Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

  • Systematic Review
  • Published:

Nutritional access routes following oesophagectomy—a systematic review

European Journal of Clinical Nutrition volume 65, pages 565–573 (2011)Cite this article

Subjects

A Corrigendum to this article was published on 03 August 2011

Abstract

Nutritional support in patients undergoing oesophagectomy is of paramount importance in this usually malnourished patient group, but encountering significant clinical practice variation between units. Our aim was therefore to assess the strength of evidence behind nutritional support routes post-oesophagectomy. The Cochrane Library and Controlled Trials Registry, MEDLINE (Ovid) (1966–April 2009), PubMed, EMBASE (1966–April 2009), CINAHL, Web of knowledge and SCOPUS databases, were electronically searched for the highest level of evidence, with English language as a limit. Reference follow-up was also used. Studies were critically reviewed based on The NHS Public Health Resource Unit Critical Appraisal Skills Programme Tools. Five randomised control trials (RCTs) and one case-control trial, with 344 patients, were included in the review. There was a significant variation in the routes assessed (including intravenous fluid therapy, peripheral and central line nutrition, feeding jejunostomy, nasojejunal and nasoduodenal tubes) and the methodological quality of each study, with small patient numbers. No route was found to be superior over another in the RCTs. In the case-control trial, the combination of enteral parenteral nutrition led to shorter hospital stay compared with parenteral feeding alone. Nasojejunal and nasoduodenal tubes are associated with a significant rate of dislodgement. There is absence of strong direct evidence supporting a single feeding access route in oesophagectomy patients. Clinical decisions should be made based on available evidence from other types of gastrointestinal surgery, currently favouring enteral nutrition. If enteral feeding is chosen, feeding jejunostomy may be superior to nasojejunal or duodenal tubes.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution

Access options

Buy this article

  • Purchase on Springer Link
  • Instant access to full article PDF
Buy now

Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout

Figure 1

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Cochrane Reviewer's Handbook. (2009). Cochrane handbook for systematic reviews of interventions. Version 5.0.2 (updated September 2009). In: Higgins J and Green S (eds). The Cochrane Collaboration.

