The energy-converting organelles mitochondria and chloroplasts are tightly embedded in cellular metabolism and stress response. To appropriately control organelle function, extensive regulatory mechanisms are at play that involve two-way exchange between the nucleus and mitochondria/chloroplasts. In recent years, our understanding of how mitochondria and chloroplasts provide ‘retrograde’ feedback to the nucleus, resulting in targeted transcriptional changes, has greatly increased. Nevertheless, mitochondrial and chloroplast retrograde signalling have largely been studied independently, and only few points of interaction have been found or proposed. Through reassessment of recent publications, this perspective proposes that two of the most well-studied retrograde signalling pathways in plants, those mediated by ANAC017 and those mediated by phosphoadenosine phosphate (PAP), are most likely convergent and can direct overlapping genes. Furthermore, at least part of this common retrograde response appears targeted towards suppression of programmed cell death (PCD) triggered by organellar defects. The identified target genes are discussed in light of their roles in PCD suppression and amplifying the signalling cascade via positive-feedback loops. Finally, a mechanism is proposed that may explain why the convergence of PAP/ANAC017-dependent signalling appears capable of suppressing some types of PCD lesions, but not others, based on the subcellular location of the initial PCD-inducing dysfunction.
The complex endosymbiotic origin of eukaryotic cells and the inherent separation of intracellular compartments necessitates efficient communication between the organelles and the nucleus. The feedback provided by organelles to the nucleus – retrograde signalling – has been described in all eukaryotic kingdoms (animals, fungi and plants), but each kingdom seems to have its proprietary systems.1, 2, 3 Plants also evolved intricate retrograde pathways between chloroplasts and the nucleus.4 Mitochondria and chloroplasts have a key role during normal life in energy metabolism and biosynthesis of important compounds for the cell. However, they can also have key roles in the execution of programmed cell death (PCD) to remove unwanted cells that may produce toxic levels of reactive molecules or are infected by pathogens.5, 6, 7, 8 Therefore, many systems are in place that control organelle numbers, composition and quality, and keep track of their suicidal tendencies.3 This perspective paper proposes that mitochondrial and chloroplast retrograde signalling – or at least some types – are convergent on overlapping target genes. Furthermore, this common response mechanism may help prevent PCD initiation and steer the balance towards cell survival, most likely by suppressing excessive oxidative stress and repairing organelle damage.
The ANAC017 Pathway and PCD
The most clearly understood pathway for mitochondrial retrograde signalling in plants involves activation of the transcription factor ANAC017.9, 10, 11, 12 This activation can be triggered by acute inhibition of mitochondrial function, for example, by antimycin A (complex III).10 Recently it was shown that the ANAC017-dependent signalling pathway is also active when mitochondrial biogenesis is disturbed by genetic defects, for instance when the mitochondrial prohibitin AtPHB3 scaffolding complex is defective, or when mitochondrial/plastid RNA polymerase RpoTmp is impaired.9 ANAC017 has a C-terminal transmembrane domain, which probably anchors it into the endoplasmic reticulum (ER).10, 11 Currently, we have little understanding of how signals from dysfunctional mitochondria reach the ER and activate ANAC017. Most evidence points towards mitochondrial reactive oxygen species (ROS) production, with H2O2 as the most likely mobile signal.10, 13 Inhibitor studies suggested that rhomboid proteases might be involved in release of ANAC017 from the ER.10
Although we know little about the activation of ANAC017, we have a good overview of its downstream target genes, at least 200 in Arabidopsis.9 Many of these encode mitochondrial proteins such as alternative oxidase (AOX1a), alternative NADH dehydrogenases, OPA3 potentially involved in mitochondrial fission and a range of oxidative stress inducible genes with less-defined roles.14, 15, 16 On the basis of recent findings, it appears that one of the functions of the ANAC017 pathway may be to suppress cell death. First, when ANAC017 function is abolished in mitochondrial RNA polymerase rpotmp anac017 double mutants, the plants develop spontaneous lesions.9, 17 This is likely caused at least in part by the lack of ANAC017-dependent induction of AOX1a in rpotmp anac017 double mutants, as rpotmp aox1a double mutants also display similar lesions.18 Although the exact reasons for lesion formation in rpotmp aox1a or rpotmp anac017 mutants are unknown, they are likely caused by spontaneous PCD. In agreement, AOX has been shown extensively to suppress PCD in plants during inhibition of mitochondrial function.19, 20
