Abstract
Purpose:
To analyze tear protein variations in patients suffering from dry eye symptoms in the presence of tear film instability but without epithelial defects.
Methods:
Five microlitres of non-stimulated tears from 60 patients, suffering from evaporative dry eye (EDE) with a break-up time (BUT) <10 s, and from 30 healthy subjects as control (no symptoms, BUT >10 s) were collected. Tear proteins were separated by mono and bi-dimensional SDS-PAGE electrophoresis and characterized by immunoblotting and enzymatic digestion. Digested peptides were analyzed by liquid chromatography coupled to electrospray ionization quadrupole-time of flight mass spectrometry followed by comparative data analysis into Swiss-Prot human protein database using Mascot. Statistical analysis were performed by applying a t-test for independent data and a Mann–Whitney test for unpaired data (P<0.05).
Results:
In EDE patients vscontrols, a significant decrease in levels of lactoferrin (data in %±SD): 20.15±2.64 vs24.56±3.46 (P=0.001), lipocalin-1: 14.98±2.70 vs17.73±2.96 (P=0.0001), and lipophilin A–C: 2.89±1.06 vs3.63±1.37 (P=0.006) was revealed, while a significant increase was observed for serum albumin: 9.45±1.87 vs3.46±1.87 (P=0.0001). No changes for lysozyme and zinc α-2 glycoprotein (P=0.07 and 0.7, respectively) were shown. Proteomic analysis showed a downregulation of lipophilin A and C and lipocalin-1 in patients, which is suggested to be associated with post-translational modifications.
Conclusions:
Data show that tear protein changes anticipate the onset of more extensive clinical signs in early stage dry eye disease.
Similar content being viewed by others
Introduction
‘Dry eye’ is now recognized as a disruption of the lachrymal functional unit,1 a system comprising the ocular surface (cornea, conjunctiva, and limbus), the lachrymal and meibomian glands and the lids, interconnected by an integrated neural arc. The updated definition states that ‘Dry eye is a multifactorial disease of the tears and ocular surface that results in symptoms of discomfort, visual disturbance, and tear instability with potential damage to the ocular surface. It is accompanied by increased osmolarity of the tear and inflammation of the ocular surface’.2 As postulated already in the previous report by Lemp et al in 1995,3 the major classes of dry eye are mainly related to tear deficiency or increased tear evaporation.
This last form, in particular, is increasingly observed as a consequence of environmental factors such as forced air dry heat, wind, air pollution, or reduced blinking because of driving, TV watching, and computer work. Tear evaporation is considered the main contribution to tear thinning and break-up,4 although neither the complete mechanism of stability nor the role of tear composition have been elucidated to date.
Proteomic methods have identified nearly 500 proteins in human tears,5, 6, 7, 8 but for only a minority of these proteins has the biological role in dry eye disease or, more generally, in ocular surface physiology been clarified. The most representative tear proteins have been analyzed either in Sjogren's and non-Sjogren's dry eye.9, 10 Abnormal changes in these protein profiles were suggestive of impaired lachrymal gland function, related to autoimmune disease or apoptotic events.
The purpose of this work was to analyze the behaviour of the main tear proteins in patients suffering from mild evaporative dry eye (EDE), the most frequent form of the disease, which consists in an excessive water loss from the ocular surface even in the presence of adequate tear production.
Materials and methods
Subjects
A total of 90 subjects, including 60 patients affected by EDE (18 men and 42 women; mean age 64.2±22.3 years) and 30 healthy control subjects (8 men and 22 women; mean age 61.1±17.8 years), were enrolled for this study.
Patients were classified as grade 1 dry eye severity according to DEWS2 scheme (Table 1). For patients, the inclusion criteria were a Schirmer test I value higher than 10 mm/5 min, a tear film break-up time (TFBUT) value ⩽10 s, mild subjective symptoms of ocular discomfort as evaluated by an OSDI questionnaire11 (score 12–24), and use of tear substitutes only, for treatment, which were suspended for at least 3 days before tear collection.
Inclusion criteria for healthy control subjects were a Schirmer test I value higher than 10 mm/5 min, a TFBUT value ⩾10 s, and absence of subjective symptoms of ocular discomfort (OSDI score <12).
