Abstract
The sexual polymorphism tristyly is well documented in three flowering plant families (Lythraceae, Oxalidaceae and Pontederiaceae). Controversy has arisen as to whether the polymorphism exists in Narcissus triandrus L. of the Amaryllidaceae. Surveys of floral variation in 80 populations in Spain and Portugal were undertaken to determine the nature of sexual polymorphisms in the species. Most populations (85 per cent) contained three discrete floral morphs that differ from one another in the sequence in which the stigma and the two anther levels within a flower are presented. Hence, the species is genuinely tristylous. Floral morph frequencies deviated strongly from the isoplethic expectations (1:1:1) typical of tristylous species. Average frequencies for the morphs were L morph = 0.59, M morph = 0.19 and S morph = 0.22. In 15 per cent of the populations sampled, the mid-styled morph was absent. Controlled crosses indicated that individuals are moderately self-sterile but cross-compatible with other individuals, regardless of morph. Therefore, the species does not possess a conventional heteromorphic incompatibility system. Self-sterility operates in the ovary, and prior self-pollination of flowers renders ovules nonfunctional as judged by reduced seed-set in subsequent cross-pollinations. Multilocus outcrossing estimates in four tristylous populations averaged t = 0.77, range 0.68–0.87, with significant variation evident among morphs but not populations. All population estimates were less than 1, indicating significant amounts of selfing. Although N. triandrus is clearly tristylous, the expression of the polymorphism is unique among tristylous families.
Similar content being viewed by others
Article PDF
References
Barrett, S C H. 1988. The evolution, maintenance, and loss of self-incompatibility systems. In: Lovett Doust, J. and Lovett Doust, L. (eds) Plant Reproductive Ecology Patterns and Strategies, pp. 98–124. Oxford University Press, New York.
Barrett, S C H. 1993. The evolutionary biology of tristyly. Oxford Surveys in Evolutionary Biology, 9, 283–286.
Barrett, S C H, and Cruzan, M B. 1994. Incompatibility in heterostylous plants. In: Williams, E. G., Knox, R. B. and Clark, A. E. (eds) Genetic Control of Incompatibility and Reproductive Development in Flowering Plants, pp. 189–219. Kluwer Academic Publishers, Dordrecht, The Netherlands.
Barrett, S C H, Lloyd, D G, and Arroyo, J. 1996. Stylar polymorphisms and the evolution of heterostyly in Narcissus (Amaryllidaceae). In: Lloyd, D. G. and Barrett, S. C. H. (eds) Floral Biology: Studies on Floral Evolution in Animal-Pollinated Plants, pp. 339–376. Chapman & Hall, New York.
Bateman, A J. 1952. Trimorphism and self-incompatibility in Narcissus. Nature, 170, 496–497.
Bateman, A J. 1954. The genetics of Narcissus. I. Sterility. Daffodil and Tulip Year Book, 19, 23–29. Royal Horticultural Society, London.
Blanchard, J W. 1990. Narcissus: A Guide to Wild Daffodils. Alpine Garden Society, Woking, Surrey, U.K.
Charlesworth, D. 1979. The evolution and breakdown of tristyly. Evolution, 33, 486–498.
Dulberger, R. 1964. Flower dimorphism and self-incompatibility in Narcissus tazetta L. Evolution, 18, 361–363.
Dulberger, R. 1970. Floral dimorphism in Anchusa hybrida Ten. Isr J Bot, 19, 37–41.
Eckert, C G, and Barrett, S C H. 1994. Tristyly, self-compatibility and floral variation in Decodon verticillatus (Lythraceae). Biol J Linn Soc, 53, 1–30.
Fernandes, A. 1935. Remarque sur l'hétérostylie de Narcissus triandrus et de N. reflexus. Bol Soc Brot, Sér. 2, 10, 5–15.
Fernandes, A. 1965. Contribution à la connaissance de la génétique de l'hétérostylie chez le genre Narcissus L. II. L'hétérostylie chez quelques populations de N. triandrus var. cernuus et N. triandrus var concolor. Genét, lbérica, 17, 215–239.
