“I’m afraid I won’t renew your contract. I am giving you as much advance notice as I can so that you can find something else.”
Hearing these words from my supervisor’s mouth left me reeling. As a native of Italy, and as a postdoctoral researcher in a nation outside the European Union, I had a visa that depended on my having a work contract. Without a job, I would have to leave the country shortly after the end of my contract.
Furthermore, the words felt like a death knell for my research career. Surely no one would ever hire me for a second postdoc when this one had failed to yield any research papers. What would I do in a few months’ time when my postdoc ended? I was literally dizzy — I needed a strategy to find another position, and fast.
That was a tough week, but I am now grateful for that shocking announcement: it gave me clarity and enough time to make a plan.
The deadline made me think hard about my next steps. Somehow, I was able to start spelling out to myself what I emphatically did not want to do any more. It doesn’t sound like the most logical step ever — surely, planning what you actually want to do makes more sense — but it was spectacularly helpful in clarifying my thoughts. Soon, I came up with a two-pronged strategy: first, look only for a research project that perfectly matches my wishes and skills; second, explore non-academic options as a real possibility — for the first time.
Because it looked increasingly likely that my future career was going to be outside academic research, I set out to turn my weaknesses into strengths. All the points that my supervisors and potential employers had highlighted as faults for a researcher — a poor publication record; no specific research niche; a tendency to ‘waste time’ reading papers from very different fields; and indulging my passion for writing — I aimed to turn into strengths for non-lab-based jobs.
Because I couldn’t count on papers to speak for my research, I decided to network more. I converted my lack of a speciality into a ‘broad and diverse background’ and an ability to speak knowledgeably to scientists from different fields. My keen interest in writing, seen by some as a time sink, nudged me towards jobs in editing and science writing — something I had considered only as a vague dream.
I was not sure whether a good occupational fit for me existed, but I still had a few months to find out, so I set up informational chats with nearly everyone I could think of. And, for the first time ever, I was always straightforward about what I was — and was not — looking for in my new role.
One serendipitous talk on a Saturday led to a meeting with the director of the institute where I was doing my postdoc, which in turn led to an informal chat with a senior representative from the institute’s marketing and corporate communications unit. She had been tasked with forming a science-communication team on an institution-wide level, and wanted to recruit a scientist.
Three months and two interviews later, the representative became my boss, and I had found my perfect fit in a role that focused on science communication and editing and that was completely away from the bench. As it happened, I also received an offer for a postdoctoral research project that aligned perfectly with my skills and interests. I regretfully felt obliged to decline it.
In the end, although it took all the time I had, I got not one but two great offers. And both matched my skills and interests — all because I had been clear about what I no longer wanted and because I had turned my weaknesses into strengths.
Nature 556, 265 (2018)
Sign up for the daily Nature Briefing email newsletter
Stay up to date with what matters in science and why, handpicked from Nature and other publications worldwide.