In both groups, excluding criteria were the presence of punctuate keratopathy and/or autoimmune diseases, the use of contact lens, and having undergone ocular surgery in the last 6 months.
The study was conducted according to the declaration of Helsinki involving human subjects.
All the tear samples were provided by the Ophthalmic Unit at S Orsola-Malpighi University Hospital of Bologna (Italy) after obtaining informed consent from the subjects studied and according to DEWS guidelines.2 From each subject, a minimum amount of 10 μl of unstimulated tears was collected using a micropipette with sterile tips, avoiding any reflex tearing. Patients were requested to position the head slightly reclined in such a way that tears are driven to the most outer side of the lower fornix. After 30 s, the tip of the micropipette was carefully positioned and tears aspired. Samples were centrifuged at 13 200 g for 15 min and stored frozen in plastic vials at −80 °C until use.
Monodimensional electrophoresis
Tear samples were diluted 1 : 2 with 0.125 M Tris-Cl pH 6.8, 4% sodium dodecyl sulfate (SDS), 20% glycerol, 10% 2-mercaptoethanol buffer, and boiled for 5 min. The proteins were separated using a 18% acryl amide -TRIS-HCl Ready-gel (Bio-Rad, Laboratories, Milano, Italia) applying a voltage of 200 V for 1 h at room temperature. A pre-stained standard of low molecular weight proteins (Bio-Rad) was used to monitor the electrophoretic separation. Gel staining was performed using Brilliant Blu G (Sigma-Aldrich, Milano, Italy) for 12 h at room temperature. The gel image was acquired with the densitometer scanner Umax (Amersham Biosciences-GE Healthcare, Milano, Italia) and analyzed for the percent abundance of each protein of interest in the samples using Gel-Pro Analyzer software (MediaCybernetics Inc., Bethesda, MD, USA).
Immunoblotting
Total protein from 1 μl of tears was subjected to SDS-polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis at 200 V constant using a Mini-Protean III (Bio-Rad) and transferred onto a nitrocellulose membrane (Hybond-C extra, Amersham) applying a voltage of 100 V (1 h, 4 °C) in buffer containing 0.3% Tris, 1.4% glycine, and 20% methanol using a Bio-Rad wet-blotting apparatus. The correct transfer of the proteins was evaluated using the reversible coloration with Red Ponceau. The nitrocellulose membrane containing the transferred proteins was saturated with 3% bovine serum albumin (Sigma) in phosphate-buffered saline (PBS) +0.1% Tween 20 for 1 h at room temperature. For immunoblotting, anti-lactoferrin (sc-25622), anti-lipocalin (sc-34680), anti-lysozyme (sc-27956), anti-lipophillin A (sc-48324), and anti- lipophillin B (sc-48327) antibodies were purchased from Santa Cruz Biotechnology, Santa Cruz, CA, USA; the anti- zinc-alpha-2-glycoprotein (ZAG) antibody was purchased from BioVendor GmbH, Heidelberg, Germany.
Primary antibodies were diluted in PBS containing 0.1% Tween 20 and incubated overnight at 4 °C. The blots were washed three times with PBS+0.1% Tween 20 and incubated with horseradish peroxidase-conjugated secondary antibodies diluted (1 : 10000) in PBS+0.1% Tween 20 for 1 h at room temperature. All membranes were visualized by chemiluminescence using the ECL system (SuperSignal West Dura Extended Duration Substrate, Pierce Biotechnology Inc., Rockford, IL, USA).
Bidimensional electrophoresis
A total of 32 tear samples (10 healthy control subjects and 22 dry eye patients) were subjected to bi-dimensional electrophoresis followed by western blot analysis for the analysis of protein isoforms.
