Correspondence | Published:


Social impacts of science metrics

Nature volume 524, page 35 (06 August 2015) | Download Citation

Metrics used to gauge a researcher's productivity and importance to science can come at a social cost (J. Wilsdon Nature 523, 129; 2015). Too often, such metrics are underpinned by values of questionable worth.

Any quantitative measure of productivity will reward people who choose to work long hours, build large research teams and minimize their commitments to teaching, review panels and university committees.

The use of such metrics can discourage people from sharing responsibilities and time with their partners or spouses, from investing in and enjoying their children's lives, and from participating in their local communities. Researchers can feel forced to sacrifice 'unproductive' recreational pursuits such as holidays, sport, music, art and reading — activities that other metrics correlate highly with creativity and quality of life (see also J. Overbaugh Nature 477, 27–28; 2011).

We need a more nuanced approach to academic evaluations for hiring, promotion and tenure. The emphasis on quantitative measures of productivity places unfair burdens on scientists and their families, and it discourages some students from pursuing academic careers.

Author information


  1. University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, USA.

    • Stephen C. Harvey


  1. Search for Stephen C. Harvey in:

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Stephen C. Harvey.

About this article

Publication history




By submitting a comment you agree to abide by our Terms and Community Guidelines. If you find something abusive or that does not comply with our terms or guidelines please flag it as inappropriate.

Newsletter Get the most important science stories of the day, free in your inbox. Sign up for Nature Briefing