ANAC017 regulates not only mitochondrial retrograde signalling but also some types of chloroplast retrograde signalling. Anac017 mutants appear to have wild-type responses to high-light (HL) stress and norflurazon, which inhibits carotenoid biosynthesis and triggers genomes uncoupled (GUN) signalling.12, 21 However, ANAC017 is crucial for induction of gene expression in response to methylviologen (MV or paraquat).12 MV accepts electrons from photosystem I via ferredoxin in the chloroplasts, and produces large quantities of superoxide under illuminated conditions in a cyclic process. As in mitochondria, chloroplastic superoxide is rapidly dismutated into H2O2, which may act as mobile signalling molecule. Significant evidence suggests that ER and chloroplasts are biochemically connected, allowing H2O2 exchange. H2O2 can also induce plastidic stromule formation (stroma-filled tubular protrusions that extend from the main body of plastids) to transport signals to the nucleus.22, 23, 24 These signals result in activation of retrograde pathways, and eventually cell death if the ROS production is large enough.25 ANAC017 not only regulates transcriptional responses but anac017 plants are highly susceptible to MV treatment.12 Although PCD rates were not assessed in the mutants, it seems likely that ANAC017-dependent retrograde signalling has a protective role against MV-induced cell death. MV causes confined PCD in wild-type plants, but leads to uncontrolled PCD (runaway cell death or RCD) in metacaspase and autophagy-deficient mc1 atg18a double mutants,25 indicating that multiple pathways may operate in parallel to suppress PCD caused by MV-dependent ROS formation.
The Phosphoadenosine Phosphate Pathway and PCD
During HL stress multiple sets of signalling pathways are activated in the chloroplast, involving metabolites, proteins and ROS.4 Moreover, there are emerging roles for chloroplastic ROS and calcium in PCD.26, 27 1O2 produced by photosystem II is often viewed as the major ROS in PCD signalling and cell damage.28 EXECUTER proteins are needed to transfer PCD-inducing signals to the nucleus in the fluorescent (flu) mutant, which undergoes 1O2-driven PCD when shifted from darkness to light.29 Furthermore, there is evidence that 1O2 signalling resulting in cell death and acclimation involves both EXECUTER-dependent and -independent signalling.6 In contrast, superoxide/H2O2 signalling was more typically linked to HL acclimation.30 These ROS signals can interact synergistically and antagonistically, regulating cell death and oxidative stress responses.31, 32, 33, 34, 35
Recent studies investigated how spontaneous light-dependent PCD lesions occur in the myo-inositol phosphate synthase (mips1) mutant.36 MIPS catalyses the first step in myo-inositol conversion, by converting glucose-6-phosphate to myo-inositol-1-phosphate. Mutations in hexokinase 1 could restore myo-inositol levels in the mips1 background, rescuing the lesion phenotype.37 It was found that functional chloroplasts with sufficient chlorophyll and supply of CO2 were required for PCD execution, with lesions likely a result of photosynthetic activity.36 However, mips1 lesion formation was independent of chloroplast redox state, EXECUTER and GUN signalling.29, 36 In contrast, when mips1 was crossed with sal1mutants (fry1 and alx8), lesion formation was almost completely repressed.36, 38 SAL1 encodes an enzyme that is dual targeted to chloroplasts and mitochondria, and degrades phosphoadenosine phosphate (PAP).38 PAP is known to accumulate in chloroplasts under HL and drought conditions. PAP can subsequently move to the nucleus where it binds and inhibits exoribonucleases, resulting in altered mRNA stability and transcriptional changes. In agreement, the PCD lesions were also suppressed in a mips1 xrn2 xrn3 xrn4 quadruple mutant, further indicating the PAP pathway and mRNA stability are involved. Previous reports showed that mutations in CPSF30 (cleavage and polyadenylation specificity factor 30), involved in initial cleavage and polyadenylation of pre-mRNAs, could also suppress the mips1 lesion phenotype.39 This again suggests that mRNA stability and turnover are involved in PCD and stress response, but the mechanisms remain unclear. It was recently shown that SAL1 directly acts as a sensor for changes in ROS and redox poise in chloroplasts. SAL1 dimerises upon oxidation induced by HL or drought, leading to reduced enzymatic activity and in an increase in PAP.40 Thus, the PAP retrograde pathway is activated by chloroplastic oxidative stress and can inhibit cell death. In agreement, PAP-accumulating sal1 mutants are highly tolerant to drought stress.38