One microlitre of tears in TSU buffer (2 M Thiourea, 7 M Urea, 4% CHAPS, 0.8% ampholytes pH 3–10, benzonase, and protease inhibitors) was centrifuged at 21 000 g at 4 °C for 30 min. For the first electrophoretic dimension 7 cm IPG strips (pH 3–10) were used (Bio-Rad). The active rehydratation of the strip with the sample was performed at 50 V for 16 h, followed by step increase in voltage of 1000 V (1 h), 2000 V (1 h), 4000 V (2 h), and 4000 V (20 kV-h in total). Afterwards the strips were reduced using equilibration buffer (6 M urea, 2% SDS, 5 mM Tris-HCl pH 8.6, 30% glycerol, containing 125 mM dithiothreitol (DTT)) for 15 min at room temperature and alkylated with equilibration buffer containing 250 mM iodoacetamide (IAA) for 8 min. The strips were transferred to a 15%-polyacrylamide gel, and, for the electrophoretic separation, a Mini-Protean III apparatus (Bio-Rad) with a constant voltage (200V) was used. The proteins were stained with colloidal Coomassie Blue G-250 (Sigma) for 12 h at room temperature.
In-gel tryptic digestion
The monodimensional electrophoresis gel slices containing the proteins of interest were reduced with 10 mM DTT for 45 min at 56 °C, alkylated with 55 mM IAA for 30 min at room temperature in the dark and incubated overnight at 37 °C in a 50 : 1 (w/w) ratio with 12 ng/μl sequencing-grade-modified trypsin (Promega, Madison, WI, USA). The digested peptides were extracted from the gel slices using a solution of 5% trifluoroacetic acid and 50% acetonitrile. Peptides were lyophilized to dryness and resuspended with 10 μl of 0.1% formic acid for mass spectrometry (MS) analysis.
MS analysis and database search
The samples were analyzed by liquid chromatography MS using a CapLC (Waters, Manchester, UK), connected with a electrospray interface to a quadrupole-time of flight (QTOF) micro (Micromass, Manchester, UK). The peptide separation was performed on an Atlantis dC18 NanoEase column (150 × 0.3 mm, 3 μm) (Waters) with an Atlantis dC18 NanoEase precolumn (5 × 0.3 mm, 5 μm particle size) (Waters) using a flow rate of 4 μl/min (mobile phase A: H2O/acetonitrile (95 : 5) 0.1% FA; B: acetonitrile/H2O (95 : 5) 0.1% FA). The chromatographic gradient was set up to give a linear increase from 2% B to 80% B in 30 min, for a total run-time of 45 min. For identification experiments, QTOF was set to scan in survey mode the m/z 400–1800 range.
For protein identification Mascot (version 2.02.03, Matrix Science, London, UK; www.matrixscience.com) and the Swiss-Prot human database (version 52.2, 495929 in total) were used with the following settings: a 50 p.p.m. precursor and 0.3-Da fragment tolerance, carbamidomethylation of cysteine as a fixed modification, oxidation of methionine as a variable modification, and trypsin as enzyme (one miss cleavage allowed).
Statistic evaluations
Data were statistically evaluated by using the Statistical Package for the Social Sciences (SPSS) version 13.0 (SPSS, Chicago, IL, USA) and the MedCalc 9.3 software (MedcCalc Sofware bvba, Mariakerke, Belgium). Statistical analysis were performed by applying a t-test for independent data and a Mann–Whitney test for unpaired data (P<0.05) to evaluate statistical difference between normal control groups vs EDE patients.
An evaluation was made of the linear relationship between the evaluated tear proteins and: break-up time, Schirmer test, OSDI subjective symptoms. This was performed by using Pearson's correlation coefficient r for parametric data.
Results
The separation of tear proteins by SDS-PAGE electrophoresis was optimized by using 18% acrylamide-TRIS-HCl gels, which allowed us to properly separate the major tear proteins within the same gel, facilitating their identification. Previous attempts with other types of gels were performed (data not shown).
Protein identification was carried out by means of two different complementary types of analysis: (i) excision of the bands of interest from the gel, followed by tryptic digestion and MS analysis; (ii) western blot analysis on the monodimensional electrophoretic gels. In Table 2, the results of the protein identification using MS and database searching are reported.
Protein quantification was assessed by means of computerized densitometric analysis using image analyzer software to calculate the relative percentage of each protein of interest within the proteins in the gel strip taken as the whole. For lactoferrin, lipophillin, and lipocalin, a statistically significant decrease in the protein abundances was found in patients vs controls, while for serum albumin a statistically significant increase could be observed. No significant changes for lisozyme and ZAG (Table 3) were noticed. The results were further confirmed by densitometric analysis on immunoblotted gels (Figure 1).
