Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

  • Letter to the Editor
  • Published:

Response to: Is inverted BMI really better than BMI in predicting body fatness in children?

European Journal of Clinical Nutrition volume 68, page 1274 (2014)Cite this article

Subjects

We thank Dr Singhal1 for their interest in our article.2 The observations made by Dr Singhal are accurate in that inverted body mass index (iBMI) predicted 0.2% greater variance in body fatness than body mass index (BMI). However, we believe our assertion that iBMI is ‘better’ than BMI in our sample population is still valid and appropriate. This is for several reasons and not solely based on results from statistical analysis. Firstly, we would consider any increase in the prediction of variance in a variable to represent ‘better’ performance. This would hold even if the change in prediction is small, as in some instances even a small magnitude of improvement is practically important.

Secondly, and more importantly, the reason why iBMI might be considered ‘better’ than BMI in children is because it addresses some of the key problems when using BMI as a proxy for fatness in children. In brief, the validity of BMI as a measure of adiposity has been based on the assumption that as BMI increases so does adiposity.3 However, the assumption of a linear body fat–BMI relationship has been questioned by studies reporting strong evidence of curvature in this association.4 This linear relationship is particularly not the case in children.5 If this curvature is ignored and linearity assumed, then the true relationship between body fatness and BMI will be systematically underestimated in people with lower values of BMI and overestimated in people with higher BMI values.6 Furthermore, BMI is also not normally distributed in children.6 Thus, when BMI is used in statistical analysis, as is often the case, assumptions of normality are violated and inferences made cannot be trusted.6

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution

Access options

Buy this article

  • Purchase on Springer Link
  • Instant access to full article PDF
Buy now

Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout

References

  1. Singhal N . Is inverted BMI really better than BMI in predicting body fatness in children? Eur J Clin Nutr 2014; e-pub ahead of print 2 July 2014; doi:10.1038/ejcn.2014.124.

  2. Duncan MJ, Martins C, Silva G, Marques E, Mota J, Aires L . Inverted BMI rather than BMI is a better predictor of DEXA determined body fatness in children. Eur J Clin Nutr 2014; 68: 638–640.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Nevill AM, Metsios GS, Jackson AS, Wang J, Thornton J, Gallagher D . Can we use the Jackson and Pollock equations to predict body density/fat of obese individuals in the 21st century? Int J Body Comp Res 2008; 6: 115–122.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Rothman KJ . BMI-related errors in the measurement of obesity. Int J Obes 2008; 32 (Suppl 3): S56–S59.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Federico B, D’Aliesio F, Pane F, Capelli G, Rodio A . Body mass index has a curvilinear relationship with the percentage of body fat among children. BMC Res Notes 2011; 18: 301.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Nevill AM, Stavropoulos-Kalinoglou A, Metsios GS, Koutedakis Y, Holder RL, Kitas GD et al. Inverted BMI rather than BMI is a better proxy for percentage body fat. Ann Hum Biol 2011; 36: 681–684.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Nevill AM, Holder RL . Body mass index: a measure of fatness or leanness? Br J Nut 1995; 73: 507–516.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Biomolecular and Sports Sciences, Coventry University, Coventry, UK

    M J Duncan

Authors
  1. M J Duncan
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to M J Duncan.

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

The author declares no conflict of interest.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Duncan, M. Response to: Is inverted BMI really better than BMI in predicting body fatness in children?. Eur J Clin Nutr 68, 1274 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1038/ejcn.2014.147

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/ejcn.2014.147

Search

Advanced search

Quick links