Sight restored by turning back the epigenetic clock

Huberman, Andrew D.

doi:10.1038/d41586-020-03119-1

NEWS AND VIEWS
02 December 2020

Sight restored by turning back the epigenetic clock

Neurons progressively deteriorate with age and lose resilience to injury. It emerges that treatment with three transcription factors can re-endow neurons in the mature eye with youthful characteristics and the capacity to regenerate.

Andrew D. Huberman ⁰

Andrew D. Huberman
1. Andrew D. Huberman is in the Department of Neurobiology and the Department of Ophthalmology, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, California 94305, USA.
View author publications

You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Access through your institution

Buy or subscribe

Ageing has negative consequences for all the cells and organs in our bodies. Our brains are no exception. Neurons in the developing brain form circuits that can adapt to change and regenerate in response to injury. These capacities have long been known¹ to diminish over time, but the molecular shifts that underlie this deterioration have remained mysterious. Lu et al.² show in a paper in Nature that neurons of the eye can be programmed to revert to a youthful state in which they reacquire their ability to resist injury and to regenerate. The authors’ findings shed light on mechanisms of ageing and point to a potent therapeutic target for age-related neuronal diseases.

Access options

Access through your institution

Buy article

Get time limited or full article access on ReadCube.

$32.00

Buy

All prices are NET prices.

Nature 588, 34-36 (2020)

doi: https://doi.org/10.1038/d41586-020-03119-1

References

D.-B., D. Nature 125, 230–231 (1930).
Article Google Scholar
Lu, Y. et al. Nature 588, 124–129 (2020).
Article Google Scholar
Goldberg, J. L., Klassen, M. P., Hua, Y. & Barres, B. A. Science 296, 1860–1864 (2002).
PubMed Article Google Scholar
Laha, B., Stafford, B. K. & Huberman, A. D. Science 356, 1031–1034 (2017).
Article Google Scholar
Horsburgh, G. M., Lund, R. D. & Hankin, M. H. J. Comp. Neurol. 327, 323–340 (1993).
PubMed Article Google Scholar
Takahashi, K. & Yamanaka, S. Cell 126, 663–676 (2006).
PubMed Article Google Scholar
Abad, M. et al. Nature 502, 340–345 (2013).
PubMed Article Google Scholar
Oberdoerffer, P. et al. Cell 135, 907–918 (2008)
PubMed Article Google Scholar
López-Otín, C., Blasco, M. A., Partridge, L., Serrano, M. & Kroemer, G. Cell 153, 1194–1217 (2013).
PubMed Article Google Scholar
Horvath, S. Genome Biol. 14, 3156 (2013).
Article Google Scholar
Wang, M. & Lemos, B. Genome Res. 29, 325–333 (2019).
PubMed Article Google Scholar
Rasmussen, K. D. & Helin, K. Genes Dev. 30, 733–750 (2016).
PubMed Article Google Scholar
Laugesen, A., Højfeld, J. W. & Helin, K. Mol. Cell 74, 8–18 (2019).
PubMed Article Google Scholar