Convergence of the ANAC017 and PAP Pathways
The sal1 mutants are unable to degrade PAP, resulting in PAP accumulation and constitutive activation of the downstream retrograde signalling pathway.38 Also, xrn2 xrn3 mutants are similarly affected in PAP-dependent retrograde signalling. The question arises whether the PAP retrograde pathway is related to the role of ANAC017-dependent retrograde signalling, which also appears to be activated by superoxide/H2O2 produced in chloroplasts (e.g., by MV) and mitochondria (e.g., by antimycin A). SAL1 is indeed dual-targeted to chloroplasts and mitochondria, and PAP is thought to accumulate in both organelles.38 While hypothesised, there is no direct evidence for any role for SAL1 and PAP in mitochondria. Interesting clues come from the transcript profiles of the different mutants and stress treatments, which show remarkable overlaps (Figure 1). A highly co-regulated gene set is induced in sal1 and xrn2 xrn3 mutants.38, 41 Interestingly, these genes comprise many of the core ANAC017 target genes induced by mitochondrial defects.9, 10 Intriguingly, none of these core ANAC017/PAP-regulated retrograde target genes are differentially expressed in the mips1 mutants (Figure 1). Thus, the mips1 mutation does not normally trigger the ANAC017 and PAP pathways. In agreement, mips1 mutants only display elevated H2O2 levels 4 days after PCD induction (indicating that ROS formation is not an early causative event for PCD execution),39 and do not contain increased PAP levels. However, PAP content is greatly induced in the mips1 sal1 double mutants, suppressing PCD and lesion formation. Therefore, it is proposed here that by crossing sal1 into the mips1 background, a retrograde pathway was artificially switched on and subsequently was capable of PCD suppression. This further supports the hypothesis that retrograde signalling is at least one system in place to suppress PCD. However, retrograde signalling to suppress PCD may need to be strictly regulated to avoid negative side effects, as suppression of PCD in the sal1 mutant allowed enhanced bacterial growth upon Pseudomonas syringae pathogen infection.36
The mips1 mutants accumulate salicylic acid (SA),36 which was completely reversed in mips1 sal1 double mutants, coinciding with reduced PCD. Crossing the mips1 with SA-deficient mutants such as 35S:NahG and sid2 also suppressed lesion formation, confirming that SA likely contributes to the downstream PCD effects.42 The PAP pathway might thus affect events upstream of SA production in mips1 mutants36 via unclear mechanisms. Conversely, sal1 could not suppress the cell death phenotype of lsd1 mutants, which are also SA-dependent.43 Mutations in cpsf30 could suppress both mips1 and lsd1 lesions, also via effects on SA signalling.39 This indicates that different mechanisms of PCD repression are involved, further supported by the lack of induction of ANAC017/PAP retrograde target genes in cpsf30. Potentially, sal1 could not suppress the lsd1 lesion phenotype because lsd1 appears to operate at least in part via peroxisomal H2O2 production.44 LSD1 was found to directly bind all three catalases in Arabidopsis, and catalase gene activity was reduced in lsd1 mutants. Furthermore, additional chemical or genetic inhibition of peroxisomal catalase activity resulted in greatly increased lesion appearance in the lsd1 background (runaway cell death). In contrast, MV treatment (affecting chloroplasts) did not trigger RCD in an lsd1 background,45 further suggesting the ROS source determines the downstream events. Inducing a retrograde pathway that targets chloroplast or mitochondrial function in lsd1 sal1 would thus have little or no effect, if the negative effect of LSD1 loss of function primarily occurs in the peroxisomes.
Together, these findings suggest that the decision to activate ANAC017 and/or PAP-dependent retrograde signalling in vivo depends on the underlying PCD-inducing stimulus or cellular defect (e.g. mips1 versus dysfunction of mitochondrial RNA polymerase in rpotmp). A potential determinant may be the type and location of ROS being induced, with superoxide and H2O2 in chloroplasts or mitochondria apparently favouring the ANAC017/PAP pathways. mips1 mutants do not seem to accumulate H2O2 early on during lesion formation, possibly explaining the lack of induction of the ANAC017/PAP pathway.39
How do the ANAC017/PAP Pathways Suppress PCD?
