Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

  • NEWS

Sharp criticism of controversial ancient-human claims tests eLife’s revamped peer-review model

Access options

Rent or buy this article

Prices vary by article type

from$1.95

to$39.95

Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout

Nature 620, 13-14 (2023)

doi: https://doi.org/10.1038/d41586-023-02415-w

References

  1. Berger, L. R. et al. eLife https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.89106.1 (2023).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Berger, L. R. et al. eLife 4, 09560 (2015).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Dirks, P. H. G. M. et al. eLife https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.24231 (2017).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Berger, L. R. et al. Preprint at bioRxiv https://doi.org/10.1101/2023.06.01.543133 (2023).

  5. Berger, L. R. et al. eLife https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.89102.1 (2023).

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Subjects

Latest on:

Nature Careers

Jobs

Nature Briefing

Sign up for the Nature Briefing newsletter — what matters in science, free to your inbox daily.

Get the most important science stories of the day, free in your inbox. Sign up for Nature Briefing

Search

Quick links