Abstract
Intron sizes vary widely among different genes and among homologous genes of different species. The distribution of intron sizes may be maintained in a steady state, reflecting the processes of insertion and deletion of gene sequences, or it may be that the distribution is constrained by natural selection1,2,3. If intron size is governed by natural selection, there should be a statistical association between this size and the rate of recombination per map unit of the genome, assuming that natural selection is less effective in genomic regions of low recombination4,5,6. Here we show that larger introns of Drosophila melanogaster occur preferentially in regions of low recombination, which is consistent with large introns having a deleterious effect. The association is significant (P=40.001, linear regression), despite the fact that no effort was made to stratify the data by other factors that affect intron size, such as the size of the associated coding region7 or the presence of regulatory sequences inside the intron.
Similar content being viewed by others
Main
The mechanisms by which splice sites are selected and the evolutionary patterns are different in ‘small’ (up to 80 base pairs) and ‘large’ (more than 80 base pairs) introns in Drosophila3,8,9,10. Size-class transitions in homologous introns are frequent (about 20%) between D. melanogaster and D. virilis or D. pseudoobscura but rare among most closely related species3,11. We investigated the relation between intron size and recombination rate by analysing each intron type separately (Fig. 1a), and found that recombination occurs in small introns on average at 2.45±0.04 centimorgans per million base pairs (cM Mb−1), whereas the value for large introns is 2.20±0.05 cM Mb−1, a difference that is significant at the 0.001 level (by analysis of variance).
Within large introns, there is no significant association between recombination rate and intron size (b=−0.012, P>0.2), so whatever causes this relation must act equally against all large introns, irrespective of their absolute size. In small introns, there is a significant, positive association between recombination rate and intron size (b=+0.002, P=0.02), indicating that very small introns are also deleterious: they tend to occur in regions of low recombination, where natural selection is less efficient.
The average rate of recombination for introns of less than 60 base pairs is 2.26±0.07 cM Mb−1, whereas the rate for introns of 60 to 80 base pairs is 2.56±0.06 cM Mb−1, a difference significant at the 0.001 level (Fig. 1b). These findings are not surprising, as it is known that very small introns do not splice well8.
Another explanation for these results is that intron size is a neutral trait, with recombination alone generating the association between recombination rate and intron size by its effect on DNA insertion and deletion processes. However, very small and large introns are both associated with regions of low recombination, excluding not only this possibility, but also any other that does not involve the direct action of natural selection on intron size. Fewer than 2% of the large introns in our sample show any sequence similarity to transposable elements, so our results cannot be explained by the accumulation of these elements in regions of low recombination3,12.
Intron size usually changes through small deletions and insertions of DNA2,3,13. Our results suggest that natural selection in Drosophila acts on the variants generated by these processes, selecting against large introns and very short introns, as both tend to occur in regions of low recombination where selection is less effective.
References
Hughes, A. L. & Hughes, M.K. Nature 377, 391 (1995).
Ogata, H., Fujibuchi, W. & Kanehisa, M. FEBS Lett. 390, 99–103 (1996).
Moriyama, E. N., Petrov, D. A. & Hartl, D.L. Mol. Biol. Evol. 15, 770–773 (1998).
Hill, W. G. & Robertson, A. Genet. Res. 8, 269–294 (1966).
Kliman, R. M. & Hey, J. Mol. Biol. Evol. 10, 1239–1258 (1993).
Comeron, J. M., Kreitman, M. & Aguadé, M. Genetics 151, 239–249 (1999).
Moroni, G. in An Atlas of Drosophila Genes (ed. Moroni, G.) 319–332 (Oxford Univ. Press, 1993).
Mount, S. M. et al. Nucleic Acid Res. 20, 4255–4262 (1992).
Guo, M. & Mount, S.M. J. Mol. Biol. 253, 426–437 (1995).
Kennedy, C. F. & Berget, S.M. Mol. Cell. Biol. 17, 2774–2780 (1997).
Stephan, W. et al. Genetics 138, 135–143 (1994).
Sniegowski, P. D. & Charlesworth, B. Genetics 137, 815–827 (1994).
Petrov, D. A., Lozovskaya, E. R. & Hartl, D.L. Nature 384, 346–349 (1996).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Carvalho, A., Clark, A. Intron size and natural selection. Nature 401, 344 (1999). https://doi.org/10.1038/43827
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/43827
This article is cited by
-
Intron size minimisation in teleosts
BMC Genomics (2022)
-
Genome-wide analysis and expression profiling of glyoxalase gene families in soybean (Glycine max) indicate their development and abiotic stress specific response
BMC Plant Biology (2016)
-
The effects of purifying selection on patterns of genetic differentiation between Drosophila melanogaster populations
Heredity (2015)
-
Lengths of coding and noncoding regions of a gene correlate with gene essentiality and rates of evolution
Genes & Genomics (2015)
-
Genome-wide analysis of Cyclophilin gene family in soybean (Glycine max)
BMC Plant Biology (2014)
Comments
By submitting a comment you agree to abide by our Terms and Community Guidelines. If you find something abusive or that does not comply with our terms or guidelines please flag it as inappropriate.