A key question is how the common target genes of ANAC017/PAP signalling may effectuate PCD suppression (Figures 1 and 2). In mitochondria, significant evidence has accumulated that AOX is a key mediator of PCD suppression, most likely by reducing ROS production when the mitochondrial electron transport chain is compromised.18, 20, 46 Also mitochondrial outer membrane AAA ATPase AtOM66 has been linked to PCD, pathogen defence, senescence and SA accumulation, although the precise mechanism is unknown.47 For chloroplasts, the import component TIC20-IV is induced, potentially allowing increased import of proteins needed for organellar damage repair. The ABC transporter MRP3 is thought to transport non-fluorescent chlorophyll catabolites (NCCs) to the vacuole for further degradation.48 NCCs are degradation products of red-fluorescent chlorophyll catabolites (RCC). Interestingly, RCC is a light-dependent ROS generator and can induce PCD and lesions when not removed promptly, as found in accelerated cell death 2 (acd2) mutants.49 RCC was shown to be mobile and accumulate in mitochondria via an unknown mechanism, where it may cause ROS-induced PCD. Light-dependent stress may thus result in chloroplast damage and subsequent accumulation of chlorophyll catabolites. Induction of MRP3 may indirectly increase RCC removal and thus reduce oxidative stress. Also, three multidrug and toxin extrusion (MATE) transporters are highly induced by ANAC017/PAP, which may also remove toxic products induced by stress.
The cytokinin response factor 6 (CRF6) is a transcription factor that suppresses senescence (which is often also considered as a type of PCD50), with a potential role also in abiotic stress and oxidative stress signalling.51, 52 Also, 1-aminocyclopropane-1-carboxylic acid oxidase (At5g43450) that is required for ethylene biosynthesis is induced. The interplay of ethylene with PCD is well-established, but complex.53 Both At5g43450 and AOX1a are induced in radical-induced cell death 1 (rcd1) mutants, which undergo PCD when exposed to apoplast superoxide and ozone.54 In contrast, rcd1 mutants are more resistant to MV-induced ROS production, further supporting a correlation with ANAC017/PAP target genes and PCD suppression, dependent on the source of ROS.
Finally, it appears a number of systems are in place to boost ANAC017/PAP signalling once it is initiated. First, the transcription factor ANAC013 is homologous to ANAC017 and induces the same target genes. ANAC017 thus strongly induces ANAC013 expression, which in turn can further activate the same target genes and ANAC013 itself, establishing a positive-feedback loop.11, 12 Also sulfotransferase AtST1 is induced. Sulfotransferases transfer sulfo-groups from phosphoadenosine phosphosulphate to various acceptor molecules including SA, thereby releasing more PAP.55, 56
The hypothesis is proposed that retrograde signalling in plants is at least in part directed towards regulation of cell death, most likely be preventing excessive ROS formation. Several studies on both mitochondrial and chloroplast retrograde signalling now show clear clues for such a role, particularly suppression. On the basis of current evidence, the ANAC017- and PAP-dependent signalling pathways are convergent on overlapping target genes (Figure 1). It is tempting to speculate that they are in fact directly related or operate in parallel, although a possible mechanism behind this interaction is not clear yet. Many downstream genes appear unique to either ANAC017 or PAP pathways (although the mutants were not compared directly under the same conditions), so their overlap is most likely partial.12 Whether ANAC017/PAP target genes are induced in vivo depends on the circumstances of the cellular dysfunction, most probably the location and type of ROS produced (Figure 2). Evidence to date implicates superoxide and H2O2 produced in chloroplasts and mitochondria, but changes in chloroplastic redox poise per seare sufficient to inactivate SAL1 and increase PAP. It is intriguing that the induction of the PAP pathway can rescue some PCD-causing defects, but plants apparently do not always activate this mechanism: for instance, in the mips1 mutants. Perhaps the needed cross-talk between signalling pathways is not present (yet) to activate the PAP pathway in those cases. Alternatively, overactivation of the PAP pathway may overall be more detrimental than beneficial, resulting in negative selection pressure. Finally and critically, the function of mitochondrial-targeted SAL1 remains to be determined.
OVA was supported by Australian Research Council APD fellowship and grants (DP110102868, DP160103573 and DP130102918), and facilities provided by CE140100008. BJP was supported by Australian Research Council Centre of Excellence Program (CE140100008). We thank Dr Kai Xun Chan for critically reading the manuscript and for useful suggestions.
About this article
Combinatorial Interactions of Biotic and Abiotic Stresses in Plants and Their Molecular Mechanisms: Systems Biology Approach
Molecular Biotechnology (2018)