Graham, S W, and Barrett, S C H. 1995. Phylogenese systematics of Pontederiales: Implications for breeding-system evolution. In: Rudall, P. J., Cribb, P. J., Cutler, D. F. and Humphries, C. J. (eds) Monocotyledons: Systematics and Evolution, pp. 415–441. Royal Botanic Gardens, Kew.
Henriques, J A. 1887. Observações sobre algumas especies de Narcissus, encontrados em Portugal. Bol Soc Brot, 5, 168–174.
Kohn, J R, and Barrett, S C H. 1992. Experimental studies on the functional significance of heterostyly. Evolution, 46, 43–55.
Krebs, S L, and Hancock, J F. 1990. Early acting inbreeding depression and reproductive success in the highbush blueberry Vaccinium corymbosum (Ericaceae). Theor Appl Gen, 79, 825–832.
Lemmens, R H M J. 1989. Heterostyly. In: Jongkind, C. C. H. and Lemmens, R. H. M. J. (eds) The Connaraceae, a Taxonomic Study with Emphasis on Africa, pp. 56–69. Agricultural University of Wageningen Papers, Wageningen, The Netherlands.
Lloyd, D G, and Webb, C J. 1992. The evolution of heterostyly. In: Barrett, S. C. H. (ed.) Evolution and Function of Heterostyly, pp. 151–178. Springer-Verlag, Berlin.
Lloyd, D G, Webb, C J, and Dulberger, R. 1990. Heterostyly in species of Narcissus (Amaryllidaceae) and Hugonia (Linaceae) and other disputed cases. Pl Syst Evol, 172, 215–227.
De Nettancourt, D. 1977. Incompatibility in Angiosperms. Springer-Verlag, Berlin.
Ritland, K. 1990. A series of FORTRAN computer programs for estimating plant mating systems. J Hered, 81, 235–237.
SAS Institute Inc. 1988. SAS/STAT® User's Guide, Release 6.03 edn. SAS Institute Inc., Cary, NC.
Schou, O, and Phillipp, M. 1984. An unusual heteromorphic incompatibility system. III. On the genetic control of distyly and self-incompatibility in Anchusa officinalis L. Theor Appl Genet, 68, 139–144.
Seavey, S R, and Bawa, K S. 1986. Late-acting self-incompatibility in angiosperms. Bot Rev, 52, 195–219.
Seavey, S R, and Carter, S K. 1994. Self-sterility in Epilobium obcordatum (Onagraceae). Am J Bot, 81, 331–338.
Sidák, Z. 1967. Rectangular confidence regions for the means of multivariate normal distributions. J Am Stat Ass, 62, 626–633.
Thompson, J D, Pailler, T, Strasberg, D, and Manicacci, D. 1996. Tristyly in the endangered Mascarene Island endemic Hugonia serrata (Linaceae). Am J Bot, 83, 1160–1168.
Waser, N M, and Price, M V. 1991. Reproductive costs of self-pollination in Ipomopsis aggregata (Polemoniaceae): are ovules usurped? Am J Bot, 78, 1036–1043.
Zavada, M S, and Lowrey, T K. 1995. Floral heteromorphism in Dais cotinifolia L. (Thymelaeaceae): a possible case of heterostyly. Bull Mus Natl Hist Paris Ser. 17 Section B, Adansonia nos. 1–2, 11–20.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Barrett, S., Cole, W., Arroyo, J. et al. Sexual polymorphisms in Narcissus triandrus (Amaryllidaceae): is this species tristylous?. Heredity 78, 135–145 (1997). https://doi.org/10.1038/hdy.1997.21
Received:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/hdy.1997.21
Keywords
This article is cited by
-
Convergent evolutionary patterns of heterostyly across angiosperms support the pollination-precision hypothesis
Nature Communications (2024)
-
What explains the variation in length of stamens and styles in a pollen flower? a study exemplified by Macairea radula (Melastomataceae)
Plant Systematics and Evolution (2022)
-
The avoidance of self-interference in the endemic daffodil Narcissus cyclamineus (Amaryllidaceae)
Plant Ecology (2012)
-
Mating patterns and demography in the tristylous daffodil Narcissus triandrus
Heredity (2006)
-
The evolution of plant sexual diversity
Nature Reviews Genetics (2002)