Commentary

This article is very welcome and dispels the myth commonly held and reported in successive medical textbooks that a torn upper labial frenum is “pathognomonic of child abuse”. Sabine Maguire and her co-authors have exhaustively researched the literature and found no basis for this erroneously held belief.

Two recent pieces of work involving the dental team and child protection have been party to the results of Maguire et al. Initially, the British Society of Paediatric Dentistry and the Royal College of Paediatrics and Child Health worked together to produce an advice sheet for the dental team.1 A more extensive document was then commissioned by the Chief Dental Officer (England) entitled Child Protection and the Dental Team. This latter document was produced by a multidisciplinary team led by Jenny Harris, a Specialist in Paediatric Dentistry, and at the current time has been distributed in hard copy to all general dental practices in England and Scotland and all primary care premises in Scotland. It is also available to all to download from the web (www.cpdt.org.uk). Minor differences exist in Scotland and these are covered in an addendum available for download at www.scottishdental.org/resources/child_protection.htm

Child Protection and the Dental Team states that, “a frenum tear in a very young non-ambulatory patient (less than 1 year) should arouse suspicion”. This statement is of course even more important where no clear history of direct trauma is offered.

Practice point

  • A torn labial frenum in isolation cannot be regarded as pathognomonic of physical abuse, and must be assessed in the context of the history given, and a full examination with appropriate investigations.

  • The most common abusive injury to the mouth is laceration /bruising to the lips.