Bi-dimensional electrophoresis and western blot analysis were also performed on 10 controls and 22 patients, to analyze protein isoforms differently expressed as a consequence of pathological modifications. Alterations in the relative abundance of at least three differentially modified forms of lipocalin-1, as determined by variations in the isoelectric point (pI), was shown in patients vs control. (Figure 2).
Statistically significant correlations between the content of four proteins (lactoferrin, serum albumin, lipocalin-1, and lipophillin A–B) and clinical parameter values were found vs TFBUT and subjective symptoms score but not vs Schirmer test (Table 4 and Supplementary Figures 1–4). Lysozyme and ZAG did not show significant correlations vs any clinical parameter.
Discussion
The study of the tear proteome by electrophoretic separation and MS techniques has allowed for the evaluation of the pattern of proteins associated with specific pathological conditions9, 10, 12 and the identification of over 500 proteins.5, 6
Preliminary studies were performed by our group to optimize the separation of the main tear proteins in the same gel. Furthermore, tear aspiration by micropipette was compared with other methods previously published13, 14, 15 and was found to provide the best protein release and protein expression in the gel. In our analytical approach, the 18% gels were used to achieve the best definition and separation of low molecular weight proteins and a sample size of only 1.5 μl of fluid were loaded, an amount of tears that can be collected in severe forms of dry eye as well.
Although MS can allow the identification and relative quantification of many proteins in a single analysis, monodimensional gel electrophoresis still remains one of the most used approaches for the preliminary evaluation of protein variations, although some limitations do exist. Indeed in this work some proteins were correctly identified, but their quantification could not be achieved because of lane overlapping. This is the case of prolin-rich protein 4, a lacrytin protein of emerging and increasing interest in ocular surface pathology.16, 17
The following proteins were identified and quantified in the present work: lysozyme C, lactoferrin, serum albumin, lipocalin 1, lipophillin A and B, ZAG.
Lysozyme is a glycosidase produced in the acini of the main lachrymal gland, thus representing an indirect index of its function. For its quantification some methods have been adopted,15, 18, 19 with inhomogeneous results being obtained. Lactoferrin is a single-chain polipeptide with important bacteriostatic activity,20 which also represents an index of lachrymal gland function. Its determination in tears has been conducted in the past by techniques,21, 22 currently abandoned.
In this work, we have shown a low but significant lactoferrin decrease in mild EDE patients vs controls without observing changes in the lysozyme content; data would suggest an initial impairment of the lachrymal gland function, not yet detected by the Schirmer test.
Serum albumin indicates a passive exudation as a consequence of blood-ocular barrier failure in conjunctival vessels and its value rapidly increases under various physio–pathological conditions.23 Our data showed a significant increase in tears of patients vs controls, suggesting that an early exudation is already present in EDE mild forms.
Lipocalins represent the greatest group of lipid affinity proteins in tears; they can associate with a wide variety of lipids;24 the lipocalin–lipid bond favours lipid solubility bringing lipids to a rapid equilibrium during blinking. This event is thought to promote the formation of an homogeneous and compact outermost lipid layer,25 suitable to control and limit tear evaporation rate. In addition, lipocalins are believed to serve as scavengers for the removal of wasted lipid molecules that would contaminate the system.26
Lipophillines are present in tears with two isoforms (A–B),27 belong to the Uteroglobin super family; small secretory molecules with anti-inflammatory properties that bind steroids and are subjected to their regulation.
In this study, both lipocalin-1 and lipophillin A–B were found to be reduced in EDE patients vs controls. Lipocalin decrease is in agreement with previous studies performed in patients suffering from Sjogren's Syndrome28 and Meibomian Gland Dysfunction.29 To our knowledge, the decrease in the abundances of lipophillin A–B observed in our study has never been described before and may constitute a further progress in the identification of mechanisms responsible for the stability of human tears.
In addition to this, lipocalin-1 and lipophillin variations were found to be moderately correlated with tear stability as measured by TFBUT and subjective symptoms of discomfort but not with tear secretion as evaluated by Schirmer test; thus confirming their role in stability.
