci (QTLs) in Young Maize Plants Subjected to Water Deprivation
Molecular Breeding (2006)