NEWS

Narwhals’ mixed-up response to fear could kill them

Tracking study suggests the Arctic whales are particularly vulnerable to human disturbance.
Narwhals hunting for codfish

An estimated 100,000–150,000 narwhals (Monodon monoceros) live in Arctic waters around Greenland, Canada and Russia.Credit: Paul Nicklen/NGC/Getty

When confronted with a human threat, most animals either freeze or flee — but the narwhal does a mixture of both, say the authors of a study in Science1. This paradoxical response could make the toothed whales particularly vulnerable to the expansion of human activity in their Arctic habitat. 

An estimated 100,000–150,000 narwhals (Monodon monoceros) live in the waters around Greenland, Canada and Russia. Until recently they have lived in relative isolation from humans: Inuit people kill them as part of a restricted subsistence hunt, but killer whales and polar bears have historically been their biggest threats. Now, however, declining levels of Arctic pack ice mean that seismic studies for oil exploration, shipping traffic and commercial fishing are all impinging on their habitat.

To investigate the possible impacts on narwhals, Terrie Williams, who studies the relationships between mammals’ environments and their physiology at the University of California, Santa Cruz, and her colleagues looked at heart-rate and dive data from recorders that they attached — temporarily, using suction cups — to five narwhals in eastern Greenland. All the animals had just been either released from nets or rescued from stranding during the annual indigenous hunt.

In a typical ‘freeze’ response, an animal’s heart rate slows, whereas in a ‘flee’ response, it speeds up. The narwhals apparently combined the two responses. After being freed, they made rapid deep dives — fleeing quickly — but their heart rates dropped as low as 3–4 beats per minute. 

Panic pulse

A drop in heart rate is normal for a mammal during a dive, and helps to conserve oxygen. But Williams notes that normally when narwhals dive — to escape a killer whale, for example — they do it slowly, which puts less stress on the heart. (Unlike larger killer whales, narwhals can easily swim under ice cover then dive slowly to great depth, or swim into shallow bays.) By contrast, the ‘freeze–flee’ response had a worrying impact on the animals’ cardiovascular systems. The researchers calculated that a typical ‘escape dive’ after rescue from nets or stranding used up 97% of a narwhal’s oxygen stores, compared with just 52% for later dives, which the recorders also captured.

“The impact of humans is a relatively novel danger for narwhals,” says Williams. “Couple that with a threat that is comparatively diffuse under water, such as noise, and the animal reacts by trying to get out of the area as quickly as possible — something that evolution has not equipped them to do very well.” One major fear is that noisy seismic studies by oil companies could trigger exactly the physiological conflict and stress observed in this research.

Researchers measuring the body length of an adult narwhal.

Researchers measuring the body length of an adult narwhal.Credit: M.P. Heide-Jorgensen

The researchers are now trying to understand the implications for narwhals’ health. For some other mammals, including rats and even people, this combination of fear and intense exercise when diving has been found to be potentially lethal2.

Because of the remoteness of its habitat, the narwhal has been difficult to study. “These are important data — and not easy to obtain,” says Kristin Laidre, an Arctic marine mammalogist at the University of Washington in Seattle. The paper provides a new insight into the vulnerability of narwhals to human activity, she says, at a time of “sweeping environmental changes in the Arctic”.

Nature Briefing

Sign up for the daily Nature Briefing email newsletter

Stay up to date with what matters in science and why, handpicked from Nature and other publications worldwide.

Sign Up

References

  1. 1.

    Williams, T. M., Blackwell, S. B., Richter, B., Sinding, M.-H. S. & Heide-Jørgensen, M. P. Science 358, 1328–1331 (2017).

  2. 2.

    Alboni, P., Alboni, M. & Gianfranchi, L. J. Cardiovasc. Med. 12, 422–427 (2011).

Download references