It is important to note that a shift in the relative ratio of at least three forms of lipocalin-1 was evident between control subjects and EDE patients. The exact modifications that give rise to the different forms of lipocalin-1 as shown by two-dimensional western blot analysis have not been identified yet by MS because of their low abundance, but it could be speculated that they are due to the presence of both different lipocalin-1 isoforms and/or different post-translational modifications of the same isoform. This part of the work is still undergoing.
ZAG is a protein of interest because of its ability to have many important functions in the human body, including lipid mobilization and degradation.30 The exact function of ZAG in tears and its possible role in lipid degradation have only been postulated and not completely clarified.31, 32 In our study, we detected ZAG in both patients and controls, with no statistically significant differences in the respective expression. Our data, do not suggest any significant role of ZAG in the tear stability mechanism, at least as far as mild dry eye is concerned.
Conclusive remarks
Our data showed a very early lachrymal gland dysfunction, the presence of a light inflammatory condition, and the altered distribution of tear lipid because of decreased expression of affinity lipid-proteins. These data confirm the importance of tear proteomic analysis and show that tear protein changes anticipate the onset of more extensive clinical signs.
In addition, our data are interesting when interpreted taking into consideration what recently was suggested33 on the natural history of EDE. It is here suggested that in early EDE, a compensatory mechanism occurs and a stimulation of the lachrymal gland dilutes concentrated tears. In this study, the decrease showed in the amounts of certain proteins would account for a stimulation of the water phase only, and would further confirm the initial protein secretory function impairment of the gland.
References
Stern ME, Gao J, Siemasko KF, Beuerman RW, Pflugfelder SC . The role of the lacrimal functional unit in the pathophysiology of dry eye. Exp Eye Res 2004; 78: 409–416.
No author listed. 2007 Report of the Dry Eye Workshop (DEWS). Ocul Surf 2007; 5 (2): 14. Special Issue.
Lemp MA . Report of the National Eye Institute/Industry Workshop on clinical trials in dry eyes. CLAO J 1995; 21: 221–222.
King-Smith PE, Fink BA, Nichols JJ, Nichols KK, Braun RJ, McFadden GB . The contribution of lipid layer movement to tear film thinning and breakup. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 2009; 50: 2747–2756.
de Souza GA, Godoy LM, Mann M . Identification of 491 proteins in the tear fluid proteome reveals a large number of proteases and protease inhibitors. Genome Biol 2006; 7 (8): R72.
Li N, Wang N, Zheng J, Liu XM, Lever OW, Erickson PM et al. Characterization of human tear proteome using multiple proteomic analysis techniques. J Proteome Res 2005; 4: 2052–2061.
Green-Church KB, Nichols KK, Kleinholz NM, Zhang L, Nichols JJ . Investigation of the human tear film proteome using multiple proteomic approaches. Mol Vis 2008; 14: 456–470.
Jacob JT, Ham B . Compositional profiling and biomarker identification of the tear film. Ocul Surf 2008; 6: 175–185.
Tomosugi N, Kitagawa K, Takahashi N, Sugai S, Ishikawa I . Diagnostic potential of tear proteomic patterns in Sjögren′s syndrome. J Proteome Res 2005; 4: 820–825.
Grus FH, Podust VN, Bruns K, Lackner K, Fu S, Dalmasso EA . SELDI-TOF-MS ProteinChip array profiling of tears from patients with dry eye. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 2005; 46: 863–876.
Schiffman RM, Christianson MD, Jacobsen G, Hirsch JD, Reis BL . Reliability and validity of the ocular surface disease index. Arch Ophthalmol 2000; 118: 615–621.
Ohashi Y, Dogru M, Tsubota K . Laboratory findings in tear fluid analysis. Clin Chim Acta 2006; 369: 17–28.
Coyle PK, Sibony PA, Johnson C . Electrophoresis combined with immunologic identification of human tear proteins. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 1989; 30: 1872–1878.
Jones DT, Monroy D, Pflugfelder SC . A novel method of tear collection: comparison of glass capillary micropipettes with porous polyester rods. Cornea 1997; 16: 450Y458.
Kuizenga A, van Haeringen NJ, Kijlstra A . SDS-minigel electrophoresis of human tears. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 1991; 2: 381–386.
