Dear Editor,
HeLa cells manipulated to express the human immunodeficiency virus (HIV-1)-encoded envelope glycoprotein complex (Env) can fuse with HeLa cells expressing the Env receptor CD4 as well as a chemokine coreceptor (e.g. CXCR4), thus forming syncytia.1, 2 We have used such Env-elicited syncytia to dissect a lethal p53-dependent signal transduction cascade3, 4, 5 relevant to AIDS,6, 7, 8 as well as ‘mitotic catastrophe’, an apoptosis-like cell death that occurs during the metaphase, after fusion of nonsynchronized cells and inactivation of the cell cycle checkpoint kinase Chk2.9, 10 One of the intrinsic advantages of a model of cell death affecting giant multinuclear cells is the ease with which the subcellular localization of apoptosis-regulatory proteins can be studied.11
In a coculture of Cell Tracker® Green-labeled HeLa Env cells and Cell Tracker® Red-labeled HeLa CD4 cells, syncytia can be easily detected as double-strained cells,12, 13 the vast majority of which have a ⩾4n DNA content. However, a fraction (∼10%) of such bona fide syncytia have an ∼2n DNA content, as determined by simultaneous staining with Hoechst 33342 (Figure 1a) and a normal cell size, as determined by analyses of the forward and side scatters in the cytofluorometer (see below). In the past, we have neglected this population of cells due to their normal size and mononuclear morphology, which is indistinguishable from that of normal cells (see below). Importantly, when the cell cycle of HeLa Env or HeLa CD4 cocultures was blocked by the microtubule poison nocodazol at the G2/M border (4n), most syncytia had an octaploid (∼8n) DNA content, and the percentage of syncytia with an ∼2n DNA content dropped to <1% (Figure 1b). A similar reduction in the frequency of ∼2n syncytia was observed in response to a variety of cell cycle blockers that arrest in the S or in the G2/M phases (Figure 1c). This indicates that ∼2n syncytia must result from the division of larger heterokarya.
Syncytia arising from the Env/CD4 interaction are known to undergo a first phase of cytoplasmic fusion (cytogamy), followed by nuclear fusion (karyogamy) after a latency period of several hours.17 We wondered whether the division of syncytia would occur at the two-nucleus stage (in which case the two daughter cells would be genetically identical to their parental cells) or rather after mixture of the two genomes by karyogamy. In this latter case, multipolar cell division (as demonstrated in Castedo et al.10) would result in asymmetric cell divisions with consequent aneuploidy. To address this question, we FACS-purified syncytia (that is Cell Tracker® Red+Green cells) with an ∼2n DNA content, a normal size and one single nucleus, syncytia with a >4n DNA content and several nuclei, as well as nonfused cells with ∼2n DNA content which served as controls (Figure 2a), led them adhere to glass slides for a minimum of 3 h, and subjected them to multifluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) for the detection of a random set of chromosomes (chromosomes 7, 17 and 18). While >95% of single HeLa Env or HeLa CD4 cells demonstrated an HeLa-specific, unaltered karyotype, up to 50% of the HeLa Env/CD4 syncytia with an ∼2n DNA content demonstrated either a loss or a gain of the three chromosomes investigated (Figure 2b), suggesting that an even higher proportion of cells have undergone numeric aberrations. Of note, we did not observe a single case of nullisomy (loss of all copies of a chromosome), presumably because such a genetic event would be acutely lethal and incompatible with readherence of the cells.
On theoretical grounds, a sudden change in chromosome numbers should provoke undesirable gene dosage effects, and loss of chromosomes should unravel genetic defects resulting from monoallelic deletions or mutations. Thus, we comparatively studied the survival kinetics of FACS-sorted HeLa Env cells, HeLa CD4 cells and ∼2n syncytia (Figure 2c). An increasing proportion of ∼2n syncytia spontaneously underwent cell death in standard culture conditions, while HeLa Env cells and HeLa CD4 cells survived although they had undergone the same staining procedure and the same shear stress during FACS purification. Cell death was detectable by incorporation of the vital dye trypan blue and was accompanied by apoptotic chromatin condensation (insert in Figure 2c). The mortality of ∼2n syncytia was roughly equivalent to that of large >4n syncytia (not shown). If aneuploidy was the factor that determined the spontaneous mortality of ∼2n syncytia, then one would expect that the percentage of aneuploid cells would decline among the population of surviving cells. In accord with this hypothesis, multi-FISH revealed a constant decrease in the fraction of cells exhibiting a gain or loss of chromosomes 7, 17 and 18 (Figure 2d).
In conclusion, we have generated a cellular machine for the rapid generation of a population of cells highly enriched for aneuploid heterokarya, a significant portion of which are apoptosis-prone. This is the formal demonstration of the concept that a numeric chromosomal instability (aneuploidy with monosomies, trisomies or higher-order polysomies) can trigger apoptosis as such.18 Moreover, this experimental system should allow us to address the question as to whether an inhibition of the apoptotic machinery can increase the frequency of aneuploid cells, at the population level, and/or change the level of aneuploidization that is compatible with survival, at a cell-per-cell basis.
References
Ferri KF et al. (2000) J. Exp. Med. 192: 1081–1092
Ferri KF et al. (2000) Exp. Cell Sci. 261: 119–126
Castedo M et al. (2001) J. Exp. Med. 194: 1097–1110
Castedo M et al. (2002) EMBO J. 21: 4070–4080
Perfettini JL et al. (2004) J. Exp. Med. 199: 629–640
Genini D. et al. (2001) FASEB J. 15: 5–6
Jordan-Sciutto KL et al. (2000) Am J Pathol. 157: 497–507
Silva C. et al. (2003) Ann. Neurol. 54: 605–614
Castedo M et al. (2004) Oncogene 23: 4353–4361
Castedo M et al. (2004) Oncogene 23: 4362–4370
Castedo M and Kroemer G (2003) Trends Cell Biol. 12: 446–447
Roumier T. et al. (2003) Biochem. Pharmacol. 68: 66–74
Andreau K. et al. (2004) J. Cell Sci. (in press)
Dragic T et al. (1992) J. Virol. 66: 4794–4802
Cliby WA et al. (2002) J. Biol. Chem. 277: 1599–1606
Kanazawa T et al. (2000) J. Cell Biol. 149: 943–950
Ferri KF et al. (2000) Cell Death Differ. 7: 1137–1139
Zhivotovsky B and Kroemer G (2004) Nat. Rev. Mol.Cell. Biol. 5: 752–762
Acknowledgements
This work has been supported by a special grant from the Ligue Nationale contre le Cancer, as well as grants from ANRS and the European Commission.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Roumier, T., Valent, A., Perfettini, JL. et al. A cellular machine generating apoptosis-prone aneuploid cells. Cell Death Differ 12, 91–93 (2005). https://doi.org/10.1038/sj.cdd.4401521
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/sj.cdd.4401521