Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

  • COMMENT

Analysis: the biodiversity footprint of the University of Oxford

Bright orange and yellow California poppies flowering in front of an Oxford building

The Botanic Garden at the University of Oxford, UK. Credit: Greg Smolonski/Oxford University Images

Access options

Rent or buy this article

Get just this article for as long as you need it

$39.95

Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout

Nature 604, 420-424 (2022)

doi: https://doi.org/10.1038/d41586-022-01034-1

References

  1. Folke, C. et al. Nature Ecol. Evol. 3, 1396–1403 (2019).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Barbier, E. B., Burgess, J. C. & Dean, T. J. Science 360, 486–488 (2018).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. de Silva, G. C., Regan, E. C., Pollard, E. H. B. & Addison, P. F. E. Bus. Strategy Environ. 28, 1481–1495 (2019).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Addison, P. F. E., Bull, J. W. & Milner-Gulland, E. J. Conserv. Biol. 33, 307–318 (2019).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Bull, J. W. et al. Nature Ecol. Evol. 4, 4–7 (2020).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Moran, D., Giljum, S., Kanemoto, K. & Godar, J. One Earth 3, 5–8 (2020).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Ciroth, A. & Bunsen, J. Exiobase 3.4 in openLCA (GreenDelta, 2019).

    Google Scholar 

  8. Huijbregts, M. A. J. et al. Int. J. Life Cycle Assess. 22, 138–147 (2017).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Thurston, M. & Eckelman, M. J. Int. J. Sustain. Higher Educ. 12, 225–235 (2011).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Kering. Environmental Profit & Loss (EP&L) 2020 Group Results (Kering, 2021); available at go.nature.com/3tnw5s2.

  11. Findler, F., Schönherr, N., Lozano, R., Reider, D. & Martinuzzi, A. Int. J. Sustain. Higher Educ. 20, 23–38 (2019).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Li, X., Tan, H. & Rackes, A. J. Cleaner Prod. 106, 97–108 (2015).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Klöwer, M., Hopkins, D., Allen, M. & Higham, J. Nature 583, 356–359 (2020).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Devenish, K., Desbureaux, S., Willcock, S. & Jones, J. P. G. Nature Sustain. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41893-022-00850-7 (2022).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Smith, A. C. et al. Front. Environ. Sci. https://doi.org/10.3389/fenvs.2021.737659 (2021).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Sonter, L. J., Dade, M. C., Watson, J. E. M. & Valenta, R. K. Nature Commun. 11, 4174 (2020).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Convention on Biological Diversity. First Draft of the Post-2020 Global Biodiversity Framework CBD/WG2020/3/3 (CBD, 2021).

  18. Torres, A., Brandt, J., Lear, K. & Liu, J. Science 357, 970–971 (2017).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Maron, M. et al. BioScience 66, 489–498 (2016).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. zu Ermgassen, S. O. S. E. et al. Conserv. Lett. 12, e12664 (2019).

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Supplementary Information

  1. Supplementary report and appendix - biodiversity impact of the University of Oxford

Competing Interests

The authors declare no competing interests.

Subjects

Nature Careers

Jobs

Nature Briefing

Sign up for the Nature Briefing newsletter — what matters in science, free to your inbox daily.

Get the most important science stories of the day, free in your inbox. Sign up for Nature Briefing

Search

Quick links