  • Aiko S, Yoshizumi Y, Sugiura Y, Matsuyama T, Naito Y, Matsizaki J et al. (2001). Beneficial effects of immediate enteral nutrition after oesophageal cancer surgery. Surg Today 31, 971–978.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Athanassiadi KA (2009). Infections of the mediastinum. Thorac Surg Clin 19, 37–45.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Baigrie RJ, Devitt PG, Watkin DS (1996). Enteral versus parenteral nutrition after oesophagogastric surgery: a prospective randomised comparison. Au N Z J Surg 66, 668–670.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Bengmark S, Anderson R, Mangiante G (2001). Uniterrupted peri-operative enteral nutrition. Gut 20, 11–19.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Bozzetti F, Braga M, Gianotti L, Gavazzi C, Mariani L (2001). Postoperative enteral versus parenteral nutrition in malnourished patients with gastrointestinal cancer: a randomised multicentre trial. Lancet 358, 1487–1492.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Briel JW, Tamhankar AP, Hagen JA, Demeester SR, Johansson J, Choustoulakis E et al. (2004). Prevalence and risk factors for ischaemia, leak, and stricture of esophageal anastomosis: gastric pull-up versus colon interposition. J Am Coll Surg 198, 541–542.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cohen J (1988). Statistical Power Analysis for the Behavioural Sciences. 2nd edn. Lawrence Eribaum Associates Inc: New Jersey.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cooper SC, Hulley CM, Grimley CE, Howden J, Mccluskey K, Norton RN et al. (2006). Perioperative peripheral parenteral nutrition for patients undergoing esophagectomy for cancer: a pilot study for safety, surgical and nutritional outcomes. Int Surg 91, 358–364.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Ercan S, Rice TW, Murthy SC, Rybicki LA, Blackstone EH (2005). Does esophagogastric anastomotic technique influence the outcome of patients with esophageal cancer? J Thora Cardio Surg 129, 623–631.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gabor S, Renner H, Matzi V, Ratzenhofer B, Lindenmann J, Sankin O et al. (2005). Early enteral feeding compared with parenteral nutrition after oesophageal or oesophagogastric resection and reconstruction. Br J Nutr 93, 509–513.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Gerndt SJ, Orringer MB (1994). Tube jejunostomy as an adjunct to esophagectomy. Surgery 115, 164–169.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Han-Geurts IJM, Hop WC, Verhoef C, Tran KTC, Tilanus HW (2007). Randomised clinical trial comparing feeding jejunostomy with nasoduodenal tube placement in patients undergoing oesophagectomy. BJS 94, 31–35.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Han-Geurts IJM, Verhoef C, Tilanus HW (2004). Relaparotomy following complications of feeding jejunostomy in esophageal surgery. Digestive surgery 21, 192–196.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kirk HJ, Heys SD (2003). Immunonutrition. BJS 90, 1459–1460.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Lassen K, Revhaug A (2006). Early oral nutrition after major upper gastrointestinal surgery: why not? Curr Opin Clin Nutr Metab Care 9, 613–617.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Law S, Swen DT, Wong KH, Kwok KF, Wong J (2005). A single-layer, continuous, hand-sawn method for oesophageal anastomosis: prospective evaluation in 218 patients. Arch Surg 140, 33–39.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mazaki T, Ebisawa K (2008). Enteral versus parenteral nutrition after gastrointestinal surgery: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials in the English literature. J Gastrointest Surg 12, 739–755.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mccarter MD, Gomez ME, Daly JM (1996). Early post-operative enteral feeding following major upper gastrointestinal surgery. J Gastrointest Surg 1, 278–285.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mercer CD, Mungara A (1996). Enteral feeding in oesophageal surgery. Nutrition 12, 200–201.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Neyman J, Pearson ES (1967). The testing of statistical hypotheses in relation to probabilities a priori. Cambridge University Press: Cambridge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Page RD, Oo AY, Russel GN, Pennefather SH (2002). Intravenous hydration versus naso-jejunal enteral fedding after esophagectomy: a randomised study. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg 22, 666–672.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Powell-Tuck J (2000). Peri-operative nutritional support: does it reduce hospital complications or shorten convalescence? Gut 46, 749–750.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Ryan AM, Rowley SP, Healy LA, Flood PM, Ravi N, Reynolds JV (2006). Post-oesophagectomy early enteral nutrition via a needle catheter jejunostomy: 8-year experience at a specialist unit. Clin Nutr 25, 386–393.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Saito T, Zeze K, Kuwahara A, Miyahara M, Kobayashi M (1990). Correlations between preoperative malnutirtion and septic complications of oesophageal cancer surgery. Nutrition 6, 303–308.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Saluja SS, Kaur N, Shrivastava UK (2002). Enteral nutrition in surgical patients. Surg Today 32, 672–678.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Shiraishi T, Kawahara K, Yamamoto S, Maekawa T, Shirakusa T (2005). Postoperaative nutritional management after esophagectomy: is TPN the standard of nutritional care? Int Surg 90, 30–35.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Sica GS, Sujendaran V, Wheeler J, Soin B, Maynard N (2005). Needle catheter jejunostomy at esophagectomy for cancer. J Surg Onco 91, 276–279.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Velez JP, Lince LF, Restrepo JI (1997). Early enteral nutrition in gastrointestinal surgery: a pilot study. Nutrition 13, 442–445.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Wakefield SE, Mansell NJ, Baigrie RJ, Dowling BL (1995). Use of a feeding jejunostomy after oesophagogastric surgery. Br J Surg 82, 811–813.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Ward N (2003). Nutrition support to patients undergoing gastrointestinal surgery. Nutr J 1, 18.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Oesophago-Gastric Surgery, Salford Royal Foundation Trust, Manchester, UK

    G A Markides, B Al-Khaffaf & J Vickers

Authors
  1. G A Markides
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. B Al-Khaffaf
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. J Vickers
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to J Vickers.

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

Additional information

Part of the study was conducted as an assignment for an MSc degree in Advanced Surgical Practise undertaken by G Markides at Cardiff University, Wales, UK.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Markides, G., Al-Khaffaf, B. & Vickers, J. Nutritional access routes following oesophagectomy—a systematic review. Eur J Clin Nutr 65, 565–573 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1038/ejcn.2010.292

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/ejcn.2010.292

Keywords

This article is cited by

Search

Advanced search

Quick links