McKown RL, Wang N, Raab RW, Karnati R, Zhang Y, Williams PB et al. Lacrytin and other new proteins of the lachrymal functional unit. Exp Eye Res 2009; 88: 848–858.
Fung KYC, Morris C, Sathe S, Sack R, Duncan MW . Characterization of the in vivo forms of lachrymal-specific proline-rich proteins in human tear fluid. Proteomics 2004; 4: 3953–3959.
Klaeger AJ, Cevallos V, Sherman MD, Whitcher JP, Stephens RS . Clinical application of a homogeneous colorimetric assay for tear lisozyme. Ocul Immunol Inflamm 1999; 7: 7–15.
Batellier L, Rea A, Chaumeil C, Scat Y . Protein evaluation of tears: different biological parameters and their respective value. J Fr Ophtalmol 1996; 19: 520–526.
Flanagan JL, Willcox MD . Role of lactoferrin in the tear film. Biochimie 2009; 91: 35–43.
Sen DK, Sarin GS . Immunoassay of tear lysozyme in conjunctival diseases. Br J Ophthalmol 1982; 66: 732–735.
Kruize AA, van Bijsterveld OP, Hené RJ, de Wilde PC, Feltkamp TE, Kater L . Long-term course of tear gland function in patients with keratoconjunctivitis sicca and Sjögren′s syndrome. Br J Ophthalmol 1997; 81: 435–438.
Fukuda M, Fullard RJ, Willcox MD, Baleriola-Lucas C, Bestawros F, Sweeney D . Fibronectin in the tear film. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 1996; 37: 459–467.
Redl B . Human tear lipocalin. Biochim Biophys Acta 2000; 1482: 241–248.
Breustedt DA, Schönfeld DL, Skerra A . Comparative ligand-binding analysis of ten human lipocalins. Biochim Biophys Acta 2006; 1764: 161–173.
Gasymov OK, Abduragimov AR, Prasher P, Yusifov TN, Glasgow BJ . Tear lipocalin: evidence for a scavenging function to remove lipids from the human corneal surface. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 2005; 46: 3589–3596.
Lehrer RI, Xu G, Abduragimov A, Dinh NN, Qu XD, Martin D . Lipophilin, a novel heterodimeric protein of human tears. FEBS Lett 1998; 432: 163–167.
Caffery B, Joyce E, Boone A, Slomovic A, Simpson T, Jones L . Tear lipocalin and lysozyme in Sjögren and non-Sjögren dry eye. Optom Vis Sci 2008; 85: 661–667.
Yamada M, Mochizuki H, Kawai M, Tsubota K, Bryce TJ . Decreased tear lipocalin concentration in patients with meibomian gland dysfunction. Br J Ophthalmol 2005; 89: 803–805.
Hassan I, Waheed A, Yadav S, Singh TP, Ahmad F . Zinc α2-glycoprotein: a multidisciplinary protein. Mol Cancer Res 2008; 6: 892–906.
Molloy MP, Bolis S, Herbert BR, Ou K, Tyler MI, van Dyk DD et al. Establishment of the human reflex tear two-dimensional polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis reference map: new proteins of potential diagnostic value. Electrophoresis 1997; 18: 2811–2815.
Baker GRC, Morton M, Rajapaska RS, Bullock M, Gullu S, Mazzi B et al. Altered tear composition in smokers and patients with graves ophthalmopathy. Arch Ophthalmol 2006; 124: 1451–1456.
Bron AJ, Yokoi N, Gafney E, Tiffany JM . Predicted phenotypes of dry eye: proposed consequences of its natural history. Ocul Surf 2009; 7: 78–92.
Acknowledgements
This work was partially supported by a grant from Fondazione Cassa di Risparmio di Bologna to Prof Emilio C Campos. The authors thank Ms Chiara Coslovi for her skilfull technical help.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Competing interests
The authors declare no conflict of interest.
Additional information
Supplementary Information accompanies the paper on Eye website
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Versura, P., Nanni, P., Bavelloni, A. et al. Tear proteomics in evaporative dry eye disease. Eye 24, 1396–1402 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1038/eye.2010.7
Received:
Revised:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/eye.2010.7