Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

Common mammals drive the evolutionary increase of hypsodonty in the Neogene


During the past 20 million years, herbivorous mammals of numerous lineages have evolved hypsodont, or high-crowned, cheek teeth. Hypsodonty is informative ecologically because it is well developed in mammals eating fibrous and abrasive foods that are most abundant in open and generally or seasonally dry environments1,2,3,4,5. Here we report that in the Neogene of Europe mammals with the greatest locality coverages showed an increase in hypsodonty. We used a data set of 209 localities to measure whether large mammals occurring in many fossil localities show a similar increase in hypsodonty to mammals occurring in single or few localities. Taxonomic and morphological groupings show a low average hypsodonty in the early Miocene epoch. From the middle Miocene onwards, only the hypsodonty of commonly found mammals shows a marked increase. Therefore, in the drying Europe of the late Miocene, only increasingly hypsodont mammals may have been able to expand their share of habitats and food resources. These results suggest that the relatively small number of species known from multiple localities are palaeoecologically informative by themselves, irrespective of the rest of the known species.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution

Relevant articles

Open Access articles citing this article.

Access options

Rent or buy this article

Get just this article for as long as you need it


Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout

Figure 1: The nine locality intervals and number of localities (in parenthesis) analysed.
Figure 2: Increase in hypsodonty is limited to common groups (present at over 25 per cent of localities within MN interval).


  1. Simpson, G. G. Horses (Oxford Univ. Press, New York, 1951)

    Google Scholar 

  2. Van Valen, L. A functional index of hypsodonty. Evolution 14, 531–532 (1960)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Janis, C. M. & Fortelius, M. On the means whereby mammals achieve increased functional durability of their dentitions, with special reference to limiting factors. Biol. Rev. 63, 197–230 (1988)

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Meng, J. & McKenna, M. C. Faunal turnovers of Palaeogene mammals from the Mongolian plateau. Nature 394, 364–367 (1998)

    Article  ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. MacFadden, B. J. in Evolution of Herbivory in Terrestrial Vertebrates (ed. Sues, H.-D.) 223–244 (Cambridge Univ. Press, Cambridge, 2000)

    Book  Google Scholar 

  6. Alroy, J. Constant extinction, constrained diversification, and uncoordinated stasis in North American mammals. Palaeogeogr. Palaeoclimatol. Palaeoecol. 127, 285–311 (1996)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Alroy, J. et al. Effects of sampling standardization on estimates of Phanerozoic marine diversification. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 98, 6261–6266 (2001)

    Article  ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Damuth, J. Analysis of the preservation of community structure in assemblages of fossil mammals. Paleobiology 8, 434–446 (1982)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Fortelius, M., et al. in The Evolution of Western Eurasian Neogene Mammal Faunas (eds Bernor, R. L., Fahlbusch, V. & Mittmann, H.-V.) 414–448 (Columbia Univ. Press, New York, 1996)

    Google Scholar 

  10. Barnosky, A. D. Distinguishing the effects of the Red Queen and Court Jester on Miocene mammal evolution in the northern Rocky Mountains. J. Vert. Paleontol. 21, 172–185 (2001)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Mein, P. in European Neogene Mammal Chronology (eds Lindsay, E. H., Fahlbusch, V. & Mein, P.) 73–90 (Plenum, New York, 1989)

    Google Scholar 

  12. Steininger, F. F., et al. in The Evolution of Western Eurasian Neogene Mammal Faunas (eds Bernor, R. L., Fahlbusch, V. & Mittmann, H.-W.) 7–46 (Columbia Univ. Press, New York, 1996)

    Google Scholar 

  13. Alroy, J., Bernor, R. L., Fortelius, M. & Werdelin, L. The MN system: Regional or continental? Mitt. Bayerischen Staatsamlung Paläontol. Hist. Geol. 38, 243–258 (1998)

    Google Scholar 

  14. Jernvall, J. Mammalian molar cusp patterns: Developmental mechanisms of diversity. Acta Zool. Fennica 198, 1–61 (1995)

    Google Scholar 

  15. Jernvall, J., Hunter, J. P. & Fortelius, M. Molar tooth diversity, disparity, and ecology in Cenozoic Ungulate Radiations. Science 274, 1489–1492 (1996)

    Article  ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Garcés, M., Cabrera, L., Agust', J. & Parés, J. M. Old World first appearance datum of “Hipparion” horses: Late Miocene large-mammal dispersal and global events. Geology 25, 19–22 (1997)

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  17. Broccoli, A. J. & Manabe, S. in Tectonic Uplift and Climate Change (ed. Ruddiman, W. F.) 89–121 (Plenum, New York, 1997)

    Book  Google Scholar 

  18. Ruddiman, W. F. (ed.) Tectonic Uplift and Climate (Plenum, New York, 1997)

  19. An, Z., Kutzbach, J. E., Prell, W. L. & Porter, S. C. Evolution of Asian monsoons and phased uplift of the Himalaya–Tibetan plateau since Late Miocene times. Nature 411, 62–66 (2001)

    Article  ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Jarman, P. J. The social organization of antelope in relation to their ecology. Behavior 48, 215–267 (1974)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Janis, C. M. Evolution of horns in ungulates: Ecology and palaeoecology. Biol. Rev. 57, 216–317 (1982)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Pérez-Barbería, F. J., Gordon, I. J. & Nores, C. Evolutionary transitions among feeding styles and habitats in ungulates. Evol. Ecol. Res. 3, 221–230 (2001)

    Google Scholar 

  23. Fortelius, M. & Hokkanen, A. in Phylogeny of the Neogne Hominoid Primates of Eurasia (eds De Bonis, L., Koufos, G. & Andrews, A.) (Cambridge Univ. Press, Cambridge, 2001)

    Google Scholar 

  24. Manly, B. F. J. Randomization, Bootstrap and Monte Carlo Methods in Biology (Chapman and Hall, London, 1997)

    MATH  Google Scholar 

Download references


We thank A. D. Barnosky, J. Damuth, I. Hanski, J. P. Hunter and P. C. Wright for discussions and advice on this work, which was supported by the Academy of Finland.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations


Corresponding authors

Correspondence to Jukka Jernvall or Mikael Fortelius.

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

The authors declare that they have no competing financial interests.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Jernvall, J., Fortelius, M. Common mammals drive the evolutionary increase of hypsodonty in the Neogene. Nature 417, 538–540 (2002).

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI:

This article is cited by


By submitting a comment you agree to abide by our Terms and Community Guidelines. If you find something abusive or that does not comply with our terms or guidelines please flag it as inappropriate.


Quick links

Nature Briefing

Sign up for the Nature Briefing newsletter — what matters in science, free to your inbox daily.

Get the most important science stories of the day, free in your inbox. Sign up for Nature Briefing